Jembrana disease virus Vif antagonizes the inhibition of bovine APOBEC3 proteins through ubiquitin-mediate protein degradation

The roles of nucleic acid editing in adaptation of zoonotic viruses to humans

Following spillover, viruses must adapt to new selection pressures exerted by antiviral responses in their new hosts. In mammals, cellular defense mechanisms often include viral nucleic acid editing pathways mediated through protein families apolipoprotein-B mRNA-editing complex (APOBEC) and Adenosine Deaminase Acting on ribonucleic acid (ADAR). APOBECs induce C→U transitions in viral genomes; the APOBEC locus is highly polymorphic with variable numbers of APOBEC3 paralogs and target preferences in humans and other mammals. APOBEC3 paralogs have shaped the evolutionary history of human immunodeficiency virus, with compelling bioinformatic evidence also for its mutagenic impact on monkeypox virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. ADAR-1 induces adenose-to-inosine (A→I) substitutions in double-stranded ribonucleic acid (RNA); its role in virus adaptation is less clear, as are epigenetic modifications to viral genomes, such as methylation. Nucleic acid editing restricts evolutionary space in which viruses can explore and may restrict viral-host range.

Study of the Genetic Expression of Antiretroviral Restriction Factors and Acute Phase Proteins in Cattle Infected with Bovine Leukemia Virus

The goal of this study was to analyze the genetic expression of antiretroviral restriction factors (ARF) and acute phase proteins (APP), as well as their correlation with proviral and viral loads in cattle with aleukemic (AL) and persistent lymphocytosis (PL). Complete blood samples were collected from a herd of dairy cows, and we extracted genetic material from peripheral blood leukocytes. Absolute quantification of the expression of ARF (APOBEC-Z1, Z2, and Z3; HEXIM-1, HEXIM-2, and BST2) and APP (haptoglobin (HP), and serum amyloid A (SAA)) was performed by qPCR. Statistical significance was observed in the expression of APOBEC-Z3 in BLV-infected animals. We only found positive correlations with a strong expression of the ARF genes in the AL group. The participation of APOBEC (Z1 and Z3), HEXIM-1, and HEXIM-2 was more frequently identified in BLV-infected animals. HEXIM-2 showed active gene expression in the AL group. Although the expression of ARF in early stages of infection (AL) maintains an important participation, in late stages (PL) it seems to have little relevance.

Retroviral Restriction Factors and Their Viral Targets: Restriction Strategies and Evolutionary Adaptations

The evolutionary conflict between retroviruses and their vertebrate hosts over millions of years has led to the emergence of cellular innate immune proteins termed restriction factors as well as their viral antagonists. Evidence accumulated in the last two decades has substantially increased our understanding of the elaborate mechanisms utilized by these restriction factors to inhibit retroviral replication, mechanisms that either directly block viral proteins or interfere with the cellular pathways hijacked by the viruses. Analyses of these complex interactions describe patterns of accelerated evolution for these restriction factors as well as the acquisition and evolution of their virus-encoded antagonists. Evidence is also mounting that many restriction factors identified for their inhibition of specific retroviruses have broader antiviral activity against additional retroviruses as well as against other viruses, and that exposure to these multiple virus challenges has shaped their adaptive evolution. In this review, we provide an overview of the restriction factors that interfere with different steps of the retroviral life cycle, describing their mechanisms of action, adaptive evolution, viral targets and the viral antagonists that evolved to counter these factors.

CAEV Vif Hijacks ElonginB/C, CYPA and Cullin5 to Assemble the E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Complex Stepwise to Degrade oaA3Z2-Z3

Caprine arthritis encephalitis virus (CAEV) is a lentivirus that causes multisystemic chronic disorders in sheep and goats. It encodes Vif to counteract the restriction of Ovis aries A3Z2-Z3 (oaA3Z2-Z3) by inducing their degradation. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying the interplay between CAEV Vif and OaA3Z2-Z3 have yet to be elucidated. Here, we identified the cellular factors ElonginB/C, CYPA and Cullin5 as being hijacked by CAEV Vif as well as several functional domains of CAEV Vif required for degrading oaA3Z2-Z3. Moreover, we determined that CAEV Vif assembled E3 ubiquitin ligase stepwise via its SLE motif (170SLE172) to recruit ElonginB/C, the P21 site and the zinc finger motif (C132-C134-C154-C157) to recruit CYPA, as well as the hydrophobic domain (141IR142) to recruit Cullin5. And this CAEV Vif-mediated E3 ligase triggers the proteasomal degradation of oaA3Z2-Z3, which directly bind CAEV Vif through residues Y39 and L44. In particular, CYPA played an essential role in the process to regulate ligase assembly, which was analogous to CBF-β, the essential regulator for HIV-1 and SIV-mediated E3 ligase, indicating that there is a modular conservation and lineage-specific preference for cellular partners required by Vifs from different subgroups of lentiviruses. Taken together, these findings provide important insights regarding the CAEV Vif function and deepen our understanding of the arms race between the lentiviruses and their hosts.

Prospects in Innate Immune Responses as Potential Control Strategies against Non-Primate Lentiviruses

Lentiviruses are infectious agents of a number of animal species, including sheep, goats, horses, monkeys, cows, and cats, in addition to humans. As in the human case, the host immune response fails to control the establishment of chronic persistent infection that finally leads to a specific disease development. Despite intensive research on the development of lentivirus vaccines, it is still not clear which immune responses can protect against infection. Viral mutations resulting in escape from T-cell or antibody-mediated responses are the basis of the immune failure to control the infection. The innate immune response provides the first line of defense against viral infections in an antigen-independent manner. Antiviral innate responses are conducted by dendritic cells, macrophages, and natural killer cells, often targeted by lentiviruses, and intrinsic antiviral mechanisms exerted by all cells. Intrinsic responses depend on the recognition of the viral pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs), and the signaling cascades leading to an antiviral state by inducing the expression of antiviral proteins, including restriction factors. This review describes the latest advances on innate immunity related to the infection by animal lentiviruses, centered on small ruminant lentiviruses (SRLV), equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV), and feline (FIV) and bovine immunodeficiency viruses (BIV), specifically focusing on the antiviral role of the major restriction factors described thus far.