Abstract
PURPOSE
For the first time in nearly 20 years, 2 antigen-binding fragment (Fab) antivenoms are available to treat patients who incur North American pit viper snakebites: Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (ovine), or simply FabAV; and Crotalidae immune F(ab')2 (equine), or simply F(ab')2. Pharmacists are in a key position for the selection, dosing, reconstitution, administration, and monitoring of antivenom therapy; however, they encounter inconsistent exposure and experience with these drugs. Thus, an updated review of the literature is necessary.
METHODS
The search strategy and selection incorporated both controlled vocabulary terms and keywords to describe concepts relevant to the search. Retrieval was limited to literature published from 1997 to the present in English, Portuguese, or Spanish.
RESULTS
Given the paucity of available prospective literature, the authors elected to include all prospective evidence to best describe the role of antivenom. For the primary literature review, manuscripts were excluded if they were observational studies, conference abstracts, narrative or opinion articles, letters to the editor, or in-progress studies.
CONCLUSION
While there is limited evidence-based guidance on the superiority of F(ab')2 to FabAV, or vice versa, individual and regional considerations should contribute to formulary decisions. Pharmacists must play a role in the development of clinical pathways to ensure appropriate evaluation, supportive care, and antivenom procurement, administration, and monitoring.
Collapse