1
|
Verdoia M, Zilio F, Gioscia R, Viola O, Brancati MF, Fanti D, Soldà PL, Bonmassari R, Rognoni A, De Luca G. Prognostic Impact of Drug-Coated Balloons in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Propensity-Matched Study. Am J Cardiol 2023; 206:73-78. [PMID: 37683582 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at higher risk of restenosis and stent thrombosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and drug-eluting stent (DES) positioning. Whether drug-coated balloons (DCB) can offer any benefit in this subset of patients has been seldom cleared out and was the aim of the present propensity-matched cohort study, that compared the prognostic impact of DCB versus DES in patients with DM who underwent PCI. Patients with DM enrolled in the NOvara-BIella-TREnto (NOBITRE) Registry were identified and matched according to propensity score, to a control population of patients with DM treated with DES. The primary study end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). A total of 150 patients were identified in the DCB group and matched with 150 DES-treated patients. Patients treated with DCB displayed more often a previous cardiovascular history and received a more complete pharmacological therapy. Target vessel diameter and the percentage of stenosis were lower in patients with DCB, whereas binary in-stent restenosis was more common (p <0.001, p = 0.003, and p <0.001, respectively). Paclitaxel-eluting balloon represented the most common strategy in the DCB group, whereas Zotarolimus-eluting stents were used in half of the DES population. At a median follow-up of 545.5 days, MACE occurred in 54 (19.4%) of patients, with no difference according to the PCI strategy (21.6% vs 17.3%, adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.51 [0.46 to 4.93], p = 0.50). Major ischemic end points were slightly increased in patients treated with DCB, whereas overall death was significantly reduced (3.6% vs 10.9%; adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.27 [0.08 to 0.91], p = 0.03). In conclusion, the present propensity-matched study shows that, in patients with DM who underwent PCI for in-stent restenosis or de novo lesions, the use of DCB is associated with a similar rate of MACE and a modest increase in target lesion failure, but a significantly improved survival as compared with DES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Verdoia
- Division of Cardiology Ospedale degli Infermi, ASL Biella, Italy.
| | - Filippo Zilio
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Santa Chiara, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - Rocco Gioscia
- Division of Cardiology Ospedale degli Infermi, ASL Biella, Italy
| | - Orazio Viola
- Division of Cardiology Ospedale degli Infermi, ASL Biella, Italy
| | | | - Diego Fanti
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Santa Chiara, APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - Pier Luigi Soldà
- Division of Cardiology Ospedale degli Infermi, ASL Biella, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Rognoni
- Division of Cardiology Ospedale degli Infermi, ASL Biella, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Luca
- Division of Cardiology, AOU Policlinico "G Martino"; Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università degli Studi di Messina, Messina, Italy; Division of Cardiology, IRCCS Hospital Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zilio F, Verdoia M, De Angelis MC, Zucchelli F, Borghesi M, Rognoni A, Bonmassari R. Drug Coated Balloon in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12113662. [PMID: 37297857 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12113662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Drug coated balloons (DCBs) are currently indicated in guidelines as a first choice option in the management of instant restenosis, whereas their use in de novo lesions is still debated. The concerns raised after the contrasting results of the initial trials with DCBs in de novo lesions have been more recently overcome by a larger amount of data confirming their safety and effectiveness as compared to drug-eluting stents (DES), with potentially greater benefits being achieved, especially in particular anatomical settings, as in very small or large vessels and bifurcations, but also in selected subsets of higher-risk patients, where a 'leave nothing behind' strategy could offer a reduction of the inflammatory stimulus and thrombotic risk. The present review aims at providing an overview of current available DCB devices and their indications of use based on the results of data achieved so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Zilio
- Department of Cardiology, Santa Chiara Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Marco Borghesi
- Department of Cardiology, Santa Chiara Hospital, 38122 Trento, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Verdoia M, Rognoni A. Coronary Physiology: Modern Concepts for the Guidance of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Medical Therapy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:2274. [PMID: 36983275 PMCID: PMC10057250 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent evidence on ischemia, rather than coronary artery disease (CAD), representing a major determinant of outcomes, has led to a progressive shift in the management of patients with ischemic heart disease. According to most recent guidelines, myocardial revascularization strategies based on anatomical findings should be progressively abandoned in favor of functional criteria for the guidance of PCI. Thus, emerging importance has been assigned to the assessment of coronary physiology in order to determine the ischemic significance of coronary stenoses. However, despite several indexes and tools that have been developed so far, the existence of technical and clinical conditions potentially biasing the functional evaluation of the coronary tree still cause debates regarding the strategy of choice. The present review provides an overview of the available methods and the most recent acquirements for the invasive assessment of ischemia, focusing on the most widely available indexes, fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instant-wave free ratio (iFR), in addition to emerging examples, as new approaches to coronary flow reserve (CFR) and microvascular resistance, aiming at promoting the knowledge and application of those "full physiology" principles, which are generally advocated to allow a tailored treatment and the achievement of the largest prognostic benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Verdoia
- Nuovo Ospedale Degli Infermi, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Biella, 13900 Biella, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Verdoia M, Zilio F, Viola O, Brancati MF, Fanti D, Soldà PL, Rognoni A, Bonmassari R, De Luca G. Long-Term Outcomes With Drug-Eluting Balloon for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis and De Novo Lesions: The Novara-Biella-Trento (NOBITRE) Registry. Angiology 2022; 74:488-495. [PMID: 37005331 DOI: 10.1177/00033197221110961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of in-stent restenosis or particular anatomical subsets. We provide a real-world analysis of the prognostic determinants and long-term outcomes of patients treated with DCB for any lesion in a comprehensive multicenter registry. The primary study endpoint was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events (MACE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) at the longest available follow-up. We included 267 patients (196 treated for in-stent restenosis and 71 for de novo lesions), with a median follow-up of 616 [368–1025] days. MACE occurred in 70 (26.2%) of the patients and related with higher rates of in-stent restenosis (P = .04), longer and more type C lesions ( P = .05 and P = .04). At multivariate Cox-regression, type C lesions emerged as the only independent predictor of MACE (adjusted OR [95% CI] = 1.83[1.13–2.97], P = .014), mainly driven by target vessel revascularization (adjusted OR[95% CI] = 1.78[1.05–2.95], P = .03) not conditioning survival. In-stent restenosis emerged as major determinant of TLF (adjusted OR[95% CI] = 2.59[1.17–5.75], P = .02). DCBs represent a treatment option for any lesion; however, type C and restenotic lesions are associated with an increased risk of MACE and target lesion failure, where the optimal strategies for patients’ selection and lesion preparation are still undefined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Verdoia
- Division of Cardiology Ospedale degli Infermi, ASL Bi, Biella, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, Eastern Piedmont University, Novara, Italy
| | - Filippo Zilio
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy
| | - Orazio Viola
- Division of Cardiology Ospedale degli Infermi, ASL Bi, Biella, Italy
| | | | - Diego Fanti
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy
| | - Pier Luigi Soldà
- Division of Cardiology Ospedale degli Infermi, ASL Bi, Biella, Italy
| | - Andrea Rognoni
- Division of Cardiology Ospedale degli Infermi, ASL Bi, Biella, Italy
| | - Roberto Bonmassari
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy
- Cardiology, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Luca
- Department of Translational Medicine, Eastern Piedmont University, Novara, Italy
- Division of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Utilization of Drug-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of Coronary Lesions in the Elderly Population. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092616. [PMID: 35566739 PMCID: PMC9099474 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) has become more prevalent in the past few years for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and de novo lesions. The absence of foreign polymer implantations potentially shortens the duration of dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT), which can be beneficial for the elderly population. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the use of DCBs for the treatment of coronary lesions in elderly patients as compared to the younger population. Materials and methods: A database of 446 consecutive patients who underwent a procedure of DCB inflation in our institution was divided into two groups, below 70 years old and above 80 years old. We compared and analyzed the endpoints of total major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular (CV) death, and all-cause mortality in both groups. Results: The difference in MACE between the two age groups was non-significant (p = 0.225); the difference in cardiovascular death was also non-significant (p = 0.086). All-cause mortality was significantly different (p < 0.0001) and can be attributed to the age of the patients. Conclusion: The utilization of DCBs for the treatment of coronary lesions may be as safe and effective for the elderly population as for the younger population and may allow a shorter period of DAPT therapy, which can lower the risk of bleeding.
Collapse
|
6
|
Liu C, Wolfers M, Awan BEZ, Ali I, Lorenzana AM, Smith Q, Tadros G, Yu Q. Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty for Hemodialysis Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e022060. [PMID: 34796720 PMCID: PMC9075359 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.022060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Both drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and conventional plain balloon angioplasty (PBA) can be implemented to treat hemodialysis dysfunction. The present study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of these 2 approaches by conducting a meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials. Methods and Results PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were queried from establishment to January 2021. A total of 18 randomized controlled trials including 877 and 875 patients in the DCB and PBA groups, respectively, were included in the present meta-analysis. Target lesion primary patency, circuit patency, target lesion revascularization, and mortality were pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were reported with 95% CIs. Publication bias was analyzed with funnel plot and Egger test. Target lesion primary patency was higher among patients who underwent DCB (OR, 2.93 [95% CI, 2.13-4.03], P<0.001 at 6 months; OR, 2.47 [95% CI, 1.53-3.99], P<0.001 at 1 year). Also, the DCB group had a higher dialysis circuit patency at 6 months (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.56-3.77 [P<0.001]) and 1 year (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.22-3.00 [P=0.005]). Compared with the PBA group, the DCB group had lower odds of target lesion revascularization during follow-up (OR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23-0.82], P=0.001 at 6 months; OR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.32-1.73], P=0.490 at 1 year). The OR of mortality was comparable between 2 groups at 6 months (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.42-3.33 [P=0.760]) and 1 year (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.58-1.48 [P=0.750]). Conclusions Based on evidence from 18 randomized controlled trials, DCB angioplasty is superior to PBA in maintaining target lesion primary patency and circuit patency among patients with dialysis circuit stenosis. DCB angioplasty also reduces target lesion revascularization with a similar risk of mortality compared with PBA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyu Liu
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences George Washington University Washington DC
| | - Matthew Wolfers
- Department of General Surgery Cleveland Clinic Florida Weston FL
| | - Bint-E Zainab Awan
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences George Washington University Washington DC
| | - Issa Ali
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences George Washington University Washington DC
| | | | - Quinn Smith
- College of Osteopathic Medicine Kansas City University Kansas City MO
| | - George Tadros
- Department of General Surgery Cleveland Clinic Florida Weston FL
| | - Qian Yu
- Division of Interventional Radiology Department of Radiology University of Chicago Chicago IL
| |
Collapse
|