1
|
Celedón N, González C, Cuadrado C. Perspectives of patients and consumers on the use of generic medicines. Medwave 2021. [DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2021.11.8155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Access to medicines constitutes a public health challenge worldwide. Promoting utilization of generic medicines is one of the strategies that has been proposed to optimize pharmaceutical spending and thus allow greater coverage. However, its use is not yet widespread enough. This study seeks to explore the perspectives and acceptability to the use of generic medicines from patients and consumers. METHODS We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a evidence synthesis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS We identified four systematic reviews that together include 47 primary studies, of which one corresponds to a randomized trial. A low rate of patients or consumers has a negative perception regarding generic medicines, including dimensions such as risk, quality, safety, risk of adverse effects, among others.
Collapse
|
2
|
Huo N, Chen L, Ullah Mishuk A, Li C, Hansen RA, Harris I, Kiptanui Z, Wang Z, Dutcher SK, Qian J. Generic levothyroxine initiation and substitution among Medicare and Medicaid populations: a new user cohort study. Endocrine 2020; 68:336-348. [PMID: 31993992 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-020-02211-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Generic levothyroxine has been approved and available since 2004 but its substitution remains controversial. Therefore, the objective was to examine patterns of and identify factors associated with initiation and substitution of generic levothyroxine treatment. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study, including new users of brand and generic levothyroxine in 2013-2015 Medicare (n = 15,877) or 2011-2012 Medicaid (n = 9390) administrative claim databases. The primary outcomes included (1) generic levothyroxine initiation, and (2) among brand-new users, generic levothyroxine substitution in 12 months. The factors associated with generic levothyroxine initiation and substitution were measured. RESULTS Among all levothyroxine new users, Medicare beneficiaries had a higher proportion of generic levothyroxine initiation than Medicaid beneficiaries (66.40% vs. 44.04%, respectively). Medicare beneficiaries' demographic factors, and health service utilizations were associated with generic levothyroxine initiation. Medicaid beneficiaries who were male and residing in the northeast region and rural areas were more likely to initiate generic levothyroxine. Among brand levothyroxine new users, the generic substitution rate was higher in the Medicare than the Medicaid cohort (18.26 vs. 3.88%). Medicare brand levothyroxine new users' demographic factors and health service utilizations were associated with generic levothyroxine substitution. Medicaid brand levothyroxine new users who were residing in the northeast region, with more prior hospitalization, and initiating a lower dosage of brand levothyroxine, had higher rates of generic substitution. CONCLUSION Patient demographic factors and health service utilizations are associated with generic levothyroxine initiation and substitution. Educational outreach programs targeted to increase generic levothyroxine use and prescription savings should be tailored based on different patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Huo
- Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Li Chen
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IL, USA
| | | | - Chao Li
- Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Zhong Wang
- Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Sarah K Dutcher
- Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Jingjing Qian
- Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yaphe H, Adekoya I, Steiner L, Maraj D, O'Campo P, Persaud N. Exploring the experiences of people in Ontario, Canada who have trouble affording medicines: a qualitative concept mapping study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e033933. [PMID: 31888944 PMCID: PMC6937130 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The experiences of people who report cost-related medicine non-adherence are not well documented. We aimed to present experiences relating to accessing medicines reported by the participants in a randomised controlled trial of free medicine distribution. METHODS The trial consisted of primary care patients from a large urban family practice and three rural family practices who reported cost-related medicine non-adherence. Participants were randomly allocated to continue their poor access (control) or to receive free and easily accessible medicines (intervention). As part of data collection for the first year of the trial, participants were asked closed and open-ended questions to assess their adherence to medication, health outcomes and their experiences in relation to medicine accessibility. We conducted a qualitative concept mapping study in which we analysed and summarised participants' responses to the open-ended question on a concept map to visually present their experiences relating to accessing medicines. RESULTS Of the 524 trial participants contacted, 198 (38%) responded to the open-ended question. The concept map contains clusters that represent eight types of experiences of participants related to medicine access including stress, relationship with doctor, health impact, quality of life, sacrificing other essentials, medicines are expensive, financial impact and adherence. These experiences fall under two major themes, experiences relating to personal finances and experiences relating to well-being, which are bridged by a central cluster of adherence. CONCLUSIONS The experiences shared by the participants demonstrate that access to medicines impacts people's finances and well-being as well as their adherence to prescribed medicines. These results indicate that effects on personal finances and general well-being should be measured for interventions and policy changes aimed at improving medicine access. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This article is linked to the Carefully Selected and Easily Accessible at No Charge Medicines (CLEAN Meds) randomised controlled trial (trial registration number: NCT02744963).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Yaphe
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Itunuoluwa Adekoya
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liane Steiner
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Darshanand Maraj
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patricia O'Campo
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nav Persaud
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salmane Kulikovska I, Poplavska E, Ceha M, Mezinska S. Use of generic medicines in Latvia: awareness, opinions and experiences of the population. J Pharm Policy Pract 2019; 12:1. [PMID: 30627436 PMCID: PMC6322251 DOI: 10.1186/s40545-018-0159-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To stimulate use of generic medicines a combination of supply and demand side mechanisms are employed in the Latvian reimbursement system. It is reported that patients have high out-of-pocket pharmaceutical spending and that they overpay by not choosing generic medicines. Patient preferences may be an important obstacle in implementing generic policy. Objective of this study was to assess awareness, opinions and experience of the Latvian population regarding use of generic medicines. Methods Survey of representative sample of the population of Latvia (n = 1005) aged 18-74 was conducted in March 2015. The survey was distributed in Latvian and Russian languages using Computer Assisted Web Interviews. Associations between experience with generic medicines, preference for medicines, and sociodemographic variables were tested with Pearson Chi-square statistics. Associations between the previous experience and information given by different sources versus choice between medicines were tested with Spearman's correlation test. Results 72.3% of the population were informed about generic medicines. Men (66.9%) and respondents with primary or secondary education (58.3%; 69.3%) were less informed compared to total (72.3%). From those who recalled using generic medicines (n = 441), 94.4% evaluated their experience as positive or neutral. Despite this, only 21% of the population would opt for generic medicines. The strongest preference for brand-name medicines was in the age group > 55 (40.5%). Opinion of a physician was the most important factor when choosing between generic and brand-name medicines (88.7%). The more positive the information provided by general practitioners, physician specialists, pharmacists, family members, friends and internet is perceived, the more likely respondents are to choose generic medicines (p < 0.001). Conclusion This study demonstrates that people in Latvia are aware of generic medicines but only a minority of the population would choose them when presented with a choice. It is therefore important that health care professionals provide objective and unbiased information about generic medicines to their patients. Interventions should aim to reach groups that are less informed and to improve providers' understanding and communication with patients about generics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elita Poplavska
- 2Faculty of Pharmacy and Institute of Public Health, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Str., Riga, LV1007 Latvia
| | - Marija Ceha
- 3Faculty of Pharmacy, Riga Stradins University, 16 Dzirciema Str., Riga, LV1007 Latvia
| | - Signe Mezinska
- 4Faculty of Medicine and Institute of Clinical and Preventive Medicine University of Latvia, 19 Raina Blvd., Riga, LV1586 Latvia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Howard JN, Harris I, Frank G, Kiptanui Z, Qian J, Hansen R. Influencers of generic drug utilization: A systematic review. Res Social Adm Pharm 2018; 14:619-627. [PMID: 28814375 PMCID: PMC5910277 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Revised: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With an increase in prescription drug spending and rising drug costs there is a need to encourage the use of generic prescription drugs. However, maximizing generic drug use is not possible without the public's positive perception and meeting their informational needs about generic drugs. Thus, improving the public's confidence in, and knowledge of generic drugs on the market is critical. The objective of this systematic review is to examine and evaluate the studies focusing on the nature and extent of key factors influencing generic drug use in the United States in order to help guide policy, education and practice interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using multiple search engines and key word screening criteria, empirical studies published in English between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015 were identified. A qualitative synthesis of the evidence identified domains of key factors that influenced generic drug use across studies. RESULTS Over 3000 citations met the key word screening criteria; 67 of these met inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Seven domains of factors that influence generic drug utilization were identified: 1) patient-related factors, 2) formulary management or cost containment, 3) healthcare policies, 4) promotional activities, 5) educational initiatives, 6) technology, and 7) physician-related factors. CONCLUSION Patients, physicians, pharmacists, formulary managers, and policymakers play an important role in generic drug use. Understanding the factors influencing generic drug use can help guide future policy, education, and practice interventions to increase generic drug use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer N Howard
- IMPAQ International, LLC, 10420 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 300, Columbia, MD, 21044, USA.
| | - Ilene Harris
- IMPAQ International, LLC, 10420 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 300, Columbia, MD, 21044, USA.
| | - Gavriella Frank
- IMPAQ International, LLC, 10420 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 300, Columbia, MD, 21044, USA.
| | - Zippora Kiptanui
- IMPAQ International, LLC, 10420 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 300, Columbia, MD, 21044, USA.
| | - Jingjing Qian
- Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, 038 James E. Foy Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
| | - Richard Hansen
- Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, 038 James E. Foy Hall, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Domeyer PJ, Aletras V, Anagnostopoulos F, Katsari V, Niakas D. Development and validation of a tool to assess knowledge and attitudes towards generic medicines among students in Greece: The ATtitude TOwards GENerics (ATTOGEN) questionnaire. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0188484. [PMID: 29186163 PMCID: PMC5706728 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2015] [Accepted: 11/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of generic medicines is a cost-effective policy, often dictated by fiscal restraints. To our knowledge, no fully validated tool exploring the students' knowledge and attitudes towards generic medicines exists. The aim of our study was to develop and validate a questionnaire exploring the knowledge and attitudes of M.Sc. in Health Care Management students and recent alumni's towards generic drugs in Greece. MATERIALS AND METHODS The development of the questionnaire was a result of literature review and pilot-testing of its preliminary versions to researchers and students. The final version of the questionnaire contains 18 items measuring the respondents' knowledge and attitude towards generic medicines on a 5-point Likert scale. Given the ordinal nature of the data, ordinal alpha and polychoric correlations were computed. The sample was randomly split into two halves. Exploratory factor analysis, performed in the first sample, was used for the creation of multi-item scales. Confirmatory factor analysis and Generalized Linear Latent and Mixed Model analysis (GLLAMM) with the use of the rating scale model were used in the second sample to assess goodness of fit. An assessment of internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and construct validity was also performed. RESULTS Among 1402 persons contacted, 986 persons completed our questionnaire (response rate = 70.3%). Overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.871. The conjoint use of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis resulted in a six-scale model, which seemed to fit the data well. Five of the six scales, namely trust, drug quality, state audit, fiscal impact and drug substitution were found to be valid and reliable, while the knowledge scale suffered only from low inter-scale correlations and a ceiling effect. However, the subsequent confirmatory factor and GLLAMM analyses indicated a good fit of the model to the data. CONCLUSIONS The ATTOGEN instrument proved to be a reliable and valid tool, suitable for assessing students' knowledge and attitudes towards generic medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip J. Domeyer
- School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece
- * E-mail:
| | - Vassilis Aletras
- School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece
- Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Fotios Anagnostopoulos
- School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece
- Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Kallithea, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasiliki Katsari
- Department of Social and Educational Policy, University of Peloponnese, Korinthos, Greece
| | - Dimitris Niakas
- School of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University, Patras, Greece
- Μedical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Why do generic drugs fail to achieve an adequate market share in Greece? Empirical findings and policy suggestions. Health Policy 2017; 121:265-272. [PMID: 28109680 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2016] [Revised: 12/28/2016] [Accepted: 12/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Since 2010, the memoranda of understanding were implemented in Greece as a measure of fiscal adjustment. Public pharmaceutical expenditure was one of the main focuses of this implementation. Numerous policies, targeted on pharma spending, reduced the pharmaceutical budget by 60.5%. Yet, generics' penetration in Greece remained among the lowest among OECD countries. This study aims to highlight the factors that affect the perceptions of the population on generic drugs and to suggest effective policy measures. METHODOLOGY The empirical analysis is based on a national cross-sectional survey that was conducted through a sample of 2003 individuals, representative of the general population. Two ordinal logistic regression models were constructed in order to identify the determinants that affect the respondents' beliefs on the safety and the effectiveness of generic drugs. FINDINGS The empirical findings presented a positive and statistically significant correlation with income, bill payment difficulties, safety and effectiveness of drugs, prescription and dispensing preferences and the views toward pharmaceutical companies. Also, age and trust toward medical community have a positive and statistically significant correlation with the perception on the safety of generic drugs. Policy interventions are suggested on the bases of the empirical results on 3 major categories; (a) information campaigns, (b) incentives to doctors and pharmacists and (c) to strengthen the bioequivalence control framework and the dissemination of results.
Collapse
|
8
|
Dunne SS. What Do Users of Generic Medicines Think of Them? A Systematic Review of Consumers’ and Patients’ Perceptions of, and Experiences with, Generic Medicines. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2016; 9:499-510. [DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0176-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
9
|
Dunne SS, Dunne CP. What do people really think of generic medicines? A systematic review and critical appraisal of literature on stakeholder perceptions of generic drugs. BMC Med 2015; 13:173. [PMID: 26224091 PMCID: PMC4520280 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0415-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considerable emphasis is presently being placed on usage of generic medicines by governments focussed on the potential economic benefits associated with their use. Concurrently, there is increasing discussion in the lay media of perceived doubts regarding the quality and equivalence of generic medicines. The objective of this paper is to report the outcomes of a systematic search for peer-reviewed, published studies that focus on physician, pharmacist and patient/consumer perspectives of generic medicines. METHODS Literature published between January 2003 and November 2014, which is indexed in PubMed and Scopus, on the topic of opinions of physicians, pharmacists and patients with respect to generic medicines was searched, and articles within the scope of this review were appraised. Search keywords used included perception, opinion, attitude and view, along with keywords specific to each cohort. RESULTS Following review of titles and abstracts to identify publications relevant to the scope, 16 papers on physician opinions, 11 papers on pharmacist opinions and 31 papers on patient/consumer opinions were included in this review. Quantitative studies (n = 37) were the most common approach adopted by researchers, generally in the form of self-administered questionnaires/surveys. Qualitative methodologies (n = 15) were also reported, albeit in fewer cases. In all three cohorts, opinions of generic medicines have improved but some mistrust remains, most particularly in the patient group where there appears to be a strongly held belief that less expensive equals lower quality. Acceptance of generics appears to be higher in consumers with higher levels of education while patients from lower socioeconomic demographic groups, hence generally having lower levels of education, tend to have greater mistrust of generics. CONCLUSIONS A key factor in improving confidence in generic products is the provision of information and education, particularly in the areas of equivalency, regulation and dispelling myths about generic medicines (such as the belief that they are counterfeits). Further, as patient trust in their physician often overrules their personal mistrust of generic medicines, enhancing the opinions of physicians regarding generics may have particular importance in strategies to promote usage and acceptance of generic medicines in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne S Dunne
- Centre for Interventions in Infection, Inflammation and Immunity (4i), Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Colum P Dunne
- Centre for Interventions in Infection, Inflammation and Immunity (4i), Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Patient perceptions of generic medicines: a mixed-methods study. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2014; 7:177-85. [PMID: 24385381 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-013-0042-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In an attempt to benefit from the cost-savings associated with use of generic medicines, in June 2013 Ireland introduced generic substitution and reference pricing for the first time. However, perceptions of Irish patients towards generic medicines have not been published previously. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess how generic medicines were perceived amongst patients in the time leading up to the enactment of the new legislation. METHODOLOGY A total of 42 patients were recruited from general practices affiliated with the Graduate Entry Medical School at the University of Limerick and from community pharmacies. Interviews were semi-structured and included quantitative assessments of opinions using 15 structured questions and a five-point Likert scale response system. Interview transcripts were coded and thematically analysed using NVivo (version 9), for qualitative data. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS (version 20). RESULTS Nearly one-third (31 %) of patients had no knowledge of generic medicines and 39 % of those exhibited confusion between the words 'generic' and 'genetic'. Almost one-quarter (24 %) held the view that generics were of poorer quality than originators, while 18 % expressed the opinion that generics do not work as well as originator products. Approximately one-third (30 %) of patients believed that generics were manufactured to a poorer quality, with 29 % holding the view that generics are less expensive due to being of inferior quality. Nearly 90 % of patients stated they would take a generic medicine if it were prescribed by their GP; however, 24 % of patients stated a preference, if offered a choice, for the originator medication. Additionally, a majority of patients (86 %) were in favour of reference pricing and generic substitution. Of the patients interviewed, 50 % stated that a leaflet, or similar, with appropriate, understandable, and accessible information regarding generic medicines would be of use to them. CONCLUSION This is the first study of patients' attitudes towards generic medicines in Ireland. Conducted in the time period leading up to the implementation of legislation promoting the use of generic medicines, it highlights variable knowledge about generic medicines among this key stakeholder group. Although patients are supportive of their more widespread use, concerns regarding safety, clinical effectiveness, and manufacturing quality of generic medicines were identified.
Collapse
|
11
|
Omojasola A, Hernandez M, Sansgiry S, Paxton R, Jones L. Predictors of $4 generic prescription drug discount programs use in the low-income population. Res Social Adm Pharm 2013; 10:141-8. [PMID: 23684716 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2012] [Revised: 04/04/2013] [Accepted: 04/04/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generic drug discount programs (GDDPs) are an option to provide affordable prescription medication to low-income individuals. However, the factors that influence the use of GDDPs in low-income population are unknown. OBJECTIVES To evaluate factors associated with utilization of generic a drug discount program in a low-income population. METHODS A survey was administered to adult participants at health centers and community-based organizations in Houston, Texas, USA (n = 525). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine the construct validity of the survey instrument and to assess distinct factors associated with GDDP utilization. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the distribution of patient socio-demographic characteristics and questionnaire responses. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compute adjusted odds ratios and to examine the strength of association with GDDP utilization after adjusting for participant socio-demographic features that were statistically significant at a priori level of P < 0.05. RESULTS In this study, 72% of respondents were aware of the GDDP, and 61% had utilized the GDDP. Participants were 4 times likely to use a GDDP when their physician (AOR: 4.0, 95% CI: 2.6-6.4, P < 0.001) or pharmacist (AOR: 4.0, 95% CI: 2.6-6.3, P < 0.001) talked to them about it. Participants indicated that the most important barriers to utilization of GDDPs were lack of awareness (44%), and lack of recommendation by a physician (19%). CONCLUSIONS Increased patient awareness and physician recommendation may increase the use of GDDPs, which may lead to improved compliance with medications, better health outcomes and reduced health care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Omojasola
- The Dorothy I. Height - Center for Health Equity & Evaluation Research, The University of Texas M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|