Optimizing the use of methods and measurement endpoints in respiratory safety pharmacology

Robustness of arterial blood gas analysis for assessment of respiratory safety pharmacology in rats

Whole body plethysmography using unrestrained animals is a common technique for assessing the respiratory risk of new drugs in safety pharmacology studies in rats. However, wide variations in experimental technique make cross laboratory comparison of data difficult and raise concerns that non-appropriate conditions may mask the deleterious effects of test compounds - in particular with suspected respiratory depressants. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the robustness of arterial blood gas analysis as an alternative to plethysmography in rats. We sought to do this by assessing the effect of different vehicles and times post-surgical catheterization on blood gas measurements, in addition to determining sensitivity to multiple opioids. Furthermore, we determined intra-lab variability from multiple datasets utilizing morphine and generated within a single lab and lastly, inter-lab variability was measured by comparing datasets generated in two separate labs. Overall, our data show that arterial blood gas analysis is a measure that is both flexible in terms of experimental conditions and highly sensitive to respiratory depressants, two key limitations when using plethysmography. As such, our data strongly advocate the adoption of arterial blood gas analysis as an investigative approach to reliably examine the respiratory depressant effects of opioids.

Overview of Respiratory Studies to Support ICH S7A

Tests of pulmonary function are useful tools for evaluating the potential for compounds to produce toxicity affecting the pulmonary system. Insults to the pulmonary system (i.e., due to drugs, biologics, toxins) can cause detectable dysfunction through multiple mechanisms. Manifestation of the response to insults will depend on the component(s) involved and the compensatory mechanism(s) initiated. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce the concepts of pulmonary testing as it is applied to the preclinical evaluation of pharmaceutical test articles. The topics will include the techniques and methods that have been developed for use in nonclinical (animal) subjects and the parameters that are routinely measured.

Safety Pharmacology Evaluation of Biopharmaceuticals

Biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals or biopharmaceuticals (BPs) are molecules such as monoclonal antibodies, soluble/decoy receptors, hormones, enzymes, cytokines, and growth factors that are produced in various biological expression systems and are used to diagnose, treat, or prevent various diseases. Safety pharmacology (SP) assessment of BPs has evolved since the approval of the first BP (recombinant human insulin) in 1982. This evolution is ongoing and is informed by various international harmonization guidelines. Based on these guidelines, the potential undesirable effect of every drug candidate (small molecule or BP) on the cardiovascular, central nervous, and respiratory systems, referred to as the "core battery," should be assessed prior to first-in-human administration. However, SP assessment of BPs poses unique challenges such as choice of test species and integration of SP parameters into repeat-dose toxicity studies. This chapter reviews the evolution of SP assessment of BPs using the approval packages of marketed BPs and discusses the past, current, and new and upcoming approach and methods that can be used to generate high-quality data for the assessment of SP of BPs.

Reprint of "Safety pharmacology in 2014: New focus on non-cardiac methods and models"

"What do you know about Safety Pharmacology?" This is the question that was asked in 2000 with the inception of the Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS). There is now a widespread awareness of the role of safety pharmacology in drug discovery and increasing awareness among the wider community of methods and models used in the assessment of the core battery required set of safety studies. However, safety pharmacology does not stop with core battery studies. New methods are intensively sought in order to achieve a swifter and more reliable assessment of adverse effect liability. The dynamics of the discipline and method expansion are reflected in the content of this issue of the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM). We are into the second decade of publishing on safety pharmacology methods and models, reflected by the annual themed issue in JPTM, and on willingness of investigators to embrace new technologies and methodologies. This years' themed issue is derived from the annual Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) meeting, held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, in 2013.

Safety pharmacology in 2014: new focus on non-cardiac methods and models

"What do you know about Safety Pharmacology?" This is the question that was asked in 2000 with the inception of the Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS). There is now a widespread awareness of the role of safety pharmacology in drug discovery and increasing awareness among the wider community of methods and models used in the assessment of the core battery required set of safety studies. However, safety pharmacology does not stop with core battery studies. New methods are intensively sought in order to achieve a swifter and more reliable assessment of adverse effect liability. The dynamics of the discipline and method expansion are reflected in the content of this issue of the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM). We are into the second decade of publishing on safety pharmacology methods and models, reflected by the annual themed issue in JPTM, and on willingness of investigators to embrace new technologies and methodologies. This years' themed issue is derived from the annual Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) meeting, held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, in 2013.