The Dynamic Gait Index in Evaluating Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus for Cerebrospinal Fluid Diversion

Enhancing the quality of evidence, comparability, and reproducibility in ventriculoatrial shunt research for normal pressure hydrocephalus: A systematic review and VAS-NPH reporting guideline

BACKGROUND

Ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS) is an important treatment option for normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). However, clinical studies reporting the use of VAS for NPH lack sufficient standardization for meta-analytic comparisons that could provide robust evidence regarding its use. This study aims to assess the quality of reporting in these studies and develop a reporting guideline checklist to standardize terminology, concepts, and reporting while reinforcing the essential elements to ensure comparability and reproducibility.

METHODS

This is a systematic literature review that followed the PRISMA guidelines with the search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, with no timeframe restriction. The level of evidence of the studies was assessed using the GRADE system, and the rigor used in the publication of the results was assessed concerning adherence to the guidelines indicated by the EQUATOR Network Group. Furthermore, the studies were scrutinized focusing on eight domains: (1) Characteristics of the included studies and baseline characteristics of the patients; (2) Reporting methodology; (3) Pivotal concepts definition; (4) Adverse events assessment; (5) Data writing and reporting; (6) Detailed outcomes reporting; (7) Specific clinical outcomes assessment and reporting; and (8) Complications reporting.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies with 734 patients and 753 shunts were included in this review, and the assessment exposes notable deficiencies in reporting, specifically in baseline patient details, methodology, and outcome assessments. Only two studies followed reporting guidelines, prompting concerns about comprehensive reporting of adverse events and intraoperative complications. Varied reporting completeness existed for shunt-related issues. The absence of standardized definitions for key concepts and insufficient intervention details were observed. A VAS-NPH reporting guideline, encompassing 36 items across eight domains, was developed to address these shortcomings.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review reveals significant deficiencies in methodological rigor and reporting quality. The proposed VAS-NPH Reporting Guideline covers all essential aspects and is a potential solution to rectify these shortcomings and increase transparency, comparability, and reproducibility. This initiative aims to advance the level of evidence and enhance knowledge regarding the use of VAS in NPH.

Are we supererestimating gait assessments of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus?

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a syndrome characterized by a triad composed of cognitive alteration, urinary incontinence, and gait impairment associated with ventricular enlargement and normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Gait impairment is among the earliest symptoms; however, the reliability of the evaluation is not well-established and no consensus has been reaching regarding variables that should be analyzed and which parameters should be considered to accurately assess post-intervention improvement.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are the degree of repeatability, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change considered to detect changes in gait variables in iNPH patients?

METHODS

A total of 84 iNPH patients with a mean age of 77.1 (±6.4) years were analyzed. Gait deviation index (GDI), speed, cadence, cycle time, stride length, single support, and first and second double support were chosen as the variables to be analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed by an independent evaluator, with gait repeatability assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measure (SEM).

RESULTS

ICC values were 0.76-0.85 with excellent repeatability, while SEM demonstrated that the variables with best repeatability were the GDI (mean, 4.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.63-5.43), representing a 7.65% mean relative error of the measurement (mean, 0.05 m; 95% CI, 0.05-0.06), and stride length (mean 0.05 m; 95% CI, 0.05-0.06), with a 7.69% mean relative error.

SIGNIFICANCE

We concluded that GDI and stride length were the variables with the best repeatability and lower variability in the gait of iNPH patients.

Development of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the "Grading scale for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus": cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity

OBJECTIVE

The current study translated to Portuguese and validated the normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) scale originally developed in English as the Grading Scale for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

METHODS

Following Guillemin's validation protocol, the last version of the Portuguese NPH scale was applied to 121 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus (73 men and 48 women) from the Group of Cerebral Hydrodynamics from July 2010 to March 2012.

RESULTS

The mean age was 71.09 years old, ranging from 35 to 92 years. The rate of agreement and reproducibility was high, as confirmed by Cohen's Kappa coefficient, with excellent intraobserver correlation for the NPH scale items individually evaluated: gait (0.80), dementia (0.90) and incontinence (0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

The Portuguese version of the Grading Scale for Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus was successfully translated and validated for use in Brazilian patients.

Effect of spinal tap test on the performance of sit-to-stand, walking, and turning in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the spinal tap test on sit-to-stand (STS), walking, and turning and to determine the relationship among the outcome measures of STS, walking, and turning in patients with iNPH. Twenty-seven patients with clinical symptoms of iNPH were objectively examined for STS, walking, and turning by the Force Distribution Measurement (FDM) platform connected with a video camera. Assessments were performed at before and 24 hours after spinal tap. Motor abilities were assessed by the STS time, time of walking over 3 meters, and time and number of steps when turning over 180 degrees. Significant improvements were found in the STS time (p = 0.046), walking time (p = 0.048), and turning step (p = 0.001). In addition, turning time was improved but not statistically significant (p = 0.064). Significant relationships were found among all outcome measures (p < 0.001). The relationship among these outcome measures indicated that the individuals had similar ability levels to perform different activities. This may serve as a new choice of outcome measures to evaluate the effect of intervention in different severity levels of patients with iNPH.

Causes of Failure during the Management Process from Identification of Brain-Dead Potential Organ Donors to Actual Donation in Korea: a 5-Year Data Analysis (2012-2016)

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study analyzed the causes of failure in the management process from the identification of brain-dead potential organ donors to actual donation in Korea over the past 5 years.

METHODS

Data of 8,120 potential brain deaths reported to the Korea Organ Donation Agency were used, including information received at the time of reporting, donation suitability evaluation performed by the coordinator after the report, and data obtained from interviews of hospital medical staff and the donor's family.

RESULTS

From January 2012 to December 2016, the total number of brain-dead potential organ donors in Korea was 8,120, of which 2,348 (28.9%) underwent organ procurement surgery with designated recipients. While the number of transplant donors has increased over time, the ratio of transplant donors to medically suitable brain-dead donors has decreased. The common causes of donation failure included donation refusal (27.6%), non-brain death (15.5%), and incompatible donation (11.6%); 104 potential donors (7.8%) were unable to donate their organs because they were not pronounced brain dead.

CONCLUSION

The rate of successful organ donation may be increased by analyzing the major causes of failure in the brain-dead organ donation management process and engaging in various efforts to prevent such failures.

Improved lumbar infusion test analysis for normal pressure hydrocephalus diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

Constant infusion lumbar infusion test (LIT) is an important way to find which patients, of those with signs and symptoms corresponding to normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) who will improve from shunt operation. LIT is a stress test on the ability for cerebrospinal fluid re-absorbtion. The aim of this study is to show how the information from LIT can be improved by quantitative analysis and avoidance of methodological pitfalls.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The potential pitfalls, and the analysis method, are described in detail. The analysis was applied on pre-operative constant infusion LIT from 31 patients operated for NPH, with known outcome. The pre- and post-operative walking speed was used to grade pathology progression or improvement.

RESULTS

The maximal, plateau, intra-spinal pressure at constant infusion LIT is an ambivalent indicator for NPH: while low maximal pressure indicates no cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) absorbtion pathology, too high pressure (≥47 mmHg) may mean no diagnosis, because of stenosis of the Sylvian aqueduct. When subjects with too high intra-spinal pressure were excluded, the new analysis gave a couple of diagnostic volume parameters, of which one appears to be an optimal LIT parameter for identifying NPH patients with 14% better accuracy than plateau pressure.

CONCLUSION

By avoiding methodological pitfalls, and optimal analysis of the results from lumbar infusion test, the number of NPH patients who do not have a successful outcome after shunt operation may be further decreased.

Reversible Dementias

As the worldwide prevalence of dementia increases, there is a greater and more urgent need for all health care providers to understand how to evaluate and manage cognitive impairment. Many people presenting with a dementing illness have one or more reversible underlying conditions that worsen prognosis and, if treated, can improve cognitive function. This article reviews the major potentially reversible dementias, including the basic workup and management of each condition.

A systematic review of the diagnostic utility of simple tests of change after trial removal of cerebrospinal fluid in adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the evidence regarding the diagnostic value of simple ancillary tests post cerebrospinal fluid drainage in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases; last searched on 12 September 2017.

REVIEW METHODS

This review was performed applying the steps of the PRISMA statement. The QUADAS 2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Prospective and retrospective trials were systematically reviewed, and data on diagnostic accuracy were extracted. Meta-analysis (where possible) was performed. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic package was used to calculate pooled estimates of included diagnostic studies.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials (with 812 subjects in total) were identified for inclusion in the meta-analyses for the 18-meter walk test, video-recorded gait performance, cognitive test, and Timed Up and Go Test. The summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity for the 18-meter walk test was 0.83 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.99) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.95), video-recorded gait performance was 0.85 (95% CI 0.47 to 0.99) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.96), cognitive test was 0.82 (95% CI 0.41-0.99) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.39-0.99), and Timed Up and Go Test was 0.89 (95% CI 0.79-0.95) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.24-0.90), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the diagnostic value of the 18-meter walk test, video-recorded gait performance, cognitive test, and Timed Up and Go Test in predicting shunt outcomes among adults with normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Relationship between gait parameters and MR imaging in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients after shunt surgery

BACKGROUND

A few previous studies have reported a change in gait motion in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients after shunt surgery compared with before shunt surgery; however, there has been no detailed quantitative investigation of gait, including kinetic and kinematic parameters. Furthermore, the relationship between gait parameters and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has not been confirmed.

RESEARCH QUESTION

We investigated the gait motion in patients with iNPH, and evaluated the relationship between kinetic gait parameters and MR imaging before and after shunt surgery.

METHODS

The subjects were 12 patients with iNPH who could walk 10 m without aids. A three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to obtain the spatiotemporal, kinetic, and kinematic parameters before and after surgery. Relationships between each gait parameter and MR imaging were assessed.

RESULTS

The post-shunt walking speed and step length were increased compared with pre-shunt values. The post-shunt evaluation showed increased range of motion of the hip, knee, and ankle joints in the sagittal plane during the gait cycle. The peak flexion moment of the hip during the stance phase was greater after shunt surgery. The improvement rate of the Evans index was significantly correlated with the improvement rate of walking speed, and the total ranges of motion of the hip and ankle joints in the sagittal plane.

SIGNIFICANCE

The propulsive force of the hip and ankle joints was regained after shunt surgery. Normalization of the Evans index could predict improvement in propulsive force after shunt surgery in iNPH.