Current trends and applications in endoscopy for otology and neurotology

Enhancing Surgical Vision: Augmented Reality in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

Augmented reality (AR) technology has become widely established in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Over the past 20 years, numerous AR systems have been investigated and validated across the subspecialties, both in cadaveric and in live surgical studies. AR displays projected through head-mounted devices, microscopes, and endoscopes, most commonly, have demonstrated utility in preoperative planning, intraoperative guidance, and improvement of surgical decision-making. Specifically, they have demonstrated feasibility in guiding tumor margin resections, identifying critical structures intraoperatively, and displaying patient-specific virtual models derived from preoperative imaging, with millimetric accuracy. This review summarizes both established and emerging AR technologies, detailing how their systems work, what features they offer, and their clinical impact across otolaryngology subspecialties. As AR technology continues to advance, its integration holds promise for enhancing surgical precision, simulation training, and ultimately, improving patient outcomes.

Five historical innovations that have shaped modern otolaryngological surgery

Throughout history, many innovations have contributed to the development of modern otolaryngological surgery, improving patient outcomes and expanding the range of treatment options available to patients. This article explores five key historical innovations that have shaped modern otolaryngological surgery: Operative Microscope, Hopkins Rigid Endoscope, Laryngeal Nerve monitoring, Cochlear implants and Laser surgery. The selection of innovations for inclusion in this article was meticulously determined through expert consensus and an extensive literature review. We will review the development, impact and significance of each innovation, highlighting their contributions to the field of otolaryngological surgery and their ongoing relevance in contemporary and perioperative practice.

Improving image classification of gastrointestinal endoscopy using curriculum self-supervised learning

Endoscopy, a widely used medical procedure for examining the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to detect potential disorders, poses challenges in manual diagnosis due to non-specific symptoms and difficulties in accessing affected areas. While supervised machine learning models have proven effective in assisting clinical diagnosis of GI disorders, the scarcity of image-label pairs created by medical experts limits their availability. To address these limitations, we propose a curriculum self-supervised learning framework inspired by human curriculum learning. Our approach leverages the HyperKvasir dataset, which comprises 100k unlabeled GI images for pre-training and 10k labeled GI images for fine-tuning. By adopting our proposed method, we achieved an impressive top-1 accuracy of 88.92% and an F1 score of 73.39%. This represents a 2.1% increase over vanilla SimSiam for the top-1 accuracy and a 1.9% increase for the F1 score. The combination of self-supervised learning and a curriculum-based approach demonstrates the efficacy of our framework in advancing the diagnosis of GI disorders. Our study highlights the potential of curriculum self-supervised learning in utilizing unlabeled GI tract images to improve the diagnosis of GI disorders, paving the way for more accurate and efficient diagnosis in GI endoscopy.

Experiences of Percutaneous Endoscopic Approach for the Mastoid Lesions: A Novel Minimally Invasive Ear Surgery

OBJECTIVES

We developed a novel keyhole surgery, named "percutaneous endoscopic ear surgery" (PEES), with the aim of further reducing the invasiveness of otologic surgery. We reported the cases we encountered and retrospectively analyzed the invasiveness of PEES.

METHODS

We analyzed the ears of eight patients who underwent PEES for mastoid lesions that could not be manipulated with transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) at our hospital between July 2021 and November 2022. We performed PEES alone in three patients, including one case of type A (preauricular incision) and two cases of type B (retroauricular incision). The last five patients underwent combined endoscopic ear surgery, which is simultaneous PEES and TEES. In these cases, one patient underwent type A PEES, and four patients underwent type B PEES.

RESULTS

PEES was performed in all patients without converting to conventional microscopic mastoidectomy. The mean length of skin incisions was 19.1 ± 4.5 mm, which was smaller than that in conventional mastoidectomy. In all cases, the average length of the major axis of the keyhole was <10 mm, indicating that sufficient minimally invasive surgery was achieved. The average depth from the keyhole to the deepest site was 21.6 ± 8.9 mm. There was no change in the mean hearing level before and after the surgery.

CONCLUSION

PEES is a minimally invasive procedure for manipulating lesions in the mastoid. In addition, the combination of PEES and TEES is an ideal, minimally invasive procedure that can be used to treat all regions of the temporal bone.

Exoscope-Assisted Stapedotomy: Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of exoscope-assisted stapedotomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care neurotology clinic.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with otosclerosis undergoing stapedotomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Primary stapedotomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Evaluation of audiologic outcomes, including pure-tone average, bone-conduction thresholds, word recognition score, and air-bone gap. Complications, need for scutum removal, and length of surgery were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were identified, and 24 patients underwent surgery with the microscope and 22 with the exoscope. There were significant improvements in pure-tone average, mean bone-conduction thresholds, and air-bone gap for both groups. There was no difference in preoperative or postoperative audiologic status for either group. There was no difference in rates of dysgeusia, chorda tympani nerve damage, dizziness, or facial paresis in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates similar audiologic outcomes, complication profiles, and visualization when comparing exoscopic and microscopic stapedotomy. Demonstrated here, exoscopic stapedotomy can be safely performed in a transcanal manner.

Intraoperative Neck Angles in Endoscopic and Microscopic Otologic Surgeries

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively compare the ergonomic risk of otologic surgeries performed with endoscopes and microscopes.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Operating room of a tertiary academic medical center.

METHODS

Intraoperative neck angles of otolaryngology attendings, fellows, and residents were assessed during 17 otologic surgeries using inertial measurement unit sensors. Sensors were attached midline between the shoulder blades and on the posterior scalp of participants and were calibrated just prior to beginning each case. Quaternion data were used to calculate neck angles during periods of active surgery.

RESULTS

Endoscopic and microscopic cases included similar percentages of time in high-risk neck positions, 75% and 73%, respectively, according to a validated ergonomic risk assessment tool, the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment. However, microscopic cases included a higher percentage of time spent in extension (25%) compared to endoscopic cases (12%) (p < .001). When examining the magnitude of average flexion and extension angles, endoscopic and microscopic cases were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing intraoperative sensor data, we found that both endoscopic and microscopic approaches in otologic surgery were associated with high-risk neck angles, which can result in sustained neck strain. These results suggest that optimal ergonomics may be better achieved by the consistent application of basic ergonomic principles than by changing the technology in the operating room.