Newly developed proximal release-type colonic stent placement for malignant lower rectal obstruction

Radiation Exposure with Self-Expandable Metallic Stent versus Transanal Decompression Tube for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction: A Post Hoc Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Background: Although several reports have compared the outcomes of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMSs) and transanal decompression tube (TDT) placement for malignant colorectal obstruction (MCO), few studies have compared the radiation exposure (RE) associated with these two procedures. Consequently, we aimed to compare the RE of SEMS and TDT placements for MCO using propensity score matching (PSM) in a multi-center, prospective observational study. Methods: This study investigated the clinical data of 236 patients who underwent SEMS or TDT placement. The air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r: mGy) and air kerma-area product (PKA; Gycm2) were measured and compared between SEMS and TDT groups after PSM. Results: After PSM, 61 patients were identified in each group. The median Ka,r in the SEMS group was significantly greater than that in the TDT group (77.4 vs. 55.6 mGy; p = 0.025) across the entire cohort. With respect to subgroup analyses by location, in the rectum, the median Ka, r and PKA were significantly greater in the SEMS group than in the TDT group (172.9 vs. 34.6 mGy; p = 0.001; and 46.0 vs. 18.1 Gycm2; p = 0.006, respectively). However, in the colon, the RE parameters did not significantly differ between the two groups. Conclusions: TDT might be a more suitable option for decompression in patients with malignant rectal obstruction due to its lower RE and technical advantages. Conversely, SEMS placement is recommended as the first decompression method to treat malignant colonic obstruction, in line with the current guidelines.

Impact of self-expanding metal stents on long-term survival outcomes as a bridge to surgery in patients with colon cancer obstruction: Current state and future prospects

Since self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) were first introduced in acute colon cancer obstruction, the increased rate of primary anastomosis and improved quality of life following SEMS placement have been clearly shown. However, it was demonstrated that SEMS are associated with higher recurrence rates. Although several trials have shown that overall and disease-free survival in patients following SEMS placement is similar with patients undergoing emergency surgery, obstruction and a high incidence of recurrence imposed many concerns. The optimal time interval from SEMS to surgery is still a matter of debate. Some studies have recommended a time interval of ~2 weeks between SEMS insertion and elective surgery. A prolonged interval of time from SEMS insertion to elective surgery and the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been proposed. SEMS-NAC might have advantages for improving the surgical and long-term survival outcomes of patients with acute colon cancer obstruction, which is an optional approach in the management of acute colon cancer obstruction.

The Deployment of a Newly Developed Proximal Release-Type Colonic Stent Is Feasible for Malignant Colorectal Obstruction near the Anal Verge: A Single-Center Preliminary Study

INTRODUCTION

Colonic self-expandable metallic stents are widely used to treat malignant colorectal obstructions. Stent placement in lesions near the dentate line causes problems, including severe pain due to difficulty in positioning the stent accurately. Therefore, a proximal release-type stent was developed to overcome this issue, and this preliminary study aimed to investigate its efficacy and safety.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This research enrolled eight patients with malignant colorectal obstructions up to 10 cm from the anal verge who required placement of the newly developed proximal release-type colonic stent. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate, and the secondary outcomes were the technical success and adverse events rates.

RESULTS

The technical and clinical success rates were 87.5% each, and the mean procedure time was 25.5 ± 22.0 min. The mean procedure time in the rectosigmoid colon was significantly longer than that in the rectum. Only one (12.5%) patient had stent migration, and neither anal pain nor tenesmus was observed.

DISCUSSION

The stent was highly effective in treating lesions near the anal verge, and it might contribute to the expansion of indications for colorectal stents for lesions near the dentate line. However, the indications for rectosigmoid colon lesions should be cautiously considered.

Multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: recommendations from the SICG (Italian Society of Geriatric Surgery), SIFIPAC (Italian Society of Surgical Pathophysiology), SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies), and the WSES (World Society of Emergency Surgery) International Consensus Project

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although rectal cancer is predominantly a disease of older patients, current guidelines do not incorporate optimal treatment recommendations for the elderly and address only partially the associated specific challenges encountered in this population. This results in a wide variation and disparity in delivering a standard of care to this subset of patients. As the burden of rectal cancer in the elderly population continues to increase, it is crucial to assess whether current recommendations on treatment strategies for the general population can be adopted for the older adults, with the same beneficial oncological and functional outcomes. This multidisciplinary experts' consensus aims to refine current rectal cancer-specific guidelines for the elderly population in order to help to maximize rectal cancer therapeutic strategies while minimizing adverse impacts on functional outcomes and quality of life for these patients.

METHODS

The discussion among the steering group of clinical experts and methodologists from the societies' expert panel involved clinicians practicing in general surgery, colorectal surgery, surgical oncology, geriatric oncology, geriatrics, gastroenterologists, radiologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, and endoscopists. Research topics and questions were formulated, revised, and unanimously approved by all experts in two subsequent modified Delphi rounds in December 2020-January 2021. The steering committee was divided into nine teams following the main research field of members. Each conducted their literature search and drafted statements and recommendations on their research question. Literature search has been updated up to 2020 and statements and recommendations have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. A modified Delphi methodology was implemented to reach agreement among the experts on all statements and recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2021 SICG-SIFIPAC-SICE-WSES consensus for the multidisciplinary management of elderly patients with rectal cancer aims to provide updated evidence-based statements and recommendations on each of the following topics: epidemiology, pre-intervention strategies, diagnosis and staging, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgery, watch and wait strategy, adjuvant chemotherapy, synchronous liver metastases, and emergency presentation of rectal cancer.