Interchangeability between Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

CIRCULATING CLONAL COMPLEXES AND SEQUENCE TYPES OF STREPTOCOCCUS PNEUMONIAE SEROTYPE 19A WORLDWIDE: THE IMPORTANCE OF MULTIDRUG RESISTANCE: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

INTRODUCTION

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially amongst young children and the elderly. Childhood implementation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) significantly reduced the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), while several nonvaccine serotypes remained substantial. Although there is evidence of the impact of higher-valent PCVs on serotype 19A, 19A IPD burden and antibiotic resistance remain a major concern post-vaccination.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a systematic literature review to analyze the frequency and clonal distribution of serotype 19A isolates in the pre- and post-PCV era worldwide providing a scientific background on the factors that influence multidrug resistance in pneumococcal isolates.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Serotype 19A IPD incidence increased in all regions following the introduction of the 7-valent PCV. The higher-valent PCVs have reduced the rates of 19A IPD isolates, but several circulating strains with diverse antibiotic resistance prevailed. Heterogeneous clonal distribution in serotype 19A was observed within countries and regions, irrespective of higher-valent PCV used. An increase of 19A isolates from pre- to post-vaccination periods were associated with frequently occurring serotype switching events and with the prevalence of multidrug resistant strains. Rational antibiotic policies must be implemented to control the emergence of resistance.Plain Language SummaryWhat is the context?Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major cause of pneumococcal diseases especially amongst young children and the elderly. Vaccination with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines has significantly reduced the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease worldwide. However, the invasive pneumococcal disease remains an important health problem due to the increase of nonvaccine serotypes. Serotype 19A is predominant in many countries worldwide. Factors contributing to its prevalence include serotype replacement, the emergence of clones with multidrug resistance due to antibiotic overuse, and potential bacteria adaptation in response to the vaccine.What is new?We performed a systematic literature review to 1) analyze the incidence and clonal distribution of serotype 19A isolates pre- and post-vaccination worldwide, and to collect data evaluating antimicrobial resistance patterns displayed by the clones of serotype 19A. We found that 1) clonal distribution in serotype 19A was heterogeneous within countries and regions, irrespective of the vaccine used; 2) the diversity of 19A isolates increased after vaccination. It was associated with frequent serotype switching events and with the prevalence of multidrug resistant strains.What is the impact?Implementation of policies to educate on sustainable antibiotic use and infectious prevention measures may help control the emergence of antibiotic resistance. High-quality active surveillance and future molecular epidemiology studies are needed to understand rapid genetic changes.

Can two different pneumococcal conjugate vaccines be used to complete the infant vaccination series? A randomized trial exploring interchangeability of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and the pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccine

Background: We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of 2 + 1 infant regimens initiated with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and completed with the pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV). Methods: This partially blinded study randomized 6-12-week-old infants to receive two-dose priming and a booster (at ages 2, 4, 12-15 months) with: PCV13 at priming and PHiD-CV at boosting (PPS); PCV13 then PHiD-CV at priming and PHiD-CV at boosting (PSS); or PHiD-CV at priming and boosting (SSS control). All analyses were descriptive, i.e., no statistical significance tests were done. Results: The total vaccinated cohort at priming comprised 294 infants. Grade 3 adverse events were reported after 8.7% (PPS), 11.4% (PSS), and 16.9% (SSS) of primary doses (primary objective). No serious adverse events were considered vaccination-related. For most PHiD-CV serotypes, observed percentages of children reaching antibody concentrations ≥0.2 µg/mL and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) titers above cutoffs were similar across groups 1 month post-priming and post-booster. Observed geometric mean antibody concentrations and OPA titers were lower for some PHiD-CV serotypes with the mixed regimens than with PHiD-CV only, especially for PSS. However, no tests of statistical significance were performed. Conclusions: Immunogenicity of the two mixed PCV13/PHiD-CV regimens seemed mostly similar to that of a PHiD-CV-only series, although observed antibody GMCs and OPA GMTs for some PHiD-CV serotypes were lower. No safety concerns were raised. The clinical relevance of the observed differences is unknown. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01641133.

Impact of Switch Options on the Economics of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV) Introduction in Indonesia

As one of Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance (previously the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization), graduating countries, Indonesia is still eligible to access Gavi price for PCV13, PCV10 A and B. This study aims to estimate the economic impact of switch from the existing product/presentation of PCV (single-dose of PCV13) to the new product/presentation of PCV (multi-dose of PCV13, PCV10 A and B) since PCV is one of the most expensive vaccines in the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) schedule. Assuming that Gavi-Advance Market Commitment (AMC) price for all PCVs can be accessed in 2021, the use of multi-dose PCV13, PCV10 A and PCV10 B with Gavi-AMC price in 2021–2024 were considered as respective scenarios. The result showed that the scenario assuming the use of single-dose of PCV13 with contract price in 2019–2020 that would be switched into multi-dose of PCV10 B with Gavi-AMC price in 2021–2024 resulted in the highest potential saving, compared with other scenarios. Our analysis suggests an economic advantage to switch from single-dose into a multi-dose presentation. Vaccination coverage, vaccine price, vaccine wastage and additional Gavi-AMC vaccine costs were considered to be the most influential parameter affecting the savings in all scenarios. Applying the effectiveness of PCV13 and PCV10 A on reducing the risk for invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), potential averted incidence of IPD in children under one year of age during 2019–2024 would be 246,164 and 105,587 in both scenarios. Despite the result confirmed that PCV13 may provide an additional benefit, a more comprehensive economic evaluation study is required to investigate further the comparison of cost-effectiveness values among all PCVs in Indonesia.

Interchangeability between pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for pediatric use: a systematic literature review

Introduction: Evidence on the interchangeability between the two pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) - pneumococcal non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV) and 13-valent PCV (PCV13) - is limited but growing. We performed a systematic literature review to summarize evidence for PHiD-CV/PCV13 interchangeability regarding immunogenicity, safety, and effectiveness against pneumococcal disease. Areas covered: Seven records disclosing results from six studies on PHiD-CV/PCV13 interchangeability were identified. Four clinical trials showed that mixed schedules with a PHiD-CV-to-PCV13 switch at boosting or a PCV13-to-PHiD-CV switch during priming or at boosting were immunogenic with no apparent safety concerns. Two observational studies in the context of a programmatic PHiD-CV-to-PCV13 switch showed similarly high effectiveness against overall invasive pneumococcal disease with a mixed PHiD-CV/PCV13 schedule and a PCV13-only schedule. No effectiveness data for a PCV13-to-PHiD-CV switch and no immunogenicity/safety/effectiveness data for a PHiD-CV-to-PCV13 switch during priming were found. Expert opinion: For epidemiological or programmatic reasons, several local/national authorities have switched PCVs in their immunization programs. Consequently, children have received mixed schedules. Although herd immunity may obscure the individual effect, the limited data are reassuring. Additional evidence from these settings - especially effectiveness or impact data - may provide the necessary information for authorities to make informed decisions on interchanging PCVs.

Model Comparisons of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Vaccination: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

To describe all published articles that have conducted comparisons of model-based effectiveness and cost-effectiveness results in the field of vaccination. Specific objectives were to 1) describe the methodologies used and 2) identify the strengths and limitations of the studies.

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE and Embase databases for studies that compared predictions of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vaccination of two or more mathematical models. We categorized studies into two groups on the basis of their data source for comparison (previously published results or new simulation results) and performed a qualitative synthesis of study conclusions.

RESULTS

We identified 115 eligible articles (only 5% generated new simulations from the reviewed models) examining the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vaccination against 14 pathogens (69% of studies examined human papillomavirus, influenza, and/or pneumococcal vaccines). The goal of most of studies was to summarize evidence for vaccination policy decisions, and cost-effectiveness was the most frequent outcome examined. Only 33%, 25%, and 3% of studies followed a systematic approach to identify eligible studies, assessed the quality of studies, and performed a quantitative synthesis of results, respectively. A greater proportion of model comparisons using published studies followed a systematic approach to identify eligible studies and to assess their quality, whereas more studies using new simulations performed quantitative synthesis of results and identified drivers of model conclusions. Most comparative modeling studies concluded that vaccination was cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the variability in methods used to conduct/report comparative modeling studies, guidelines are required to enhance their quality and transparency and to provide better tools for decision making.