The effect of mean luminance change and grating pedestals on contrast perception: model simulations suggest a common, retinal, origin

Binocular vision adaptively suppresses delayed monocular signals

A neutral density filter placed before one eye will produce a dichoptic imbalance in luminance, which attenuates responses to visual stimuli and lags neural signals from retina to cortex in the filtered eye. When stimuli are presented to both the filtered and unfiltered eye (i.e., binocularly), neural responses show little attenuation and no lag compared with their baseline counterpart. This suggests that binocular visual mechanisms must suppress the attenuated and delayed input from the filtered eye; however, the mechanisms involved remain unclear. Here, we used a Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential (SSVEP) technique to measure neural responses to monocularly and binocularly presented stimuli while observers wore an ND filter in front of their dominant eye. These data were well-described by a binocular summation model, which received the sinusoidal contrast modulation of the stimulus as input. We incorporated the influence of the ND filter with an impulse response function, which adjusted the input magnitude and phase in a biophysically plausible manner. The model captured the increase in attenuation and lag of neural signals for stimuli presented to the filtered eye as a function of filter strength, while also generating the filter phase-invariant responses from binocular presentation for EEG and psychophysical data. These results clarify how binocular visual mechanisms-specifically interocular suppression-can suppress the delayed and attenuated signals from the filtered eye and maintain normal neural signals under imbalanced luminance conditions.

Context-dependent lightness affects perceived contrast

Perceived contrast of a grating varies with its background (or mean) luminance: of the two gratings with the same photometric contrast the one on higher luminance background appears to have higher contrast. Does perceived contrast also vary with context-dependent background lightness even when the luminance remains constant? We investigated this question using a stimulus in which two equiluminant patches ("context squares", CSs) appear different in lightness. First we measured the lightness effect in a behavioral experiment. After ensuring that it was present for all participants, we conducted perceived contrast experiments, where participants judged the contrast of rectified incremental and decremental square-wave gratings superimposed on the CSs. For the incremental gratings participants' settings were significantly different for the two CSs. Specifically, perceived contrast was higher when the gratings were placed on the context square that was perceived lighter. In a follow-up experiment we measured perceived contrast of rectified gratings on isolated patches that differed in luminance. The pattern of results of the two experiments was consistent, demonstrating that possibly shared mechanisms underpin the effects of background luminance and context-dependent lightness on perceived contrast.