The pros and cons of additional axillary arm for transoral robotic thyroidectomy

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy: Lessons learned from consecutive series of 1,000 patients

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy has gained popularity as a promising approach for thyroid surgery owing to its improved cosmetic outcomes. The objective of this retrospective study was to describe the surgical and safety outcomes of 1,000 consecutive transoral robotic thyroidectomy cases.

METHODS

1,000 consecutive patients who underwent transoral robotic thyroidectomy for thyroid disease were reviewed at a large metropolitan tertiary hospital (Seoul, Korea) between September 2012 and March 2022.

RESULTS

The study comprised 1,000 patients (815 women), with 891 cancer cases. Lobectomy was the most common procedure (89.4%), followed by total thyroidectomy (9.8%) and isthmusectomy (0.8%), and their respective mean total operative times were 173.8 ± 36.2, 236.8 ± 50.5, and 107.5 ± 19.8 minutes. An obvious learning curve was noted. The respective postoperative pain scores on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2 were 4.6 ± 1.3, 3.1 ± 0.8, and 2.5 ± 0.8. The mean postoperative hospital stay duration was 2.6 ± 0.9 days. Complications occurred in 3.6% of cases, including oral wound infection, skin flap burn, bleeding, chyle leakage, transient and permanent mental nerve injury, and transient and permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Transient hypoparathyroidism occurred in 4.1% of total thyroidectomy cases. Thirty-seven patients (4.2%) underwent additional radioactive iodine therapy. The median follow-up period was 39 months, and there were no cases of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the expertise of an experienced surgeon, transoral robotic thyroidectomy results in favorable cosmetic outcomes, tolerable postoperative pain, and acceptable complication rates in carefully selected patients.

Re-do transoral robotic thyroidectomy is feasible: preliminary results of the surgical feasibility and efficacy of completion transoral robotic thyroidectomy: cohort study

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT) has proven to be a safe and effective procedure with favourable surgical and cosmetic outcomes, but its application in completion thyroidectomy procedures remains to be established. In this study, the authors present our experience with completion TORT, assessing its surgical feasibility and efficacy. between February 2017 and August 2023.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent completion TORT after an initial TORT procedure between February 2017 and August 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients (three males and seven females) were included in the study, with a mean age of 42.2±13.5 years. The indications for completion thyroidectomy included five cases of aggressive initial lesions and five cases of metachronous papillary thyroid carcinoma detected in the remnant lobe. The median interval between the initial and completion TORT procedures was 6.5 months. Flap dissection time showed no significant difference between the initial TORT and completion TORT operations (43.3±7.5 vs. 36.2±11.2, P =0.125). However, the mean console time (127.9±42.6 vs. 86.4±26.3 min, P =0.019) and mean total operation time (206.7±65.9 vs. 146.0±34.9 min, P =0.021) were significantly longer during the initial TORT procedure than during the completion TORT procedure. Two patients experienced transient hypoparathyroidism, which resolved within four weeks postoperatively. No other complications, such as vocal cord palsy, mental nerve injury, or bleeding, were observed. The median follow-up period was 21.5 months, and no recurrences were detected in any of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that re-do TORT is feasible, showing excellent cosmetic results and minimal adverse effects. Completion TORT may be considered a viable option for selected patients who require completion thyroidectomy after an initial TORT procedure.

Prince and princesses: The current status of robotic surgery in surgical oncology

Robotic surgery has experienced a dramatic increase in utilization across general surgery over the last two decades, including in surgical oncology. Although urologists and gynecologists were the first to show that this technology could be utilized in cancer surgery, the robot is now a powerful tool in the treatment of gastrointestinal, hepato-pancreatico-biliary, colorectal, endocrine, and soft tissue malignancies. While long-term outcomes are still pending, short-term outcomes have showed promise for this technologic advancement of cancer surgery.

Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach vs. transoral robotic thyroidectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes of the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) and transoral robotic thyroidectomy (TORT). We carried out a systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar on studies comparing TOETVA and TORT until January 2023. A total of five articles published between 2018 and 2023 that matched the inclusion criteria were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies included 641 patients (394 TOETVA patients and 247 TORT patients). TOETVA group was associated with a significantly shorter operative time with a mean difference of 60.08 min [95% confidence interval (CI) - 83.95 to - 36.20; P < 0.001). Transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was more common in the TOETVA group than the TORT group (OR 3.00; 95% CI 1.14-7.88; P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in the other outcomes, including the length of hospital stay, postoperative pain scores, number of central lymph nodes retrieved, permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries, and transient and permanent hypoparathyroidism. The TOETVA group was associated with shorter operative time and more transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy than the TORT group. Each procedure has its benefits and limitations. The surgical approach should be determined by considering the patient's characteristics and preferences, as well as the surgeon's preference and area of expertise.

A comparative study of two robotic thyroidectomy procedures: transoral vestibular versus bilateral axillary-breast approach

Objective

To compare the surgical outcomes between the transoral-vestibular robotic thyroidectomy (TOVRT) and bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABART).

Methods

A total of 99 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma but no distant metastasis were enrolled in this study from May 2020 to April 2021. Lobectomy or total thyroidectomy with central lymph node dissection were performed in all cases. All 99 patients were received an ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy prior to surgical intervention, out of which 49 patients underwent TOVRT, while rest 50 patients underwent BABART. During the procedure, intraoperative neuromonitoring system was used and all recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) were preserved, additionally for TOVRT procedure, three intraoral ports or right axillary fold incision was used to allow for fine countertraction of tissue for radical oncological dissection. The clinical data including age, gender, height, weight, BMI, primary tumor size, number of central lymph node removed, central lymph node metastasis, operating time, total hospital stays, postoperative hospital stays, total postoperative drainage volume, postoperative pain score, cosmetic effect and complications were recorded and analyzed.

Results

There were no significant differences in gender, height, weight, BMI and removed central lymph nodes between the two groups (P > 0.05). Patients accepted TOVRT were younger and had smaller primary tumor size than those who accepted BABART. The TOVRT group had a longer surgical time than the BABART group, but with smaller postoperative drainage volume and superior cosmetic effect (under visual analogue scale, VAS) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in lymph node metastasis, hospital stay and postoperative pain score (under numerical rating scale, NRS) between the two groups (P > 0.05). Last but not least, certain peculiar complications were observed in TOVRT group: paresthesia of the lower lip and the chin (one case), surgical site infection (one case) and skin burn (one case).

Conclusion

Transoral-vestibular robotic thyroidectomy is safe and feasible for certain patients, which could be considered an alternative approach for patients who require no scarring on their neck.