Direct Cost for Treating Chronic Kidney Disease at an Outpatient Setting of a Tertiary Hospital: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study

Effect of CYP3A5*3, ABCC2 C-24T, and ABCC2 C3972T Genetic Polymorphisms on Direct Cost of Kidney Transplant Recipients

Introduction Genetic variations can influence how kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) respond to immunosuppressive drugs. However, limited resources necessitate a cost-benefit analysis of pharmacogenetic testing to determine its role in routine practice. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of three genetic polymorphisms (CYP3A5*3, ABCC2 -24C>T, and ABCC2 3972C>T) in KTRs. Methods This was a multicenter, prospective observational cohort study that included patients on tacrolimus-mycophenolate-prednisolone treatment. Ethnically diverse adult KTRs who had undergone kidney transplantation between 2020 and 2021 and consented were enrolled in the study. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from the collected blood samples using a commercially available kit. CYP3A5*3, ABCC2 -24C>T, and ABCC2 3972C>T single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results Data was analyzed from 39 KTRs with an average age of 32.2 ± 7.0 years. The median annual healthcare cost per patient was MYR 52,700 (laboratory tests and immunosuppressants being the highest expenses). Notably, the annual cost was significantly higher in patients with the CYP3A5*3 variant compared to the wildtype (p < 0.001). Furthermore, an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that carriers of the CYP3A5*1 wildtype allele, the ABCC2 -24C>T T variant allele, and the ABCC2 3972C>T T variant allele were associated with a more cost-effective approach to kidney transplantation management, potentially reducing the risk of graft rejection and acute tubular necrosis (ATN). Conclusion While these findings suggest potential cost benefits for specific genotypes, further research with larger and more diverse patient populations is necessary to definitively establish the role of pharmacogenetic testing in optimizing cost-effectiveness for KTRs.

Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for microalbuminuria in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in India

OBJECTIVES

Patients with diabetes have a higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Early detection of CKD through microalbuminuria screening, followed by treatment, delays the progression of CKD. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of population-based screening of microalbuminuria among normotensive type 2 diabetes mellitus patients aged >40 years compared with no screening scenario using a decision tree combined with the Markov model.

METHODS

We considered two scenarios: Scenario I - dipstick microalbuminuria followed by spot-urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) and serum creatinine in sequence; Scenario II - spot urine ACR plus serum creatinine. A mathematical cohort of the target population was simulated over a lifetime horizon with an annual cycle. Data for the model were obtained from secondary resources. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated for screening scenarios compared to nonscreening scenario, along with sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The discounted ICER per quality-adjusted life years gained for annual microalbuminuria screening in the normotensive diabetic population in India were ₹ 24,114 (US$ 308) and ₹ 13,790 (US$ 176) for scenarios I and II, respectively. Annual screening by scenarios I and II resulted in a reduction of 180 and 193 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) cases per 100,000 population, respectively, resulting in a cost saving of ₹ 12.3 and 13.3 Crore spent on ESRD management over 10 years. Both scenarios were also cost-effective even at the screening frequencies of 5 and 10 yearly.

CONCLUSION

Microalbuminuria screening was cost-effective at the threshold of one-time GDP per capita in India.

Update on Existing Care Models for Chronic Kidney Disease in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Approximately 78% of chronic kidney disease (CKD) cases reside in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, little is known about the care models for CKD in LMICs.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to update a prior systematic review on CKD care models in LMICs and summarize information on multidisciplinary care and management of CKD complications.

DESIGN

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Global Health databases in September 2020, for papers published between January 1, 2017, and September 14, 2020. We used a combination of search terms, which were different iterations of CKD, care models, and LMICs. The World Bank definition (2019) was used to identify LMICs.

SETTING

Our review included studies published in LMICs across 4 continents: Africa, Asia, North America (Mexico), and Europe (Ukraine). The study settings included tertiary hospitals (n = 6), multidisciplinary clinics (n = 1), primary health centers (n = 2), referral centers (n = 2), district hospitals (n = 1), teaching hospitals (n = 1), regional hospital (n = 1), and an urban medical center (n = 1).

PATIENTS

Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria, and encompassed 4679 patients, of which 4665 were adults. Only 9 studies reported mean eGFR which ranged from 7 to 45.90 ml/min/1.73 m2.

MEASUREMENTS

We retrieved the following details about CKD care: funding, urban or rural location, types of health care staff, and type of care provided, as defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines for CKD care.

METHODS

We included studies which met the following criteria: (1) population was largely adults, defined as age 18 years and older; (2) most of the study population had CKD, and not end-stage kidney disease (ESKD); (3) population resided in an LMIC as defined by the World Bank; (4) manuscript described in some detail a clinical care model for CKD; (5) manuscript was in either English or French. Animal studies, case reports, comments, and editorials were excluded.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (24 care models with 4665 patients) met inclusion criteria. Out of 24 care models, 20 involved interdisciplinary health care teams. Twenty models incorporated international guidelines for CKD management. However, conservative kidney management (management of kidney failure without dialysis or renal transplant) was in a minority of models (11 of 24). Although there were similarities between all the clinical care models, there was variation in services provided and in funding arrangement; the latter ranged from comprehensive government funding (eg, Sri Lanka, Thailand), to out-of-pocket payments (eg, Benin, Togo).

LIMITATIONS

These include (1) lack of detail on CKD care in many of the studies, (2) small number of included studies, (3) using a different definition of care model from the original Stanifer et al paper, and (4) using the KDIGO Guidelines as the standard for defining a CKD care model.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the CKD models of care include the key elements of CKD care. However, access to such care depends on the funding mechanism available. In addition, few models included conservative kidney management, which should be a priority for future investment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.