Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Resection of Intra-Axial Brain Lesions: A Decade of Experience Using Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Polestar N-10, 20, 30 Systems

Intraoperative use of low-field magnetic resonance imaging for brain tumors: A systematic review

Background

Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (LF-MRI) has become a valuable tool in the diagnosis of brain tumors due to its high spatial resolution and ability to acquire images in a short amount of time. However, the use of LF-MRI for intraoperative imaging during brain tumor surgeries has not been extensively studied. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the impact of low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (LF-IMRI) on the duration of brain tumor surgery and the extent of tumor resection.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar from February 2000 to December 2022. The studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria and reviewed independently by two reviewers. The gathered information was organized and analyzed using Excel.

Results

Our review of 21 articles found that low-field intraoperative MRI (LF-IMRI) with a field below 0.3T was used in most of the studies, specifically 15 studies used 0.15T LF-IMRI. The T1-weighted sequence was the most frequently reported, and the average scanning time was 24.26 min. The majority of the studies reported a positive impact of LF-IMRI on the extent of tumor resection, with an increase ranging from 11% to 52.5%. Notably, there were no studies describing the use of ultra-low-field (ULF) intraoperative MRI.

Conclusion

The results of this systematic review will aid neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists in making informed decisions about the use of LF-MRI in brain tumor surgeries. Further, research is needed to fully understand the impact of LF-MRI in brain tumor surgeries and to optimize its use in the clinical setting. There is an opportunity to study the utility of ULF-MRI in brain tumor surgeries.

A Novel Portable, Mobile MRI: Comparison with an Established Low-Field Intraoperative MRI System

Background  MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) using low-magnet field strength has unique advantages for intraoperative use. We compared a novel, compact, portable MR imaging system to an established intraoperative 0.15 T system to assess potential utility in intracranial neurosurgery. Methods  Brain images were acquired with a 0.15 T intraoperative MRI (iMRI) system and a 0.064 T portable MR system. Five healthy volunteers were scanned. Individual sequences were rated on a 5-point (1 to 5) scale for six categories: contrast, resolution, coverage, noise, artifacts, and geometry. Results  Overall, the 0.064 T images (M = 3.4, SD = 0.1) had statistically higher ratings than the 0.15 T images (M = 2.4, SD = 0.2) ( p  < 0.01). All comparable sequences (T1, T2, T2 FLAIR and SSFP) were rated significantly higher on the 0.064 T and were rated 1.2 points (SD = 0.3) higher than 0.15 T scanner, with the T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences showing the largest increment on the 0.064 T with an average rating difference of 1.5 points (SD = 0.2). Scanning time for the 0.064 T system obtained images more quickly and encompassed a larger field of view than the 0.15 T system. Conclusions  A novel, portable 0.064 T self-shielding MRI system under ideal conditions provided images of comparable quality or better and faster acquisition times than those provided by the already well-established 0.15 T iMR system. These results suggest that the 0.064 T MRI has the potential to be adapted for intraoperative use for intracranial neurosurgery.

Low-field MRI: Clinical promise and challenges

Modern MRI scanners have trended toward higher field strengths to maximize signal and resolution while minimizing scan time. However, high-field devices remain expensive to install and operate, making them scarce outside of high-income countries and major population centers. Low-field strength scanners have drawn renewed academic, industry, and philanthropic interest due to advantages that could dramatically increase imaging access, including lower cost and portability. Nevertheless, low-field MRI still faces inherent limitations in image quality that come with decreased signal. In this article, we review advantages and disadvantages of low-field MRI scanners, describe hardware and software innovations that accentuate advantages and mitigate disadvantages, and consider clinical applications for a new generation of low-field devices. In our review, we explore how these devices are being or could be used for high acuity brain imaging, outpatient neuroimaging, MRI-guided procedures, pediatric imaging, and musculoskeletal imaging. Challenges for their successful clinical translation include selecting and validating appropriate use cases, integrating with standards of care in high resource settings, expanding options with actionable information in low resource settings, and facilitating health care providers and clinical practice in new ways. By embracing both the promise and challenges of low-field MRI, clinicians and researchers have an opportunity to transform medical care for patients around the world. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for cerebral cavernous malformations: When is it maybe worth it?

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) can be useful for cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) surgery. However, literature on this topic is scarce. We aim to investigate its clinical utility and propose criteria for the selection of patients who may benefit the most from iMRI.

METHODS

From 2017 to 2019, all patients with CCMs who required surgery assisted with iMRI were included in the study. Clinical and radiological features were analyzed. Outcome measures included the need for an immediate second-look resection and clinical course in early post-surgery -Timepoint 1- (Tp1) and at the 6-to-12-month follow-up -Timepoint2- (Tp2).

RESULTS

Out of 19 patients with 20 CCMs, 89% had bleeding in the past, and in 75% the CCM affected an eloquent area. According to the iMRI results, an immediate second-look resection was needed in 16% of them. In one patient, a remnant was not seen on iMRI. The mRS worsened in the immediate post-surgical exam (median, 1; IQR, 1) with improvements on the 6-month visit (median, 1; IQR, 2), (p = 0.018). When comparing the outcome of patients with and without symptoms at baseline, the latter fared better at Tp2 (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

iMRI is an intraoperative imaging tool that seems safe for CCM surgery and might reduce the risk of lesion remnants. In our series, it allowed additional revision for further resection in 16% of the patients. In our experience, iMRI may be especially useful for lesions in eloquent areas, those with a significant risk of brain shift and for large CCMs.

Techniques for Open Surgical Resection of Brain Metastases

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumor and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with systemic cancer. En bloc surgical resection of brain metastases improves survival, local recurrence rates, and functional independence in patients with up to three metastases and controlled extracranial disease. Modern techniques and technologies provide the neurosurgeon with minimally invasive approaches, such as keyhole craniotomies and tubular retractors. Preoperative planning for tumors located in eloquent regions includes mapping with functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging, and intraoperative mapping and monitoring with electrophysiologic techniques under general or awake anesthesia to preserve normal neurologic function.

10 Years' Experience of Using Low-Field Intraoperative MRI in Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma: Results of the Swiss Pituitary Registry (SwissPit)

BACKGROUND

For 20 years, several studies have reported intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) utility to achieve gross total resections in transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery. Although few studies on low-field iMRI included >100 patients, data on hormonally active tumors remain scarce and follow-up times are <3 years. This is not sufficient to judge the long-term efficiency of the use of low-field iMRI. The aim of this retrospective study is to report the detailed outcome of iMRI-controlled transsphenoidal surgery in >200 patients during a follow-up exceeding 5 years.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for pituitary adenoma by iMRI-controlled, endoscopically assisted transsphenoidal surgery at the authors' institution between 2006 and 2016 were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected in the Swiss Pituitary Registry. A Polestar 0.15T-scanner was used.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients had surgery for 160 nonfunctioning adenomas; 28 hGH-, 27 PRL-, 10 ACTH-secreting and 6 mixed adenomas and were followed for 62 months (9-178). Additional iMRI-guided resections were possible in 54% and increased the gross total resection rate by 4% (P = 0.004). Remission rates were as follows: nonfunctioning adenoma, 53%; acromegaly, 61%; prolactinoma, 50%; Cushing disease, 90%. Tumor regrowth and recurrence was detected at a mean time of 24 and 63 months, respectively. Recovery of deficient hormone axes was detected in 22% to 27%. The risk for new postoperative hormonal deficiencies was 15%. Postoperative relieve of visual field and visual acuity deficiencies was seen in 94 (86%) and 73 (81%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Judged by long-term follow-ups of >200 nonfunctioning/functioning pituitary adenomas, the use of low-field iMRI in transsphenoidal surgery increases resection rates and sustainably influences outcomes.

Surgical resection of cavernous angioma located within eloquent brain areas: International survey of the practical management among 19 specialized centers

PURPOSE

The practical management of cavernous angioma located within eloquent brain area before, during and after surgical resection is poorly documented. We assessed the practical pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative management of cavernous angioma located within eloquent brain area.

METHOD

An online survey composed of 61 items was sent to 26 centers to establish a multicenter international retrospective cohort of adult patients who underwent a surgical resection as the first-line treatment of a supratentorial cavernous angioma located within or close to eloquent brain area.

RESULTS

272 patients from 19 centers (mean 13.6 ± 16.7 per center) from eight countries were included. The pre-operative management varied significantly between centers and countries regarding the pre-operative functional assessment, the pre-operative epileptological assessment, the first given antiepileptic drug, and the time to surgery. The intra-operative environment varied significantly between centers and countries regarding the use of imaging systems, the use of functional mapping with direct electrostimulations, the extent of resection of the hemosiderin rim, the realization of a post-operative functional assessment, and the time to post-operative functional assessment. The present survey found a post-operative improvement, as compared to pre-operative evaluations, of the functional status, the ability to work, and the seizure control.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a variety of practice between centers and countries regarding the management of cavernous angioma located within eloquent regions. Multicentric prospective studies are required to solve relevant questions regarding the management of cavernous angioma-related seizures, the timing of surgery, and the optimal extent of hemosiderin rim resection.

Compact Intraoperative MRI: Stereotactic Accuracy and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative imaging must supply data that can be used for accurate stereotactic navigation. This information should be at least as accurate as that acquired from diagnostic imagers.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the stereotactic accuracy of an updated compact intraoperative MRI (iMRI) device based on a 0.15-T magnet to standard surgical navigation on a 1.5-T diagnostic scan MRI and to navigation with an earlier model of the same system.

METHODS

The accuracy of each system was assessed using a water-filled phantom model of the brain. Data collected with the new system were compared to those obtained in a previous study assessing the older system. The accuracy of the new iMRI was measured against standard surgical navigation on a 1.5-T MRI using T1-weighted (W) images.

RESULTS

The mean error with the iMRI using T1W images was lower than that based on images from the 1.5-T scan (1.24 vs. 2.43 mm). T2W images from the newer iMRI yielded a lower navigation error than those acquired with the prior model (1.28 vs. 3.15 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Improvements in magnet design can yield progressive increases in accuracy, validating the concept of compact, low-field iMRI. Avoiding the need for registration between image and surgical space increases navigation accuracy.

Factors triggering an additional resection and determining residual tumor volume on intraoperative MRI: analysis from a prospective single-center registry of supratentorial gliomas

OBJECTIVE

In this analysis, the authors sought to identify variables triggering an additional resection (AR) and determining residual intraoperative tumor volume in 1.5-T intraoperative MRI (iMRI)-guided glioma resections.

METHODS

A consecutive case series of 224 supratentorial glioma resections (WHO Grades I–IV) from a prospective iMRI registry (inclusion dates January 2011–April 2013) was examined with univariate and multiple regression models including volumetric data, tumor-related, and surgeon-related factors. The surgeon's expectation of an AR, in response to a questionnaire completed prior to iMRI, was evaluated using contingency analysis. A machine-learning prediction model was applied to consider if anticipation of intraoperative findings permits preoperative identification of ideal iMRI cases.

RESULTS

An AR was performed in 70% of cases after iMRI, but did not translate into an accumulated risk for neurological morbidity after surgery (p = 0.77 for deficits in cases with AR vs no AR). New severe persistent deficits occurred in 6.7% of patients. Initial tumor volume determined frequency of ARs and was independently correlated with larger tumor remnants delineated on iMRI (p < 0.0001). Larger iMRI volume was further associated with eloquent location (p = 0.010) and recurrent tumors (p < 0.0001), and with WHO grade (p = 0.0113). Greater surgical experience had no significant influence on the course of surgery. The surgeon's capability of ruling out an AR prior to iMRI turned out to incorporate guesswork (negative predictive value 43.6%). In a prediction model, AR could only be anticipated with 65% accuracy after integration of confounding variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine use of iMRI in glioma surgery is a safe and reliable method for resection guidance and is characterized by frequent ARs after scanning. Tumor-related factors were identified that influenced the course of surgery and intraoperative decision-making, and iMRI had a common value for surgeons of all experience levels. Commonly, the subjective intraoperative impression of the extent of resection had to be revised after iMRI review, which underscores the manifold potential of iMRI guidance. In combination with the failure to identify ideal iMRI cases preoperatively, this study supports a generous, tumor-oriented rather than surgeon-oriented indication for iMRI in glioma surgery.