PEG allergy - A COVID-19 pandemic-made problem? A German perspective

Polyethylene glycol and immunology: aspects of allergic reactions and their mechanisms, as well as ways to prevent them in clinical practice

In modern medical practice, where polyethylene glycol is widely used as a component of various drugs, such as vaccines, chemotherapy drugs, and antibiotics, including vaccines, the issue of allergic reactions to this substance is becoming increasingly important. The purpose of this study is to review and systematise data on various aspects of allergic reactions to polyethylene glycol with the aim of better understanding their pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic methods, and possible treatment approaches. The study analysed literature data in modern databases, such as MEDLINE, PubMed, and Scopus, on allergic reactions to polyethylene glycol, using the keywords: "PEG", "polyethylene glycol", "allergy", "side effect". The main aspects of allergy to this substance were highlighted, including mechanisms of development, diagnostic methods, and possible treatment strategies. The analysis found that allergic reactions to polyethylene glycol can manifest in a variety of ways, including anaphylaxis and systemic reactions. A possible role for the immune response has been identified, including the production of IgE and IgM antibodies, complement activation, and accelerated clearance in response to polyethylene glycol, in blood plasma. Data are also provided on how to diagnose an increased risk of an allergic reaction in patients who have previously received drugs with this type of drug transporter and in patients receiving high molecular weight types of polyethylene glycol. The results of this review contribute to a better understanding of allergic reactions to polyethylene glycol and provide information for the development of more effective diagnostic and treatment methods.

Effects of PEG antibodies on in vivo performance of LNP-mRNA vaccines

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) plays important roles in stabilizing and lengthening circulation time of lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccines. Nowadays various levels of PEG antibodies have been detected in human blood, but the impact and mechanism of PEG antibodies on the in vivo performance of LNP vaccines has not been clarified thoroughly. By illustrating the distribution characteristics of PEG antibodies in human, the present study focused on the influence of PEG antibodies on the safety and efficacy of LNP-mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 in animal models. It was found that PEG antibodies led to shortened blood circulation duration, elevated accumulation and mRNA expression in liver and spleen, enhanced expression in macrophage and dendritic cells, while without affecting the production of anti-Spike protein antibodies of COVID-19 LNP vaccine. Noteworthily, PEG antibodies binding on the LNP vaccine increased probability of complement activation in animal as well as in human serum and led to lethal side effect in large dosage via intravenous injection of mice. Our data suggested that PEG antibodies in human was a risky factor of LNP-based vaccines for biosafety concerns but not efficacy.

Absence of Anaphylactic Reactions to Injection of Hemoglobin Vesicles (Artificial Red Cells) to Rodents

The safety and efficacy of hemoglobin vesicles (HbVs) as artificial oxygen carriers encapsulating a purified and concentrated Hb solution in liposomes have been studied extensively. The HbV surface, modified with PEG by incorporating a PEG-conjugated phospholipid, is beneficial for storage and biocompatibility. However, it might be possible that interaction of PEG and the pre-existing anti-PEG antibody in the bloodstream causes acute adverse reaction. This study used two sets of experiments with rats and guinea pigs to ascertain whether the anti-PEG antibody generated by the PEG-modified HbV injection can induce anaphylactic reactions. SD rats received repeated intravenous injection of HbV at a dose rate of 16 or 32 mL/kg three times. Not anti-PEG IgG but anti-PEG IgM was detected. Nevertheless, no anaphylactic reaction occurred. Guinea pigs were used to study the presence of active systemic anaphylaxis further after injections of the PEG-modified liposomes used for HbV. The animals were sensitized by three repeated subcutaneous injections of PEG-modified liposomes (PEG-liposome) along with adjuvant at 1 week intervals. For comparison, unmodified liposomes (liposome) and 10 times excessively PEG-modified liposomes with ionizable lipid (10PEG-DODAP-liposome) were used. Inclusion of PEG modification induced not only anti-PEG IgM but also anti-PEG IgG. Three weeks after the final injection, intravenous injection of both PEG-liposome and liposome (1 mL/kg) induced no anaphylactic reaction. However, the injection of 10PEG-DODAP-liposome showed one lethal anaphylaxis case and one mild anaphylaxis case. Antisera obtained from the animal sensitized as described above were inoculated (0.05 mL) intradermally into fresh guinea pigs. The presence of passive cutaneous anaphylaxis was evaluated after intravenous injections (1 mL/kg) of three liposomes with Evans blue. No dye leakage was detected at any inoculated skin point for PEG-liposome or liposome, but a slight leakage was detected in one inoculated skin point for 10PEG-DODAP-liposome. These results indicate the absence of acute allergic reactions at repeated injections of HbVs despite the anti-PEG antibody induction. Not all the PEG-modified liposomes show anaphylaxis, and it may depend on the amount of PEGylated phospholipid and lipid composition of PEG-modified liposomes.

Increasing the COVID-19 immunization rate through allergy testing

BACKGROUND

Vaccination of the population is required to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Allergy testing could reduce anxiety towards COVID-19 vaccination and thereby may increase vaccination rate, however, its effectiveness remains unclear.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty prospective real-life patients in need of but not daring to get vaccinated asked for allergy workup for COVID-19 vaccine hypersensitivity in 2021/2022. Characterization of patients, identification of anxieties, decrease of patient's anxiety levels, overall vaccination rate and adverse reactions after vaccination were assessed.

RESULTS

Tested patients were characterized by being female (91.5%) and having a high rate of previous allergies (e.g. to food 55.4%, drugs 54.6%, or previous vaccinations 50%) and dermatological disease (29.2%) but not always had medical contraindications for COVID-19 vaccination. Sixty one patients (49.6%) were highly concerned (4-6, Likert scale 0-6) about vaccination and 47 (37.6%) expressed resolving thoughts about vaccinaion anaphylaxis (3-6, Likert scale 0-6). However only 35 patients (28.5%) were scared of getting COVID-19 within 2 months (4-6, Likert scale 0-6) and only 11 (9%) patients had high expectations of getting COVID-19 (4-6, Likert scale 0-6). Allergy testing significantly (p < 0.01 to p < 0.05 respectively) reduced the median anxiety of allergic symptoms following vaccination: dyspnoea (4.2-3.1), to faint (3.7-2.7), long-term consequences (3.6-2.2), pruritus (3.4-2.6), skin rash (3.3-2.6) and death (3.2-2.6). After allergy testing, most patients (108/122, 88.5%) let themselves be vaccinated within 60 days. Revaccinated patients with previous symptoms experienced a reduction of symptoms (p < 0.05) upon revaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients not daring to get vaccinated have more anxiety towards vaccination than to acquire COVID-19. For those, allergy testing excludes vaccine allergy, and is a tool to increase vaccination willingness and thereby helps to combat vaccination hesitancy.