Evaluation of pro-convulsant risk in the rat: Spontaneous and provoked convulsions

N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor modulators: a patent review (2015-present)

INTRODUCTION

- The NMDA receptor is implicated in various diseases including neurodegenerative, neurodevelopmental and mood disorders. However, only a limited number of clinically approved NMDA receptor modulators are available. Today, apparent NMDA receptor drug development strategies entail 1) exploring the unknown chemical space to identify novel scaffolds; 2) using the clinically available NMDA receptor modulators to expand the therapeutic indication space; 3) and to trace physiological functions of the NMDA receptor.

AREAS COVERED

- The current review reflects on the functional and pharmacological facets of NMDA receptors and the current clinical status quo of NMDA receptor modulators. Patent literature covering 2015 till April 2020 is discussed with emphasis on new indications.

EXPERT OPINION

- Supporting evidence shows that subtype-selective NMDA receptor antagonists show an improved safety profile compared to broad-spectrum channel blockers. Although GluN2B-selective antagonists are by far the most extensively investigated subtype-selective modulators, they have shown only modest clinical efficacy so far. To overcome the limitations that have hampered the clinical development of previous subtype-selective NMDA receptor antagonists, future studies with improved animal models that better reflect human NMDA receptor pathophysiology are warranted. The increased availability of subtype-selective probes will allow target engagement studies and proper dose finding in future clinical trials.

Refinement of the rodent pentylenetetrazole proconvulsion assay, which is a good predictor of convulsions in repeat-dose toxicology studies

INTRODUCTION

The pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced seizure assay in rodents is an established method for investigating drug-induced alterations in seizure threshold such as proconvulsant effects. The standard procedure in our laboratory was to administer the test item prior to 75-120 mg/kg subcutaneous PTZ. However, this dose range is associated with a high incidence of mortality, including approximately 40% or greater deaths of control animals.

METHODS

The predictivity of the PTZ-induced seizure assay was retrospectively evaluated by relating drug plasma levels associated with proconvulsant effects to exposures observed during convulsions in repeat-dose toxicology studies. Margins to estimated efficacious doses were also considered. To investigate potential refinements, a high PTZ dose (80 mg/kg, subcutaneously) was compared to two lower doses (40 and 60 mg/kg), and a range of doses of theophylline was orally administered as positive control.

RESULTS

The PTZ-induced proconvulsion assay proved to be a good predictor of convulsions in toxicology studies. In the refinement study, theophylline potentiated PTZ-induced seizures over all doses tested. At 60 mg/kg PTZ, the proconvulsant dose-dependency of theophylline was best observed. At both 40 and 60 mg/kg PTZ, mortality in control animals was significantly reduced.

DISCUSSION

Risk assessment at an early stage of drug development supports candidate selection and, along that approach, the PTZ proconvulsion assay was proven to be a good predictor of convulsions in subsequent toxicology studies. It was also demonstrated that a relatively lower PTZ dose (60 mg/kg) improved the dose-response-curve of the positive control tested, decreased mortality overall and, therefore, contributes to refining this standard procedure for CNS safety evaluation.

Recalibration of nonclinical safety pharmacology assessment to anticipate evolving regulatory expectations

Safety pharmacology (SP) has evolved in terms of architecture and content since the inception of the SP Society (SPS). SP was initially focused on the issue of drug-induced QT prolongation, but has now become a broad spectrum discipline with expanding expectations for evaluation of drug adverse effect liability in all organ systems, not merely the narrow consideration of torsades de pointes (TdP) liability testing. An important part of the evolution of SP has been the elaboration of architecture for interrogation of non-clinical models in terms of model development, model validation and model implementation. While SP has been defined by mandatory cardiovascular, central nervous system (CNS) and respiratory system studies ever since the core battery was elaborated, it also involves evaluation of drug effects on other physiological systems. The current state of SP evolution is the incorporation of emerging new technologies in a wide range of non-clinical drug safety testing models. This will refine the SP process, while potentially expanding the core battery. The continued refinement of automated technologies (e.g., automated patch clamp systems) is enhancing the scope for detection of adverse effect liability (i.e., for more than just IKr blockade), while introducing a potential for speed and accuracy in cardiovascular and CNS SP by providing rapid, high throughput ion channel screening methods for implementation in early drug development. A variety of CNS liability assays, which exploit isolated brain tissue, and in vitro electrophysiological techniques, have provided an additional level of complimentary preclinical safety screens aimed at establishing the seizurogenic potential and risk for memory dysfunction of new chemical entities (NCEs). As with previous editorials that preface the annual themed issue on SP methods published in the Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods (JPTM), we highlight here the content derived from the most recent (2015) SPS meeting held in Prague, Czech Republic. This issue of JPTM continues the tradition of providing a publication summary of articles primarily presented at the SPS meeting with direct bearing on the discipline of SP. Novel method development and refinement in all areas of the discipline are reflected in the content.