Transarticular screw and C1 hook fixation for os odontoideum with atlantoaxial dislocation

Traumatic posterior dislocation of atlanto-axial joint with anterior arch fracture in the patient of atlanto-occipital assimilation: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Traumatic atlanto-axial dislocation (AAD) is relatively uncommon and can pose life-threatening risks. In this case, we describe a patient with a combination of AAD, an anterior arch fracture of the atlas, and a rare congenital anomaly known as atlanto-occipital assimilation (AOA).

CASE PRESENTATION

A 70-year-old man presented with posterior neck pain and right-sided torticollis following an accident that collision with a car while riding an electric scooter. Radiographic findings confirmed posterior AAD with anterior arch fracture of C1 in the inherent setting of AOA. The patient showed no neurologic deficit, so a closed reduction technique using Gardner-Wells tongs was attempted in an awakened state, and successful reduction could achieve without a neurologic deficit. After about three months of rigid brace application, head and neck motion was allowed, and no recurrence of dislocation or cervical pain occurred during the follow-up period of about one year.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Because the posterior AAD is usually accompanied by anterior arch fracture of atlas, the transverse atlantal ligament remained intact. So nonoperative management after manual reduction was possible. The presence of a C1 anterior arch fracture observed in our case can be regarded as an indicator predicting the success of closed reduction of AAD.

CONCLUSION

Our case highlighted the successful nonoperative management of traumatic posterior AAD with an accompanying anterior arch fracture of the atlas in a peculiar inherent combination of AOA through the closed reduction technique and rigid cervical brace application.

Posterior Reduction and Intra-Articular Cage Fusion With a C2 Nerve Root Preservation Technique for Treating Posterior Atlantoaxial Dislocation Secondary to Os Odontoideum

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Posterior C1-C2 interlaminae compression fusion with iliac bone graft may lead to donor site complications and recurrent C1 posterior dislocation for posterior atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) secondary to os odontoideum. C1-C2 intra-articular fusion often needs C2 nerve ganglion transection to facilitate exposing and manipulating the facet joint, leading to bleeding from the venous plexus and suboccipital numbness or pain. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of posterior C1-C2 intra-articular fusion with a C2 nerve root preservation technique in the treatment of posterior AAD secondary to os odontoideum.

METHODS

Data of the 11 patients who underwent C1-C2 posterior intra-articular fusion because of posterior AAD secondary to os odontoideum were retrospectively reviewed. Posterior reduction was performed using C1 transarch lateral mass screws and C2 pedicle screws. Intra-articular fusion was performed using a polyetheretherketone cage filled with autologous bone from the caudal edge of the C1 posterior arch and cranial edge of the C2 laminar. Outcomes were evaluated by using the Japanese Orthopaedics Association score, Neck Disability Index, and visual analog scale for neck pain. Bone fusion was evaluated by using computed tomography and 3-dimensional reconstruction.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration was 43.9 ± 9.5 months. All patients achieved good reduction and bone fusion, without transection of the C2 nerve roots. The mean bone fusion time was 4.3 ± 1.1 months. There was no complication related to the surgical approach and instrumentation. Function of the spinal cord manifested by the Japanese Orthopaedics Association score significantly improved ( P < .05). The Neck Disability Index score and visual analog scale for neck pain markedly decreased (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Posterior reduction and intra-articular cage fusion with a C2 nerve root preservation technique was a promising treatment of posterior AAD secondary to os odontoideum.

An In Vitro Biomechanical Study of the Ectopic Functional Reconstruction of the Transverse Ligament of Atlas

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the stability and function of the C1-C2 joint after ectopic functional reconstruction (EFR) of the C1 transverse ligament.

METHODS

Eight human cadaveric cervical spines (C0-C4) were subjected to in vitro biomechanical test with moment control. Spine specimens were tested under the following conditions: 1) left intact; 2) destabilized by severing the transverse ligament of atlas; 3) after EFR of the transverse ligament. Range of motion was measured in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

RESULTS

Destabilization significantly increased range of motion in all directions compared with the intact status (P < 0.001). However, after EFR of the transverse ligament, range of motion in all directions was restored to the intact state. Meanwhile, coupling motions were reproduced in the axial rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

EFR of the transverse ligament virtually recovers all the physiological functions of the native transverse ligament and might be a promising alternative for the treatment of anterior atlantoaxial dislocation. Further studies are warranted before clinical application of EFR of the transverse ligament.

Os odontoideum: A comprehensive review

Os odontoideum (OO) is a rare craniocervical anomaly that is characterized by a round ossicle separated from the C2 vertebral body. With a controversial etiology and unknown prevalence in the population, OO may be asymptomatic or present in patients with myelopathic and neurological symptoms. In this literature review, we aimed to investigate epidemiology, embryology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and the role of diagnostic radiography in OO. By providing an overview of different management strategies, surgical complications, and postoperative considerations for OO, our findings may guide neurosurgeons in providing proper diagnosis and treatment for OO patients. A literature review was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases. A search using the query "os odontoideum" yielded 4319 results, of which 112 articles were chosen and analyzed for insights on factors such as etiology, clinical presentation, and management of OO. The presentation of OO varies widely from asymptomatic cases to severe neurological deficits. Asymptomatic patients can be managed either conservatively or surgically, while symptomatic patients should undergo operative stabilization. Although multiple studies show different techniques for surgical management involving posterior fusion, the diversity of such cases illustrates how treatment must be tailored to the individual patient to prevent complications. Conflicting studies and the paucity of current literature on OO highlight poor comprehension of the condition. Further understanding of the natural history of OO is critical to form evidence-based guidelines for the management of OO patients. More large-center studies are thus needed to promote accurate management of OO patients with optimal outcomes.

Posterior atlantoaxial fusion: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques and relevant vascular anomalies

Posterior atlantoaxial fusion is an important surgical technique frequently used to treat various pathologies involving the cervical 1-2 joint. Since the beginning of the 20th century, various fusion techniques have been developed with improved safety profile, higher fusion rates, and superior clinical outcome. Despite the advancement of technology and surgical techniques, posterior C1-2 fusion is still a technically challenging procedure given the complex bony and neurovascular anatomy in the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). In addition, vascular anomalies in this region are not uncommon and can lead to devastating neurovascular complications if unrecognized. Thus, it is important for spine surgeons to be familiar with various posterior atlantoaxial fusion techniques along with a thorough knowledge of various vascular anomalies in the CVJ. Intimate knowledge of the various surgical techniques in combination with an appreciation for anatomical variances, allows the surgeon develop a customized surgical plan tailored to each patient's particular pathology and individual anatomy. In this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of existing posterior C1-2 fusion techniques along with a review of common vascular anomalies in the CVJ.

Posterior Screw-Rod Fixation and Selective Axial Loosening for the Treatment of Atlantoaxial Instability or Dislocation Caused by Os Odontoideum: A Case Series for a Single Posterior Approach

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of screw-rod fixation and selective axial loosening in the treatment of atlantoaxial instability or dislocation (including reducible and irreducible) caused by os odontoideum (OO) via a single posterior approach.

METHODS

A consecutive series of patients with OO surgically treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. For atlantoaxial instability and reducible atlantoaxial dislocation, C1-C2 screw-rod fixation and fusion were performed. OO combined with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation was reduced after posterior axial loosening, followed by screw-rod fixation and fusion. The general information, clinical data, and radiographic data were compared between the 2 different procedures.

RESULTS

There were 41 patients with an average age of 40.6 ± 21.7 years. All the patients underwent posterior reduction and C1-2 screw rod fixation, 6 with axial loosening and 35 without axial loosening. The clinical manifestations and radiographic data significantly improved after the operation with a low rate of complications. Except for clivus-canal angle and visual analogue score of cervical pain, there were no differences in clinical and radiographic data between the 2 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior screws-rod fixation and selective axial loosening is appropriate for treating OO complicated with atlantoaxial instability or dislocation (including reducible and irreducible) without the need for anterior decompression.

Potential intraoperative factors of screw-related complications following posterior transarticular C1-C2 fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of several factors, including patients' intraoperative position, intraoperative visualization technique, fixation method, and type of screws and their parameters, on the frequency of intraoperative screw-associated complications in posterior transarticular C1-C2 fixation.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed database between January 1986 and March 2018 was performed. The key inclusion criteria comprised detailed descriptions of the surgical technique and post-operative screw-associated complications.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 1041 abstracts, and a total of 54 abstracts were included in the present study. The overall number of operated patients was 2306. In this group, 4439 screws were inserted. The rate of screw-associated complications during the different time periods was estimated upon meta-analysis. Statistical analysis of the screw malposition rate, vertebral artery injury rate, screw breakage rate based on patients' intraoperative position, intraoperative visualization technique, fixation method, and type of implants and their parameters was also performed.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors that help reduce the rate of screw-associated complications include the intraoperative application of biplanar fluoroscopy or neuronavigation system, the use of 4 mm or thicker lag screws, and screw insertion through contraincisions using cannulated ported instruments. On the other hand, the potential risk factors of screw-associated complications include inadequate intraoperative head fixation using skeletal traction, uniplanar fluoroscopy-guided screw insertion, screw insertion using the posterior midline approach, and the use of 3.5 mm or thinner full-threaded screws. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

C1 Titanium Cables Combined with C2 Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability Not Suitable for Placement of C1 Screws

OBJECTIVE

We sought to develop a new posterior fusion technique composed of bilateral C1 titanium cables and C2 pedicle screw-rods for treatment of atlantoaxial instability not suitable for C1 screw placement.

METHODS

A study was conducted of 18 patients with atlantoaxial instability who had C1 broken screw trajectory or anatomic anomalies. All patients underwent posterior fixation with bilateral C1 titanium cables and C2 pedicle screws. The follow-up period was a minimum 1 year. Clinical outcomes measurements included visual analog scale score for neck pain assessment, the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale and Japanese Orthopaedic Association score for neurologic status and function. According to preoperative computed tomography (CT) reconstruction and CT angiography, the patients selected in this study were not suitable for C1 screw placement. Postoperative plain radiographs and CT reconstruction were performed to evaluate the reduction, bony fusion, and implant position. All outcomes were evaluated at each follow-up.

RESULTS

The average clinical follow-up period was 24 months (range 12-36 months). All patients had complete neck pain relief at postoperative 6 months. Their neurologic symptoms had improved significantly at 1-year follow-up. Radiologic outcomes indicated good bony fusion and construction stability in all patients without implant failure at the last follow-up. No neural or vascular complications related to this technique were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior atlantoaxial fixation using C1 titanium cables and C2 pedicle screw-rod construct appears to be an effective and safe technique for treatment of atlantoaxial instability, which could be an alternative method for cases unsuitable for C1 screw placement when using C1-C2 screw fixation.

Surgery for Chronic Traumatic Atlantoaxial Dislocation Associated With Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of myelopathy caused by atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

No reports to date have accurately evaluated the results of surgery for delayed myelopathy for patients with chronic AAD. Thus, the appropriate surgical time and methods of decompression and fusion remain a hot debate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In our study, 18 patients underwent decompression, fixation, and fusion. Demographic data, operation time, blood loss, and complications were evaluated. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Scale, severity of disability and visual analogue scale were evaluated. The fusion rate, space available for the cord, instability index, cord compression index, and cord decompression rate were also assessed.

RESULTS

The average time of operation was 248±50 minutes, and blood loss was 350±200 mL. Five patients in grade I maintained their neurological status, and the others had improved neurological status. With average follow-up time of 15.3±9.6 months, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score improved, the visual analogue scale score decreased, the space available for the cord improved, and the instability index and cord compression index decreased. Cord decompression rate was 65.9%. Fusion rate reached 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high risk of delayed myelopathy for patients with AAD who do not undergo timely surgical treatment. There is no need for complete reduction for treatment of chronic AAD. Whether it can be reduced or not, sufficient decompression and solid fusion for AAD are required. Both C1-C2 fusion for reducible dislocation and occipital-cervical fusion for irreducible dislocation have satisfactory outcomes.

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel Integrated C1 Laminar Hook Combined with C1-C2 Transarticular Screws for Atlantoaxial Fusion: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the acute stability of a novel integrated C1 laminar hook (H) combined with a C1-C2 transarticular screw (TAS) with established techniques.

METHODS

A novel integrated C1 laminar hook was tested. Seven human cadaveric cervical spines (C0-C3) were used. The range of motion (ROM) of C1-C2 during flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were recorded. The specimens were tested under the following conditions: intact, destabilized (using a type II odontoid fracture model), and destabilized but with internal fixation. The following screw systems were used: bilateral C1-C2 TAS combined with the Gallie (G) technique (TAS+G), C1-C2 TAS combined with a novel integrated C1 laminar hook (TAS+H), C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screws (C2PS+C1LMS), and novel integrated C1 laminar hook combined with C2 pedicle screws (C2PS+H). The TASs were always inserted after the C2PSs. The C2PS+C1LMS and C2PS+H tests were performed alternatively, as were the TAS+G and TAS+H tests.

RESULTS

All fixation constructs greatly improved acute atlantoaxial stability, with no significant difference among TAS+H, TAS+G, and C2PS+C1LMS (all P > 0.05). C2PS+H showed the greatest C1-C2 ROM in axial rotation, significantly different from TAS+G, C2PS+C1LMS, and TAS+H fixation models (all P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between C2PS+H and the other 3 models in flexion-extension and lateral bending (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The TAS+H technique can achieve acute stability comparable to that with the TAS+G technique for treating C1-C2 instability. The C2PS+H is a promising alternative, although it provides less stability in axial rotation than TAS+G, TAS+H, or C2PS+C1LMS.

New Posterior Atlantoaxial Restricted Non-Fusion Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability: A Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

Loss of axial rotation and lateral bending after atlantoaxial fusion reduces a patient's quality of life. Therefore, effective, nonfusion fixation alternatives are needed for atlantoaxial instability.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the initial stability and function of posterior atlantoaxial restricted nonfusion fixation (PAARNF), a new protocol, using cadaveric cervical spines compared with the intact state, destabilization, and posterior C1-C2 rod fixation.

METHODS

Cervical areas C0 through C3 were used from 6 cadaveric spines to test flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation range of motion (ROM). With the use of a machine, 1.5-Nm torque at a rate of 0.1 Nm/s was used and held for 10 seconds. The specimens were loaded 3 times, and data were collected in the third cycle and tested in the following sequence: (1) intact, (2) destabilization (using a type II odontoid fracture model), (3) destabilization with PAARNF (PAARNF group), and (4) rod implantation (rod group). The order of tests for the PAARNF and rod groups was randomly assigned.

RESULTS

The average flexion-extension ROM in the PAARNF group was 7.44 ± 2.05°, which was significantly less than in the intact (P = .00) and destabilization (P = .00) groups but not significantly different from that of the rod group (P = .07). The average lateral bending ROM (10.59 ± 2.33°; P = .00) and axial rotation ROM (38.79 ± 13.41°; P = .00) of the PAARNF group were significantly greater than in the rod group. However, the values of the PAARNF group showed no significant differences compared with those of the intact group.

CONCLUSION

PAARNF restricted atlantoaxial flexion-extension but preserved axial rotation and lateral bending at the atlantoaxial joint in a type II odontoid fracture model. However, it should not be used clinically until further studies have been performed to test the long-term effects of this procedure.

Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: a review of all techniques

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Posterior atlantoaxial fixation is an effective treatment for atlantoaxial instability. Great advancements on posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques have been made in the past decades. However, there is no article reviewing all the posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques yet.

PURPOSE

The aim was to review the evolution and advancements of posterior atlantoaxial fixation.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a literature review.

METHODS

The application of all posterior fixation techniques in atlantoaxial stabilization, including wiring techniques, interlaminar clamp fixation, transarticular fixation, screw-plate systems, screw-rod systems, and hook-screw systems, are reviewed and discussed. Recent advancements on the novel technique of atlantoaxial fixation are described. The combination of the C1 and C2 screws in screw-rod systems are described in detail.

RESULTS

All fixation techniques are useful. The screw-rod system appears to be the most popular approach. However, many novel or modified fixation methods have been introduced in recent years.

CONCLUSIONS

Great advancements on posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques have been made in the past decades. The wiring technique and interlaminar clamps technique have fallen out of favor because of the development of newer and superior fixation techniques. The C1-C2 transarticular screw technique may remain the gold standard for atlantoaxial fusion, whereas screw-rod systems, especially the C1 pedicle screw combined with C2 pedicle/pars screw fixation, have become the most popular fixation techniques. Hook-screw systems are alternatives for atlantoaxial fixation.

Retrospective review of 22 surgically treated adults with congenital anomalies of the upper cervical spine: a clinical and radiological review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to clarify the characteristics of adult cases with instability due to upper cervical spine anomalies who needed fusion surgery regarding the clinical and radiological findings.

METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive patients with instability due to upper cervical spine anomaly in adult cases were reviewed. The congenital anomalies included idiopathic atlanto-axial subluxation in nine cases, os odontoideum in seven cases, occipitalization of the atlas in four cases, atlanto-occipital subluxation in one case and AAS with another anomaly in one case. We evaluated the severity of neurological symptoms before surgery and at the last follow-up. We also observed MR images before and 1 year after surgery.

RESULTS

Before surgery, the 22 patients included seven Ranawat Grade I cases, ten Ranawat Grade II cases, and five Ranawat Grade IIIa cases. Regarding the neurological status after surgery, those included eighteen Ranawat Grade I cases, three Ranawat Grade II cases, and one Ranawat Grade IIIa case. Preoperative T2-weighted MR images demonstrated intramedullary high signal intensity (IHSI) in 12 cases. IHSI group did not include significantly more Ranawat Grade IIIa cases compared to the remaining 10 cases. In postoperative MR images (nine cases), the regression or disappearance of IHSI was demonstrated in only three cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In adult cases with instability due to upper cervical spine anomalies, we acquired favorable clinical outcomes after surgery. Regarding the neurological severity before surgery, there was no relationship with the IHSI on T2-weighted MR image. Moreover, the regression or disappearance of IHSI after surgery was not frequently demonstrated.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Posterior C1-C2 Temporary Fixation Without Fusion and C1-C2 Fusion for Fresh Odontoid Fractures

BACKGROUND:

Posterior C1-C2 temporary-fixation technique can spare the range of motion (ROM) of the atlantoaxial joint after odontoid fracture healing. However, few studies analyze the difference in clinical outcome between this technique and posterior C1-C2 fusion technique for new odontoid fracture.

OBJECTIVE:

To verify whether the clinical outcome of the posterior C1-C2 temporary-fixation technique is superior to that of the posterior C1-C2 fusion technique in the treatment of a new odontoid fracture.

METHODS:

Twenty-one of 22 patients who underwent posterior C1-C2 temporary fixation of an odontoid fracture achieved fracture healing and regained motion of the atlantoaxial joint. The functional outcomes of these 21 patients were compared with that of a control group, which consisted of 21 randomly enrolled cases with posterior C1-C2 fixation and fusion. The differences between the 2 groups in the visual analog scale score for neck pain, neck stiffness, Neck Disability Index, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and time to fracture healing were analyzed.

RESULTS:

Significantly better outcomes were observed in the temporary-fixation group for visual analog scale score for neck pain, Neck Disability Index, and neck stiffness. The outcomes in the temporary-fixation group was superior to those in the fusion group in all dimensions of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. There were no significant differences in fracture healing rate and time to fracture healing between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSION:

Functional outcomes were significantly better after posterior C1-C2 temporary fixation than after fusion. Temporary fixation can be used as a salvage treatment for an odontoid fracture with an intact transverse ligament in cases of failure of, or contraindication to, anterior screw fixation.

Traumatic atlantoaxial subluxation, posterior transfacet fixation: a case report

Cervical spine injuries are often described as catastrophic events in neurological terms, with very low survival rate. Lesions to C3-C7 segment are the most common (about 80%) followed by segment C1-C2 (20%). The cervical spine injuries are of great importance, both by severity as the neurological implications. It is important to consider that among cervical traumas that do not present neurological damage at the time of the accident, 10% have deficits later, so all cervical trauma should be considered as potential spinal cord traumas, until the evolution of the case shows that definitively there is no spinal cord or nerve root damage. Cases have been reported with both atlantooccipital and atlantoaxial dislocations without neurological deficit, so these lesions went unnoticed in the emergency services. Some of the events to be considered at the time of the accident are suboccipital pain on axial skull pressure and spontaneous stiffness of the patient's neck. Dysphagia, pain on palpation of the anterior neck and a visible increase of prepharyngeal mass can also be observed, which is why it is important to keep the suspicion of craniocervical trauma in all patients who have these symptoms and carry out the relevant tests. This paper presents a case of post-traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation, which showed no neurological deficit at the time of the accident, but was later presented, as well as the surgical procedure carried out.

A review of the diagnosis and treatment of atlantoaxial dislocations

Study Design Literature review. Objective Atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) is a rare and potentially fatal disturbance to the normal occipital-cervical anatomy that affects some populations disproportionately, which may cause permanent neurologic deficits or sagittal deformity if not treated in a timely and appropriate manner. Currently, there is a lack of consensus among surgeons on the best approach to diagnose, characterize, and treat this condition. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive review of the literature to identify timely and effective diagnostic techniques and treatment modalities of AAD. Methods This review examined all articles published concerning "atlantoaxial dislocation" or "atlantoaxial subluxation" on the PubMed database. We included 112 articles published between 1966 and 2014. Results Results of these studies are summarized primarily as defining AAD, the normal anatomy, etiology of dislocation, clinical presentation, diagnostic techniques, classification, and recommendations for timely treatment modalities. Conclusions The Wang Classification System provides a practical means to diagnose and treat AAD. However, future research is required to identify the most salient intervention component or combination of components that lead to the best outcomes.