What bone part is important to remove in accessing the suprachiasmatic region with less frontal lobe retraction in frontotemporal craniotomies

Quantitative Anatomical Studies in Neurosurgery: A Systematic and Critical Review of Research Methods

BACKGROUND

The anatomy laboratory can provide the ideal setting for the preclinical phase of neurosurgical research. Our purpose is to comprehensively and critically review the preclinical anatomical quantification methods used in cranial neurosurgery.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid EMBASE databases were searched, yielding 1667 papers. A statistical analysis was performed using R.

RESULTS

The included studies were published from 1996 to 2023. The risk of bias assessment indicated high-quality studies. Target exposure was the most studied feature (81.7%), mainly with area quantification (64.9%). The surgical corridor was quantified in 60.9% of studies, more commonly with the quantification of the angle of view (60%). Neuronavigation-based methods benefit from quantifying the surgical pyramid features that define a cranial neurosurgical approach and allowing post-dissection data analyses. Direct measurements might diminish the error that is inherent to navigation methods and are useful to collect a small amount of data.

CONCLUSION

Quantifying neurosurgical approaches in the anatomy laboratory provides an objective assessment of the surgical corridor and target exposure. There is currently limited comparability among quantitative neurosurgical anatomy studies; sharing common research methods will provide comparable data that might also be investigated with artificial intelligence methods.

Cranio-Orbito-Zygomatic Approach: Core Techniques for Tailoring Target Exposure and Surgical Freedom

Background: The cranio-orbito-zygomatic (COZ) approach is a workhorse of skull base surgery, and each of its steps has a precise effect on target exposure and surgical freedom. The present study overviews the key techniques for execution and tailoring of the COZ approach, focusing on the quantitative effects resulting from removal of the orbitozygomatic (OZ) bar, orbital rim, and zygomatic arch. Methods: A PRISMA-based literature review was performed on the PubMed/Medline and Web of Science databases using the main keywords associated with the COZ approach. Articles in English without temporal restriction were included. Eligibility was limited to neurosurgical relevance. Results: A total of 78 articles were selected. The range of variants of the COZ approach involves a one-piece, two-piece, and three-piece technique, with a decreasing level of complexity and risk of complications. The two-piece technique includes an OZ and orbitopterional variant. Superolateral orbitotomy expands the subfrontal and transsylvian corridors, increasing surgical freedom to the basal forebrain, hypothalamic region, interpeduncular fossa, and basilar apex. Zygomatic osteotomy shortens the working distance of the pretemporal and subtemporal routes. Conclusion: Subtraction of the OZ bar causes a tremendous increase in angular exposure of the subfrontal, transsylvian, pretemporal, and subtemporal perspectives avoiding brain retraction, allowing for multiangled trajectories, and shortening the working distance. The COZ approach can be tailored based on the location of the lesion, thus optimizing the target exposure and surgical freedom and decreasing the risk of complications.

Comparative Anatomical Study of Fronto-Orbito-Zygomatic and Fronto-Temporal Approach to the Central Skull Base

ABSTRACT

Despite the advances in microsurgery and neuroanatomy, surgery of the central skull base still represents a challenge. Fronto-temporal approach has represented the mainstay of surgical approaches to this region. With advances in skull base surgery, orbital and zygomatic extensions were added to fronto-temporal approach to improve exposure minimizing brain retraction.The authors compared fronto-temporal and fronto-orbitozygomatic approaches to the central skull base by using the previously described operability score, to three different anatomical targets: the ipsilateral anterior clinoid process, the contralateral anterior clinoid process, and the ipsilateral posterior clinoid process.Based on the measurements taken, fronto-orbitozygomatic approache showed higher values at all 3 targets. The reported values were critically discussed.The operability score has been reported as an effective method to compare surgical approaches. The present study demonstrated the maximal possibility of exposure of the two approaches. Based on the strong variability of this anatomical region, especially because of the different pathologies, the authors suggest considering the operability score as a further tool to better define the best surgical approach to this anatomical region.

The Benefits of Limited Orbitotomy on the Supraorbital Approach: An Anatomic and Morphometric Study in Virtual Reality

BACKGROUND

Cadaveric studies on surgical anatomy and approaches are hampered by the limited number of specimens. Virtual reality (VR) technology can overcome this limitation, allowing for more in-depth statistical analysis of the data.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the benefit of a supraorbital ridge osteotomy in a supraorbital craniotomy targeting (1) the anterior communicating artery complex (ACOM), and (2) a lesion 25 mm above tuberculum sellae, using a large dataset generated by VR.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of 30 subjects without cranial osseous pathology were identified for use with VR technology. After correlating VR and DICOM datasets, supraorbital craniotomies were simulated without and with removal of supraorbital ridge, bilaterally (n = 60). Area of freedom (AOF) from the outer table to the targets and the vertical center angle (VCA) to targets were calculated, before and after the orbitotomy.

RESULTS

For the ACOM, AOF averaged 496 mm2 (range: 322-805) and increased 8.9% to an average of 547 mm2 with the removal of the supraorbital ridge (P < .001). VCA increased from 18.5 to 20.3 degrees. For the suprasellar target, AOF averaged 507 mm2 (range 324-772) and increased 42.5% to 722 mm2 after orbitotomy (P < .001). VCA increased from 22.1 to 30.8 degrees.

CONCLUSION

VR technology is an emerging tool to study neurosurgical approaches. Here, we demonstrate with VR that the removal of the supraorbital ridge in a supraorbital craniotomy affords greater access to superiorly located lesions of the anterior fossa floor; however, deeper and lower lesions require a more aggressive orbital roof osteotomy to widen the exposure.

Quantification and comparison of neurosurgical approaches in the preclinical setting: literature review

There is a growing awareness of the need for evidence-based surgery and of the issues that are specific to research in surgery. Well-conducted anatomical studies can represent the first, preclinical step for evidence-based surgical innovation and evaluation. In the last two decades, various reports have quantified and compared neurosurgical approaches in the anatomy laboratory using different methods and technology. The aim of this study was to critically review these papers. A PubMed and Scopus search was performed to select articles that quantified and compared different neurosurgical approaches in the preclinical setting. The basic characteristics that anatomically define a surgical approach were defined. Each study was analyzed for measured features and quantification method and technique. Ninety-nine papers, published from 1990 to 2013, were included in this review. A heterogeneous use of terms to define the features of a surgical approach was evident. Different methods to study these features have been reported; they are generally based on quantification of distances, angles, and areas. Measuring tools have evolved from the simple ruler to frameless stereotactic devices. The reported methods have each specific advantages and limits; a common limitation is the lack of 3D visualization and surgical volume quantification. There is a need for a uniform nomenclature in anatomical studies. Frameless stereotactic devices provide a powerful tool for anatomical studies. Volume quantification and 3D visualization of the surgical approach is not provided with most available methods.

Fascia patchwork closure for endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery

With the development of endoscopic technology and surgery, resection of midline skull base tumors has been achieved using endoscopic endonasal skull base (EESB) approaches. EESB approaches reportedly have a greater risk of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. Recently, the introduction of the nasoseptal flap (NSF) decreased dramatically the incidence of CSF leakage, but the use of an NSF increases the risk of disturbing the function of the nose. Here, we report our new technique called "fascia patchwork closure" for closure after EESB surgery and its outcome. All 48 cases involved midline skull base tumors resected via EESB approaches. Of them, 32 cases were closed by the fascia patchwork technique after tumor resection, and there was no incidence of CSF leakage. Moreover, 6 of the 32 cases were closed without the use of an NSF, indicating that the fascia patchwork closure approach is effective as part of a multilayer closure for the prevention of CSF leakage. The establishment and popularization of this technique might result in the further development of EESB surgery and also an improvement of postoperative nasal function.

[Orbitozygomatic approaches to the skull base]

The paper is written in the lecture format and dedicated to one of the main basal approaches, the orbitozygomatic approach, that has been widely used by neurosurgeons for several decades. The authors describe the historical background of the approach development and the surgical technique features and also analyze the published data about application of the orbitozygomatic approach in surgery for skull base tumors and cerebral aneurysms.

Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: advantages, limitations, and our techniques to overcome cerebrospinal fluid leakage: technical note

In recent years, resections of midline skull base tumors have been conducted using endoscopic endonasal skull base (EESB) approaches. Nevertheless, many surgeons reported that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is still a major complication of these approaches. Here, we report the results of our 42 EESB surgeries and discuss the advantages and limits of this approach for resecting various types of tumors, and also report our technique to overcome CSF leakage. All 42 cases involved midline skull base tumors resected using the EESB technique. Dural incisions were closed using nasoseptal flaps and fascia patch inlay sutures. Total removal of the tumor was accomplished in seven pituitary adenomas (33.3%), five craniopharyngiomas (62.5%), five tuberculum sellae meningiomas (83.3%), three clival chordomas (100%), and one suprasellar ependymoma. Residual regions included the cavernous sinus, the outside of the intracranial part of the internal carotid artery, the lower lateral part of the posterior clivus, and the posterior pituitary stalk. Overall incidence of CSF leakage was 7.1%. Even though the versatility of the approach is limited, EESB surgery has many advantages compared to the transcranial approach for managing mid-line skull base lesions. To avoid CSF leakage, surgeons should have skills and techniques for complete closure, including use of the nasoseptal flap and fascia patch inlay techniques.