1
|
Gagneur A, Gutnick D, Berthiaume P, Diana A, Rollnick S, Saha P. From vaccine hesitancy to vaccine motivation: A motivational interviewing based approach to vaccine counselling. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2391625. [PMID: 39187772 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2391625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 07/30/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted Vaccine Hesitancy (VH) as an accelerating global phenomenon that must be addressed. According to the WHO, thirty to fifty percent of the world's population are VH. Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based communication style demonstrated to significantly reduce VH. MI guides people toward change through the expression of empathy and by respecting an individual's autonomy. Healthcare providers (HCPs) are the primary implementors of vaccine policies and the most trusted advisors and influencers of vaccination intention at the individual patient level. Training HCPs in MI is one of the most effective strategies to overcome VH. Many countries are currently implementing HCP training programs and population-based MI interventions to improve vaccine uptake. MI conversations are 'the heart' of vaccine decision-making processes. Understanding individual patient-level drivers of hesitancy allows clinicians to efficiently provide tailored, accurate information that reinforces a person's own motivation and confidence in their own decision. This paper describes a 4-step practical framework designed to support HCPs in their dialogue with vaccine-hesitant patients. (1) Engaging to establish a trustful relationship and safety to freely express opinions, beliefs, and knowledge gaps; (2) Understanding what matters most to the individual; (3) Offering Information to co-build accurate knowledge in order to guide the individual toward vaccine intention (4) Clarifying and Accepting to validate an individual's decision-making autonomy. We believe that our pragmatic approach can contribute to greater acceptability of COVID-19 and other vaccines, and enable rapid deployment of practical MI skills across care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Gagneur
- Department of Pediatrics, Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Damara Gutnick
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, The Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Alessandro Diana
- IUMFE - Institute of Primary care Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Paediatric Center, Grangettes Hirslanden Clinic, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Prantik Saha
- Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dionne M, Sauvageau C, Etienne D, Kiely M, Witteman H, Dubé E. Development of Promising Interventions to Improve Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in a School-Based Program in Quebec, Canada: Results From a Formative Evaluation Using a Mixed Methods Design. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e57118. [PMID: 38976317 PMCID: PMC11263894 DOI: 10.2196/57118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the availability of school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programs, disparities in vaccine coverage persist. Barriers to HPV vaccine acceptance and uptake include parental attitudes, knowledge, beliefs, and system-level barriers. A total of 3 interventions were developed to address these barriers: an in-person presentation by school nurses, an email reminder with a web-based information and decision aid tool, and a telephone reminder using motivational interviewing (MI) techniques. OBJECTIVE Here we report on the development and formative evaluation of interventions to improve HPV vaccine acceptance and uptake among grade 4 students' parents in Quebec, Canada. METHODS In the summer of 2019, we conducted a formative evaluation of the interventions to assess the interventions' relevance, content, and format and to identify any unmet needs. We conducted 3 focus group discussions with parents of grade 3 students and nurses. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for thematic content using NVivo software (Lumivero). Nurses received training on MI techniques and we evaluated the effect on nurses' knowledge and skills using a pre-post questionnaire. Descriptive quantitative analyses were carried out on data from questionnaires relating to the training. Comparisons were made using the proportions of the results. Finally, we developed a patient decision aid using an iterative, user-centered design process. The iterative refinement process involved feedback from parents, nurses, and experts to ensure the tool's relevance and effectiveness. The evaluation protocol and data collection tools were approved by the CHU (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire) de Québec Research Ethics Committee (MP-20-2019-4655, May 16, 2019). RESULTS The data collection was conducted from April 2019 to March 2021. Following feedback (n=28) from the 3 focus group discussions in June 2019, several changes were made to the in-person presentation intervention. Experts (n=27) and school nurses (n=29) recruited for the project appreciated the visual and simplified information on vaccination in it. The results of the MI training for school nurses conducted in August 2019 demonstrated an increase in the skills and knowledge of nurses (n=29). School nurses who took the web-based course (n=24) filled out a pretest and posttest questionnaire to evaluate their learning. The rating increased by 19% between the pretest and posttest questionnaires. Several changes were made between the first draft of the web-based decision-aid tool and the final version during the summer of 2019 after an expert consultation of experts (n=3), focus group participants (n=28), and parents in the iterative process (n=5). More information about HPV and vaccines was added, and users could click if more detail is desired. CONCLUSIONS We developed and pilot-tested 3 interventions using an iterative process. The interventions were perceived as potentially effective to increase parents' knowledge and positive attitudes toward HPV vaccination, and ultimately, vaccine acceptance. Future research will assess the effectiveness of these interventions on a larger scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maude Dionne
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Chantal Sauvageau
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Infectious and Immune Diseases Axis, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Doriane Etienne
- VITAM-Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Québec, QC, Canada
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Axis, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Marilou Kiely
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Infectious and Immune Diseases Axis, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Holly Witteman
- Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- VITAM-Centre de Recherche en Santé Durable, Québec, QC, Canada
- Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Axis, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Eve Dubé
- Infectious and Immune Diseases Axis, Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garrison A, Fressard L, Mitilian E, Gosselin V, Berthiaume P, Casanova L, Gagneur A, Verger P. Motivational interview training improves self-efficacy of GP interns in vaccination consultations: A study using the Pro-VC-Be to measure vaccine confidence determinants. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2163809. [PMID: 36703495 PMCID: PMC10012912 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2163809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunization-specific motivational interviewing (MI), a patient-centered communication style used to encourage internal motivation for attitudinal and behavioral change, can provide healthcare professionals (HCPs) with the skills and practice required to respond to patients' doubts and concerns related to vaccines. We sought to assess the impact of an MI-training of General Practitioner (GP) interns on the psychosocial determinants of their vaccine confidence and behaviors. French GP interns participated in a virtual three-day MI-workshop in southeastern France. We used the validated Pro-VC-Be questionnaire - before and after the MI-workshop spanning over three months - to measure the evolution of these determinants. Scores before and after workshop trainings were compared in pairs. Participants' scores for commitment to vaccination (+10.5 ± 20.5, P = .001), perceived self-efficacy (+36.0 ± 25.8, P < .0001), openness to patients (+18.7 ± 17.0, P < .0001), and trust in authorities (+9.5 ± 17.2, P = 0.01) significantly increased after the training sessions, but not the score for confidence in vaccines (+1.5 ± 11.9, P = .14). The effect sizes of the four score improvements were moderate to large, with self-efficacy and openness to patients having the largest effect sizes (P = .83 and 0.78, respectively). This study provides evidence that certain determinants of overall vaccine confidence in HCPs, reflected respectively in the openness to patients and self-efficacy scores of the Pro-VC-Be, improve after immunization MI-training workshops. Incorporating immunization-specific MI-training in the curriculum for HCPs could improve several necessary skills to improve HCP-patient relationships and be useful for vaccination and other healthcare services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Garrison
- Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Observatoire Régional de la Santé (ORS) PACA, Marseille, France
| | - Lisa Fressard
- Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Observatoire Régional de la Santé (ORS) PACA, Marseille, France
| | - Eva Mitilian
- Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Observatoire Régional de la Santé (ORS) PACA, Marseille, France.,Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale (DUMG), Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Virginie Gosselin
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier, Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Ludovic Casanova
- Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Observatoire Régional de la Santé (ORS) PACA, Marseille, France.,Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale (DUMG), Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Arnaud Gagneur
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier, Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Pierre Verger
- Faculté des Sciences Médicales et Paramédicales, Observatoire Régional de la Santé (ORS) PACA, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Malik AA, Ahmed N, Shafiq M, Elharake JA, James E, Nyhan K, Paintsil E, Melchinger HC, Team YBI, Malik FA, Omer SB. Behavioral interventions for vaccination uptake: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Policy 2023; 137:104894. [PMID: 37714082 PMCID: PMC10885629 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human behavior and more specifically behavioral insight-based approaches to vaccine uptake have often been overlooked. While there have been a few narrative reviews indexed in Medline on behavioral interventions to increase vaccine uptake, to our knowledge, none have been systematic reviews and meta-analyses covering not just high but also low-and-middle income countries. METHODS We included 613 studies from the Medline database in our systematic review and meta-analysis categorizing different behavioral interventions in 9 domains: education campaigns, on-site vaccination, incentives, free vaccination, institutional recommendation, provider recommendation, reminder and recall, message framing, and vaccine champion. Additionally, considering that there is variability in the acceptance of vaccines among different populations, we assessed studies from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs), separately. FINDINGS Our results showed that behavioral interventions can considerably improve vaccine uptake in most settings. All domains that we examined improved vaccine uptake with the highest effect size associated with provider recommendation (OR: 3.4 (95%CI: 2.5-4.6); Domain: motivation) and on-site vaccination (OR: 2.9 (95%CI: 2.3-3.7); Domain: practical issues). While the number of studies conducted in LMICs was smaller, the quality of studies was similar with those conducted in HICs. Nevertheless, there were variations in the observed effect sizes. INTERPRETATION Our findings indicate that "provider recommendation" and "on-site vaccination" along with other behavioral interventions can be employed to increase vaccination rates globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amyn A Malik
- Yale Institute for Global Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA 02199, USA
| | - Noureen Ahmed
- UT Southwestern Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Mehr Shafiq
- Yale Institute for Global Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Columbia University School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Jad A Elharake
- Yale Institute for Global Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; UT Southwestern Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Erin James
- Yale Institute for Global Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Kate Nyhan
- Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Elliott Paintsil
- Yale Institute for Global Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA; Columbia University Institute of Human Nutrition, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | | | | | - Fauzia A Malik
- UT Southwestern Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Saad B Omer
- UT Southwestern Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cogordan C, Fressard L, Ramalli L, Rebaudet S, Malfait P, Dutrey-Kaiser A, Attalah Y, Roy D, Berthiaume P, Gagneur A, Verger P. Motivational interview-based health mediator interventions increase intent to vaccinate among disadvantaged individuals. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2261687. [PMID: 37772602 PMCID: PMC10543359 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2261687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Coverage for recommended COVID-19 and diphtheria-tetanus-poliomyelitis (DTP) booster shots is often inadequate, especially among disadvantaged populations. To help health mediators (HMs) involved in outreach programs deal with the problems of vaccine hesitancy (VH) in these groups, we trained them in motivational interviewing (MI). We evaluated the effectiveness of this training among HMs on their MI knowledge and skills (objective 1) and among the interviewees on their vaccination readiness (VR) and intention to get vaccinated or accept a booster against COVID-19 and/or DTP (objective 2). Two MI specialists trained 16 HMs in a two-day workshop in May 2022. The validated MISI questionnaire evaluated HMs' acquisition of MI knowledge and skills (objective 1). Trained HMs offered an MI-based intervention on vaccination to people in disadvantaged neighborhoods of Marseille (France). Those who consented completed a questionnaire before and after the interview to measure VR with the 7C scale and intentions regarding vaccination/booster against COVID-19 and DTP (objective 2). The training resulted in HMs acquiring good MI skills (knowledge, application, self-confidence in using it). HMs enrolled 324 interviewees, 96% of whom completed both questionnaires. VR increased by 6%, and intentions to get vaccinated or update COVID-19 and DTP vaccination increased by 74% and 52% respectively. Nearly all interviewees were very satisfied with the interview, although 21% still had questions about vaccination. HMs assimilated MI principles well. MI use in outreach programs appears to show promise in improving vaccine confidence and intentions among disadvantaged people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Cogordan
- Southeastern Health Regional Observatory, ORS PACA, Marseille, France
| | - Lisa Fressard
- Southeastern Health Regional Observatory, ORS PACA, Marseille, France
| | - Lauriane Ramalli
- Santé publique France (French National Public Health Agency), Marseille, France
| | - Stanislas Rebaudet
- Hôpital Européen, Marseille, France
- UMR1252 SESSTIM, Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, IRD, ISSPAM, Marseille, France
| | - Philippe Malfait
- Santé publique France (French National Public Health Agency), Marseille, France
| | | | | | - David Roy
- Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | - Arnaud Gagneur
- Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - Pierre Verger
- Southeastern Health Regional Observatory, ORS PACA, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
School staff as vaccine advocates: Perspectives on vaccine mandates and the student registration process. Vaccine 2023; 41:1169-1175. [PMID: 36631362 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Recently, several states in the US have made it more difficult to receive nonmedical exemptions to school vaccine mandates in the hope of better orienting parents towards vaccination. However, little is known about how public-facing school staff implement and enforce mandate policies, including why or how often they steer parents towards nonmedical exemptions. This study focused on Michigan, which has recently added an additional burden for families seeking nonmedical exemptions. We used an anonymous online survey to assess Michigan public-school employees (n = 157) about their knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding Michigan's school enrollment vaccine mandate policy. Our main conclusions are that frontline school staff are generally knowledgeable about vaccines and immunization policy, but are at best ambivalent about their role in immunization governance, believing that other agents should be responsible for ensuring that children are vaccinated. Furthermore, some respondents indicated low vaccine confidence, which was associated with increased ambivalence about, or opposition to, their role in immunization governance. As more jurisdictions within and beyond the US consider introducing or tightening childhood vaccine mandates, it is increasingly important to understand how these policies can be improved by attending to the attitudes and roles of relevant frontline actors.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lip A, Pateman M, Fullerton MM, Chen HM, Bailey L, Houle S, Davidson S, Constantinescu C. Vaccine hesitancy educational tools for healthcare providers and trainees: A scoping review. Vaccine 2023; 41:23-35. [PMID: 36437208 PMCID: PMC9688224 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
In the era of vaccine hesitancy, highlighted by the current SARS-CoV2 pandemic, there is an acute need to develop an approach to reduce and address apprehension towards vaccinations. We sought to map and present an overview of existing educational interventions for healthcare providers (HCPs) on strategies to engage in effective vaccine discussion. We applied the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology framework in this scoping review. We searched five relevant databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and SCOPUS) and grey literature through the Google search engine using keywords and subject headings that were systematically identified. We identified 3384 citations in peer-reviewed literature and 41 citations in grey literature. After screening for our inclusion criteria, we included 28 citations from peer reviewed literature and 16 citations from grey literature for analysis. We identified a total of 41 unique education interventions. Interventions were available from multiple disciplines, training levels, clinical settings, and diseases/vaccines. Interventions predominantly centered around two foci: knowledge sharing and communication training. Most interventions identified from peer-reviewed literature were facilitated and were applied with multiple modes of delivery. Interventions from grey literature were more topical and generally self-directed. We identified several gaps in knowledge. Firstly, accessibility and generalizability of interventions was limited. Secondly, distribution of interventions did not adequately address nursing and pharmacy disciplines, and did not cover the breadth of medical specialties for whom vaccine discussions apply. Thirdly, no interventions addressed self monitoring and the clinicians' recognition and management of emotions during difficult conversations. There is a need to address this gap and provide available, credible and comprehensive educational interventions that will support our healthcare providers in effective communication with vaccine hesitant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lip
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - M Pateman
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 19 to Zero Inc., Rocky Mountain House, Alberta, Canada
| | - M M Fullerton
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 19 to Zero Inc., Rocky Mountain House, Alberta, Canada
| | - H M Chen
- 19 to Zero Inc., Rocky Mountain House, Alberta, Canada
| | - L Bailey
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - S Houle
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - S Davidson
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - C Constantinescu
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Betsch C, Schmid P, Verger P, Lewandowsky S, Soveri A, Hertwig R, Fasce A, Holford D, De Raeve P, Gagneur A, Vuolanto P, Correia T, Tavoschi L, Declich S, Marceca M, Linos A, Karnaki P, Karlsson L, Garrison A. A call for immediate action to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake to prepare for the third pandemic winter. Nat Commun 2022; 13:7511. [PMID: 36473855 PMCID: PMC9726862 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34995-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cornelia Betsch
- University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
- Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Philipp Schmid
- University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
- Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pierre Verger
- Faculty of Medicine, Southeastern Regional Health Observatory, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Ralph Hertwig
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Dawn Holford
- School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Paul De Raeve
- European Federation of Nurses Associations, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arnaud Gagneur
- Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | - Tiago Correia
- Global Health and Tropical Medicine, GHTM, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, IHMT, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Lara Tavoschi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Silvia Declich
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Italian National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Marceca
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Amanda Garrison
- Faculty of Medicine, Southeastern Regional Health Observatory, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Navin MC, Kozak AT, Attwell K. School staff and immunization governance: Missed opportunities for public health promotion. Vaccine 2022; 40:7433-7439. [PMID: 34579977 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In US states, childhood immunization mandates are enforced for school registration by front-line school staff, usually secretaries. Despite substantial changes to mandate policies in several states and many countries, little attention has been paid to the people who enforce them. This qualitative pilot study aimed to uncover beliefs, attitudes, and practices regarding immunization governance of Michigan school staff. METHOD Front-line administrative workers from Michigan schools and district offices were solicited by email. Sixteen were interviewed remotely. RESULTS Front-line school staff believed in vaccines, but did not advocate for vaccination while registering children. Instead, they sought low-friction bureaucratic transactions, privileging the collection of data over the promotion of public health goals. This revealed a mismatch between the goals of the front-line staff who enforce vaccine mandates in schools and the goals of the policymakers who created school vaccine mandates. CONCLUSIONS This study found low mobilization of front-line enforcers of mandates in public-facing school administration roles, a problem likely to afflict the majority of American states with the 'mandates + exemptions' model of immunization governance. Schools would have stronger incentives to promote vaccination if state funding were better tied to immunization compliance. Front-line staff could better enforce vaccine mandates if they were provided with resources and training about vaccine promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark C Navin
- Department of Philosophy, Oakland University, Mathematics and Science Center, Room 746, 146 Library Drive, Rochester, MI 48309-4479, USA.
| | - Andrea T Kozak
- Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Pryale Hall, Room 210, 654 Pioneer Drive, Rochester, MI 48309-4482, USA.
| | - Katie Attwell
- Political Science and International Relations, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mitilian E, Gosselin V, Casanova L, Fressard L, Berthiaume P, Verger P, Gagneur A. Assessment of training of general practice interns in motivational interviews about vaccination. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2022; 18:2114253. [PMID: 36494997 PMCID: PMC9746523 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2114253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The effectiveness of motivational interviewing (MI) for reducing vaccine hesitancy (VH) has been demonstrated in Quebec. We conducted a study to evaluate the acquisition of MI skills after MI training via videoconferencing for interns training as general practitioners (GPs) in southeastern France. A vaccination-specific MI training workshop was offered to interns in 2021, consisting of two separate Zoom videoconference sessions. Participants completed the Motivational Interviewing Skills in Immunization questionnaire before and after the training to measure skills acquisition. We used pairwise exact Wilcoxon-Pratt signed rank tests for the analysis. Among 45 GP interns enrolled in the first MI session, 34 (75.6%) attended both sessions and completed the questionnaire at 3 different time points. After the first session, MI knowledge scores improved significantly (+21.1 ± 21.6; P < .0001), as did application of MI skills (+36.8 ± 36.7; P < .0001), and MI practice confidence (+21.2 ± 11.1; P < .0001). The second MI session maintained the skills developed after the first session without further improvement. Participant satisfaction was high. This is the first study in France assessing the impact of a vaccination-specific MI training for GP interns. It shows a substantial improvement in knowledge, application of MI skills, and self-confidence in the practice of MI. GP interns were highly satisfied with the training despite the videoconference format. These promising results will allow the integration of MI training in GP medical curricula in order to prepare future GPs for communication in the field of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Mitilian
- Aix Marseille Univ, DUMG, département universitaire de médecine générale, Marseille, France,ORS PACA. Southeastern Health Regional Observatory, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France,CONTACT Eva Mitilian Aix Marseille Univ, DUMG, département universitaire de médecine générale, 40, rue Saint-Bruno, Marseille13004
| | - Virginie Gosselin
- Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ludovic Casanova
- Aix Marseille Univ, DUMG, département universitaire de médecine générale, Marseille, France,ORS PACA. Southeastern Health Regional Observatory, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France
| | - Lisa Fressard
- ORS PACA. Southeastern Health Regional Observatory, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France
| | | | - Pierre Verger
- ORS PACA. Southeastern Health Regional Observatory, Faculty of Medicine, Marseille, France
| | - Arnaud Gagneur
- Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rutchanagul P, Sangnimitchaikul W. Knowledge and Skill Needs in E-course Training of an Expanded Program for Immunization Staff in Thailand: A Mixed-method Design. Open Nurs J 2022. [DOI: 10.2174/18744346-v16-e2208101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background:
This study was conducted to examine essential content needs in E-course training to improve the knowledge and skills of immunization staff members in Thailand.
Methods:
This study used a mixed-method research design. Quantitative methodology was used to study 449 staff members of government care facilities in the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI). Surveys were conducted by using the perceived needs for immunization training questionnaire. Qualitative methodology employed in-depth interview guidelines on immunization content that were used to interview 14 staff members at EPI. The quantitative data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Interview data were analyzed in content analysis.
Results:
The participants were immunization staff members of three positions: registered nurses, pharmacists and public health technical officers. The participants had different E-course training content needs concerning vaccine-report registration, administering the vaccines and dealing with adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with a statistical significance of .05. This was consistent with the findings from in-depth interviews, which showed staff members had both varying and connected work responsibilities, giving members from all three groups a need for the same basic knowledge pertaining to immunization. In some aspects, staff members required different training content details depending on job descriptions. Public health technical officers were found to require details on vaccine-report registration. Nurses required knowledge dealing with AEFI and administering the vaccines. Pharmacists needed details on the cold-chain system the most.
Conclusion:
Executives at the policy level should specify essential content requiring development for each position in addition to designing training models to meet the needs of EPI staff, enabling access and promoting effective use.
Collapse
|
12
|
Navin MC, Oberleitner LMS, Lucia VC, Ozdych M, Afonso N, Kennedy RH, Keil H, Wu L, Mathew TA. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Personnel Who Generally Accept Vaccines. J Community Health 2022; 47:519-529. [PMID: 35277813 PMCID: PMC8916908 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-022-01080-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
To identify psychological antecedents of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among healthcare personnel (HCP). We surveyed 4603 HCP to assess psychological antecedents of their vaccination decisions (the ‘5 Cs’) for vaccines in general and for COVID-19 vaccines. Most HCP accept vaccines, but many expressed hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccines for the psychological antecedents of vaccination: confidence (vaccines are effective), complacency (vaccines are unnecessary), constraints (difficult to access), calculation (risks/benefits), collective responsibility (need for vaccination when others vaccinate). HCP who were hesitant only about COVID-19 vaccines differed from HCP who were consistently hesitant: those with lower confidence were more likely to be younger and women, higher constraints were more likely to have clinical positions, higher complacency were more likely to have recently cared for COVID-19 patients, and lesser collective responsibility were more likely to be non-white. These results can inform interventions to encourage uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in HCP.
Collapse
|
13
|
Barton SM, Calhoun AW, Bohnert CA, Multerer SM, Statler VA, Bryant KA, Arnold DM, Felton HM, Purcell PM, Kinney MD, Parrish-Sprowl JM, Marshall GS. Standardized Vaccine-Hesitant Patients in the Assessment of the Effectiveness of Vaccine Communication Training. J Pediatr 2022; 241:203-211.e1. [PMID: 34699909 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine if training residents in a structured communication method elicits specific behaviors in a laboratory model of interaction with vaccine-hesitant parents. STUDY DESIGN Standardized patients portraying vaccine-hesitant parents were used to assess the effectiveness of training in the Announce, Inquire, Mirror, Secure (AIMS) Method for Healthy Conversations. Blinded pediatric residents were pseudorandomized to receive AIMS or control training and underwent pre- and post-training encounters with blinded standardized patients. Encounters were assessed by blinded raters using a novel tool. Participant confidence and standardized patient evaluations of the participants' general communication skills were assessed. RESULTS Ratings were available for 27 AIMS and 26 control participants. Statistically significant increases in post-training scores (maximum = 30) were detected in AIMS, but not in control, participants (median, 21.3 [IQR, 19.8-24.8] vs 18.8 [IQR, 16.9-20.9]; P < .001). Elements (maximum score = 6) with significant increases were Inquire (0.67 [IQR, 0-1.76] vs -0.33 [IQR, -0.67 to 0.33]; P < .001); Mirror (1.33 [IQR, 0 to 2] vs -0.33 [IQR, -0.92 to 0]; P < .001) and Secure (0.33 [IQR, 0 to 1.67] vs -0.17 [IQR, -0.67 to 0.33]; P = .017). Self-confidence increased equally in both groups. Standardized patients did not detect a difference in communication skills after training and between groups. Internal consistency and inter-rater reliability of the assessment tool were modest. CONCLUSIONS Standardized patients proved useful in studying the effectiveness of structured communication training, but may have been limited in their ability to perceive a difference between groups owing to the predetermined encounter outcome of vaccine refusal. AIMS training should be studied in real-world scenarios to determine if it impacts vaccine acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanna M Barton
- Norton Children's Hospital, and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | - Aaron W Calhoun
- Norton Children's Hospital, and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | - Carrie A Bohnert
- Department of Undergraduate Medical Education, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | - Sara M Multerer
- Norton Children's Hospital, and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | - Victoria A Statler
- Norton Children's Hospital, and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | - Kristina A Bryant
- Norton Children's Hospital, and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | - Daniel M Arnold
- Norton Children's Hospital, and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | - Heather M Felton
- Norton Children's Hospital, and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | - Patricia M Purcell
- Norton Children's Hospital, and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | - Matthew D Kinney
- Norton Children's Hospital, and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY
| | - John M Parrish-Sprowl
- Department of Communication Studies, Global Health Communication Center, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Gary S Marshall
- Norton Children's Hospital, and University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Training Physicians in Motivational Communication to Address Influenza Vaccine Hesitation: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10020143. [PMID: 35214603 PMCID: PMC8875187 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Strategies to support health care professionals on how to address vaccine hesitancy are needed. Methods: We developed a 4-h Motivational Communication (MC) training program tailored to help physicians address hesitancy related to influenza vaccination among patients living with rheumatoid arthritis. Five MC competencies were evaluated at baseline and post-training with a standardized patient using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity [MITI] scale. Adherence to MC during clinical consultations and changes in vaccine intentions was measured as secondary outcomes. Results: Seven rheumatology physicians participated in the training. MITI scores increased in all participants, and 71% (n = 5) achieved thresholds of clinical competency (i.e., ≥3.5/5 at MITI global score and ≥3/5 on at least 3 individual competency score) post-training. Autonomy/support and empathy competencies reached competency thresholds (+2.4 ± 1.3 to +4.1 ± 0.7 and +2.1 ± 0.7 to +4.1 ± 0.7, respectively). Evocation and collaboration competencies improved but without reaching competency thresholds (+1.4 ± 0.8 to +3.1 ± 1.1; +1.4 ± 0.8 to +2.9 ± 1.1, respectively). Direction did not improve. Among 21 patient consultations post-training, 15 (71%) were MC-consistent. Of the 15 patients, 67% (10/15) intended to receive the influenza vaccine and 33% (5/15) received it. Conclusion: A brief MC training program targeting vaccine hesitancy increased MC competency among rheumatology physicians and promoted behavioral change among patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Penlington M, Goulet P, Metcalfe B. Improving knowledge and trust in vaccines: A survey-based assessment of the potential of the European Union Clinical Trial Regulation No 536/2014 plain language summary to increase health literacy. Vaccine 2022; 40:924-933. [PMID: 34996640 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The European Clinical Trial Regulation No 536/2014 is the first mandate for a non-technical, publicly disclosed, plain language summary (PLS) of clinical trial results. This easy-to-understand summary has the potential to inform the public about clinical trial results and thereby improve health literacy in vaccines. To investigate the utility of the PLS, we undertook 2 online surveys (July/October 2020) in the United Kingdom, the United States and India. Participants were selected by quota sampling to ensure representation of gender, age and parental status. Those lacking interest in vaccine clinical research were excluded. In survey 1, participants were questioned about their interest in and expectations of vaccine trial results. In survey 2, the perceptions of participants to a range of written communication styles used in publicly available PLSs were evaluated. A total of 66 (13%) and 122 (29%) individuals were excluded solely due to lack of interest in vaccine clinical research in surveys 1 and 2, respectively; 450 respondents (150/country) completed survey 1 and 300 (100/country) completed survey 2. In survey 1, there was a correlation (p < 0.01) between claimed knowledge of and trust in vaccines. Healthcare professionals were the most trusted source for vaccine information, while vaccine companies were ranked relatively low. In survey 2, infographic PLS formats were considered easiest to understand, most engaging and the strongest communicators. Emphasizing the main points of the infographics in the text did not improve comprehension or recall. Most respondents (86%) indicated that they would like to see this type of communication in the future. Overall, this research suggests that the PLS, by optimizing content and format, has a potential to increase health literacy, and thereby, as part of a wider integrated communication strategy, build vaccine knowledge and confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Beth Metcalfe
- InSites Consulting, 51 Lever Street, Manchester M1 1FN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cassidy C, Langley J, Steenbeek A, Taylor B, Kennie-Kaulbach N, Grantmyre H, Stratton L, Isenor J. A Behavioral analysis of nurses' and pharmacists' role in addressing vaccine hesitancy: scoping review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2021; 17:4487-4504. [PMID: 34406908 PMCID: PMC8828075 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1954444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review was to identify, characterize, and map the existing knowledge on a) nurses' and pharmacists' perceived barriers and enablers to addressing vaccine hesitancy among patients; and b) strategies or interventions for nurses and pharmacists to address vaccine hesitancy in their practice. Our comprehensive search strategy targeted peer-reviewed and grey literature. Two independent reviewers screened papers and extracted data. We coded narrative descriptions of barriers and enablers and interventions using the Behavior Change Wheel. Sixty-six records were included in our review. Reported barriers (n = 9) and facilitators (n = 6) were identified in the capability, opportunity and motivation components. The majority of the reported interventions were categorized as education (n = 47) and training (n = 26). This current scoping review offers a detailed behavioral analysis of known barriers and enablers for nurses and pharmacists to address vaccine hesitancy and interventions mapped onto these behavioral determinants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Cassidy
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- Children's Health Program, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada
| | - Jodi Langley
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | | | - Beth Taylor
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gagneur A. Motivational interviewing: A powerful tool to address vaccine hesitancy. CANADA COMMUNICABLE DISEASE REPORT = RELEVE DES MALADIES TRANSMISSIBLES AU CANADA 2020; 46:93-97. [PMID: 32281992 PMCID: PMC7145430 DOI: 10.14745/ccdr.v46i04a06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization, vaccine hesitancy is among the top threats to global health and few effective strategies address this growing problem. In Canada, approximatively 20% of parents/caregivers are concerned about their children receiving vaccines. Trying to convince them by simply providing the facts about vaccination may backfire and make parents/caregivers even more hesitant. In this context, how can health care providers overcome the challenge of parental decision-making needs regarding vaccination of their children? Motivational interviewing aims to support decision making by eliciting and strengthening a person's motivation to change their behaviour based on their own arguments for change. This approach is based on three main components: the spirit to cultivate a culture of partnership and compassion; the processes to foster engagement in the relationship and focus the discussion on the target of change; and the skills that enable health care providers to understand and address the parent/caregiver's real concerns. With regard to immunization, the motivational interviewing approach aims to inform parents/caregivers about vaccinations, according to their specific needs and their individual level of knowledge, with respectful acceptance of their beliefs. The use of motivational interviewing calls for a respectful and empathetic discussion of vaccination and helps to build a strong relationship. Numerous studies in Canada, including multicentre randomized controlled trials, have proven the effectiveness of the motivational interviewing approach. Since 2018, the PromoVac strategy, an educational intervention based on the motivational interviewing approach, has been implemented as a new practice of care in maternity wards across the province of Quebec through the Entretien Motivationnel en Maternité pour l'Immunisation des Enfants (EMMIE) program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Gagneur
- Department of Pediatrics, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC
- Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|