Clinical trials with GMO-containing vaccines in Europe: Status and regulatory framework

The science and practice of current environmental risk assessment for gene therapy: a review

Gene therapy is a fast-growing field showing great potential to treat genetic diseases and cancer. With accelerating gene therapy development and approval, their environment risk assessment (ERA) becomes increasingly important. An ERA is an assessment of the risks to human health and the environment upon exposure to a medicinal product as the result of its release during clinical development or after entering the market. Because ERA is an important component of regulatory submission, drug developers must perform a robust assessment to ensure the safety of unintended persons, animal, plants, microorganisms and environment at large. Global regulations on gene therapy ERA continue to evolve. Gene therapy ERAs are carried out according to general principles as provided in regulatory guidelines for application of clinical trials and marketing authorizations. The current review intends to summarize regulations and content requirements on gene therapy ERA in European Union, the USA and Japan. The approved gene therapy products by EMA and US Food and Drug Administration are analyzed for the critical aspects of their ERAs to provide the current status and practice of gene therapy ERAs by drug developers. For this purpose, the main contents of these gene therapy ERAs are summarized. Critical safety factors of gene therapy ERAs are described. With more experience and knowledge to be accumulated, gene therapy ERAs are expected to be less challenging with commonly used viral vectors.

Yeast oral vaccines against infectious diseases

Vaccines that are delivered orally have several advantages over their counterparts that are administered via injection. Despite the advantages of oral delivery, however, approved oral vaccines are currently limited either to diseases that affect the gastrointestinal tract or to pathogens that have a crucial life cycle stage in the gut. Moreover, all of the approved oral vaccines for these diseases involve live-attenuated or inactivated pathogens. This mini-review summarizes the potential and challenges of yeast oral vaccine delivery systems for animal and human infectious diseases. These delivery systems utilize whole yeast recombinant cells that are consumed orally to transport candidate antigens to the immune system of the gut. This review begins with a discussion of the challenges associated with oral administration of vaccines and the distinct benefits offered by whole yeast delivery systems over other delivery systems. It then surveys the emerging yeast oral vaccines that have been developed over the past decade to combat animal and human diseases. In recent years, several candidate vaccines have emerged that can elicit the necessary immune response to provide significant protection against challenge by pathogen. They serve as proof of principle to show that yeast oral vaccines hold much promise.

Bovine Anaplasmosis: Will there ever be an almighty effective vaccine?

Bovine anaplasmosis is a tick-borne bacterial disease with a worldwide distribution and the cause of severe economic losses in the livestock industry in many countries, including México. In the present work, we first review the elements of the immune response of the bovine, which allows ameliorating the clinical signs while eliminating the majority of the blood forms and generating an immunologic memory such that future confrontations with the pathogen will not end in disease. On the other hand, many vaccine candidates have been evaluated for the control of bovine anaplasmosis yet without no commercial worldwide effective vaccine. Lastly, the diversity of the pathogen and how this diversity has impaired the many efforts to control the disease are reviewed.

Comparison of regulatory framework of clinical trial with genetically modified organism-containing vaccines in the Europe, Australia, and Switzerland

New vaccines production and manufacture have revolutionized by recombinant technology. Various regulatory associations are engaged with the appraisal of a clinical trial with genetically modified organisms. At present safe, effective vaccines are needed in order to control the various emerging diseases which are a major cause of mortality. In reality, most vaccines raise biosafety worries with respect to human wellbeing. "Federal Office for Environment" is the competent authority for environmental risk assessments in Switzerland. Gene Technology Act 2000 is the fundamental direction that provides the necessary information to carry the clinical trials with genetically modified organism-containing vaccines. In addition, regulatory framework for "clinical trial with genetically modified organisms-containing vaccines" is stringent and partially harmonized in Switzerland, the European Union and Australia. In this study, we mainly concerned with regulatory aspects of "clinical trial with genetically modified organism" containing vaccine in three regions. This review includes various aspects like ethics, guidelines related to clinical trials of vaccines with genetically modified organisms.

Regulatory Harmonization and Streamlining of Clinical Trial Applications globally should lead to faster clinical development and earlier access to life-saving vaccines

Vaccines continue to play a central role in our ability to prevent disease, save lives, and improve health. The scientific community, including our own researchers, are driven by a shared purpose to improve vaccine technologies and bring the benefits of immunization to everyone, regardless of where they live - as soon as possible, especially when the medical need is considerable. Vaccine developers and manufacturers (sometimes referred to as "study sponsors" or "applicants") are exploring technological advancements to translate breakthrough discoveries into novel vaccines which have the potential to provide protection from life-threatening and debilitating infectious diseases. Developing new vaccines is a lengthy process regulated by guidance provided by independent organizations, National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) and the World Health Organization. As most infectious diseases can span a considerable area of the world, clinical trials are often conducted across different countries and regions. Regulatory requirements for clinical trials (both Chemistry Manufacturing & Controls - CMC, nonclinical and clinical) vary significantly between the different countries and regions adding to the complexity of vaccine development and leading to significant delays in the development of novel vaccines and ultimately equitable access for populations to these innovations. Without progress in terms of regulatory convergence and harmonization the benefits from these scientific advancements will not be fully realized. There is an urgent need by global bodies such as WHO to partner with and the NRAs to establish and implement.