A cognitive architecture account of the visual local advantage phenomenon in autism spectrum disorders

Segregated Dynamical Networks for Biological Motion Perception in the Mu and Beta Range Underlie Social Deficits in Autism

OBJECTIVE

Biological motion perception (BMP) correlating with a mirror neuron system (MNS) is attenuated in underage individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). While BMP in typically-developing controls (TDCs) encompasses interconnected MNS structures, ASD data hint at segregated form and motion processing. This coincides with less fewer long-range connections in ASD than TDC. Using BMP and electroencephalography (EEG) in ASD, we characterized directionality and coherence (mu and beta frequencies). Deficient BMP may stem from desynchronization thereof in MNS and may predict social-communicative deficits in ASD. Clinical considerations thus profit from brain-behavior associations.

METHODS

Point-like walkers elicited BMP using 15 white dots (walker vs. scramble in 21 ASD (mean: 11.3 ± 2.3 years) vs. 23 TDC (mean: 11.9 ± 2.5 years). Dynamic Imaging of Coherent Sources (DICS) characterized the underlying EEG time-frequency causality through time-resolved Partial Directed Coherence (tPDC). Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification validated the group effects (ASD vs. TDC).

RESULTS

TDC showed MNS sources and long-distance paths (both feedback and bidirectional); ASD demonstrated distinct from and motion sources, predominantly local feedforward connectivity, and weaker coherence. Brain-behavior correlations point towards dysfunctional networks. SVM successfully classified ASD regarding EEG and performance.

CONCLUSION

ASD participants showed segregated local networks for BMP potentially underlying thwarted complex social interactions. Alternative explanations include selective attention and global-local processing deficits.

SIGNIFICANCE

This is the first study applying source-based connectivity to reveal segregated BMP networks in ASD regarding structure, cognition, frequencies, and temporal dynamics that may explain socio-communicative aberrancies.

The Effect of the Graphic Structures of Humanoid Robot on N200 and P300 Potentials

Humanoid robots are widely used in brain computer interface (BCI). Using a humanoid robot stimulus could increase the amplitude of event-related potentials (ERPs), which improves BCI performance. Since a humanoid robot contains many human elements, the element that increases the ERPs amplitude is unclear, and how to test the effect of it on the brain is a problem. This study used different graphic structures of an NAO humanoid robot to design three types of robot stimuli: a global robot, its local information, and its topological action. Ten subjects first conducted an odd-ball-based BCI (OD-BCI) by applying these stimuli. Then, they accomplished a delayed matching-to-sample task (DMST) that was used to specialize the encoding and retrieval phases of the OD-BCI task. In the retrieval phase of the DMST, the global stimulus induces the largest N200 and P300 potentials with the shortest latencies in the frontal, central, and occipital areas. This finding is in accordance with the P300 and classification performance of the OD-BCI task. When induced by the local stimulus, the subjects responded faster and more accurately in the retrieval phase of the DMST than in the other two conditions, indicating that the local stimulus improved the subject's responses. These results indicate that the OD-BCI task causes subject's retrieval work when the subject recognizes and outputs the stimulus. The global stimulus that contains topological and local elements could make brain react faster and induce larger ERPs, this finding could be used during the development of visual stimuli to improve BCI performance.

Human visual perceptual organization beats thinking on speed

What is the degree to which knowledge influences visual perceptual processes? This question, which is central to the seeing-versus-thinking debate in cognitive science, is often discussed using examples claimed to be proof of one stance or another. It has, however, also been muddled by the usage of different and unclear definitions of perception. Here, for the well-defined process of perceptual organization, I argue that including speed (or efficiency) into the equation opens a new perspective on the limits of top-down influences of thinking on seeing. While the input of the perceptual organization process may be modifiable and its output enrichable, the process itself seems so fast (or efficient) that thinking hardly has time to intrude and is effective mostly after the fact.

Structural coding versus free-energy predictive coding

Focusing on visual perceptual organization, this article contrasts the free-energy (FE) version of predictive coding (a recent Bayesian approach) to structural coding (a long-standing representational approach). Both use free-energy minimization as metaphor for processing in the brain, but their formal elaborations of this metaphor are fundamentally different. FE predictive coding formalizes it by minimization of prediction errors, whereas structural coding formalizes it by minimization of the descriptive complexity of predictions. Here, both sides are evaluated. A conclusion regarding competence is that FE predictive coding uses a powerful modeling technique, but that structural coding has more explanatory power. A conclusion regarding performance is that FE predictive coding-though more detailed in its account of neurophysiological data-provides a less compelling cognitive architecture than that of structural coding, which, for instance, supplies formal support for the computationally powerful role it attributes to neuronal synchronization.

An overview of quantitative approaches in Gestalt perception

Gestalt psychology is often criticized as lacking quantitative measurements and precise mathematical models. While this is true of the early Gestalt school, today there are many quantitative approaches in Gestalt perception and the special issue of Vision Research "Quantitative Approaches in Gestalt Perception" showcases the current state-of-the-art. In this article we give an overview of these current approaches. For example, ideal observer models are one of the standard quantitative tools in vision research and there is a clear trend to try and apply this tool to Gestalt perception and thereby integrate Gestalt perception into mainstream vision research. More generally, Bayesian models, long popular in other areas of vision research, are increasingly being employed to model perceptual grouping as well. Thus, although experimental and theoretical approaches to Gestalt perception remain quite diverse, we are hopeful that these quantitative trends will pave the way for a unified theory.