The effect of retinal illuminance on visual motion priming

Visual priming of two-step motion sequences

Perception of an ambiguous apparent motion is influenced by the immediately preceding motion. In positive priming, when an observer is primed with a slow-pace (1-3 Hz) sequence of motion frames depicting unidirectional drift (e.g., Right-Right-Right-Right), subsequent sequences of ambiguous frames are often perceived to continue moving in the primed direction (illusory Right-Right …). Furthermore, priming an observer with a slow-pace sequence of rebounding apparent motion frames that alternate between opponently coded motion directions (e.g., Right-Left-Right-Left) leads to an illusory continuation of the two-step rebounding sequence in subsequent random frames. Here, we show that even more arbitrary two-step motion sequences can be primed; in particular, two-step motion sequences that alternate between non-opponently coded directions (e.g., Up-Right-Up-Right; staircase motion) can be primed to be illusorily perceived in subsequent random frames. We found that staircase sequences, but not drifting or rebounding sequences, were primed more effectively with four priming frames compared with two priming frames, suggesting the importance of repeating the sequence element for priming arbitrary two-step motion sequences. Moreover, we compared the effectiveness of motion primes to that of symbolic primes (arrows) and found that motion primes were significantly more effective at producing prime-consistent responses. Although it has been proposed that excitatory and rivalry-like mechanisms account for drifting and rebounding motion priming, current motion processing models cannot account for our observed priming of staircase motion. We argue that higher order processes involving the recruitment and interaction of both attention and visual working memory are required to account for the type of two-step motion priming reported here.

Common and independent processing of visual motion perception and oculomotor response

Visual motion signals are used not only to drive motion perception but also to elicit oculomotor responses. A fundamental question is whether perceptual and oculomotor processing of motion signals shares a common mechanism. This study aimed to address this question using visual motion priming, in which the perceived direction of a directionally ambiguous stimulus is biased in the same (positive priming) or opposite (negative priming) direction as that of a priming stimulus. The priming effect depends on the duration of the priming stimulus. It is assumed that positive and negative priming are mediated by high- and low-level motion systems, respectively. Participants were asked to judge the perceived direction of a π-phase-shifted test grating after a smoothly drifting priming grating during varied durations. Their eye movements were measured while the test grating was presented. The perception and eye movements were discrepant under positive priming and correlated under negative priming on a trial-by-trial basis when an interstimulus interval was inserted between the priming and test stimuli, indicating that the eye movements were evoked by the test stimulus per se. These findings suggest that perceptual and oculomotor responses are induced by a common mechanism at a low level of motion processing but by independent mechanisms at a high level of motion processing.

Characterizing the spatiotemporal envelope of the human visual system through the visibility of temporal aliasing artifacts

Previous studies have demonstrated that the onset of temporal aliasing artifacts occurs when the spatial displacement between samples reaches a critical distance, and that subsequently a linear relationship exists between stimulus speed and critical sampling rates. In this paper, we carry out further experimentation using a novel experimental setup, in which a strobe light is used to emulate impulsive temporal sampling, in order to investigate the spatiotemporal envelope of the human visual system and the effect of a stimulus. For non-periodic stimuli, experimental results show that critical sampling rates increase with motion speed and decrease with stimulus width. These interactions can be described using simple log-linear models, and characterized using the temporal aliasing visibility function, where maximum critical frame rates up to 1500 Hz are predicted. For periodic stimuli, we demonstrate that both perceptible temporal aliasing artifacts and stimulus aliasing can cause stroboscopic effects.

Effect of spatial attention on spatiotopic visual motion perception

We almost never experience visual instability, despite retinal image instability induced by eye movements. How the stability of visual perception is maintained through spatiotopic representation remains a matter of debate. The discrepancies observed in the findings of existing neuroscience studies regarding spatiotopic representation partly originate from differences in regard to how attention is deployed to stimuli. In this study, we psychophysically examined whether spatial attention is needed to perceive spatiotopic visual motion. For this purpose, we used visual motion priming, which is a phenomenon in which a preceding priming stimulus modulates the perceived moving direction of an ambiguous test stimulus, such as a drifting grating that phase shifts by 180°. To examine the priming effect in different coordinates, participants performed a saccade soon after the offset of a primer. The participants were tasked with judging the direction of a subsequently presented test stimulus. To control the effect of spatial attention, the participants were asked to conduct a concurrent dot contrast-change detection task after the saccade. Positive priming was prominent in spatiotopic conditions, whereas negative priming was dominant in retinotopic conditions. At least a 600-ms interval between the priming and test stimuli was needed to observe positive priming in spatiotopic coordinates. When spatial attention was directed away from the location of the test stimulus, spatiotopic positive motion priming completely disappeared; meanwhile, the spatiotopic positive motion priming at shorter interstimulus intervals was enhanced when spatial attention was directed to the location of the test stimulus. These results provide evidence that an attentional resource is requisite for developing spatiotopic representation more quickly.

Bistable Perception Is Biased by Search Items but Not by Search Priming

During visual search, selecting a target facilitates search for similar targets in the future, known as search priming. During bistable perception, in turn, perceiving one interpretation facilitates perception of the same interpretation in the future, a form of sensory memory. Previously, we investigated the relation between these history effects by asking: can visual search influence perception of a subsequent ambiguous display and can perception of an ambiguous display influence subsequent visual search? We found no evidence for such influences, however. Here, we investigated one potential factor that might have prevented such influences from arising: lack of retinal overlap between the ambiguous stimulus and the search array items. In the present work, we therefore interleaved presentations of an ambiguous stimulus with search trials in which the target or distractor occupied the same retinal location as the ambiguous stimulus. Nevertheless, we again found no evidence for influences of visual search on bistable perception, thus demonstrating no close relation between search priming and sensory memory. We did, however, find that visual search items primed perception of a subsequent ambiguous stimulus at the same retinal location, regardless of whether they were a target or a distractor item: a form of perceptual priming. Interestingly, the strengths of search priming and this perceptual priming were correlated on a trial-to-trial basis, suggesting that a common underlying factor influences both.

Primed and unprimed rebounding illusory apparent motion

Although sequences of uncorrelated random dots can yield a wide range of illusorily coherent motion percepts (including translation, rotation, contraction, expansion, shear, and rebounding motion), past priming studies have relied on two-alternative forced choice tasks that only measure unidirectional (positive or negative) priming effects. In Experiment 1 we showed that when participants are primed with unidirectional motion and given an additional option to report bidirectional (rebounding) motion, they do so frequently, suggesting that unidirectional motion can "default" to a rebounding percept. Furthermore, rebounding percepts are more prevalent during trials with long frame durations, suggesting a role for attention in forming and maintaining these illusory percepts. In Experiment 2 we compared rebounding percepts that followed unidirectional, drifting primes with rebounding percepts that followed bidirectional, rebounding primes, and found that these two types of illusory rebounding motion percepts differ systematically in their temporal structures. We argue that rebounding percepts following drifting primes can be understood as a breakdown of positive priming into an underlying oscillatory state, whereas rebounding percepts following rebounding primes may be understood either as (1) the initialization of the same oscillatory process, or (2) the entrainment of a two-step motion pattern by a higher-order mechanism.

Dissociating Higher and Lower Order Visual Motion Systems by Priming Illusory Apparent Motion

Motion processing is thought of as a hierarchical system composed of higher and lower order components. Past research has shown that these components can be dissociated using motion priming paradigms in which the lower order system produces negative priming while the higher order system produces positive priming. By manipulating various stimulus parameters, researchers have probed these two systems using bistable test stimuli that permit only two motion interpretations. Here we employ maximally ambiguous test stimuli composed of randomly refreshing pixels in a task that allows observers to report more than just two types of motion percepts. We show that even with such stimuli, motion priming can constrain the unstructured random pixel patterns into coherent percepts of positive or negative apparent motion. Moreover, we find that the higher order system is uniquely susceptible to cognitive influences, as evidenced by a significant suppression of positive priming in the presence of alternative response options.

Individual differences in visual motion perception and neurotransmitter concentrations in the human brain

Recent studies have shown that interindividual variability can be a rich source of information regarding the mechanism of human visual perception. In this study, we examined the mechanisms underlying interindividual variability in the perception of visual motion, one of the fundamental components of visual scene analysis, by measuring neurotransmitter concentrations using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. First, by psychophysically examining two types of motion phenomena-motion assimilation and contrast-we found that, following the presentation of the same stimulus, some participants perceived motion assimilation, while others perceived motion contrast. Furthermore, we found that the concentration of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate-glutamine (Glx) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 46) was positively correlated with the participant's tendency to motion assimilation over motion contrast; however, this effect was not observed in the visual areas. The concentration of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid had only a weak effect compared with that of Glx. We conclude that excitatory process in the suprasensory area is important for an individual's tendency to determine antagonistically perceived visual motion phenomena.This article is part of the themed issue 'Auditory and visual scene analysis'.