An application of threshold-versus-intensity functions in automated static perimetry

Retinal sensitivity changes in early/intermediate AMD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of visual field testing under mesopic and scotopic lighting

Visual fields under mesopic and scotopic lighting are increasingly being used for macular functional assessment. This review evaluates its statistical significance and clinical relevance, and the optimal testing protocol for early/intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD). PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to 14/05/2022. All quality assessments were performed according to GRADE guidelines. The primary outcome was global mean sensitivity (MS), further meta-analysed by: AMD classification scheme, device, test pattern, mesopic/scotopic lighting, stimuli size/chromaticity, pupil dilation, testing radius (area), background luminance, adaptation time, AMD severity, reticular pseudodrusen presence, and follow-up visit. From 1489 studies screened, 42 observational study results contributed to the primary meta-analysis. Supported by moderate GRADE certainty of the evidence, global MS was significantly reduced across all devices under mesopic and scotopic lighting with large effect size (-0.9 [-1.04, -0.75] Hedge's g, P < 0.0001). The device (P < 0.01) and lighting (P < 0.05) used were the only modifiable factors affecting global MS, whereby the mesopic MP-1 and MAIA produced the largest effect sizes and exceeded test-retest variabilities. Global MS was significantly affected by AMD severity (intermediate versus early AMD; -0.58 [-0.88, -0.29] Hedge's g or -2.55 [3.62, -1.47] MAIA-dB) and at follow-up visit (versus baseline; -0.62 [-0.84, -0.41] Hedge's g or -1.61[-2.69, -0.54] MAIA-dB). Magnitudes of retinal sensitivity changes in early/intermediate AMD are clinically relevant for the MP-1 and MAIA devices under mesopic lighting within the central 10° radius. Other factors including pupil dilation and dark adaptation did not significantly affect global MS in early/intermediate AMD.

Mechanisms of cone sensitivity loss in retinitis pigmentosa

PURPOSE

To explore the mechanisms of cone sensitivity loss in retinitis pigmentosa by combining two-colour perimetry with threshold versus intensity (tvi) testing.

METHODS

Seven subjects with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa and 10 normal subjects were recruited and underwent perimetric testing of one eye using 480- and 640-nm Goldman size V targets presented under scotopic conditions (no background illumination) and against a white background ranging in luminance from -1.5 to 2 log cd m-2 in 0.5 log cd m-2 steps. Data were fitted with tvi functions of the form logT = logT0 + log ((A + A0)/A0)n, where T is the threshold, T0 is the absolute threshold, A is the background intensity, A0 is the 'dark-light' constant and n is a gain constant.

RESULTS

Reliable tvi functions could not be obtained within the region of the visual field corresponding to loss of the ellipsoid zone on optical coherence tomography. At fixation, changes in both T0 and A0 were observed, consistent with a d1 mechanism loss, which resulted in an upwards and rightwards shift of the tvi function. Losses at [±3°, ±3°] demonstrated changes in T0, consistent with a d3 mechanism loss, resulting in an upwards translation of the tvi curve.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the absolute cone threshold was elevated at each location, shifts in the tvi function (so-called d1 mechanism loss) at fixation minimise threshold elevation in the presence of white adapting backgrounds, such as those typically employed in standard two-colour perimetry. At more peripheral testing locations, changes in threshold occurred independent of background luminance (so-called d3 mechanism loss). These findings suggest that backgrounds which selectively adapt rods while maintaining cones at, or near, absolute threshold may be preferable to conventional two-colour perimetry for assessing loss of cone sensitivity, especially at the point of fixation.

Spatial Cluster Patterns of Retinal Sensitivity Loss in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration Features

Purpose

To examine spatial patterns of retinal sensitivity loss in the three key features of intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD).

Methods

One-hundred individuals (53 iAMD, 47 normal) underwent 10-2 mesopic microperimetry testing in one eye. Pointwise sensitivities (dB) were corrected for age, sex, iAMD status, and co-presence of co-localized key iAMD features: drusen load, pigmentary abnormalities, and reticular pseudodrusen (RPD). Clusters (labeled by ranks of magnitude C-2, C-1, C0) were derived from pointwise sensitivities and then assessed by quadrants and eccentricity/rings.

Results

Two clusters of decreased sensitivities were evident in iAMD versus normal: C-2, -1.67 dB (95% CI (confidence intervals), -2.36 to -0.98; P < 0.0001); C-1, -0.93 dB (95% CI, -1.5 to -0.36; P < 0.01). One cluster of decreased sensitivity was independently associated each with increased drusen load (13.57 µm increase per -1 dB; P < 0.0001), pigmentary abnormalities (C-1: -2.23 dB; 95% CI, -3.36 to -1.1; P < 0.01), and RPD (C-1: -1.07 dB; 95% CI, -2 to -0.14; P < 0.01). Sensitivity loss in iAMD was biased toward the superior and central macula (P = 0.16 to <0.0001), aligning with structural distributions of features. However, sensitivity loss associated with drusen load also extended to the peripheral macula (P < 0.0001) with paracentral sparing, which was discordant with the central distribution of drusen.

Conclusions

Drusen load, pigmentary abnormalities, and RPD are associated with patterns of retinal sensitivity loss commonly demonstrating superior and central bias. Results highlighted that a clinical focus on these three key iAMD features using structural measures alone does not capture the complex, spatial extent of vision-related functional impairment in iAMD.

Translational Relevance

Defining the spatial patterns of retinal sensitivity loss in iAMD can facilitate a targeted visual field protocol for iAMD assessment.

Should clinical automated perimetry be considered for routine functional assessment of early/intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD)? A systematic review of current literature

Purpose

There is growing interest in functional testing for early/intermediate age‐related macular degeneration (iAMD). However, systematic evaluation of existing clinical functional tests is lacking. This systematic review examines evidence for using clinical automated perimetry in routine assessment of early/iAMD.

Recent findings

PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and Embase were searched from inception to October 2020 to answer, is there evidence of visual field defects in early/iAMD, and if so, are early/iAMD visual field defects linked to real‐world patient outcomes? Articles using clinical automated perimetry (commercially accessible and non‐modified devices/protocols) were included. Microperimetry was excluded as this has yet to be incorporated into clinical guidelines. The primary outcome was global visual field indices including mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), mean sensitivity (MS) and frequency of defects. The secondary outcome was any real‐world patient outcome including quality of life and/or activities of daily living indices. Twenty‐six studies were eligible for inclusion and all studies were observational. There was consistent evidence of worsened MD, PSD, MS and frequency of defects for early/iAMD compared to normal eyes under photopic, low‐photopic and scotopic conditions. Meta‐analysis of studies using standard automated perimetry (SAP) under photopic conditions revealed worsened MD (−1.52dB [−2.27, −0.78 dB]) and MS (−1.47dB [−2, −0.94 dB]) in early/iAMD compared to normal eyes, representing large statistical effect sizes but non‐clinically meaningful reductions. There was insufficient data for meta‐analyses regarding other clinical automated perimetry protocols. Only one study assessed a real‐world patient outcome (on‐road driving performance), with no significant link to visual field outcomes in early/iAMD.

Summary

Significant reduction of global visual field indices is present in early/iAMD, but not clinically meaningful using SAP under photopic conditions. Translational relevance of visual field outcomes to patient outcomes in early/iAMD remains unclear. Thus, SAP under photopic conditions is unlikely to be useful for routine assessment of early/iAMD.

Threshold versus intensity functions in two-colour automated perimetry

PURPOSE

Two-colour computerised perimetry is a technique developed for assessing cone- and rod-function at fixed background luminances in retinal disease. However, the state of adaptation during testing is unknown but crucial in the interpretation of results. We therefore aimed to determine the adaptational state of rod- and cone-mechanisms in two-colour perimetry.

METHODS

Sensitivity to 480 nm (blue) and 640 nm (red) Goldmann size V targets was determined for 10 normal subjects aged 16 to 46 years at 17 locations in the central 60 degrees of the visual field under scotopic conditions and then from -1.5 log cd m^-2 to 2 log cd m^-2 (white background) in 0.5 log unit steps. Data were fitted with threshold versus intensity (tvi) functions of the form logT = logT₀ + log ((A + A₀ )/A₀ )ⁿ .

RESULTS

No clear rod-cone break was observed for 640 nm stimuli. For 480 nm stimuli, transition from rod-detection to cone-detection occurred at mesopic illumination levels, where rod adaptation approached Weber behaviour. Cone detection mechanisms did not display Weber-like adaptation until the background luminance approached 1 log cd.m^-2 . Diseases resulting in a "filter effect" - including disorders of the photoreceptors - are therefore predicted to affect sensitivity when rod function is probed with short-wavelength targets under scotopic conditions, but less so under mesopic conditions. Filter effects are similarly anticipated to affect cone function measured using long-wavelength targets under mesopic conditions (e.g., during microperimetry), but less so under photopic conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Asymmetries in adaptation in automated two-colour perimetry are predicted to artefactually favour the detection of losses in rod sensitivity under scotopic conditions and cones under mesopic conditions.

The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives

White‐on‐white standard automated perimetry (SAP) is widely used in clinical and research settings for assessment of contrast sensitivity using incremental light stimuli across the visual field. It is one of the main functional measures of the effect of disease upon the visual system. SAP has evolved over the last 40 years to become an indispensable tool for comprehensive assessment of visual function. In modern clinical practice, a range of objective measurements of ocular structure, such as optical coherence tomography, have also become invaluable additions to the arsenal of the ophthalmic examination. Although structure‐function correlation is a highly desirable determinant of an unambiguous clinical picture for a patient, in practice, clinicians are often faced with discordance of structural and functional results, which presents them with a challenge. The construction principles behind the development of SAP are used to discuss the interpretation of visual fields, as well as the problem of structure‐function discordance. Through illustrative clinical examples, we provide useful insights to assist clinicians in combining a range of clinical results obtained from SAP and from advanced imaging techniques into a coherent picture that can help direct clinical management.

Comparison between MP-1 and Humphrey visual field defects in glaucoma and retinitis pigmentosa

PURPOSE

To compare MP-1 microperimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) defects, in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), a disease primarily affecting the photoreceptors, and in patients with glaucoma, a disease primarily affecting postreceptoral ganglion cells, and to analyze the similarities and differences between the results.

METHODS

Eleven patients (11 eyes) with RP and 10 patients (10 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma (OAG) underwent MP-1 and HFA visual field testing (10-2 pattern). All tested eyes had defects encroaching within 10° of fixation. MP-1 total deviation (TD) probability defects, derived from a previously collected normative database of 50 subjects, were compared to HFA TD defects and to the local defect map of the MP-1. Test duration was compared between instruments.

RESULTS

In RP patients, MP-1 scotomata were deeper and wider than HFA defects; however in OAG, the opposite was observed. Examination duration in both patient groups was 12 to 14 min for the MP-1 and 6 min for the HFA. The MP-1 local defect map tended to overestimate defects compared to the MP-1 TD analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The differences in results between the MP-1 and HFA for the two groups of patients with RP and OAG can be attributed to the different adaptation levels and to the dynamic range of test lights available for the two instruments. The clinician should also be aware of the possible consequences of the differences in the method of derivation of normative data for the two instruments, as this may affect the interpretation of visual field results.