Patient-Rated Access to Needed Care: Patient-Centered Medical Home Principles Intertwined

The Value of the Patient-Centered Medical Home in Getting Adults Suffering From Acute Conditions Back to Work: An Integrative Literature Review

Acute conditions are the leading cause of work restrictions and missed workdays, contributing to over $27 billion in lost productivity each year and negatively impacting workers' health and quality of life. Primary care services, specifically patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs), play an essential role in supporting timely acute illness or injury recovery for working adults. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence on the relationship between PCMH implementation, care processes, and outcomes. In addition, we discuss the empirical connection between this evidence and return-to-work outcomes, as well as the need for further research.

The role of healthcare system hassles in delaying or forgoing care

BACKGROUND

Several factors besides appointment availability can influence access to care. Among these factors are the diverse challenges that patients may experience in navigating the healthcare system. However, the relationship between these challenges or "hassles" and delaying or forgoing care has not been assessed.

METHODS

We examined the relationship between healthcare system hassles and delaying or forgoing needed care. We used data from a 2016 Veterans Affairs (VA) survey of women veterans (N = 821) who were active users of primary care (3+ primary care visits in the past year) at any of 12 VA medical centers. The main independent variable was a measure of 16 healthcare system hassles, encompassing a wide range of clinically-relevant aspects of patient experience, such as uncertainty about when/how to take a medication or difficulty getting questions answered between appointments. The outcome was a self-reported measure of delaying or forgoing needed care. We used logistic regression to estimate this outcome as a function of hassles, adjusting for age, comorbidities, and health care utilization. Survey weights accounted for within-site clustering, nonproportional sampling, and nonresponse.

RESULTS

Overall, 26% of participants reported 0 hassles, and 39% reported 4 or more. Reporting 4 or more hassles (vs. 0) was associated with a roughly 5-fold increase in the predicted probability of delaying or forgoing care.

CONCLUSION

Addressing healthcare system hassles could yield unexpected benefits to realized access.