Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage

Spatial constraints of binocularly matched information on perceived depth resulted from temporal interocular asynchrony

Quantitative depth of a subjective occluding surface could only be perceived when binocularly matched information is presented along with temporal interocular unmatched (IOUM) information [1]. However, it is still unclear whether the horizontal separation that binocularly matched information is presented from the occluding surface edge would affect the quantitative depth perception. In the present study we aim to answer this question by manipulating the distance between binocularly matched and IOUM information in spatial domains. In Experiment 1, we examined the spatial limitation of binocular matched information along horizontal axes by measuring the threshold for quantitatively perceiving depth from temporal interocular asynchrony. In Experiment 2, within the threshold, temporal IOUM information was presented at three distances from the matched information along horizontal axes, respectively. Our results from these experiments showed a robust effect of binocular information in generating quantitative perceived depth from IOUM information in spatial domains. Moreover, the perceived depth of the subjective surface can be significantly influenced by spatial separations along horizontal axes. This may help to propose a computational theory of the mechanisms underlying "da Vinci stereopsis" in motion and other stereoscopic percepts.

Simulation of Driving in Low-Visibility Conditions: Does Stereopsis Improve Speed Perception?

Laboratory-based studies of perceived speed show that, under most circumstances, perceived speed is reduced as a function of contrast. However, a recent investigation of perceived vehicular speed while driving around a closed road circuit showed no such effect (Owens, Wood, & Carberry, 2010, Perception, 39: , 1199-1215). We sought to probe the source of this discrepancy, asking whether the presence or absence of stereoscopic motion information might account for the difference in results. In a two-alternative forced-choice psychophysical speed-discrimination task, observers compared the speed of high- and low-contrast driving clips filmed with a 3-D camera and presented either stereoscopically (3-D) or monoscopically (2-D). Although perceived speed was reduced at low contrast, the size of this misperception was equivalent for 2-D and 3-D presentations. However, the inclusion of stereoscopic cues to vehicular speed caused significant improvements in the precision of speed judgments. It is concluded that although stereopsis can provide access to valuable information on perceived speed, contrast-independent speed estimation as demonstrated by Owens et al. (2010) is more likely to reflect the use of the full visual field in a real driving situation (compared with limited field of view simulations), or the additional contributions of nonvisual cues rather than stereopsis.

The Stereoscopic Sliver: A Comparison of Duration Thresholds for Fully Stereoscopic and Unmatched Versions

Just as positional disparities of image features seen with both eyes provide depth information, the presence of an area visible to one eye but not the other within a binocularly viewed scene can indicate an occlusion at a depth discontinuity,. The close geometrical association between these two kinds of cues suggests they may both be exploited by stereopsis. To investigate this, we developed a novel binocular stimulus entirely lacking in classical disparity that contains an unmatched vertical sliver which elicits a warping of the surrounding surface to accommodate a depth discontinuity. We measured depth-discrimination performance at a range of stimulus durations, correcting for variations in stimulus visibility, to characterise the decline of the efficacy of the depth signal with limited integration time. Results show a close correspondence of performance for similar stimuli with unmatched features and classical binocular disparity across a sixtyfold range of viewing durations, supporting the notion of a close association between the two types of cues in human stereopsis. Control experiments excluded simple eye-of-origin cues and long-range false matches as explanatory factors.

Accuracy of stereomotion speed perception with persisting and dynamic textures

It has been established that the motion in depth of stimuli visible to both eyes may be signalled binocularly either by a change of disparity over time or by the difference in the velocity of the images projected on each retina, known as an interocular velocity difference. A two-interval forced-choice stereomotion speed discrimination experiment was performed on four participants to ascertain the relative speed of a persistent random dot stereogram (RDS) and a dynamic RDS undergoing directly approaching or receding motion in depth. While the persistent RDS pattern involved identical dot patterns translating in opposite directions in each eye, and hence included both changing disparity and interocular velocity difference cues, the dynamic RDS pattern (which contains no coherent monocular motion signals) specified motion in depth through changing disparity, but no motion through interocular velocity difference. Despite an interocular velocity difference speed signal of zero motion in depth, the dynamic RDS stimulus appeared to move more rapidly. These observations are consistent with a scheme in which cues that rely on coherent monocular motion signals (such as looming and the interocular velocity difference cue) are less influential in dynamic stimuli due to their lack of reliability (i.e., increased noise). While dynamic RDS stimuli may be relatively unaffected by the contributions of such cues when they signal that the stimulus did not move in depth, the persistent RDS stimulus may retain a significant and conflicting contribution from the looming cue, resulting in a lower perceived speed.

The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception

The mainstream of binocular vision research has long been focused on understanding how binocular disparity is used for depth perception. In recent years, researchers have begun to explore how monocular regions in binocularly viewed scenes contribute to our perception of the three-dimensional world. Here we review the field as it currently stands, with a focus on understanding the extent to which the role of monocular regions in depth perception can be understood using extant theories of binocular vision.

Stimulus motion propels traveling waves in binocular rivalry

State transitions in the nervous system often take shape as traveling waves, whereby one neural state is replaced by another across space in a wave-like manner. In visual perception, transitions between the two mutually exclusive percepts that alternate when the two eyes view conflicting stimuli (binocular rivalry) may also take shape as traveling waves. The properties of these waves point to a neural substrate of binocular rivalry alternations that have the hallmark signs of lower cortical areas. In a series of experiments, we show a potent interaction between traveling waves in binocular rivalry and stimulus motion. The course of the traveling wave is biased in the motion direction of the suppressed stimulus that gains dominance by means of the wave-like transition. Thus, stimulus motion may propel the traveling wave across the stimulus to the extent that the stimulus motion dictates the traveling wave's direction completely. Using a computational model, we show that a speed-dependent asymmetry in lateral inhibitory connections between retinotopically organized and motion-sensitive neurons can explain our results. We argue that such a change in suppressive connections may play a vital role in the resolution of dynamic occlusion situations.

Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis

Howard and Duke [Howard, I. P. & Duke, P. A. (2003). Monocular transparency generates quantitative depth. Vision Research, 43, 2615-2621] recently proposed a new source of binocular information they claim is used to recover depth in stereoscopic displays. They argued that these displays lack conventional disparity and that the metrical depth experienced results from transparency rather than occlusion relations. Using a variety of modified versions of their stimuli, we show here that the conditions for transparency are not required to elicit the depth experienced in their stereograms. We demonstrate that quantitative and precise depth depended not on the presence of transparency but horizontal contours of the same contrast polarity. Depth was attenuated, particularly at larger target offsets, when horizontal contours had opposite contrast polarity for at least a portion of their length. We also show that a demonstration they used to control for the role of horizontal contours can be understood with previously identified mechanisms involved in the computations associated with stereoscopic occlusion. These results imply that the findings reported by Howard and Duke can be understood with mechanisms responsible for the computation of binocular disparity and stereoscopic occlusion.