Pipeline Embolization Device: Lessons Learned After 1000 Aneurysms

Comparison Between the Efficacy of a Flow Diverter and Interventional Trapping with Bypass in the Treatment of Unruptured Large- or Giant-Sized ICA Aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Management of large- or giant-sized internal carotid artery aneurysms (LICAAs) remains challenging. Whether a flow diverter device (FDD) or interventional trapping with extracranial-intracranial bypass (ITB) is better, remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of unruptured LICAA patients treated with FDD or ITB at 3 medical centers. Both the effectiveness and safety results of FDD and ITB were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 101 aneurysms in 95 patients treated with FDDs and 36 aneurysms in 36 patients managed with ITBs were included (September 2014-June 2021). There was no significant difference between the groups in the complete obliteration rate 1 year after surgery (P = 0.101). There were 2 relapse cases (2.0%) and 4 retreated cases (4.0%) in the FDD group and 1 relapse case (2.8%) and 2 retreated cases (5.6%) in the ITB group. Neither the relapse rates nor retreat rates between groups were significantly different. The neurological morbidity rates were 4.0% (4/101) and 2.8% (1/36) in the FDD group and ITB group, respectively, and were not significantly different. There was 1 mortality case in each group, and the mortality rates were not significantly different (P = 0.443). Both the perioperative and overall (perioperative plus long-term) complication rates in the FDD group were significantly lower than those in the ITB group (P = 0.033, P = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

FDD had comparable surgical efficacy and a significantly lower postoperative complication rate to traditional ITB. FDD might be preferable to ITB as a treatment modality for LICAA.

Combined standard bypass and parent artery occlusion for management of giant and complex internal carotid artery aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Complex aneurysms do not have a standard protocol for treatment. In this study, we investigate the safety and efficacy of microsurgical revascularization combined with parent artery occlusion (PAO) in giant and complex internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2017, 41 patients with 47 giant and complex ICA aneurysms were treated by an a priori planned combined treatment strategy. Clinical and radiological outcomes were stratified according to mRS and Raymond classification. Bypass patency was assessed. Median follow-up time was 3.9 years.

RESULTS

After successful STA-MCA bypass, staged endovascular (n=37) or surgical (n=1) PAO was executed in 38 patients following a negative balloon occlusion test. Intolerance to PAO led to stent/coil treatments in two patients. Perioperative bypass patency was confirmed in 100% of completed STA-MCA bypass procedures. Long-term overall bypass patency rate was 99%. Raymond 1 occlusion and good outcome were achieved in 95% and 97% (mRS 0-2) of cases, respectively. No procedure-related mortality was encountered. Eighty-four percent of patients with preoperative cranial nerve compression syndromes improved during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined approach of STA-MCA bypass surgery followed by parent artery occlusion achieves high aneurysm occlusion and low morbidity rates in the management of giant and complex ICA aneurysms. This combined indirect approach represents a viable alternative to flow diversion in patients with cranial nerve compression syndromes or matricidal aneurysms, and may serve as a backup strategy in cases of peri-interventional complications or lack of suitable endovascular access.

Endoluminal flow diverters in the treatment of sidewall and bifurcation aneurysm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications and angiographic outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The use of endoluminal flow diversion in bifurcation aneurysms has been questioned due to the potential for complications and lower occlusion rates. In this study we assessed outcomes of endovascular treatment of intracranial sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms with flow diverters.

METHODS

In July 2020, a literature search for all studies utilizing endoluminal flow diverter treatment for sidewall or bifurcation aneurysms was performed. Data were collected from studies that met our inclusion/exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers and confirmed by a third reviewer. Using random-effects meta-analysis the target outcomes including overall complications (hematoma, ischemic events, minor ischemic stroke, aneurysm rupture, side vessel occlusion, stenosis, thrombosis, transient ischemic stroke, and other complications), perioperative complications, and follow-up (long-term) aneurysm occlusion were intestigated.

RESULTS

Overall, we included 35 studies with 1084 patients with 1208 aneurysms. Of these aneurysms, 654 (54.14%) and 554 (45.86%) were classified as sidewall and bifurcation aneurysm, respectively, based on aneurysm location. Sidewall aneurysms had a similar total complication rate (R) of 27.12% (95% CI, 16.56%-41.09%), compared with bifurcation aneurysms (R, 20.40%, 95% CI, 13.24%-30.08%) (p = 0.3527). Follow-up angiographic outcome showed comparable complete occlusion rates for sidewall aneurysms (R 69.49%; 95%CI, 62.41%-75.75%) and bifurcation aneurysms (R 73.99%; 95% CI, 65.05%-81.31%; p = 0.4328).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of sidewall and bifurcation aneurysms treated with endoluminal flow diverters demonstrated no significant differences in complications or occlusion rates. These data provide new information that can be used as a benchmark for comparison with emerging devices for the treatment of bifurcation aneurysms.

Reconsiderations on the use of pipeline embolization device in the treatment of intracerebral aneurysms with special angioarchitecture: fetal PCA, AVM, V-B junction and DAVF

Background

Pipeline embolization device (PED) has proved its safety and efficacy in the treatment of intracranial large and giant side-wall aneurysms. With the accumulation of treatment experience, it is an inevitable trend to expand its off-label use on aneurysms. Whether flow diversion is safe and efficient in cases with special angioarchitecture has rarely been explored.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 210 consecutive patients treated by PED for intracerebral aneurysms in our center. Except for aneurysm, those patients also presented with special angioarchitecture: Fetal PCA, AVM, V-B junction and DAVF.

Results

Nine patients were qualified for the study. 1 was with fetal PCA, the aneurysm remained patent on 4-month follow-up. 2 with ipsilateral AVMs, one patient died due to brain hemorrhage 20 days after the operation, the other one was only partially embolised on 6 month follow up. 3 aneurysms located at V-B junction, angiographic follow up on 3 months demonstrated no complete occlusion of both the aneurysms, the other patients were still on follow up. All of the 3 cases with concomitant DAVF are completely occluded during short to midterm follow up.

Conclusions

PED for aneurysms incorporated the fetal PCA and V-B junction might meet a high propensity for incomplete occlusion during short term follow up. Aneurysm with ipsilateral AVM is not suitable for PED treatment due to the risk of hemorrhage and incomplete occlusion during midterm follow up. For aneurysm with concurrent DAVF, PED treatment is safe and efficient relatively in one session or by staged operation.