1
|
Smith ES, Crawford TJ. The inhibitory effect of a recent distractor: singleton vs. multiple distractors. Exp Brain Res 2024; 242:1745-1759. [PMID: 38819649 PMCID: PMC11208228 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06846-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
In the complex interplay between sensory and cognitive processes, the brain must sift through a flood of sensory data to pinpoint relevant signals. This selective mechanism is crucial for the effective control of behaviour, by allowing organisms to focus on important tasks and blocking out distractions. The Inhibition of a Recent Distractor (IRD) Task examines this selection process by exploring how inhibiting distractors influences subsequent eye movements towards an object in the visual environment. In a series of experiments, research by Crawford et al. (2005a) demonstrated a delayed response to a target appearing at the location that was previously occupied by a distractor, demonstrating a legacy inhibition exerted by the distractor on the spatial location of the upcoming target. This study aimed to replicate this effect and to investigate any potential constraints when multiple distractors are presented. Exploring whether the effect is observed in more ecologically relevant scenarios with multiple distractors is crucial for assessing the extent to which it can be applied to a broader range of environments. Experiment 1 successfully replicated the effect, showing a significant IRD effect only with a single distractor. Experiments 2-5 explored a number of possible explanations for this phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor S Smith
- Centre for Ageing Research, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YF, England
| | - Trevor J Crawford
- Centre for Ageing Research, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YF, England.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Readman MR, Polden M, Gibbs MC, Wareing L, Crawford TJ. The Potential of Naturalistic Eye Movement Tasks in the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease: A Review. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11111503. [PMID: 34827502 PMCID: PMC8615459 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11111503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Extensive research has demonstrated that eye-tracking tasks can effectively indicate cognitive impairment. For example, lab-based eye-tracking tasks, such as the antisaccade task, have robustly distinguished between people with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and healthy older adults. Due to the neurodegeneration associated with AD, people with AD often display extended saccade latencies and increased error rates on eye-tracking tasks. Although the effectiveness of using eye tracking to identify cognitive impairment appears promising, research considering the utility of eye tracking during naturalistic tasks, such as reading, in identifying cognitive impairment is limited. The current review identified 39 articles assessing eye-tracking distinctions between people with AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy controls when completing naturalistic task (reading, real-life simulations, static image search) or a goal-directed task involving naturalistic stimuli. The results revealed that naturalistic tasks show promising biomarkers and distinctions between healthy older adults and AD participants, and therefore show potential to be used for diagnostic and monitoring purposes. However, only twelve articles included MCI participants and assessed the sensitivity of measures to detect cognitive impairment in preclinical stages. In addition, the review revealed inconsistencies within the literature, particularly when assessing reading tasks. We urge researchers to expand on the current literature in this area and strive to assess the robustness and sensitivity of eye-tracking measures in both AD and MCI populations on naturalistic tasks.
Collapse
|
3
|
Polden M, Crawford TJ. Active visual inhibition is preserved in the presence of a distracter: A cross-cultural, ageing and dementia study. Cortex 2021; 142:169-185. [PMID: 34271261 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The current study investigated a novel visual distracter task as a potential diagnostic marker for the detection of cognitive impairment and the extent to which this compares in healthy ageing across two cultures. The Inhibition of a Recent Distracter Effect (IRD) refers to the inhibition of a saccadic eye movement towards a target that is presented at the location of a previous distracter. Two studies compared the IRD across a large cross-cultural sample comprising of young (N = 75), old European participants (N = 119), old south Asian participants (N = 83), participants with Dementia due to Alzheimer's disease (N = 65) and Mild cognitive impairment (N = 91). Significantly longer saccadic reaction times on the target to distracter trials, in comparison to the target to target trials were evident in all groups and age cohorts. Importantly, the IRD was also preserved in participants with Alzheimer's Disease and mild cognitive impairment demonstrating that the IRD is robust across cultures, age groups and clinical populations. Eye-tracking is increasingly used as a dual diagnostic and experimental probe for the investigation of cognitive control in Alzheimer's disease. As a promising methodology for the early diagnosis of dementia, it is important to understand the cognitive operations in relation to eye-tracking that are well preserved as well as those that are abnormal. Paradigms should also be validated across ethnicity/culture, clinical groups and age cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Polden
- Psychology Department, Centre for Ageing Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, England, UK.
| | - Trevor J Crawford
- Psychology Department, Centre for Ageing Research, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wilcockson TDW, Mardanbegi D, Sawyer P, Gellersen H, Xia B, Crawford TJ. Oculomotor and Inhibitory Control in Dyslexia. Front Syst Neurosci 2019; 12:66. [PMID: 30687026 PMCID: PMC6338055 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2018.00066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Previous research has suggested that people with dyslexia may have an impairment of inhibitory control. The oculomotor system is vulnerable to interference at various levels of the system, from high level cognitive control to peripheral neural pathways. Therefore, in this work we examined two forms of oculomotor inhibition and two forms of oculomotor interference at high and low levels of the control system. This study employed a prosaccade, antisaccade, and a recent distractor eye movement task (akin to a spatial negative priming) in order to explore high level cognitive control and the inhibition of a competing distractor. To explore low-level control we examined the frequency of microsaccades and post-saccade oscillations. The findings demonstrated that dyslexics have an impairment of volitional inhibitory control, reflected in the antisaccade task. In contrast, inhibitory control at the location of a competing distractor was equivalent in the dyslexic and non-dyslexic groups. There was no difference in the frequency of microsaccades between the two groups. However, the dyslexic group generated larger microsaccades prior to the target onset in the prosaccade and the antisaccade tasks.The groups did not differ in the frequency or in the morphology of the post-saccade oscillations. These findings reveal that the word reading and attentional difficulties of dyslexic readers cannot be attributed to an impairment in the inhibition of a visual distractor or interference from low-level oculomotor instability. We propose that the inhibitory impairment in dyslexia occurs at a higher cognitive level, perhaps in relation to the process of attentional disengagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas D W Wilcockson
- Centre for Ageing Research, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.,Sport Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom
| | - Diako Mardanbegi
- School of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Sawyer
- School Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Hans Gellersen
- School of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Baiqiang Xia
- School of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| | - Trevor J Crawford
- Centre for Ageing Research, Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang Y, Merrill EC. Response cost to repeated displays--when previous distractors become targets. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2015; 68:625-34. [PMID: 25666141 DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1007149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
A varied-target search task was used to evaluate the response cost of previous distractors becoming current targets in repeated visual search. We compared the relative contributions of distractor identity and location to producing response cost. During an exposure phase, half of the items were possible targets in each repeated display, and the other half were always distractors. Participants searched for a different target from the set of potential targets when the search displays were repeated. In the test phase of Experiments 1a and 1b, the roles of targets and distractors were reversed while the overall configuration was unchanged. Results indicated significant contextual costs after the switch of identities/locations between distractors and targets. In the test phase of Experiments 2a and 2b, target identities were changed again but the target locations remained the same. Less response cost was observed in this condition relative to when both identities and locations were changed. Proximity between target and distractors in the repeated displays also influenced response cost. The mechanisms responsible for the various response cost effects and the interplay between identity, location, and proximity in the production of response cost were discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingying Yang
- a Department of Psychology , The University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa , AL , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Donovan T, Crawford TJ, Litchfield D. Negative priming for target selection with saccadic eye movements. Exp Brain Res 2012; 222:483-94. [DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3234-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2012] [Accepted: 08/15/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
7
|
Amso D, Johnson SP. Development of Visual Selection in 3- to 9-Month-Olds: Evidence From Saccades to Previously Ignored Locations. INFANCY 2008; 13:675-686. [PMID: 19337575 DOI: 10.1080/15250000802459060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
We examined changes in the efficiency of visual selection over the first postnatal year with an adapted version of a spatial negative priming paradigm. In this task, when a previously ignored location becomes the target to be selected, responses to it are impaired, providing a measure of visual selection. Oculomotor latencies to target selection were the dependent measure. Each trial consisted of a prime and a probe presentation, separated by a 67-, 200-, or 550-msec interstimulus interval (ISI), to test the efficiency of selection as a function of processing time. In the prime, the target was accompanied by a distractor item. In the probe, the target appeared either in the location formerly occupied by the distractor (repeated distractor trials) or in one of the other two locations (control trials). We tested 41 infants in each of 3 age groups (3, 6, and 9 months) on the three different ISIs. Nine-month-old infants' saccade latencies were slowed on repeated distractors relative to control trials, given sufficiently long ISIs. Saccade latencies in the youngest two age groups showed only facilitation on repeated distractor trials at short ISIs. These results suggest that visual selection efficiency is a function of the interaction of the processing limitations of a system with environmental conditions, in this case the time allotted for the selection process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dima Amso
- Department of Psychiatry, Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alvarez TL, Beck KD, Ciuffreda KJ, Chua FB, Daftari A, DeMarco RM, Bergen MT, Servatius RJ. Brief intermittent light stimulation disrupts saccadic oculomotor control. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008; 28:354-64. [PMID: 18565091 DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00569.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study sought to determine the effect of very brief, single and multiple pulses of light on spatial and temporal aspects of saccadic eye movements. METHODS Twelve visually normal, young adult subjects participated in the experiments. Horizontal eye position was monitored as subjects attempted to track target step displacements in the presence of either single or multiple brief flashes of light in the visual field. RESULTS Three primary findings were observed: (1) increased saccadic latency, (2) increased time for target acquisition and (3) increased initial saccadic error. CONCLUSION The present findings suggest the influence of attentional processes and/or visual masking effects on saccadic eye movement control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara L Alvarez
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, University Heights, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Michael GA, Garcia S, Fernandez D, Sellal F, Boucart M. The ventral premotor cortex (VPM) and resistance to interference. Behav Neurosci 2006; 120:447-62. [PMID: 16719707 DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.2.447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The authors tested a patient suffering from a circumscribed lesion of the right frontal operculum (FO) in 3 experiments of visual attention involving spatial orienting, maintenance of task-relevant priorities, and control of interference from new and old task-irrelevant items. The authors found that spatial orienting and active maintenance of priorities were intact, but there were difficulties in controlling interference from new and old irrelevant items. These results suggest that the FO is necessary for the direct control of interference, but its lesion alone is not enough to disturb spatial orienting processes or active maintenance of task priorities. The authors discuss the results in light of a hybrid cognitive model of attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George A Michael
- Department of Cognitive Experimental Psychology and Neuropsychology, Laboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs, Université Lyon 2, Lyon, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|