The influence of word frequency on word reading speed when individuals with macular diseases read text

A comparison of reading, in people with simulated and actual central vision loss, with static text, horizontally scrolling text, and rapid serial visual presentation

Reading with central vision loss (CVL), as caused by macular disease, may be enhanced by presenting text using dynamic formats such as horizontally scrolling text or rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). The rationale for these dynamic text formats is that they can be read while holding gaze away from the text, potentially supporting reading while using the eccentric viewing strategy. This study was designed to evaluate the practice of reading with CVL, with passages of text presented as static sentences, with horizontal scrolling sentences, or as single-word RSVP. In separate studies, normally sighted participants with a simulated (artificial) central scotoma, controlled by an eye-tracker, or participants with CVL resulting from macular degeneration read passages of text using the eccentric viewing technique. Comprehension was better overall with scrolling text when reading with a simulated CVL, whereas RSVP produced lower overall comprehension and high error rates. Analysis of eye movement behavior showed that participants consistently adopted a strategy of making multiple horizontal saccades on the text itself. Adherence to using eccentric viewing was better with RSVP, but this did not translate into better reading performance. Participants with macular degeneration and an actual CVL also showed the highest comprehension and lowest error rates with scrolling text and the lowest comprehension and highest errors with RSVP. We conclude that scrolling text can support effective reading in people with CVL and has potential as a reading aid.

Test-retest Reliability of the qReading Method in Normally Sighted Young Adults

SIGNIFICANCE

We recently developed a novel Bayesian adaptive method, qReading, to measure reading function. The qReading method has both the efficiency and excellent test-retest reliability in normally sighted young adults to make it an excellent candidate for future studies of its value in diagnosis and longitudinal evaluation of treatment and/or rehabilitation outcomes.

PURPOSE

A novel Bayesian adaptive method, qReading, was recently developed to measure reading function. Here we performed a systematic assessment of the test-retest reliability of the qReading method.

METHODS

The variability of five repeated measurements of the reading curve was examined in two settings: within session and between sessions. For the within-session design, we considered two subpopulations: naive observers and experienced observers. All observers were normally sighted young adults. For each set of data, in addition to examining the intrinsic precision of the qReading method (the half width of the credible interval of the posterior distribution of the estimated performance), we computed four metrics to assess repeatability: standard deviation, Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability, correlation coefficient, and Fractional Rank Precision.

RESULTS

Extrinsic factors such as observer, time interval between repeated measures, and observer experience all contribute to the variation across measurements. Nevertheless, the four metrics consistently show that the variability across five repeated measurements is small for each set of data. This is true even without taking learning effects into account (standard deviations, ≤0.092 log10 units; Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability, ≤0.15 (log10)2 units; correlation coefficient, ≥0.91; and Fractional Rank Precision, ≥0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

The qReading method has excellent test-retest reliability in normally sighted young adults.

The inhibitory effect of word neighborhood size when reading with central field loss is modulated by word predictability and reading proficiency

For normally sighted readers, word neighborhood size (i.e., the total number of words that can be formed from a single word by changing only one letter) has a facilitator effect on word recognition. When reading with central field loss (CFL) however, individual letters may not be correctly identified, leading to possible misidentifications and a reverse neighborhood size effect. Here we investigate this inhibitory effect of word neighborhood size on reading performance and whether it is modulated by word predictability and reading proficiency. Nineteen patients with binocular CFL from 32 to 89 years old (mean ± SD = 75 ± 15) read short sentences presented with the self-paced reading paradigm. Accuracy and reading time were measured for each target word read, along with its predictability, i.e., its probability of occurrence following the two preceding words in the sentence using a trigram analysis. Linear mixed effects models were then fit to estimate the individual contributions of word neighborhood size, predictability, frequency and length on accuracy and reading time, while taking patients' reading proficiency into account. For the less proficient readers, who have given up daily reading as a consequence of their visual impairment, we found that the effect of neighborhood size was reversed compared to normally sighted readers and of higher amplitude than the effect of frequency. Furthermore, this inhibitory effect is of greater amplitude (up to 50% decrease in reading speed) when a word is not easily predictable because its chances to occur after the two preceding words in a specific sentence are rather low. Severely impaired patients with CFL often quit reading on a daily basis because this task becomes simply too exhausting. Based on our results, we envision lexical text simplification as a new alternative to promote effective rehabilitation in these patients. By increasing reading accessibility for those who struggle the most, text simplification might be used as an efficient rehabilitation tool and daily reading assistive technology, fostering overall reading ability and fluency through increased practice.