The eyes prefer targets nearby fixation: Quantifying eccentricity-dependent attentional biases in oculomotor selection

Does crowding predict conjunction search? An individual differences approach

Searching for objects in the visual environment is an integral part of human behavior. Most of the information used during such visual search comes from the periphery of our vision, and understanding the basic mechanisms of search therefore requires taking into account the inherent limitations of peripheral vision. Our previous work using an individual differences approach has shown that one of the major factors limiting peripheral vision (crowding) is predictive of single feature search, as reflected in response time and eye movement measures. Here we extended this work, by testing the relationship between crowding and visual search in a conjunction-search paradigm. Given that conjunction search involves more fine-grained discrimination and more serial behavior, we predicted it would be strongly affected by crowding. We tested sixty participants with regard to their sensitivity to both orientation and color-based crowding (as measured by critical spacing) and their efficiency in searching for a color/orientation conjunction (as indicated by manual response times and eye movements). While the correlations between the different crowding tasks were high, the correlations between the different crowding measures and search performance were relatively modest, and no higher than those previously observed for single-feature search. Instead, observers showed very strong color selectivity during search. The results suggest that conjunction search behavior relies more on top-down guidance (here by color) and is therefore relatively less determined by individual differences in sensory limitations as caused by crowding.

The effects of eccentricity on attentional capture

Visual attention may be captured by an irrelevant yet salient distractor, thereby slowing search for a relevant target. This phenomenon has been widely studied using the additional singleton paradigm in which search items are typically all presented at one and the same eccentricity. Yet, differences in eccentricity may well bias the competition between target and distractor. Here we investigate how attentional capture is affected by the relative eccentricities of a target and a distractor. Participants searched for a shape-defined target in a grid of homogeneous nontargets of the same color. On 75% of trials, one of the nontarget items was replaced by a salient color-defined distractor. Crucially, target and distractor eccentricities were independently manipulated across three levels of eccentricity (i.e., near, middle, and far). Replicating previous work, we show that the presence of a distractor slows down search. Interestingly, capture as measured by manual reaction times was not affected by target and distractor eccentricity, whereas capture as measured by the eyes was: items close to fixation were more likely to be selected than items presented further away. Furthermore, the effects of target and distractor eccentricity were largely additive, suggesting that the competition between saliency- and relevance-driven selection was modulated by an independent eccentricity-based spatial component. Implications of the dissociation between manual and oculomotor responses are also discussed.

Retinal eccentricity modulates saliency-driven but not relevance-driven visual selection

Where we move our eyes during visual search is controlled by the relative saliency and relevance of stimuli in the visual field. However, the visual field is not homogeneous, as both sensory representations and attention change with eccentricity. Here we present an experiment investigating how eccentricity differences between competing stimuli affect saliency- and relevance-driven selection. Participants made a single eye movement to a predefined orientation singleton target that was simultaneously presented with an orientation singleton distractor in a background of multiple homogenously oriented other items. The target was either more or less salient than the distractor. Moreover, each of the two singletons could be presented at one of three different retinal eccentricities, such that both were presented at the same eccentricity, one eccentricity value apart, or two eccentricity values apart. The results showed that selection was initially determined by saliency, followed after about 300 ms by relevance. In addition, observers preferred to select the closer over the more distant singleton, and this central selection bias increased with increasing eccentricity difference. Importantly, it largely emerged within the same time window as the saliency effect, thereby resulting in a net reduction of the influence of saliency on the selection outcome. In contrast, the relevance effect remained unaffected by eccentricity. Together, these findings demonstrate that eccentricity is a major determinant of selection behavior, even to the extent that it modifies the relative contribution of saliency in determining where people move their eyes.