Surveillance and characterization of low pathogenic H5 avian influenza viruses isolated from wild migratory birds in Korea

Genetic characterization of a new candidate hemagglutinin subtype of influenza A viruses

AbstractAvian influenza viruses (AIV) have been classified on the basis of 16 subtypes of hemagglutinin (HA) and 9 subtypes of neuraminidase. Here we describe genomic evidence for a new candidate HA subtype, nominally H19, with a large genetic distance to all previously described AIV subtypes, derived from a cloacal swab sample of a Common Pochard (Aythya ferina) in Kazakhstan, in 2008. Avian influenza monitoring in wild birds especially in migratory hotspots such as central Asia is an important approach to gain information about the circulation of known and novel influenza viruses. Genetically, the novel HA coding sequence exhibits only 68.2% nucleotide and 68.5% amino acid identity with its nearest relation in the H9 (N2) subtype. The new HA sequence should be considered in current genomic diagnostic AI assays to facilitate its detection and eventual isolation enabling further study and antigenic classification.

Predictive analysis for pathogenicity classification of H5Nx avian influenza strains using machine learning techniques

Over the past decades, avian influenza (AI) outbreaks have been reported across different parts of the globe, resulting in large-scale economic and livestock loss and, in some cases raising concerns about their zoonotic potential. The virulence and pathogenicity of H5Nx (e.g., H5N1, H5N2) AI strains for poultry could be inferred through various approaches, and it has been frequently performed by detecting certain pathogenicity markers in their haemagglutinin (HA) gene. The utilization of predictive modeling methods represents a possible approach to exploring this genotypic-phenotypic relationship for assisting experts in determining the pathogenicity of circulating AI viruses. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance of different machine learning (ML) techniques for in-silico prediction of pathogenicity of H5Nx viruses in poultry, using complete genetic sequences of the HA gene. We annotated 2137 H5Nx HA gene sequences based on the presence of the polybasic HA cleavage site (HACS) with 46.33% and 53.67% of sequences previously identified as highly pathogenic (HP) and low pathogenic (LP), respectively. We compared the performance of different ML classifiers (e.g., logistic regression (LR) with the lasso and ridge regularization, random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Naïve Bayes (NB), support vector machine (SVM), and convolutional neural network (CNN)) for pathogenicity classification of raw H5Nx nucleotide and protein sequences using a 10-fold cross-validation technique. We found that different ML techniques can be successfully used for the pathogenicity classification of H5 sequences with ∼99% classification accuracy. Our results indicate that for pathogenicity classification of (1) aligned deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and protein sequences, with NB classifier had the lowest accuracies of 98.41% (+/-0.89) and 98.31% (+/-1.06), respectively; (2) aligned DNA and protein sequences, with LR (L1/L2), KNN, SVM (radial basis function (RBF)) and CNN classifiers had the highest accuracies of 99.20% (+/-0.54) and 99.20% (+/-0.38), respectively; (3) unaligned DNA and protein sequences, with CNN's achieved accuracies of 98.54% (+/-0.68) and 99.20% (+/-0.50), respectively. ML methods show potential for regular classification of H5Nx virus pathogenicity for poultry species, particularly when sequences containing regular markers were frequently present in the training dataset.

A literature review of the use of environmental sampling in the surveillance of avian influenza viruses

This literature review provides an overview of use of environmental samples (ES) such as faeces, water, air, mud and swabs of surfaces in avian influenza (AI) surveillance programs, focussing on effectiveness, advantages and gaps in knowledge. ES have been used effectively for AI surveillance since the 1970s. Results from ES have enhanced understanding of the biology of AI viruses in wild birds and in markets, of links between human and avian influenza, provided early warning of viral incursions, allowed assessment of effectiveness of control and preventive measures, and assisted epidemiological studies in outbreaks, both avian and human. Variation exists in the methods and protocols used, and no internationally recognized guidelines exist on the use of ES and data management. Few studies have performed direct comparisons of ES versus live bird samples (LBS). Results reported so far demonstrate reliance on ES will not be sufficient to detect virus in all cases when it is present, especially when the prevalence of infection/contamination is low. Multiple sample types should be collected. In live bird markets, ES from processing/selling areas are more likely to test positive than samples from bird holding areas. When compared to LBS, ES is considered a cost-effective, simple, rapid, flexible, convenient and acceptable way of achieving surveillance objectives. As a non-invasive technique, it can minimize effects on animal welfare and trade in markets and reduce impacts on wild bird communities. Some limitations of environmental sampling methods have been identified, such as the loss of species-specific or information on the source of virus, and taxonomic-level analyses, unless additional methods are applied. Some studies employing ES have not provided detailed methods. In others, where ES and LBS are collected from the same site, positive results have not been assigned to specific sample types. These gaps should be remedied in future studies.

Genetic characteristics and pathogenesis of H5 low pathogenic avian influenza viruses from wild birds and domestic ducks in South Korea

H5 and H7 subtypes of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses (LPAIVs) can mutate to highly pathogenic forms and are therefore subject to stringent controls. We characterized H5 LPAIVs isolated from wild-bird habitats and duck farms in South Korea from 2010 to 2017. Through nationwide active surveillance for AIVs, 59 H5 LPAIVs were isolated from wild-bird habitats (a mean annual rate of 5.3% of AIV isolations). In 2015, one LPAI H5N3 strain was isolated on a duck farm. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the hemagglutinin (HA) gene of H5 isolates belonged to the Eurasian lineage, classified into three subgroups (HA-II, HA-III, and HA-IV). The H5 LPAIVs of the HA-III and HA-IV subgroups appeared in 2015 and 2017 in unusually high proportions (13.1% and 14.4%, respectively). In gene-constellation analysis, H5 LPAIVs isolated from 2015 to 2017 constituted ≥ 35 distinct genotypes, representing high levels of genetic diversity. Representative strains of three HA subgroups replicated restrictively in specific-pathogen-free chickens. Among the 11 isolates that were tested, 10 infected and replicated in mice without prior adaptation. The frequency of recent H5 LPAIV isolates with high genetic diversity indicates the importance of continued surveillance in both wild birds and poultry to monitor genetic and pathobiological changes.

Pathogenicity and transmissibility of clade 2.3.4.4 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N6 in pigeons

Pigeons were previously thought to be resistant to H5 viruses and to play a minimal role in spreading these viruses. In this study, we evaluated the pathogenicity of two clade 2.3.4.4 H5N6 viruses in pigeons and the potential viral transmissibility to specific-pathogen-free chickens in direct close contact with experimentally infected pigeons. No pigeons from the A/goose/Eastern China/Xin/2015 (GS/Xin) group exhibited clinical signs or mortality, and the virus was only detected in a few organs. However, 3 of 12 pigeons inoculated with the A/goose/Eastern China/0326/2015 (GS/0326) virus died, and 7 of 12 showed neurological symptoms and efficient viral replication in multiple organs. In both groups, viral shedding occurred in only some of the pigeons, the shedding period was relatively short, and the infection was not transmitted to the chickens. We also used chicken, duck, and BALB/c mouse models to evaluate the pathogenicity of the two H5N6 isolates. Both H5N6 isolates showed highly pathogenic to chickens but different degrees of pathogenicity in mice. Interestingly, in ducks, the intravenous pathogenicity index indicated that the GS/Xin isolate was low pathogenic, and the GS/0326 isolate was highly pathogenic, corresponding to the pathogenicity in pigeons. Our results indicated that the pathogenicity of the clade 2.3.4.4 H5N6 virus is diverse in pigeons, and pigeons contribute little to its transmission among poultry. However, pigeons may still be potential healthy reservoirs of the H5N6 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus.

Phylogenetic Study of H5 Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza Viruses Detected in Wild Birds in Poland in 2010-2015

Introduction

The genomes of nine H5 subtypes of low pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAIV) strains identified in wild birds in Poland between 2010 and 2015 were sequenced, and their phylogenetic relationship was determined.

Material and Methods

AIV genome segments were amplified by RT-PCR and the PCR products were sequenced using Sanger method. Phylogenetic trees were generated in MEGA6 software and digital genotyping approach was used to visualise the relationship between analysed strains and other AIVs.

Results

High genetic diversity was found in the analysed strains as multiple subgroups were identified in phylogenetic trees. In the HA tree, Polish strains clustered in two distinct subclades. High diversity was found for PB2, PB1, PA and NP, since 5-8 sublineages could be distinguished. Each strain had a different gene constellation, although relationship of as much as six out of eight gene segments was observed between two isolates. A relationship with poultry isolates was found for at least one segment of each Polish strain.

Conclusion

The genome configuration of tested strains indicates extensive reassortment, although the preference for specific gene constellation could be noticed. A significant relationship with isolates of poultry origin underlines the need for constant monitoring of the AIV gene pool circulating in the natural reservoir.

Characterization of mutations associated with the adaptation of a low-pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus to chicken embryos

Migratory waterfowls are the most common reservoir for avian influenza virus (AIV), thus viral adaptation is required for efficient replication in land fowls. To date, low pathogenic (LP) H5 subtype AIVs have been isolated from migratory waterfowls, and the adaptation of these viruses to land fowls might lead to the generation of highly pathogenic AIVs. Thus, A/wild duck/Korea/50-5/2009 (H5N1) LPAIV was passaged 20 times through embryonated chicken eggs (ECEs), and the resulting genetic and phenotypic changes were investigated. The pathogenicities of the early (50-5-E2) and final passage (50-5-E20) strains to chicken embryos were similarly high, but the 50-5-E20 titer was 100 times higher than that of 50-5-E2. 50-5-E20 showed 8 amino acid changes in PA (1), HA (4), NA (1), M1 (1) and M2 (1), with different frequencies among influenza A viruses (0-99.6%). The relevance of these changes, except H103Y in HA, to viral replication remains unknown. To investigate the roles of internal genes and mutations in HA and NA in viral replication, four recombinant viruses possessing combinations of HA and NA genes of 50-5-E2 and 50-5-E20 with 6 internal genes of PR8 were generated through reverse genetics. The embryo pathogenicities of the H5N1 recombinant viruses carrying internal PR8 genes were reduced, and the titers of the recombinant viruses with 50-5-E20 HA were higher than those with 50-5-E2 HA. Therefore, the identified mutations might be useful as chicken adaptation markers for the generation of high growth H5N1 recombinant viruses in ECEs.

Low-pathogenic avian influenza viruses in wild house mice

BACKGROUND

Avian influenza viruses are known to productively infect a number of mammal species, several of which are commonly found on or near poultry and gamebird farms. While control of rodent species is often used to limit avian influenza virus transmission within and among outbreak sites, few studies have investigated the potential role of these species in outbreak dynamics.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

We trapped and sampled synanthropic mammals on a gamebird farm in Idaho, USA that had recently experienced a low pathogenic avian influenza outbreak. Six of six house mice (Mus musculus) caught on the outbreak farm were presumptively positive for antibodies to type A influenza. Consequently, we experimentally infected groups of naïve wild-caught house mice with five different low pathogenic avian influenza viruses that included three viruses derived from wild birds and two viruses derived from chickens. Virus replication was efficient in house mice inoculated with viruses derived from wild birds and more moderate for chicken-derived viruses. Mean titers (EID(50) equivalents/mL) across all lung samples from seven days of sampling (three mice/day) ranged from 10(3.89) (H3N6) to 10(5.06) (H4N6) for the wild bird viruses and 10(2.08) (H6N2) to 10(2.85) (H4N8) for the chicken-derived viruses. Interestingly, multiple regression models indicated differential replication between sexes, with significantly (p<0.05) higher concentrations of avian influenza RNA found in females compared with males.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

Avian influenza viruses replicated efficiently in wild-caught house mice without adaptation, indicating mice may be a risk pathway for movement of avian influenza viruses on poultry and gamebird farms. Differential virus replication between males and females warrants further investigation to determine the generality of this result in avian influenza disease dynamics.

Virulence and genetic compatibility of polymerase reassortant viruses derived from the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus and circulating influenza A viruses

Gene mutations and reassortment are key mechanisms by which influenza A virus acquires virulence factors. To evaluate the role of the viral polymerase replication machinery in producing virulent pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza viruses, we generated various polymerase point mutants (PB2, 627K/701N; PB1, expression of PB1-F2 protein; and PA, 97I) and reassortant viruses with various sources of influenza viruses by reverse genetics. Although the point mutations produced no significant change in pathogenicity, reassortment between the pandemic A/California/04/09 (CA04, H1N1) and current human and animal influenza viruses produced variants possessing a broad spectrum of pathogenicity in the mouse model. Although most polymerase reassortants had attenuated pathogenicity (including those containing seasonal human H3N2 and high-pathogenicity H5N1 virus segments) compared to that of the parental CA04 (H1N1) virus, some recombinants had significantly enhanced virulence. Unexpectedly, one of the five highly virulent reassortants contained a A/Swine/Korea/JNS06/04(H3N2)-like PB2 gene with no known virulence factors; the other four had mammalian-passaged avian-like genes encoding PB2 featuring 627K, PA featuring 97I, or both. Overall, the reassorted polymerase complexes were only moderately compatible for virus rescue, probably because of disrupted molecular interactions involving viral or host proteins. Although we observed close cooperation between PB2 and PB1 from similar virus origins, we found that PA appears to be crucial in maintaining viral gene functions in the context of the CA04 (H1N1) virus. These observations provide helpful insights into the pathogenic potential of reassortant influenza viruses composed of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza virus and prevailing human or animal influenza viruses that could emerge in the future.