1
|
He J, Mingolla E, Eskew RT. Psychophysics of neon color spreading: Chromatic and temporal factors are not limiting. Vision Res 2024; 223:108460. [PMID: 39094263 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2024.108460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 07/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Neon color spreading (NCS) is an illusory color phenomenon that provides a dramatic example of surface completion and filling-in. Numerous studies have varied both spatial and temporal aspects of the neon-generating stimulus to explore variations in the strength of the effect. Here, we take a novel, parametric, low-level psychophysical approach to studying NCS in two experiments. In Experiment 1, we test the ability of both cone-isolating and equiluminant stimuli to generate neon color spreading for both increments and decrements in cone modulations. As expected, sensitivity was low to S(hort-wavelength) cone stimuli due to their poor spatial resolution, but sensitivity was similar for the other color directions. We show that when these differences in detection sensitivity are accounted for, the particular cone type, and the polarity (increment or decrement), make little difference in generating neon color spreading, with NCS visible at about twice detection threshold level in all cases. In Experiment 2, we use L-cone flicker modulations (reddish and greenish excursions around grey) to study sensitivity to NCS as a function of temporal frequency from 0.5 to 8 Hz. After accounting for detectability, the temporal contrast sensitivity functions for NCS are approximately constant or even increase over the studied frequency range. Therefore there is no evidence in this study that the processes underlying NCS are slower than the low-level processes of simple flicker detection. These results point to relatively fast mechanisms, not slow diffusion processes, as the substrate for NCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyi He
- Department of Psychology, College of Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ennio Mingolla
- Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rhea T Eskew
- Department of Psychology, College of Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vinke LN, Yazdanbakhsh A. Lightness induction enhancements and limitations at low frequency modulations across a variety of stimulus contexts. PeerJ 2020; 8:e8918. [PMID: 32351782 PMCID: PMC7183748 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Lightness illusions are often studied under static viewing conditions with figures varying in geometric design, containing different types of perceptual grouping and figure-ground cues. A few studies have explored the perception of lightness induction while modulating lightness illusions continuously in time, where changes in perceived lightness are often linked to the temporal modulation frequency, up to around 2–4 Hz. These findings support the concept of a cut-off frequency for lightness induction. However, another critical change (enhancement) in the magnitude of perceived lightness during slower temporal modulation conditions has not been addressed in previous temporal modulation studies. Moreover, it remains unclear whether this critical change applies to a variety of lightness illusion stimuli, and the degree to which different stimulus configurations can demonstrate enhanced lightness induction in low modulation frequencies. Therefore, we measured lightness induction strength by having participants cancel out any perceived modulation in lightness detected over time within a central target region, while the surrounding context, which ultimately drives the lightness illusion, was viewed in a static state or modulated continuously in time over a low frequency range (0.25–2 Hz). In general, lightness induction decreased as temporal modulation frequency was increased, with the strongest perceived lightness induction occurring at lower modulation frequencies for visual illusions with strong grouping and figure-ground cues. When compared to static viewing conditions, we found that slow continuous surround modulation induces a strong and significant increase in perceived lightness for multiple types of lightness induction stimuli. Stimuli with perceptually ambiguous grouping and figure-ground cues showed weaker effects of slow modulation lightness enhancement. Our results demonstrate that, in addition to the existence of a cut-off frequency, an additional critical temporal modulation frequency of lightness induction exists (0.25–0.5 Hz), which instead maximally enhances lightness induction and seems to be contingent upon the prevalence of figure-ground and grouping organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Nicholas Vinke
- Graduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience (CSN), Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arash Yazdanbakhsh
- Graduate Program for Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Systems Neuroscience (CSN), Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shapiro A, Hedjar L, Dixon E, Kitaoka A. Kitaoka's Tomato: Two Simple Explanations Based on Information in the Stimulus. Iperception 2018; 9:2041669517749601. [PMID: 29344332 PMCID: PMC5764143 DOI: 10.1177/2041669517749601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Kitaoka’s Tomato is a color illusion in which a semitransparent blue-green field is placed on top of a red object (a tomato). The tomato appears red even though the pixels would appear green if viewed in isolation. We show that this phenomenon can be explained by a high-pass filter and by histogram equalization. The results suggest that this illusion does not require complex inferences about color constancy; rather, the tomato’s red is available in the physical stimulus at the appropriate spatial scale and dynamic range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Shapiro
- Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Computer Science, American University, Washington, DC, USA; Program in Behavior, Cognition, and Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Laysa Hedjar
- Program in Behavior, Cognition, and Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Erica Dixon
- Program in Behavior, Cognition, and Neuroscience, American University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception: Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks. Behav Res Methods 2015; 48:306-12. [PMID: 25761392 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness (perceived intensity) by Blakeslee and McCourt (Vision Research 39:4361-4377, 1999), which is based on linear spatial filtering by oriented receptive fields followed by contrast normalization, has proven highly successful in parsimoniously predicting the perceived intensity (brightness) of regions in complex visual stimuli such as White's effect, which had been believed to defy filter-based explanations. Unlike competing explanations such as anchoring theory, filling-in, edge-integration, or layer decomposition, the spatial filtering approach embodied by the ODOG model readily accounts for the often overlooked but ubiquitous gradient structure of induction which, while most striking in grating induction, also occurs within the test fields of classical simultaneous brightness contrast and the White stimulus. Also, because the ODOG model does not require defined regions of interest, it is generalizable to any stimulus, including natural images. The ODOG model has motivated other researchers to develop modified versions (LODOG and FLODOG), and has served as an important counterweight and proof of concept to constrain high-level theories which rely on less well understood or justified mechanisms such as unconscious inference, transparency, perceptual grouping, and layer decomposition. Here we provide a brief but comprehensive description of the ODOG model as it has been implemented since 1999, as well as working Mathematica (Wolfram, Inc.) notebooks which users can employ to generate ODOG model predictions for their own stimuli.
Collapse
|
5
|
McCourt ME, Leone LM, Blakeslee B. Brightness induction and suprathreshold vision: effects of age and visual field. Vision Res 2014; 106:36-46. [PMID: 25462024 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2014] [Revised: 10/05/2014] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
A variety of visual capacities show significant age-related alterations. We assessed suprathreshold contrast and brightness perception across the lifespan in a large sample of healthy participants (N=155; 142) ranging in age from 16 to 80 years. Experiment 1 used a quadrature-phase motion cancelation technique (Blakeslee & McCourt, 2008) to measure canceling contrast (in central vision) for induced gratings at two temporal frequencies (1 Hz and 4 Hz) at two test field heights (0.5° or 2°×38.7°; 0.052 c/d). There was a significant age-related reduction in canceling contrast at 4 Hz, but not at 1 Hz. We find no age-related change in induction magnitude in the 1 Hz condition. We interpret the age-related decline in grating induction magnitude at 4 Hz to reflect a diminished capacity for inhibitory processing at higher temporal frequencies. In Experiment 2 participants adjusted the contrast of a matching grating (0.5° or 2°×38.7°; 0.052 c/d) to equal that of both real (30% contrast, 0.052 c/d) and induced (McCourt, 1982) standard gratings (100% inducing grating contrast; 0.052 c/d). Matching gratings appeared in the upper visual field (UVF) and test gratings appeared in the lower visual field (LVF), and vice versa, at eccentricities of ±7.5°. Average induction magnitude was invariant with age for both test field heights. There was a significant age-related reduction in perceived contrast of stimuli in the LVF versus UVF for both real and induced gratings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E McCourt
- Center for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
| | - Lynnette M Leone
- Center for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA
| | - Barbara Blakeslee
- Center for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Neil SF, Webster MA. Filling in, filling out, or filtering out: processes stabilizing color appearance near the center of gaze. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA. A, OPTICS, IMAGE SCIENCE, AND VISION 2014; 31:A140-A147. [PMID: 24695162 PMCID: PMC3979538 DOI: 10.1364/josaa.31.00a140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Spectral sensitivity varies markedly across the center of gaze, in part because of the rapid decline in the density of macular pigment outside the fovea. Yet despite these retinal inhomogeneities, the color appearance of large uniform fields remains very uniform. We explored some of the processes contributing to these stable color percepts by measuring the effects of field size and eccentricity on saturated purples, whose spectra should show the largest biases with macular pigment screening. Small purple fields at 0° and 8° eccentricities differ in appearance but by much less than predicted by the macular screening or by compensation for the average effects of this screening at the two loci. This shows that the compensation is already nearly complete because of local adjustments that filter out the sensitivity variation and confirms that this filtering includes adjustments beyond average gain changes in the cones. In large fields, the appearance is dominated by the local peripheral color. This bias persists when the field edge is fixated or when abrupt edges are removed in Gaussian spots, suggesting that the spreading is not strongly dependent on luminance edges.
Collapse
|
7
|
The separation of monocular and binocular contrast. Vision Res 2013; 93:19-28. [PMID: 24128873 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2013.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2013] [Revised: 09/29/2013] [Accepted: 10/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The contrast asynchrony is a stimulus configuration that illustrates the visual system's separable responses to luminance and luminance contrast information (Shapiro, 2008; Shapiro et al., 2004). When two disks, whose luminances modulate in phase with each other, are each surrounded by a disk, one light and one dark, observers can see both the in-phase brightness signals and the antiphase contrast signals and can separate the two. Here we present the results of experiments in which observers viewed a similar stimulus dichoptically. We report that no asynchrony is perceived when one eye is presented with modulating disks and the other eye is presented with the black and white surround rings, nor is an asynchrony perceived in gradient versions of the contrast asynchrony. We also explore the "window shade illusion" (Shapiro, Charles, & Shear-Heyman, 2005) dichoptically and find that when a modulating disk is presented to one eye and a horizontally split black/white annulus is presented to the other, observers perceive a "shading" motion up and down the disk. This shading can be seen in either direction in the binocular condition, but it is almost always seen as moving towards low contrast in the monocular condition. These findings indicate the presence of separable retinal and cortical networks for contrast processing at different temporal and spatial scales.
Collapse
|
8
|
Blakeslee B, McCourt ME. Brightness induction magnitude declines with increasing distance from the inducing field edge. Vision Res 2012; 78:39-45. [PMID: 23262229 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2012] [Revised: 12/12/2012] [Accepted: 12/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Brightness induction refers to a class of visual illusions where the perceived intensity of a region of space is influenced by the luminance of surrounding regions. These illusions are significant because they provide insight into the neural organization and processing strategies employed by the visual system. The nature of these processing strategies, however, has long been debated. Here we investigate the spatial characteristics of grating induction as a function of the distance from the inducing field edge to evaluate the viability of various competing models. In particular multiscale spatial filtering models and homogeneous filling-in models make very different predictions in regard to the magnitude of induction as a function of this distance. Filling-in explanations predict that the brightness/lightness of the filled-in region will be homogeneous, whereas multiscale filtering predicts a fall-off in induction magnitude with distance from the inducing field edge. Induction magnitude was measured using a narrow probe version of the quadrature-phase motion-cancellation paradigm (Blakeslee & McCourt, 2011) and a point-by-point brightness matching paradigm (Blakeslee & McCourt, 1997, 1999; McCourt, 1994). Both techniques reveal a decrease in the magnitude of induction with increasing distance from the inducing edge. A homogeneous filling-in mechanism cannot explain the induced structure in the test fields of these stimuli. The results argue strongly against filling-in mechanisms as well as against any mechanism that posits that induction is homogeneous. The structure of the induction is, however, well accounted for by the multiscale filtering (ODOG) model of Blakeslee and McCourt (1999). These results support models of brightness/lightness, such as filtering models, which preserve these gradients of induction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Blakeslee
- Center for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|