1
|
Mishra A, Jamshed M, Ahmad A, Garg S, Madsen DØ. Factors influencing the intention to purchase health insurance: a study of Indian tobacco and alcohol consumers. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1332511. [PMID: 38560431 PMCID: PMC10978790 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1332511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study empirically investigates the attitude of tobacco and alcohol consumers towards health insurance purchase in India. The study aims to determine the factors which plays a significant role in determining the purchase intention of health insurance among tobacco and alcohol consumers. Methods We propose an extended theory of planned behavior (TPB) model comprising factors like attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavior control, perceived usefulness, perceived product risk, and intention to purchase. We collected responses from 420 tobacco and alcohol consumers through a Google Form link shared via different social media platforms. SPSS has been used to perform exploratory factor analysis, whereas AMOS has been used to validate the constructs, confirm the relationships among the variables, and analyze the data. Results The analysis outcomes demonstrate that subjective norms, perceived product risk, and perceived behavioral control are the factors that have a positive and significant effect on health insurance purchase intention among consumers. Discussion This research offers valuable insights to the insurance sector, government officials, policymakers, and academicians. Insurance companies may consider the criteria analysed when creating policies to promote the expansion of the health insurance sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashok Mishra
- Department of Management, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Asad Ahmad
- Department of Management, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
| | - Swati Garg
- Department of Management, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
| | - Dag Øivind Madsen
- USN School of Business, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li X, Martins AL. Leagility in the healthcare research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:307. [PMID: 38454430 PMCID: PMC10921567 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10771-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Expenditure of healthcare services has been growing over the past decades. Lean and agile are two popular paradigms that could potentially contain cost and improve proficiency of the healthcare system. However no systematic review was found on leagilty in the healthcare research. This study aims at synthesizing the extant literature of leagility in the healthcare area to consolidate its potential and identify research gaps for future study in the field. METHODS A systematic literature review is conducted following the PRISMA checklist approach. Studies were searched in multiple databases. The selection of articles was executed by dual-scanning of two researchers to ensure quality of data and relevance to the topic. Scientific articles published between January 1999 and November 2023 concerning leagile healthcare are analysed using Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer (version 1.6.18). RESULTS Out of 270 articles identified from the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 were included in the review. A total of 11 target areas were identified in leagility applications in healthcare. Success and limiting factors of leagile healthcare were classified into macro and micro aspects and further categorized into six dimensions: policy, organization, human resources, marketing, operation management and technology. Moreover, four research gaps were revealed and suggestions were provided for future study. CONCLUSION Leagility in the healthcare context is still being in its infancy. Few empirical validation was found in leagile healthcare literature. Further exploration into the application of theory in various sectors under the scope of healthcare is appealed for. Standardization and modularization, leadership support, skillfulness of professionals and staff training are the factors most frequently mentioned for a successful implementation of leagility in the healthcare sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueying Li
- Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Avenida das Forças Armadas, 1649-026, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Department of Medical Education, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Ana Lúcia Martins
- Business Research Unit (BRU-IUL), ISCTE-University Institute of Lisbon, Avenida das Forças Armadas, 1649-026, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jacobs M, Martinussen H, Swart R, Gubbels A, Dirkx M, de Boer H, Speijer G, Mondriaan K, de Jaeger K, Cuijpers J, Mast M, de Vreugt F, Boersma L. A taskforce for national improvement of innovation implementation in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2024; 192:110105. [PMID: 38244780 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Previous research among Dutch radiotherapy centres (RTCs) showed that 69% of innovations was simultaneously implemented in 7/19 centres, with a success rate of 51%. However, no structure to share lessons learned about the implementation process existed. Therefore, a national Taskforce Implementation (TTI) was raised to stimulate efficient implementation of innovations. The aim of the current study was to develop and pilot-evaluate a website for facilitating mutual learning on implementation issues. MATERIAL AND METHODS First, we made an inventory in all Dutch RTCs on their 10 most valuable innovations between 2019 and 2022. In-depth interviews, structured according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, were performed on the four most mentioned topics. A website was built, and pilot evaluated 1 year after the launch, using a qualitative survey amongst the TTI members. RESULTS In 13/18 centres, 19 interviews were conducted on 1) automation, 2) patient participation, 3) adaptive radiotherapy 4) surface guided radiotherapy and tracking. Most innovations (13/16) were implemented with a delay, with many comparable challenges: e.g. shortage of personnel (7/16) and prioritization of projects (9/16). The website allows users to upload and search for projects, including implementation experiences. After 1 year, 14 projects were uploaded. The qualitative evaluation was largely positive with room for improvement, i.e.75 % would recommend the website to others. CONCLUSION This study showed that RTCs experience comparable challenges when implementing innovations, thereby underlining the need for a platform to share implementation-lessons learned. The first concept of this platform was evaluated positively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Jacobs
- Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
| | - Hanneke Martinussen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rachelle Swart
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne Gubbels
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten Dirkx
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hans de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Gabrielle Speijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Karin Mondriaan
- Radiotherapeutisch Instituut Friesland, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Katrien de Jaeger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Johan Cuijpers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Mast
- Haaglanden Medical Center, Department of radiation oncology, Leidschendam, the Netherlands
| | - Floortje de Vreugt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|