Using telemetry to automate the detection of emesis in the ferret: New vistas for delayed emesis assessment

Recalibration of nonclinical safety pharmacology assessment to anticipate evolving regulatory expectations

Safety pharmacology (SP) has evolved in terms of architecture and content since the inception of the SP Society (SPS). SP was initially focused on the issue of drug-induced QT prolongation, but has now become a broad spectrum discipline with expanding expectations for evaluation of drug adverse effect liability in all organ systems, not merely the narrow consideration of torsades de pointes (TdP) liability testing. An important part of the evolution of SP has been the elaboration of architecture for interrogation of non-clinical models in terms of model development, model validation and model implementation. While SP has been defined by mandatory cardiovascular, central nervous system (CNS) and respiratory system studies ever since the core battery was elaborated, it also involves evaluation of drug effects on other physiological systems. The current state of SP evolution is the incorporation of emerging new technologies in a wide range of non-clinical drug safety testing models. This will refine the SP process, while potentially expanding the core battery. The continued refinement of automated technologies (e.g., automated patch clamp systems) is enhancing the scope for detection of adverse effect liability (i.e., for more than just IKr blockade), while introducing a potential for speed and accuracy in cardiovascular and CNS SP by providing rapid, high throughput ion channel screening methods for implementation in early drug development. A variety of CNS liability assays, which exploit isolated brain tissue, and in vitro electrophysiological techniques, have provided an additional level of complimentary preclinical safety screens aimed at establishing the seizurogenic potential and risk for memory dysfunction of new chemical entities (NCEs). As with previous editorials that preface the annual themed issue on SP methods published in the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM), we highlight here the content derived from the most recent (2015) SPS meeting held in Prague, Czech Republic. This issue of JPTM continues the tradition of providing a publication summary of articles primarily presented at the SPS meeting with direct bearing on the discipline of SP. Novel method development and refinement in all areas of the discipline are reflected in the content.

Gastrointestinal Safety Pharmacology in Drug Discovery and Development

Although the basic structure of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) is similar across species, there are significant differences in the anatomy, physiology, and biochemistry between humans and laboratory animals, which should be taken into account when conducting a gastrointestinal (GI) assessment. Historically, the percentage of cases of drug attrition associated with GI-related adverse effects is small; however, this incidence has increased over the last few years. Drug-related GI effects are very diverse, usually functional in nature, and not limited to a single pharmacological class. The most common GI signs are nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and gastric ulceration. Despite being generally not life-threatening, they can greatly affect patient compliance and quality of life. There is therefore a real need for improved and/or more extensive GI screening of candidate drugs in preclinical development, which may help to better predict clinical effects. Models to identify drug effects on GI function cover GI motility, nausea and emesis liability, secretory function (mainly gastric secretion), and absorption aspects. Both in vitro and in vivo assessments are described in this chapter. Drug-induced effects on GI function can be assessed in stand-alone safety pharmacology studies or as endpoints integrated into toxicology studies. In silico approaches are also being developed, such as the gut-on-a-chip model, but await further optimization and validation before routine use in drug development. GI injuries are still in their infancy with regard to biomarkers, probably due to their greater diversity. Nevertheless, several potential blood, stool, and breath biomarkers have been investigated. However, additional validation studies are necessary to assess the relevance of these biomarkers and their predictive value for GI injuries.