Revealing the factors resulting in incomplete recovery of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) when implementing the adsorbable and extractable organic fluorine methods

Latest trends in the environmental analysis of PFAS including nontarget analysis and EOF-, AOF-, and TOP-based methodologies

Ubiquitous environmental occurrence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) underscores the critical need to broaden investigative efforts in effective screening, risk assessment, and remediation. Owing to the broad spectrum of PFAS, various analytical techniques have been extensively utilized to attain inclusivity, with notable attention given to methods such as extractable organic fluorine (EOF), adsorbable organic fluorine (AOF), and the total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay. These techniques expand the scope of PFAS analysis by estimating perfluoroalkyl acid precursors or the total organochlorine fraction. This review offers a comprehensive comparative overview of up-to-date methodologies, alongside acknowledging the inherent limitations associated with their applications. When coupled with target analysis via low-resolution tandem mass spectrometry, these techniques offer a potential estimation of total PFAS concentrations. Yet, analytical challenges such as the limited availability of reference analytical standards, partial PFAS adsorption, and the entrapment of fluorinated inorganic anions on adsorbent materials often restrict the comprehensiveness of PFAS analysis. So, integrating nontarget analysis using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) tools fortifies these PFAS mass balance approaches, enabling the development of a more holistic approach for an environmental analysis framework. This review provides additional insights into the comparative advantages of PFAS analytical approaches and explores various data prioritization strategies in nontarget screening methods. It advocates for the necessary optimization of PFAS extraction methods, asserting that integrating the nontarget approach would foster the establishment of a comprehensive monitoring framework across diverse environmental matrices. Such integration holds promise for enhancing scientific comprehension of PFAS contamination across diverse environmental matrices.

City-scale impacts of PFAS from normal and elevated temperature landfill leachates on wastewater treatment plant influent

The influence of elevated temperatures on PFAS leaching in municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills has not been well characterized in the published scientific literature. This study systematically examined the compositions and concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and precursors content in both normal temperature landfill and elevated temperature landfill (ETLF) leachates and compared to a municipal wastewater and to a WWTP influent with and without introduced leachates. The characterization of the samples involved the analysis of 71 PFAS target compounds before and after applying the total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay, along with measuring fluorotelomer alcohols (FTOHs) and adsorbable organofluorine (AOF) levels. Summed PFAS concentrations in leachates were driven largely by fluorotelomer carboxylic acids (FTCAs), short-chain and ultrashort-chain perfluorinated carboxylic acids and sulfonic acids. Summed PFAS concentrations in ETLF leachate were significantly higher than in normal leachate for precursors and terminal PFAS products. TOP assay data demonstrated that ETLF leachate contained significantly higher concentrations of oxidizable PFAS precursors than normal leachate. PFAS profiles in leachates were distinct from municipal wastewater and from WWTP influent, suggesting diverse PFAS inputs to the WWTP. The presence of unknown precursors revealed by the TOP assay and AOF analyses highlights the complexity of PFAS sources impacting sewer networks, warranting further study to better characterize PFAS inputs to the WWTP on a city-wide scale.

PFAS in landfill leachate: Practical considerations for treatment and characterization

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widely used in consumer products and are particularly high in landfill leachate. The practice of sending leachate to wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is an issue for utilities that have biosolids land application limits based on PFAS concentrations. Moreover, landfills may face their own effluent limit guidelines for PFAS. The purpose of this review is to understand the most appropriate treatment technology combinations for mitigating PFAS in landfill leachate. The first objective is to understand the unique chemical characteristics of landfill leachate. The second objective is to establish the role and importance of known and emerging analytical techniques for PFAS characterization in leachate, including quantification of precursor compounds. Next, an overview of technologies that concentrate PFAS and technologies that destroy PFAS is provided, including fundamental background content and key operating parameters. Finally, practical considerations for PFAS treatment technologies are reviewed, and recommendations for PFAS treatment trains are described. Both pros and cons of treatment trains are noted. In summary, the complex matrix of leachate requires a separation treatment step first, such as foam fractionation, for example, to concentrate the PFAS into a lower-volume stream. Then, a degradation treatment step can be applied to the concentrated PFAS stream.

Characterizing the Areal Extent of PFAS Contamination in Fish Species Downgradient of AFFF Source Zones

Most monitoring programs next to large per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) sources focus on drinking water contamination near source zones. However, less is understood about how these sources affect downgradient hydrological systems and food webs. Here, we report paired PFAS measurements in water, sediment, and aquatic biota along a hydrological gradient away from source zones contaminated by the use of legacy aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) manufactured using electrochemical fluorination. Clustering analysis indicates that the PFAS composition characteristic of AFFF is detectable in water and fishes >8 km from the source. Concentrations of 38 targeted PFAS and extractable organofluorine (EOF) decreased in fishes downgradient of the AFFF-contaminated source zones. However, PFAS concentrations remained above consumption limits at all locations within the affected watershed. Perfluoroalkyl sulfonamide precursors accounted for approximately half of targeted PFAS in fish tissues, which explain >90% of EOF across all sampling locations. Suspect screening analyses revealed the presence of a polyfluoroketone pharmaceutical in fish species, and a fluorinated agrochemical in water that likely does not accumulate in biological tissues, suggesting the presence of diffuse sources such as septic system and agrochemical inputs throughout the watershed in addition to AFFF contamination. Based on these results, monitoring programs that consider all hydrologically connected regions within watersheds affected by large PFAS sources would help ensure public health protection.

Determination of organic fluorinated compounds content in complex samples through combustion ion chromatography methods: a way to define a "Total Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)" parameter?

Emerging contaminants are a growing concern for scientists and public authorities. The group of per-polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), known as 'forever chemicals', in complex environmental liquid and solid matrices was analysed in this study. The development of global analytical methods based on combustion ion chromatography (CIC) is expected to provide accurate picture of the overall PFAS contamination level via the determination of extractable organic fluorine (EOF) and adsorbable organic fluorine (AOF). The obtained results may be put into perspective with other methods such as targeted analyses (LC-MS/MS). The impact of pH, the presence of dissolved organic carbon and suspended particles on AOF measurements were explored. The effectiveness of the washing step to remove adsorbed inorganic fluorine (IF) has been proven for samples containing up to 8 mgF.L-1. CIC-based methods showed good repeatability and reproducibility for the complex matrices studied. Environmental applications of these methods have been tested. AOF and EOF analyses could explain between 1 % and 23 % and 0.1 % to 2 % of total organic fluorine (TOF), respectively. The sum of PFAS compounds expressed as fluorine could explain from 0.2 % to 11 % and from 0.003 % to 5 % for AOF and EOF, respectively. These results also suggest that some fluorinated compounds are not adsorbed or extractable and/or lost by volatilisation during the application of AOF and EOF analytical procedure. These findings highlight that AOF and EOF are not entirely efficient as proxy to assess "total PFAS" for assessing environmental contamination by PFAS. However, these methods could still be applied to gain a better understanding of the sources and fate of PFAS in the environment.

Investigation of pH-dependent extraction methods for PFAS in (fluoropolymer-based) consumer products: A comparative study between targeted and sum parameter analysis

Here, we report a comparative study of different sum parameter analysis methods for the extraction of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from manufactured consumer products, which can be measured by combustion ion chromatography (CIC). Therefore, a hydrolysis-based extraction method was further developed, which accounts for the addition of hydrolyzable covalently bound polyfluoroalkylated side-chain polymers (SFPs) to the extractable organic fluorine portion of the mass balance proposed as "hydrolyzable organically bound fluorine" (HOF). To test this hypothesis, the method was applied to 39 different consumer products containing fluoropolymers or monomeric PFAS taken from four different categories: outdoor textiles, paper packaging, carpeting, and permanent baking sheets. We also evaluated the method's efficiency by extracting four synthesized fluorotelomer polyacrylate reference compounds. The total fluorine (TF) and extractable organically bound fluorine (EOF) values were measured through CIC using established protocols. The TF values ranged from sub-ppb to %-levels, depending on the compound class. All samples showed results for hydrolyzed organofluorine (HOF) between 0.03 and 76.3 μg/g, while most EOF values were lower ( Collapse

Key Words

• Combustion ion chromatography (CIC)
• Extractable organically bound fluorine (EOF)
• Hydrolytic extraction
• Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) sum parameter
• Side-chain fluorinated polymers (SFPs)
• Solid-liquid extraction

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Fluorocarbon Polymers/analysis
• Fluorocarbons/analysis
• Chromatography, Liquid
• Fluorine/chemistry
• Tandem Mass Spectrometry
• Hydrogen-Ion Concentration

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Philipp Roesch Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Division 4.3 - Contaminant Transfer and Environmental Technologies, Unter den Eichen 87, 12205, Berlin, Germany.
Andrea Schinnen Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Division 4.3 - Contaminant Transfer and Environmental Technologies, Unter den Eichen 87, 12205, Berlin, Germany
Maren Riedel Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Division 4.3 - Contaminant Transfer and Environmental Technologies, Unter den Eichen 87, 12205, Berlin, Germany
Thomas Sommerfeld Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Division 1.7 - Organic Trace and Food Analysis, Richard-Willstätter-Straße 11, 12489, Berlin, Germany
George Sawal German Environment Agency, Colditzstr. 34, 12099, Berlin, Germany
Nicole Bandow German Environment Agency, Colditzstr. 34, 12099, Berlin, Germany
Christian Vogel Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Division 4.3 - Contaminant Transfer and Environmental Technologies, Unter den Eichen 87, 12205, Berlin, Germany
Ute Kalbe Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Division 4.3 - Contaminant Transfer and Environmental Technologies, Unter den Eichen 87, 12205, Berlin, Germany
Franz-Georg Simon Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Division 4.3 - Contaminant Transfer and Environmental Technologies, Unter den Eichen 87, 12205, Berlin, Germany

Collapse