Efficacy predictors of omalizumab in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma: Findings from a post-hoc analysis of a randomised phase III study

Efficacy of Biologic Therapies in the Management of Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common chronic condition characterized by nasal congestion, sneezing, and itching, which significantly impacts quality of life. Traditional treatments, including antihistamines and intranasal corticosteroids, often fall short in managing moderate-to-severe cases. Recently, biologic therapies such as omalizumab and dupilumab have emerged as potential alternatives. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these biologic therapies in the management of AR. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify studies published between 2000 and 2024. Studies included were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and post-hoc analyses that assessed the impact of biologics on AR symptoms. Data on study characteristics, population demographics, intervention details, and outcomes were extracted and analyzed. The review included nine studies evaluating omalizumab and dupilumab. Omalizumab demonstrated significant improvements in nasal symptoms and quality of life, with notable efficacy in reducing symptoms and improving asthma control in patients with moderate-to-severe AR. Dupilumab also showed positive outcomes, particularly in patients with comorbid asthma and perennial AR, by reducing severe exacerbations and improving symptom scores. Biologic therapies, including omalizumab and dupilumab, offer promising alternatives for the management of AR, especially in cases that are severe or refractory to conventional treatments. The evidence supports their efficacy in improving symptoms and quality of life. Nevertheless, further research is required to address the limitations identified, including the need for long-term data and clarification of the mechanisms of action. These findings underscore the potential of biologics in advancing the treatment of AR and highlight the importance of ongoing research to optimize patient outcomes.

Upper airway disease diagnosis as a predictive biomarker of therapeutic response to biologics in severe asthma

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease sharing airway instability but with different biology, risk factors, and response-to-therapy patterns. Biologics have revolutionized the one-size-fits-to-all approach to personalized medicine in severe asthma (SA), which relies on the identification of biomarkers that define distinct endotypes. Thus, blood eosinophils and, to some extent, exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) can predict the response to approved anti-type 2 (T2) biologics (anti-IgE, anti-IL-5, and anti-IL-4R alpha), whereas age at onset and comorbidities such as anxiety/depression, obesity, reflux, and upper airway disease (UAD) also influence therapeutic responses in SA. In this article, focusing on the predictive value of biomarkers for the therapeutic response to biologics in SA, we first summarize the level of prediction achieved by T2 biomarkers (blood eosinophils, FeNO) and then review whether data support the predictive value of upper airway diagnosis on such outcomes. Post hoc analysis of most studies with T2 biologics suggests that chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and, to a lower extent, allergic rhinitis may help in predicting clinical response. Considering that T2 biologics are now also approved for the treatment of severe CRSwNP, diagnosis of upper airway disease is a key step in determining eligibility for such therapy.