Clinical significance of residual platelet reactivity in patients treated with platelet P2Y12 inhibitors

Elevated High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Level Enhances the Impact of Lipoprotein(a) on Platelet Reactivity in PCI Patients Treated with Clopidogrel

BACKGROUND

Recently, the effect of Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] on thrombogenesis has aroused great interest, while inflammation has been reported to modify the Lp(a)-associated risks through an unidentified mechanism.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between platelet reactivity with Lp(a) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels in percutaneous intervention (PCI) patients treated with clopidogrel.

METHODS

Data were collected from 10,724 consecutive PCI patients throughout the year 2013 in Fuwai Hospital. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) and low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LTPR) were defined as thrombelastography (TEG) maximum amplitude of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet (MAADP) > 47 mm and < 31 mm, respectively.

RESULTS

6615 patients with TEG results were finally enrolled. The mean age was 58.24 ± 10.28 years and 5131 (77.6%) were male. Multivariable logistic regression showed that taking Lp(a) < 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L as the reference, isolated Lp(a) elevation [Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP < 2 mg/L] was not significantly associated with HTPR (P = 0.153) or LTPR (P = 0.312). However, the joint elevation of Lp(a) and hs-CRP [Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL and hs-CRP ≥ 2 mg/L] exhibited enhanced association with both HTPR (OR:1.976, 95% CI 1.677-2.329) and LTPR (OR:0.533, 95% CI 0.454-0.627).

CONCLUSIONS

The isolated elevation of Lp(a) level was not an independent indicator for platelet reactivity, yet the concomitant elevation of Lp(a) and hs-CRP levels was significantly associated with increased platelet reactivity. Whether intensified antiplatelet therapy or anti-inflammatory strategies could mitigate the risks in patients presenting combined Lp(a) and hs-CRP elevation requires future investigation.

Advances and Perspectives in methods for identifying high platelet reactivity

Antiplatelet therapy is the foundational treatment for the prevention and treatment of coronary and cerebrovascular ischemic events in patients with coronary heart disease, ischemic stroke, and transient ischemic attack (TIA). However, with more and more studies reporting an increased risk of thrombosis in some patients due to poor response to therapeutic agents, the selection of appropriate P2Y12 inhibitors has become a major challenge that needs to be addressed urgently. Currently, commonly used oral P2Y12 inhibitors include clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and prasugrel. Assessing patients' risk factors before the development of treatment regimens by effectively predicting the risk of high platelet reactivity with specific P2Y12 inhibitors in advance to avert the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) is the key point to the problem. Up to now, methods available for predicting platelet reactivity include genetic testing, platelet function testing, and risk scores. This review provides a summarization of the existent available identification methods and analyzes the advantages and drawbacks of different methods in specific clinical settings, intending to guide the rational clinical application of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors.

Advances in Cardiovascular Pharmacology in Atherosclerotic-Related Therapeutic Areas: Addressing Patients' Clinical Needs

Over the last three decades, a significant improvement has been achieved in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [...].

Baseline P2Y12 reactivity, kidney function, and CYP2C19 genotype determine clopidogrel responsiveness in acute stroke

Clopidogrel is the most-widely used platelet P2Y12-inhibitor for secondary-prevention of ischemic stroke. Platelet P2Y12 reactivity before and after inhibitors can be measured with blood sampling by commercialized system. We aimed to evaluate (1) whether high-on-clopidogrel platelet P2Y12 reactivity (HCPR) is associated with short-term vascular events and (2) the predictors of HCPR in acute stroke. The inclusion criterion was patients with acute stroke who received clopidogrel within 12-48 h after the onset. Platelet reactivity was assayed at baseline and after clopidogrel treatment using the VerifyNow system. The primary endpoint was recurrent ischemic events within 21 days after stroke. Among 190 patients, 32(16.9%) had recurrent ischemic stroke. Multivariate analyses showed that HCPR was significantly associated with the short-term events with an odds-ratio of 2.5 (95% CI 1.1-5.7, p = 0.027). Patients with HCPR had significantly higher frequencies of high baseline platelet P2Y12 reactivity, impaired kidney function, and carrying one or two CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles. A poor clopidogrel response score combining these factors was developed. Ten percent of patients with score 0, 20.3% of those with score 1, 38.3% of those with score 2, and 66.7% of those with score 3 had HCPR (χ²-test, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that, compared with the score-0 group, the score-2 and -3 groups had higher risks of HCPR with hazard-ratios of 5.4 (95% CI 1.5-20.3, p = 0.012) and 17.4 (95% CI 3.4-88.9, p = 0.001) for developing recurrent ischemic strokes. The study emphasized the role of HCPR in ischemic stroke. We also developed an HCPR risk score, which could be used in clinical practice or trials, potentially with more precision, to weigh the clinical benefit of a tailored antiplatelet-strategy for patients with stroke.

High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity in Patients Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Patient response to P2Y12 inhibitor therapy is heterogeneous, and those with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) are at an increased risk of thrombotic complications. The aim of our study was to determine whether selecting a high-risk patient group of individuals after complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) would show the clinical benefit of HTPR testing for preventing thrombotic complications. Blood samples of patients after complex PCI were acquired 1 day and 1 month after the intervention. The samples were tested using vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation (VASP-P) and platelet function assay (PFA). The occurrence of clinically significant stent thrombosis with repeated revascularization of the target vessel was observed over a 1-year period. One day after PCI, 37% of patients had HTPR as established by VASP-P. One month after PCI, the percentage of patients with HTPR decreased to 30.9%. According to PFA, 1 day after PCI, 33.3% of patients had HTPR. This percentage declined to 19.8% after 1 month. All measurements identified a significantly higher proportion of HTPR in patients on clopidogrel compared to ticagrelor and prasugrel. Two cases of early stent thrombosis and 1 case of late stent thrombosis were identified. Further study of adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker on-treatment response in patients undergoing complex PCI is necessary.

Resistance on the Latest Oral and Intravenous P2Y12 ADP Receptor Blockers in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Fact or Myth?

Novel P2Y12 ADP receptor blockers (ADPRB) should be preferred in dual-antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Nevertheless, there are still patients who do not respond optimally to novel ADP receptor blocker therapy, and this nonoptimal response (so-called "high on-treatment platelet reactivity" or "resistance") could be connected with increased risk of adverse ischemic events, such as myocardial re-infarction, target lesion failure and stent thrombosis. In addition, several risk factors have been proposed as factors associated with the phenomenon of inadequate response on novel ADPRB. These include obesity, multivessel coronary artery disease, high pre-treatment platelet reactivity and impaired metabolic status for prasugrel, as well as elderly, concomitant therapy with beta-blockers, morphine and platelet count for ticagrelor. There is no literature report describing nonoptimal therapeutic response on cangrelor, and cangrelor therapy seems to be a possible approach for overcoming HTPR on prasugrel and ticagrelor. However, the optimal therapeutic management of "resistance" on novel ADPRB is not clear and this issue requires further research. This narrative review article discusses the phenomenon of high on-treatment platelet reactivity on novel ADPRB, its importance in clinical practice and approaches for its therapeutic overcoming.

Effect of CYP4F2 Polymorphisms on Ticagrelor Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Background: Ticagrelor belongs to a new class of P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitor that has been widely used for antiplatelet therapy. This study aimed to explore the effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in metabolic enzymes, transporters, and other relevant variants on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ticagrelor and its active metabolite, AR-C124910XX.

Methods: The study population comprised 68 healthy Chinese volunteers who were enrolled in a ticagrelor bioequivalence clinical trial. The PK profile of ticagrelor was evaluated after orally administering a single 90-mg dose of ticagrelor in tablet form. The plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were determined through liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma DNA samples were used to explore the effect of gene polymorphisms on the PK of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX with whole-exome sequencing.

Results: Female participants had a higher maximum plasma concentration/weight ratio (C_max/W; p < 0.001) and a shorter half-life (T_1/2; p < 0.05) for ticagrelor than their male counterparts. In addition, a higher area under the curve/weight ratio (AUC/W; p < 0.001), and longer T_1/2 (p < 0.001) and time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (T_max; p < 0.001), as well as a lower apparent drug clearance (CL/F; p < 0.001), were observed among healthy volunteers in the fed trial compared to those enrolled in the fasting trial. For AR-C124910XX, higher C_max/W (p < 0.001) and AUC/W (p < 0.001) but lower CL/F (p < 0.001) and apparent volume of distribution (V_d/F; p < 0.001) were observed among female participants. Healthy volunteers enrolled in the fasting trial exhibited higher C_max/W (p < 0.001) and AUC/W (p < 0.01), shorter T_max (p < 0.001), and lower CL/F (p < 0.001) and V_d/F (p < 0.001) than those enrolled in the fed trial. Upon confirmation through multivariate analysis, the CYP4F2 rs2074900 A/A carriers were associated with higher C_max/W and AUC/W and lower CL/F and V_d/F than the CYP4F2 rs2074900 A/G and G/G carriers.

Conclusion: This study is the first to show that the CYP4F2 rs2074900 SNP had a remarkable effect on ticagrelor PK, which is significant since it adds to the limited pharmacogenetic information on ticagrelor.

Inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferases by vicagrel in human liver microsomes: A prediction of potential drug-drug interactions

Vicagrel, an antiplatelet drug candidate targeting platelet P2Y₁₂ receptor and has finished its phase II clinical trial. The inhibition of six major cytochrome P450 enzymes (P450) (CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4) and six UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9, and UGT2B7) by vicagrel was evaluated using pooled human liver microsomes and specific probe substrates. Physiology-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) simulation was further applied to predict the in vivo drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential between vicagrel and bupropion as well as S-mephenytoin. The results suggested that vicagrel inhibited CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 potently with apparent IC₅₀ values of 1.6 and 2.0 μM, respectively. In terms of mode of reversible inhibition, vicagrel exhibited mixed-type inhibition of CYP2B6-catalyzed bupropion hydroxylation and noncompetitive inhibition of CYP2C19-mediated S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation with K_i values of 0.19 μM and 1.2 μM, respectively. Vicagrel displayed profound time-dependent inhibition towards CYP2B6 with maximal rate constant of inactivation (k_inact) and half-maximal inactivator concentration (K_I) values of 0.062 min^-1 and 1.52 μM, respectively. No time-dependent inhibition by vicagrel was noted for CYP2C19. For UGT, negligible to moderate inhibition by vicagrel was observed with IC₅₀ values of >50.0, >50.0, 28.2, 8.7, >50.0 and 28.2 μM for UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A9 and UGT2B7, respectively. In terms of mode of reversible inhibition, vicagrel exhibited mixed-type inhibition of UGT1A6-catalyzed N-Acetylserotonin β-D-glucuronidation with a K_i value of 5.6 μM. No time-dependent inhibition by vicagrel was noted for UGT1A6. PBPK simulation indicated that neither altered AUC nor C_max of bupropion and S-mephenytoin was observed in the presence of vicagrel. Our study provides inhibitory constants for future DDI prediction between vicagrel and drug substrates of CYP2B6, CYP2C19 and UGT1A6. In addition, our simulation suggests the lack of clinically important DDI between vicagrel and bupropion or S-mephenytoin.

Clopidogrel Resistance Is Associated With DNA Methylation of Genes From Whole Blood of Humans

Antiplatelet therapy has become a cornerstone in the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). However, due to high-residual-platelet-reactivity, clopidogrel resistance (CR) is a common phenomenon, and it is rarely known about the relationship between CR and epigenetic changes. This study compared the whole genomic methylation patterns of blood samples from patients with CR (n = 6) and non-CR (n = 6) with the Human Methylation 850K BeadChip assay. We explored differentially methylated CpG sites, genes, and pathways using bioinformatics profiling. The CR and control groups showed significantly different DNA methylation at 7,098 sites, with 979 sites showing hypermethylation and 6,119 sites showing hypomethylation. The pyrosequencing method was used to validate four differentially methylated CpG loci (cg23371584, cg15971518, cg04481923, cg22507406), confirming that DNA methylation was associated with the risk of CR (30 CR vs. 30 non-CR). The relative mRNA expression of the four genes (BTG2, PRG2, VTRNA2-1, PER3) corresponding to the loci above was also associated with CR, suggesting that alterations in DNA methylation may affect the expression of these four genes, eventually resulting in CR. Additionally, differentially methylated sites are partially related to genes and pathways that play key roles in process of circadian entrainment, insulin secretion, and so on. Hence, the mechanism and biological regulation of CR might be reflected through these epigenetic alterations, but future research will need to address the causal relationships.

Mechanistic Insights to Target Atherosclerosis Residual Risk

Current pharmacological and mechanical therapies have reduced future cardiovascular risk. Nonetheless, a significant proportion of patients remained at high risk of recurrent events despite achieving guideline-directed therapeutic targets. This residual risk poses challenges despite tackling 'traditional' risk factors. Targeting the residual risk has been the focus of numerous pharmacotherapies which were associated with variable success. Incomplete understanding of the mechanistic nature combined with the lack of tools to precisely quantify the residual risk contributed to the relatively high residual risk after 'optimal' medical therapy. The development of atherosclerotic plaque is derived from lipid retention within arterial intima that triggers an inflammatory cascade accelerating atherosclerosis progression and rendering plaque more prone to rupture. The exposed subendothelial space with activated platelets causes arterial occlusion leading to potential fatality. Therefore, a distinctive approach to characterize these features may offer the opportunity to tailor novel antiatherosclerotic to reduce the residual risk. The traditional approach of measuring risk factors is beneficial at population-level but maybe less informative upon quantifying risk at an individual-basis. This review will discuss lipid accumulation, thrombosis, and inflammation as therapeutic targets of atherosclerosis. Additionally, we will summarize previous challenges of antiatherosclerosis therapies and the future role to tackle the residual risk.

A brief review on resistance to P2Y12 receptor antagonism in coronary artery disease

Background

Platelet inhibition is important for patients with coronary artery disease. When dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is required, a P2Y₁₂-antagonist is usually recommended in addition to standard aspirin therapy. The most used P2Y₁₂-antagonists are clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor. Despite DAPT, some patients experience adverse cardiovascular events, and insufficient platelet inhibition has been suggested as a possible cause. In the present review we have performed a literature search on prevalence, mechanisms and clinical implications of resistance to P2Y₁₂ inhibitors.

Methods

The PubMed database was searched for relevant papers and 11 meta-analyses were included. P2Y₁₂ resistance is measured by stimulating platelets with ADP ex vivo and the most used assays are vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), Multiplate, VerifyNow (VN) and light transmission aggregometry (LTA).

Discussion/conclusion

The frequency of high platelet reactivity (HPR) during clopidogrel therapy is predicted to be 30%. Genetic polymorphisms and drug-drug interactions are discussed to explain a significant part of this inter-individual variation. HPR during prasugrel and ticagrelor treatment is estimated to be 3–15% and 0–3%, respectively. This lower frequency is explained by less complicated and more efficient generation of the active metabolite compared to clopidogrel. Meta-analyses do show a positive effect of adjusting standard clopidogrel treatment based on platelet function testing. Despite this, personalized therapy is not recommended because no large-scale RCT have shown any clinical benefit. For patients on prasugrel and ticagrelor, platelet function testing is not recommended due to low occurrence of HPR.

The role of agonist-induced activation and inhibition for the regulation of purinergic receptor expression in human platelets

INTRODUCTION

Adenosine diphosphate (ADP) as physiological activator of human platelets mediates its effects via three purinergic receptors: P2Y1, P2Y12 and P2X1. The inhibition of P2Y12 is used pharmacologically to suppress aggregation underlining the physiological significance of this receptor. Since the regulation of purinergic receptor expression has not thoroughly been investigated yet, this study analyzed the content of purinergic receptors on the platelet surface membrane upon activation and inhibition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The surface expression of purinergic receptors was measured by flow cytometry using two different polyclonal antibodies as basal values and after incubation with thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP-6) or with inhibitors DEA/NO, MAHMA/NO or Prostaglandin E1 (PGE1). Western blot analysis was used to confirm inhibitory effects.

RESULTS

Both investigated antibodies revealed a significant increase of purinergic receptor expression upon TRAP-6 stimulation. The NO donors, DEA/NO and MAHMA/NO, did not influence basal or TRAP-6 stimulated values. PGE1 did not affect basal receptor expression, but diminished TRAP-6 stimulated purinergic receptor expression in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, TRAP-6 induced platelet activation leads to an elevation of purinergic receptor expression. In contrast to other surface ligands, this effect is not suppressed by cGMP-mediated inhibition, but almost completely abrogated by enhanced cAMP-mediated signaling as induced by PGE1.

On-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral and coronary blood in patients undergoing primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Pre-analytical variables may influence platelet function analysis results. Our aim was to evaluate the on-treatment platelet reactivity in peripheral artery vs coronary blood in patients with STEMI. We enrolled one hundred and nine patients who consecutively underwent p-PCI at Cardiology Unit of Padua University Hospital between June 2014 and June 2015. Before the procedure, all patients received intravenous aspirin 250 mg and either of the thienopyridines; clopidogrel 600 mg, prasugrel 60 mg or ticagrelor 180 mg. ASPI-test and ADP-test using multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) were performed in samples collected from both a peripheral artery and the culprit coronary artery. 'Low responders' were patients with an ASPI-test or ADP-test value greater than or equal to a pre-established normal range. No significant differences were observed in ASPI-test values between peripheral (19 (median) [3-49 (10-90 percentiles)] U) vs coronary (12 [1-40] U, p = .06) blood and in ADP-test (40 [14-82] U vs 33 [7-79] U, p =.68) blood. In peripheral blood, fifteen (14%) patients were 'low aspirin' and forty-one (38%) 'low thienopyridines' responders. The prevalence of 'low clopidogrel' responders was higher (45%) than prasugrel (36%) and ticagrelor (33%). Similar results were observed in coronary blood. In patients undergoing p-PCI for STEMI, MEA platelet function observed in coronary arteries was consistent with peripheral artery blood's independently of the antiplatelet drug used. The clinical significance of peripheral and coronary on-aspirin/thienopyridines platelet reactivity needs further clarification.

Utility of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Absorption Modeling to Predict the Impact of Salt-to-Base Conversion on Prasugrel HCl Product Bioequivalence in the Presence of Proton Pump Inhibitors

Prasugrel HCl may convert to prasugrel base during manufacturing or storage. It was reported that formulations with different ratios of salt to base were bioequivalent in healthy subjects, but formulations with a higher extent of conversion were not bioequivalent in subjects taking proton pump inhibitor (PPI) whose stomach pH is elevated. The objective of this study was to assess the magnitude of impact of salt-to-base conversion on prasugrel HCl products BE evaluation in healthy subjects on PPI. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) absorption model was constructed to predict pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of active metabolite after oral administration of prasugrel HCl products containing various fractions of base based on the prasugrel salt and base intrinsic solubility. The intrinsic solubility was obtained by deconvoluting the model against the observed active metabolite PK profiles with various fractions of base in healthy subjects with or without PPI. The developed PBPK absorption model accurately predicted the average active metabolite PK profiles in healthy subjects without PPI for the product containing 100% salt. A model based on assumptions of the fraction of a dose absorbed remaining unchanged for formulations containing different fractions of base over predicted the reduction of bioavailability upon conversion to the base. Therefore, this represented the conservative estimate with respect to the impact of free base in a product on BE evaluation. Virtual BE trial simulation predicted that less than 20% free base in prasugrel HCl product ensures in vivo BE of the generic product including in subjects that may be taking PPI.

Novel Risk Markers and Risk Assessments for Cardiovascular Disease

The use of risk markers has transformed cardiovascular medicine, exemplified by the routine assessment of troponin, for both diagnosis and assessment of prognosis in patients with chest pain. Clinical risk factors form the basis for risk assessment of cardiovascular disease and the addition of biochemical, cellular, and imaging parameters offers further refinement. Identifying novel risk factors may allow greater risk stratification and a steady, but gradual progression toward precision medicine. Indeed, the generation of data in this area of research is explosive and when combined with new technologies and techniques provides the potential for more refined, targeted approaches to cardiovascular medicine. Although discussing the most recent developments in this field, this review article aims to strike a balance between novelty and validity by focusing on recent large sample-size studies that have been validated in a separate cohort in most cases. Risk markers related to atherosclerosis, thrombosis, inflammation, cardiac injury, and fibrosis are introduced in the context of their pathophysiology. Rapidly developing new areas, such as assessment of micro-RNA, are also explored. Subsequently the prognostic ability of these risk markers in coronary artery disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation is discussed in detail.