Spatial contrast sensitivity in dynamic and static additive luminance noise

Contrast sensitivity and comfort levels with different types of polarised glasses under steady glare

The influence of various polarised glasses on visual performance is crucial due to their widespread. This study measured the visual contrast sensitivity (CS) of dominant eyes by quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) procedure at 10 spatial frequencies and 3 noise levels under nonglare, steady glare, steady glare with night lenses, and steady glare with day&night lenses, respectively. Later, the second experiment measured the subjects' subjective feelings under these four viewing conditions. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the CS between the two conditions with polarised glasses and the steady glare. However, the subjects reported greater comfort with glasses than without them. These results suggest that there was an underlying bias when people rated the polarised glasses, and the qCSF procedure was a useful tool for evaluating visual performance.

Evaluating Contrast Sensitivity in Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration With the Quick Contrast Sensitivity Function

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to describe, validate, and compare the contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) acquired with the novel quick CSF (qCSF) method from patients with early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration (eAMD and iAMD) and healthy controls.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional analysis of contrast sensitivity (CS) and visual acuity (VA) baseline data from the prospective Multimodal Functional and Structural Visual System Characterization (MUMOVI) study. The qCSF testing was conducted with the manifold contrast vision meter (Adaptive Sensory Technology, San Diego, CA, USA). CS levels at spatial frequencies from 1 cycle per degree (CPD) to 18 CPD, the area underneath the logarithmic contrast sensitivity function (AULCSF), and contrast acuity (CA) were analyzed. The association of functional metrics with variables of interest was tested with linear models.

Results

Ninety-four study eyes from 94 study patients were included in the analysis (13 patients with eAMD, 33 patients with iAMD, and 48 healthy controls). Significant differences between the eAMD and the iAMD model estimates were only found for CS at 1 CPD (t value = -2.9, P value = 0.006) and CS at 1.5 CPD (-2.7, 0.01). A specific association between smoking years and CS at 1 CPD (P = 0.02) and CS at 1.5 CPD (P = 0.03) could be described in patients with AMD.

Conclusions

The qCSF testing allows the fast measurement of the whole CSF, enabling the integration into clinical routine. We showed that novel qCSF-derived metrics detect slight functional differences between AMD stages, which testing by Pelli-Robson charts or VA testing would miss. This study, therefore, yields novel qCSF-derived candidate metrics for therapeutic trials in AMD.

The effect of small incision lenticule extraction on contrast sensitivity

The improvements due to small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in vision, e.g., in spherical equivalent (SE) and visual acuity (VA), has been widely recognized. However, the contrast sensitivity (CS) change after SMILE was not certain. Here, we investigated the effect of SMILE on CS before, 1 day after and 7 days after surgery and then clarified the corresponding mechanism by using a perceptual template model (PTM). In addition, the relationship among SE, VA, and CS was discussed. The quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) was applied to measure CS with high precision and accuracy. We found that (1) CS was significantly improved 1 day after SMILE and was also increased 7 days after the surgery, (2) CS improvements were dependent on spatial frequency and external noise, (3) the increase in CS was due to the decreased internal additive noise and an enhanced perceptual template, and (4) Greater SE improvements predicted better VA improvements 1 day after SMILE, and a positive correlation between SE improvements and AULCSF improvements 7 days after SMILE was observed. These findings help us better understand the effect of SMILE and provide effective indicators for future visual research.

Acute Alcohol Intake Affects Internal Additive Noise and the Perceptual Template in Visual Perception

A reduction in visual performance is among the serious consequences of acute alcohol intake. Contrast sensitivity (CS) is a fundamental feature of visual function. Here, we investigated the negative effect of a moderate dose of alcohol on CS across a wide range of spatial frequencies and with multiple levels of external noise and clarified the corresponding mechanisms in the context of a perceptual template model (PTM). To avoid the effect of alcohol washout, a quick contrast sensitivity function (qCSF) method was used to assess the visual performance of subjects before and 30 min after a moderate dose of alcohol intake. We found that (1) CS was significantly disrupted by acute alcohol intake; (2) alcohol-induced CS loss was dependent on spatial frequency and external noise; and (3) increased internal additive noise and an impaired perceptual template accounted for alcohol-induced CS loss. These results help us better understand the negative effect of alcohol consumption and provide guidance for driver safety studies.

Contrast Sensitivity and Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in X-Linked Retinoschisis

Purpose

To define relationships among contrast sensitivity (CS), equivalent intrinsic noise (Neq; a measure of noise within the visual pathway), and retinal thickness in X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS).

Methods

Nine XLRS and 10 visually-normal subjects participated. CS was measured in the presence and absence of luminance noise. These data were fit with a standard model to estimate Neq and sampling efficiency (an estimate of the ability to use stimulus information). Optical coherence tomography images were obtained to quantify outer nuclear layer (ONL+) and outer segment (OS+) thickness. A linear structure-function model was used to describe the relationship between CS and the product of ONL+ and OS+ thickness.

Results

CS in the absence of noise (CS0) for the XLRS subjects ranged from normal to as much as 1.5× below the lower limit of normal. Four of the nine subjects with XLRS had abnormally high Neq, whereas two others had sampling efficiency that was borderline abnormal. Log CS0 for the subjects with XLRS was correlated significantly with log Neq (r = -0.78, P = 0.01), but not with log efficiency (r = 0.19, P = 0.63). CS0 and Neq, but not efficiency, conformed to the linear ONL+ × OS+ structure-function model.

Conclusions

The XLRS subjects in this study who had elevated internal noise had abnormally low CS; both internal noise and CS fell within the predicted limits of a structure-function model.

Translational Relevance

Internal noise measurements can provide insight into a source of CS loss in some individuals with XLRS.

Reduced Contrast Sensitivity is Associated With Elevated Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in Type 2 Diabetics Who Have Mild or No Retinopathy

Purpose

To evaluate explanations for contrast sensitivity (CS) losses in subjects who have mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or no diabetic retinopathy (NDR) by measuring and modeling CS in luminance noise.

Methods

Ten diabetic subjects with NDR, 10 with mild NPDR, and 10 age-equivalent nondiabetic controls participated. Contrast threshold energy (E_t) was measured for letters presented in the absence of noise (E_t0) and in four levels of luminance noise. Data were fit with the linear amplifier model to estimate inferred noise level within the visual pathway (N_eq) and sampling efficiency (ability to use stimulus information optimally). E_t0, N_eq, and efficiency were compared to clinical characteristics.

Results

N_eq was correlated with E_t0 for the diabetic subjects (r = 0.93, P < 0.001) and ranged from normal to 12-times the upper limit of normal. ANOVA indicated significant differences among the subject groups for E_t0 and N_eq (both F > 11.92, P < 0.001). E_t0 and N_eq were elevated for the mild NPDR group compared to the control and NDR groups (all t > 3.89, P ≤ 0.001); the NDR and control groups did not differ significantly (all t < 0.61, P > 0.55). There were no significant efficiency differences among the groups (F = 1.29, P = 0.29). N_eq was correlated significantly with disease duration, microperimetric sensitivity, and Pelli-Robson CS.

Conclusions

Elevated contrast threshold may be associated with increased intrinsic noise in early-stage diabetic subjects. Results suggest that noise-based CS measurements can provide important information about early neural dysfunction in these individuals.

Luminance noise as a novel approach for measuring contrast sensitivity within the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways

This study evaluated the extent to which different types of luminance noise can be used to target selectively the inferred magnocellular (MC) and parvocellular (PC) visual pathways. Letter contrast sensitivity (CS) was measured for three visually normal subjects for letters of different size (0.8°-5.3°) under established paradigms intended to target the MC pathway (steady-pedestal paradigm) and PC pathway (pulsed-pedestal paradigm). Results obtained under these paradigms were compared to those obtained in asynchronous static noise (a field of unchanging luminance noise) and asynchronous dynamic noise (a field of randomly changing luminance noise). CS was measured for letters that were high- and low-pass filtered using a range of filter cutoffs to quantify the object frequency information (cycles per letter) mediating letter identification, which was used as an index of the pathway mediating CS. A follow-up experiment was performed to determine the range of letter duration over which MC and PC pathway CS can be targeted. Analysis of variance indicated that the object frequencies measured under the static noise and steady-pedestal paradigms did not differ significantly (p ≥ 0.065), but differed considerably from those measured under the dynamic noise (both p < 0.001) and pulsed-pedestal (both p < 0.001) paradigms. The object frequencies mediating letter identification increased as duration increased under the steady-pedestal paradigm, but were independent of target duration (50-800 ms) under the pulsed-pedestal paradigm, in static noise, and in dynamic noise. These data suggest that the spatiotemporal characteristics of noise can be manipulated to target the inferred MC (static noise) and PC (dynamic noise) pathways. The results also suggest that CS within these pathways can be measured at long stimulus durations, which has potential importance in the design of future clinical CS tests.

What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms

The internal noise present in a linear system can be quantified by the equivalent noise method. By measuring the effect that applying external noise to the system's input has on its output one can estimate the variance of this internal noise. By applying this simple "linear amplifier" model to the human visual system, one can entirely explain an observer's detection performance by a combination of the internal noise variance and their efficiency relative to an ideal observer. Studies using this method rely on two crucial factors: firstly that the external noise in their stimuli behaves like the visual system's internal noise in the dimension of interest, and secondly that the assumptions underlying their model are correct (e.g. linearity). Here we explore the effects of these two factors while applying the equivalent noise method to investigate the contrast sensitivity function (CSF). We compare the results at 0.5 and 6 c/deg from the equivalent noise method against those we would expect based on pedestal masking data collected from the same observers. We find that the loss of sensitivity with increasing spatial frequency results from changes in the saturation constant of the gain control nonlinearity, and that this only masquerades as a change in internal noise under the equivalent noise method. Part of the effect we find can be attributed to the optical transfer function of the eye. The remainder can be explained by either changes in effective input gain, divisive suppression, or a combination of the two. Given these effects the efficiency of our observers approaches the ideal level. We show the importance of considering these factors in equivalent noise studies.

Assessing the effects of dynamic luminance contrast noise masking on a color discrimination task

The aim of this work was to assess the influence of dynamic luminance contrast noise masking (LCNM) on color discrimination for color normal and anomalous trichromats. The stimulus was a colored target on a background presented on a calibrated CRT display. In the static LCNM condition, the background and target consisted of packed circles with variable size and static random luminance. In the dynamic LCNM condition, a 10 Hz square luminance signal was added to each circle. The phase of this signal was randomized across circles. Discrimination thresholds were estimated along 20 hue directions concurrent at the color of the background. Six observers with normal color vision, six deuteranomalous observers, and three protanomalous observers performed the test in both conditions. With dynamic LCNM, thresholds were significantly lower for anomalous observers but not for normal observers, suggesting a facilitation effect of the masking for anomalous trichromats.

Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise

PURPOSE

To compare differences in contrast threshold among individual Sloan letters presented in additive white luminance noise and in the absence of noise.

METHODS

Contrast threshold for letter identification was measured for three visually normal subjects (aged 22, 25, and 34 years) using letters from the Sloan set (C, D, H, K, N, O, R, S, V, and Z). The letter size was equivalent to 1.5 logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), and the letters were either unfiltered or band-pass filtered to limit the object frequency content (cycles per letter) to a one-octave wide band centered at 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 cycles per letter. Letters were presented for an unlimited duration against a uniform adapting field or in the presence of additive white luminance noise. Contrast threshold for each letter was determined using a 10-alternative forced-choice interleaved staircase procedure.

RESULTS

For standard unfiltered Sloan letters presented against a uniform field, contrast threshold for individual letters differed by as much as a factor of 1.5, consistent with a previous report. When measured in luminance noise, the individual letters differed by as much as a factor of 1.8. Band-pass filtering the letters to include only low object frequencies increased the differences in contrast threshold among the individual letters (about a factor of 3) compared with unfiltered letters and letters filtered into high object frequency bands.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of white luminance noise had relatively small effects on interletter contrast threshold differences, whereas band-pass filtering had large effects on interletter threshold differences, greatly increasing variation among the letters that contained only low object frequencies. Letters that contain only high object frequencies may be useful in the design of letter charts because the interletter threshold differences are relatively small for these optotypes and the object frequency information mediating identification is known.

Stochastic resonance in visual sensitivity

It is well known from psychophysical studies that stochastic resonance, in its simplest threshold paradigm, can be used as a tool to measure the detection sensitivity to fine details in noise contaminated stimuli. In the present manuscript, we report simulation studies conducted in the similar threshold paradigm of stochastic resonance. We have estimated the contrast sensitivity in detecting noisy sine-wave stimuli, with varying area and spatial frequency, as a function of noise strength. In all the cases, the measured sensitivity attained a peak at intermediate noise strength, which indicate the occurrence of stochastic resonance. The peak sensitivity exhibited a strong dependence on area and spatial frequency of the stimulus. We show that the peak contrast sensitivity varies with spatial frequency in a nonmonotonic fashion and the qualitative nature of the sensitivity variation is in good agreement with human contrast sensitivity function. We also demonstrate that the peak sensitivity first increases and then saturates with increasing area, and this result is in line with the results of psychophysical experiments. Additionally, we also show that critical area, denoting the saturation of contrast sensitivity, decreases with spatial frequency and the associated maximum contrast sensitivity varies with spatial frequency in a manner that is consistent with the results of psychophysical experiments. In all the studies, the sensitivities were elevated via a nonlinear filtering operation called stochastic resonance. Because of this nonlinear effect, it was not guaranteed that the sensitivities, estimated at each frequency, would be in agreement with the corresponding results of psychophysical experiments; on the contrary, close agreements were observed between our results and the findings of psychophysical investigations. These observations indicate the utility of stochastic resonance in human vision and suggest that this paradigm can be useful in psychophysical studies.

The external noise normalized gain profile of spatial vision

The contrast sensitivity function (CSF), a measure of visual sensitivity to a wide range of spatial frequencies, has been widely used as the gain profile of the front-end filter of the visual system to predict how we perceive spatial patterns. However, the CSF itself is determined by the gain profile and other processing inefficiencies of the visual system; it may be problematic to use the CSF as the gain profile in observer models. Here, we applied the external noise paradigm and the perceptual template model (PTM) to characterize several major properties of the visual system. With the external noise normalized gain profile, nonlinearity, and internal additive and multiplicative noises, the PTM accounted for 92.8% of the variance in the experiment data measured in a wide range of conditions and revealed the major processing components that determine the CSF. Unlike the CSF, the external noise normalized gain profile of the visual system is relatively flat across a wide range of spatial frequencies. The results may have major implications for understanding normal and abnormal spatial vision.

Effect of luminance noise on the object frequencies mediating letter identification

Purpose: To determine if the same object frequency information mediates letter contrast threshold in the presence and absence of additive luminance noise (i.e., “noise-invariant processing”) for letters of different size.

Methods: Contrast thresholds for Sloan letters ranging in size from 0.9 to 1.8 log MAR were obtained from three visually normal observers under three paradigms: (1) high- and low-pass Gaussian filtered letters were presented against a uniform adapting field; (2) high- and low-pass Gaussian filtered letters were presented in additive white luminance noise; and (3) unfiltered letters were presented in high- and low-pass Gaussian filtered luminance noise. A range of high- and low-pass filter cutoffs were used to limit selectively the object frequency content of the letters (paradigms 1 and 2) or noise (paradigm 3). The object frequencies mediating letter identification under each paradigm were derived from plots of log contrast threshold vs. log filter cutoff frequency.

Results: The object frequency band mediating letter identification systematically shifted to higher frequencies with increasing log MAR letter size under all three paradigms. However, the relationship between object frequency and letter size depended on the paradigm under which the measurements were obtained. The largest difference in object frequency among the paradigms was observed at 1.8 log MAR, where the addition of white noise nearly doubled the center frequency of the band of object frequencies mediating letter identification, compared to measurements made in the absence of noise.

Conclusion: Noise can affect the object frequency band mediating letter contrast threshold, particularly for large letters, an effect that is likely due to strong masking of the low frequency letter components by low frequency noise checks. This finding indicates that noise-invariant processing cannot necessarily be assumed for large letters presented in white noise.

Noise provides new insights on contrast sensitivity function

Sensitivity to luminance difference, or contrast sensitivity, is critical for animals to survive in and interact with the external world. The contrast sensitivity function (CSF), which measures visual sensitivity to spatial patterns over a wide range of spatial frequencies, provides a comprehensive characterization of the visual system. Despite its popularity and significance in both basic research and clinical practice, it hasn’t been clear what determines the CSF and how the factors underlying the CSF change in different conditions. In the current study, we applied the external noise method and perceptual template model to a wide range of external noise and spatial frequency (SF) conditions, and evaluated how the various sources of observer inefficiency changed with SF and determined the limiting factors underlying the CSF. We found that only internal additive noise and template gain changed significantly with SF, while the transducer non-linearity and coefficient for multiplicative noise were constant. The 12-parameter model provided a very good account of all the data in the 200 tested conditions (86.5%, 86.2%, 89.5%, and 96.4% for the four subjects, respectively). Our results suggest a re-consideration of the popular spatial vision model that employs the CSF as the front-end filter and constant internal additive noise across spatial frequencies. The study will also be of interest to scientists and clinicians engaged in characterizing spatial vision deficits and/or developing rehabilitation methods to restore spatial vision in clinical populations.

Functional loss in the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in patients with optic neuritis

PURPOSE

To evaluate contrast threshold and contrast gain in patients with optic neuritis under conditions designed to favor mediation by either the inferred magnocellular (MC) or parvocellular (PC) pathway.

METHODS

Achromatic and chromatic contrast discrimination was measured in 11 patients with unilateral or bilateral optic neuritis and in 18 age-matched controls with normal vision, using achromatic steady- and pulsed-pedestal paradigms to bias performance toward the MC or PC pathway, respectively. In addition, L-M chromatic discrimination at equiluminance was evaluated using the steady-pedestal paradigm. A physiologically plausible model could describe the data with parameters accounting for contrast gain and contrast sensitivity in the inferred MC or PC pathway. The fitted parameters from the eye affected by optic neuritis were compared with those from the normal eye using generalized estimation equation (GEE) models that can account for within-subject correlations.

RESULTS

Compared with normal eyes, the affected eyes had significantly higher saturation parameters when measured with both the achromatic pulsed-pedestal paradigm (GEE: β [SE] = 0.35 [0.06]; P < 0.001) and the chromatic discrimination paradigm (β [SE] = 0.18 [0.08]; P = 0.015), suggesting that contrast gain in the inferred PC pathway is reduced; the affected eyes also had reduced absolute sensitivity in the inferred MC pathway measured with the achromatic steady-pedestal paradigm (β [SE] = 0.12 [0.04]; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Optic neuritis produced large sensitivity losses mediated by the MC pathway and contrast gain losses in the inferred PC pathway. A clinical framework is presented for interpreting contrast sensitivity and gain loss to chromatic and achromatic stimuli in terms of retinal and postretinogeniculate loci contributions to detection and discrimination.