1
|
Liu G, Fang H, Di D, Du X, Zhang S, Xiao L, Zhang J, Zhang Z. Clarifying urban flood response characteristics and improving interpretable flood prediction with sparse data considering the coupling effect of rainfall and drainage pipeline siltation. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 953:176125. [PMID: 39260489 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
With climate warming and accelerated urbanisation, severe urban flooding has become a common problem worldwide. Frequent extreme rainfall events and the siltation of drainage pipes further increase the burden on urban drainage networks. However, existing studies have not fully considered the effects of rainfall and pipeline siltation on the response characteristics of flooding when constructing numerical models of urban flooding simulations. To solve this problem, a surface-subsurface coupling model was constructed by combining the Saint-Venant equation, Manning equation, a one-dimensional pipeline model (SWMM), and a two-dimensional surface overflow model (LISFLOOD-FP). Then, the SWMM model considering pipeline siltation and the two-dimensional surface overflow model (LISFLOOD-FP) were coupled with the flow exchange governing equation, and the urban flooding response characteristics considering the coupling effect of "rainfall and drainage pipeline siltation" were analysed. To enhance the solvability of waterlogging prediction, an intelligent prediction model of urban flooding based on Bayes-CNN-BLSTM was established by combining a convolutional neural network (CNN), bidirectional long short-term memory neural network (BLSTM), Bayesian optimisation (Bayes), and an interpretable loss function error correction method. The actual rainfall events and flooding processes recorded by the monitoring equipment at Huizhou University were used to calibrate and verify the model. The results show that in the Rainfall 1 and Rainfall 2 scenarios, the overload rates of the pipelines in the current siltation scenario were 60.06 % and 68.37 %, respectively, and the proportions of overflow nodes were 24.87 % and 25.89 %, respectively. When the drainage network was initially put into operation, the overload rates of the pipeline were 36.67 % and 41.16 %, and the overflow nodes accounted for 3.05 % and 4.06 %, respectively. The inundated area and volume of urban flooding increased when the combined siltation coefficient (CSC) was 0.2; therefore, two desilting schemes were determined. Under Rainfall 1, Rainfall 2, and the four rainfall recurrence periods, the Bayes-CNN-BLSTM model had clear advantages in terms of accuracy, reliability, and robustness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangxin Liu
- School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, PR China
| | - Hongyuan Fang
- School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, PR China; Yellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, PR China
| | - Danyang Di
- School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, PR China.
| | - Xueming Du
- School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, PR China
| | - Shuliang Zhang
- School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, Jiangsu, PR China; Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment for the Ministry of Education, Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource, Nanjing 21002, Jiangsu, PR China
| | - Lizhong Xiao
- Henan Provincial Academy of Building Research, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, PR China
| | - Jinping Zhang
- School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, PR China
| | - Zhaoyang Zhang
- School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xu Q, Shi Y, Bamber JL, Ouyang C, Zhu XX. Large-scale flood modeling and forecasting with FloodCast. WATER RESEARCH 2024; 264:122162. [PMID: 39126745 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
Large-scale hydrodynamic models generally rely on fixed-resolution spatial grids and model parameters as well as incurring a high computational cost. This limits their ability to accurately forecast flood crests and issue time-critical hazard warnings. In this work, we build a fast, stable, accurate, resolution-invariant, and geometry-adaptive flood modeling and forecasting framework that can perform at large scales, namely FloodCast. The framework comprises two main modules: multi-satellite observation and hydrodynamic modeling. In the multi-satellite observation module, a real-time unsupervised change detection method and a rainfall processing and analysis tool are proposed to harness the full potential of multi-satellite observations in large-scale flood prediction. In the hydrodynamic modeling module, a geometry-adaptive physics-informed neural solver (GeoPINS) is introduced, benefiting from the absence of a requirement for training data in physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) and featuring a fast, accurate, and resolution-invariant architecture with Fourier neural operators. To adapt to complex river geometries, we reformulate PINNs in a geometry-adaptive space. GeoPINS demonstrates impressive performance on popular partial differential equations across regular and irregular domains. Building upon GeoPINS, we propose a sequence-to-sequence GeoPINS model to handle long-term temporal series and extensive spatial domains in large-scale flood modeling. This model employs sequence-to-sequence learning and hard-encoding of boundary conditions. Next, we establish a benchmark dataset in the 2022 Pakistan flood using a widely accepted finite difference numerical solution to assess various flood simulation methods. Finally, we validate the model in three dimensions - flood inundation range, depth, and transferability of spatiotemporal downscaling - utilizing SAR-based flood data, traditional hydrodynamic benchmarks, and concurrent optical remote sensing images. Traditional hydrodynamics and sequence-to-sequence GeoPINS exhibit exceptional agreement during high water levels, while comparative assessments with SAR-based flood depth data show that sequence-to-sequence GeoPINS outperforms traditional hydrodynamics, with smaller simulation errors. The experimental results for the 2022 Pakistan flood demonstrate that the proposed method enables high-precision, large-scale flood modeling with an average MAPE of 14.93 % and an average Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.0610 m for 14-day water depth simulations while facilitating real-time flood hazard forecasting using reliable precipitation data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingsong Xu
- Data Science in Earth Observation, Technical University of Munich, Munich 80333, Germany
| | - Yilei Shi
- School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich 80333, Germany
| | - Jonathan L Bamber
- Data Science in Earth Observation, Technical University of Munich, Munich 80333, Germany; School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK
| | - Chaojun Ouyang
- Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xiao Xiang Zhu
- Data Science in Earth Observation, Technical University of Munich, Munich 80333, Germany; Munich Center for Machine Learning, Munich 80333, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fraehr N, Wang QJ, Wu W, Nathan R. Assessment of surrogate models for flood inundation: The physics-guided LSG model vs. state-of-the-art machine learning models. WATER RESEARCH 2024; 252:121202. [PMID: 38290237 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Hydrodynamic models can accurately simulate flood inundation but are limited by their high computational demand that scales non-linearly with model complexity, resolution, and domain size. Therefore, it is often not feasible to use high-resolution hydrodynamic models for real-time flood predictions or when a large number of predictions are needed for probabilistic flood design. Computationally efficient surrogate models have been developed to address this issue. The recently developed Low-fidelity, Spatial analysis, and Gaussian Process Learning (LSG) model has shown strong performance in both computational efficiency and simulation accuracy. The LSG model is a physics-guided surrogate model that simulates flood inundation by first using an extremely coarse and simplified (i.e. low-fidelity) hydrodynamic model to provide an initial estimate of flood inundation. Then, the low-fidelity estimate is upskilled via Empirical Orthogonal Functions (EOF) analysis and Sparse Gaussian Process models to provide accurate high-resolution predictions. Despite the promising results achieved thus far, the LSG model has not been benchmarked against other surrogate models. Such a comparison is needed to fully understand the value of the LSG model and to provide guidance for future research efforts in flood inundation simulation. This study compares the LSG model to four state-of-the-art surrogate flood inundation models. The surrogate models are assessed for their ability to simulate the temporal and spatial evolution of flood inundation for events both within and beyond the range used for model training. The models are evaluated for three distinct case studies in Australia and the United Kingdom. The LSG model is found to be superior in accuracy for both flood extent and water depth, including when applied to flood events outside the range of training data used, while achieving high computational efficiency. In addition, the low-fidelity model is found to play a crucial role in achieving the overall superior performance of the LSG model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Fraehr
- Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
| | - Quan J Wang
- Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Wenyan Wu
- Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| | - Rory Nathan
- Department of Infrastructure Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|