Limitations of the ocular wavefront correction with contact lenses

Allowable movement of wavefront-guided contact lens corrections in normal and keratoconic eyes

PURPOSE

The goal was to use SyntEyes modelling to estimate the allowable alignment error of wavefront-guided rigid contact lens corrections for a range of normal and keratoconic eye aberration structures to keep objectively measured visual image quality at or above average levels of well-corrected normal eyes. Secondary purposes included determining the required radial order of correction, whether increased radial order of the corrections further constrained the allowable alignment error and how alignment constraints vary with keratoconus severity.

METHODS

Building on previous work, 20 normal SyntEyes and 20 keratoconic SyntEyes were fitted with optimised wavefront-guided rigid contact lens corrections targeting between three and eight radial orders that drove visual image quality, as measured objectively by the visual Strehl ratio, to near 1 (best possible) over a 5-mm pupil for the aligned position. The resulting wavefront-guided contact lens was then allowed to translate up to ±1 mm in the x- and y-directions and rotate up ±15°.

RESULTS

Allowable alignment error changed as a function of the magnitude of aberration structure to be corrected, which depends on keratoconus severity. This alignment error varied only slightly with the radial order of correction above the fourth radial order. To return the keratoconic SyntEyes to average levels of visual image quality depended on maximum anterior corneal curvature (Kmax). Acceptable tolerances for misalignment that returned keratoconic visual image quality to average normal levels varied between 0.29 and 0.63 mm for translation and approximately ±6.5° for rotation, depending on the magnitude of the aberration structure being corrected.

CONCLUSIONS

Allowable alignment errors vary as a function of the aberration structure being corrected, the desired goal for visual image quality and as a function of keratoconus severity.

Theoretical Effect of Coma and Spherical Aberrations Translation on Refractive Error and Higher Order Aberrations

(1) Background: The purpose of the study is to present a simple theoretical account of the effect of translation of coma and spherical aberrations (SA) on refractive error and higher order aberrations. (2) Methods: A computer software algorithm was implemented based on previously published methods. The effect of translation (0 to +1 mm) was analyzed for SA (0 to +2 µm) and coma (0 to +2 µm) for a circular pupil of 6 mm, without any rotation or scaling effect. The relationship amongst Zernike representations of various aberrations was analyzed under the influence of translation. (3) Results: The translation of +0.40 µm of SA (C[4,0]) by +0.25 mm with a pupil diameter of 6mm resulted in induction of tilt (C[1,1]), −0.03D defocus (C[2,0]), +0.03D astigmatism (C[2,2]) and +0.21 µm coma (C[3,1]). The translation of +0.4 µm of coma (C[3,1]) by +0.25 mm with a pupil diameter of 6 mm resulted in induction of tilt (C[1,1]), −0.13D defocus (C[2,0]) and +0.13D astigmatism (C[2,2]). A theoretical quantitative relationship between SA, coma, astigmatism and defocus is presented under the influence of translation. (4) Conclusion: The results can act as a guide for the clinician, in order to readily assess theoretical impact of wavefront map translation from pupil center to the visual axis. The resultant refractive coupling has to be taken into consideration especially when treating eyes with an abnormal corneal shape and/or large pupil center to corneal vertex chord.

Alignment of a wavefront-guided scleral lens correction in the presence of a lens capsulotomy

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the necessity of aligning a wavefront-guided scleral lens (WGSL) optical correction to the eye's effective pupil, with misalignments leading to reduced performance.

CASE REPORT

A 34 year old subject with a history of failed LASIK in the left eye, leading to penetrating keratoplasty, extracapsular extraction of the crystalline lens and neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy, enrolled in a study examining WGSL performance. Habitual logMAR acuity OS (aided with a scleral lens) was +0.04. Residual higher order root mean square (HORMS) wavefront error (WFE) was 0.28 μm (Φ =4.75 mm, mean age-matched norm =0.17 μm), and objective over-refraction was -0.30 -0.54 × 008. When a WGSL (targeting aberrations up to the 5 th radial order) was manufactured with the wavefront-guided optics aligned to the center of the dilated pupil, logMAR acuity worsened to +0.15, residual HORMS WFE worsened to 0.44 μm (Φ =4.75 mm), and objective over-refraction increased to +1.19 -0.30 × 122. Slit lamp imagery revealed that the effective pupil was no longer defined by the iris of the eye, but rather the capsular opening created by the capsulotomy. When the WGSL was redesigned to align the wavefront-guided optics to the center of the capsular opening, logMAR acuity improved to -0.14, residual HORMS WFE reduced to 0.17 μm (Φ =4.75 mm) and objective over-refraction reduced to +0.20 -0.15 × 111.

CONCLUSION

WGSLs are an emerging option for patients with highly aberrated, ectatic and post-surgical corneas whose visual symptoms cannot be alleviated with conventional corrections. However, alignment of the optics of the WGSL to the underlying optics of the eye over the effective pupil is critical in achieving good optical and visual performance.

Do Polymer Coatings Change the Aberrations of Conventional and Wavefront-guided Scleral Lenses?

SIGNIFICANCE

The findings of this study indicate that patients could simultaneously be offered the individualized optical correction of wavefront-guided (WFG) lenses and the superior comfort afforded by polymer coatings. This could be helpful to patients with ectasia suffering ocular dryness or dependent on scleral lenses for lengthy periods of wear.

PURPOSE

Wavefront-guided scleral lenses target lower- and higher-order aberrations of individual eyes using submicrometer-level contours in the anterior lens surface. Hydrophilic polyethylene glycol (PEG) polymer coatings applied to lens surfaces improve comfort and wettability. This study aimed to quantify aberration changes (e.g., masking) when applying polymer coatings to WFG and conventional scleral lenses.

METHODS

Two control lenses (remained uncoated) and 14 experimental lenses (two repeated builds of seven aberration designs: one spherical, two coma, four full WFG [second- to fifth-order aberrations]) were manufactured, and aberrations were measured (mean of three) by two operators before and after coating. Root mean square (RMS) and visual image quality (logVSX) differences were calculated for 6-mm diameters.

RESULTS

Median RMS aberration change due to coating was 0.012 μm (range, 0.008 to 0.057 μm). Maximum logVSX change due to coating was 0.073, predicting an approximately one letter change in acuity. Instrument sensitivity was 0.002 μm. Acute instrument and operator variabilities (standard deviations of individual [second- to fifth-order Zernikes] were all <0.027 μm). Longitudinal variability (control lenses) was low: all less than 0.017 μm. Although RMS of differences between repeated builds of all lenses was less than 0.25 D and not statistically significant, relatively, manufacture constituted the major variability, and RMS difference between repeated builds was at least four times greater than the effect of coating (median, 0.167 μm; range, 0.088 to 0.312 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

Application of polymer coatings caused measurable changes in aberrations of WFG and conventional scleral lenses; however, these were clinically and statistically insignificant and within variability of repeated lens manufacture. In their current states, WFG lenses and polymer coatings could be used simultaneously.

Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia

SIGNIFICANCE

Visual performance with wavefront-guided (WFG) contact lenses has only been reported immediately after manufacture without time for habituation, and comparison has only been made with clinically unrefined predicate conventional lenses. We present comparisons of habitual corrections, best conventional scleral lenses, and WFG scleral lenses after habituation to all corrections.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare, in a crossover design, optical and visual performance of eyes with corneal ectasias wearing dispensed best conventional scleral lens corrections and dispensed individualized WFG scleral lens corrections.

METHODS

Ten subjects (20 eyes) participated in a randomized crossover study where best conventional scleral lenses and WFG scleral lenses (customized through the fifth radial order) were worn for 8 weeks each. These corrections, as well as each subject's habitual correction and normative data for normal eyes, were compared using (1) residual higher-order aberrations (HORMS), (2) visual acuity (VA), (3) letter contrast sensitivity (CS), and (4) visual image quality (logarithm of the visual Strehl ratio, or logVSX). Correlations were performed between Pentacam biometric measures and gains provided by WFG lenses.

RESULTS

Mean HORMS was reduced by 48% from habitual to conventional and 43% from conventional to WFG. Mean logMAR VA improved from habitual (+0.12) to conventional (-0.03) and further with WFG (-0.09); six eyes gained greater than one line with WFG over conventional. Area under the CS curve improved by 26% from habitual to conventional and 14% from conventional to WFG. The percentage of the eyes achieving normal levels were as follows: HORMS, 40% for conventional and 85% for WFG; VA, 50% for conventional and 85% for WFG; and CS, 60% for conventional and 90% for WFG. logVSX improved by 16% from habitual to conventional and 25% further with WFG. Reduction in aberrations with WFG lenses best correlated with posterior cornea radius of curvature.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual performance was superior to that reported with nonhabituated WFG lens wear. With WFG lenses, HORMS and logVSX significantly improved, allowing more eyes to reach normal levels of optical and visual performance compared with conventional lenses.

Customised aberration-controlling corrections for keratoconic patients using contact lenses

Technological advancements in the design of soft and scleral contact lenses have led to the development of customised, aberration-controlling corrections for patients with keratoconus. As the number of contact lens manufacturers producing wavefront-guided corrections continues to expand, clinical interest in this customisable technology is also increasing among both patients and practitioners. This review outlines key issues surrounding the measurement of ocular aberrations for patients with keratoconus, with a particular focus on the possible factors affecting the repeatability of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry measurements. This review also discusses and compares the relative successes of studies investigating the design and fitting of soft and scleral customised contact lenses for patients with keratoconus. A series of key limitations that should be considered before designing customised contact lens corrections is also described. Despite the challenges of producing and fitting customised lenses, improvements in visual performance and comfortable wearing times, as provided by these lenses, could help to reduce the rate of keratoplasty in keratoconic patients, thereby significantly reducing clinical issues related to corneal graft surgery. Furthermore, enhancements in optical correction, provided by customised lenses, could lead to increased independence, particularly among young adult keratoconic patients, therefore leading to improvements in quality of life.

Biometric Factors Associated with the Visual Performance of a High Addition Multifocal Intraocular Lens

Purpose/Aim: To evaluate the impact of ocular parameters on the visual performance achieved with the multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) Bi-Flex M 677MY.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

About 26 subjects were included in the current study. Several physiological variables were retrieved from the 3-month follow-up visit, including pupil diameter and distance from pupil center to the vertex normal of the anterior cornea (µ). These variables were also obtained in the preoperative visit. Binocular and monocular visual acuity defocus curves were measured at 1 and 3 months after surgery, respectively. The monocular Area Under the Curve (AUC) was computed along the total range (Total Area Under the Curve (TAUC), +1.00 to -4.00 D) and for the ranges of Far (Far Area Under the Curve (FAUC), +0.50 to -0.50 D), (Intermediate Area Under the Curve (IAUC), -1.00 to -1.50 D) and Near vision (Near Area Under the Curve (NAUC), -2.00 to -4.00 D). Correlations between these areas and the postoperative physiological variables were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean µ was reduced from 0.21 to 0.10 mm after surgery, as well as pupil diameters, either photopic (-7.4%) or mesopic (-8.1%) (p < 0.05). The mean AUCs were 2.08 ± 0.74 for TAUC, 0.57 ± 0.17 for FAUC, 0.16 ± 0.09 for IAUC, and 0.81 ± 0.29 for NAUC. Significant correlations were found between NAUC and corneal power  (r = -0.39, p = 0.05) as well as between IAUC and temporal decentration of the lens from vertex normal (ρ = -0.41, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The visual performance at near distance with the IOL evaluated improved in eyes with less corneal power. On the other hand, a slight temporal IOL decentration from vertex normal also improved intermediate visual acuity. The binocular defocus curve was similar to other trifocal IOLs.

New Objective Refraction Metric Based on Sphere Fitting to the Wavefront

Purpose

To develop an objective refraction formula based on the ocular wavefront error (WFE) expressed in terms of Zernike coefficients and pupil radius, which would be an accurate predictor of subjective spherical equivalent (SE) for different pupil sizes.

Methods

A sphere is fitted to the ocular wavefront at the center and at a variable distance, t. The optimal fitting distance, t_opt, is obtained empirically from a dataset of 308 eyes as a function of objective refraction pupil radius, r₀, and used to define the formula of a new wavefront refraction metric (MTR). The metric is tested in another, independent dataset of 200 eyes.

Results

For pupil radii r₀ ≤ 2 mm, the new metric predicts the equivalent sphere with similar accuracy (<0.1D), however, for r₀ > 2 mm, the mean error of traditional metrics can increase beyond 0.25D, and the MTR remains accurate. The proposed metric allows clinicians to obtain an accurate clinical spherical equivalent value without rescaling/refitting of the wavefront coefficients. It has the potential to be developed into a metric which will be able to predict full spherocylindrical refraction for the desired illumination conditions and corresponding pupil size.

Contact Lenses for Keratoconus- Current Practice

Background:

Keratoconus is a chronic, bilateral, usuallly asymmetrical, non-inflammatory, ectatic disorder, being characterized by progressive steepening, thinning and apical scarring of the cornea. Initially, the patient is asymptomatic, but the visual acuity gradually decreases, resulting in significant vision loss due to the development of irregular astigmatism, myopia, corneal thinning and scarring. The classic treatment of visual rehabilitation in keratoconus is based on spectacles and contact lenses (CLs).

Objective:

To summarize the types of CLs used in the treatment of keratoconus. This is literature review of several important published articles focusing on the visual rehabilitation in keratoconus with CLs.

Method:

Gas permeable (GP) CLs have been found to achieve better best corrected visual acuity than spectacles, eliminating 3rd-order coma root-mean-square (RMS) error, 3rd-order RMS, and higher-order RMS. However, they have implicated in reduction of corneal basal epithelial cell and anterior stromal keratocyte densities. Soft CLs seem to provide greater comfort and lower cost, but the low oxygen permeability (if the lens is not a silicone hydrogel), and the inability to mask moderate to severe irregular astigmatism are the main disadvantages of them. On the other hand, scleral CLs ensure stable platforms, which eliminate high-order aberrations and provide good centration and visual acuity. Their main disadvantages include the difficulties in application and removal of these lenses along with corneal flattening and swelling.

Result:

The modern hybrid CLs are indicated in cases of poor centration, poor stability or intolerance with GP lenses. Finally, piggyback CL systems effectively ameliorate visual acuity, but they have been related to corneal neovascularization and giant papillary conjunctivitis.

Conclusion:

CLs seem to rehabilitate visual performance, diminishing the power of the cylinder and the high-order aberrations. The final choice of CLs is based on their special features, the subsequent corneal changes and the patient’s needs.

Improving vision by pupil masking

We propose an alternative solution to improve visual quality by spatially modulating the amplitude of light passing into the eye (related to the eye's transmittance), in contrast to traditional correction of the wavefront phase (related to the local refractive power). Numerical simulations show that masking the aberrated areas at the pupil plane should enhance visual function, especially in highly aberrated eyes. This correction could be implemented in practice using customized contact or intraocular lenses.

Clinical applications of wavefront refraction

Purpose

To determine normative reference ranges for higher-order wavefront error (HO-WFE), compare these values with those in common ocular pathologies, and evaluate treatments.

Methods

A review of 17 major studies on HO-WFE was made, involving data for a total of 31,605 subjects. The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for HO-WFE was calculated from the most comprehensive of these studies using normal healthy patients aged 20 to 80 years. There were no studies identified using the natural pupil size for subjects, and for this reason, the HO-WFE was tabulated for pupil diameters of 3 to 7 mm. Effects of keratoconus, pterygium, cataract, and dry eye on HO-WFE were reviewed and treatment efficacy was considered.

Results

The calculated upper limit of the 95% CI for HO-WFE in a healthy normal 35-year-old patient with a mesopic pupil diameter of 6 mm would be 0.471 μm (471 nm) root-mean-square or less. Although the normal HO-WFE increases with age for a given pupil size, it is not yet completely clear how the concurrent influence of age-related pupillary miosis affects these findings. Abnormal ocular conditions such as keratoconus can induce a large HO-WFE, often in excess of 3.0 μm, particularly attributed to coma. For pterygium or cortical cataract, a combination of coma and trefoil was more commonly induced. Nuclear cataract can induce a negative spherical HO-WFE, usually in excess of 1.0 μm.

Conclusions

The upper limit of the 95% CI for HO-WFE root-mean-square is about 0.5 μm with normal physiological pupil sizes. With ocular pathologies, HO-WFE can be in excess of 1.0 μm, although many devices and therapeutic and surgical treatments are reported to be highly effective at minimizing HO-WFE. More accurate normative reference ranges for HO-WFE will require future studies using the subjects’ natural pupil size.

Registration tolerance of a custom correction to maintain visual acuity

PURPOSE

To present a predictive model of the registration tolerance for wavefront-guided correction to maintain acuity within fixed limits and demonstrate the potential utility using two typical keratoconic eyes.

METHODS

Change in log visual Strehl was plotted as a function of translation error for a series of rotations of a wavefront-guided correction. Contour lines were added at Δlog visual Strehl levels predicted to induce one- and two-line losses of logMAR visual acuity. The model was validated by regressing measured acuity loss from subjects viewing acuity charts that were degraded by the residual wavefront error resulting from the movement of wavefront-guided correction against the model's predicted acuity.

RESULTS

The model's predicted change in acuity can be substituted for measured change in acuity (R² = 0.91) within measurement error (±0.1 logMAR). Translation and/or rotation of a wavefront-guided correction induced asymmetric optical tolerance to movement. Induced errors depended on the wavefront error being corrected, the wavefront-guided correction design, and the amount of registration error.

CONCLUSIONS

Change in log visual Strehl can be used to determine the registration tolerance necessary to keep the variation in acuity within user-defined limits. This tolerance is unique for each wavefront error and wavefront-guided correction design.

Optical quality comparison of conventional and hole-visian implantable collamer lens at different degrees of decentering

PURPOSE

To compare the optical quality of implantable Collamer lens (ICL) with and without central hole (Hole ICL and conventional ICL) at different degrees of decentering.

DESIGN

Experimental laboratory investigation.

METHODS

Wavefront aberrations of the -3, -6, and -12 diopter (D) V4b and -3, -6, and -12 D V4c ICLs were measured in 3 conditions-centered and decentered 0.3 and 0.6 mm-at 3-mm and 4.5-mm pupils. The root mean square of total higher order aberrations, trefoil, coma, tetrafoil, secondary astigmatism, and spherical aberration were evaluated. In addition, point spread function and simulated retinal images of ICLs were calculated from the wavefront aberrations for each ICL and all conditions of decentering at 4.5-mm pupil.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in any Zernike coefficient terms evaluated were found between conventional and Hole ICLs for any ICL powers and pupils evaluated (P > .05). We could not appreciate differences in the point spread function images and in simulated retinal images. Regarding the effect of the ICL decentration, coma aberration increased significantly with ICL decentration (P < .05), although these differences were not visible in the point spread function images and simulated retinal images. The ICL decentration was affected in the same manner on the conventional and Hole ICLs.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes showed good and comparable optical quality of the conventional and Hole ICLs for all ICL powers evaluated. Despite that coma aberration increased with ICL decentering, these values were clinically negligible and did not have a significant effect on the simulated visual performance.

Optimizing wavefront-guided corrections for highly aberrated eyes in the presence of registration uncertainty

Dynamic registration uncertainty of a wavefront-guided correction with respect to underlying wavefront error (WFE) inevitably decreases retinal image quality. A partial correction may improve average retinal image quality and visual acuity in the presence of registration uncertainties. The purpose of this paper is to (a) develop an algorithm to optimize wavefront-guided correction that improves visual acuity given registration uncertainty and (b) test the hypothesis that these corrections provide improved visual performance in the presence of these uncertainties as compared to a full-magnitude correction or a correction by Guirao, Cox, and Williams (2002). A stochastic parallel gradient descent (SPGD) algorithm was used to optimize the partial-magnitude correction for three keratoconic eyes based on measured scleral contact lens movement. Given its high correlation with logMAR acuity, the retinal image quality metric log visual Strehl was used as a predictor of visual acuity. Predicted values of visual acuity with the optimized corrections were validated by regressing measured acuity loss against predicted loss. Measured loss was obtained from normal subjects viewing acuity charts that were degraded by the residual aberrations generated by the movement of the full-magnitude correction, the correction by Guirao, and optimized SPGD correction. Partial-magnitude corrections optimized with an SPGD algorithm provide at least one line improvement of average visual acuity over the full magnitude and the correction by Guirao given the registration uncertainty. This study demonstrates that it is possible to improve the average visual acuity by optimizing wavefront-guided correction in the presence of registration uncertainty.

Objective Amplitude of Accommodation Computed from Optical Quality Metrics Applied to Wavefront Outcomes

Purpose

We studied the accuracy and precision of 32 objective wavefront methods for finding the amplitude of accommodation obtained in 180 eyes.

Methods

Ocular accommodation was stimulated with 0.5 D steps in target vergence spanning the full range of accommodation for each subject. Subjective monocular amplitude of accommodation was measured using two clinical methods, using negative lenses and with a custom Badal optometer.

Results

Both subjective methods gave similar results. Results obtained from the Badal optometer where used to test the accuracy of the objective methods. All objective methods showed lower amplitude of accommodation that the subjective ones by an amount that varied from 0.2 to 1.1 D depending on the method. The precision in this prediction also varied between subjects, with an average standard error of the mean of 0.1 D that decreased with age.

Conclusions

Depth of field increases subjective of amplitude of accommodation overestimating the objective amplitude obtained with all the metrics used. The change in the negative direction of spherical aberration during accommodation increases the amplitude of accommodation by an amount that varies with age.