Extensive Multilocular Spinal Extradural Meningeal Cyst That Developed 16 Years After Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury: A Case Report

Cervical spine arachnoid cyst complicated by spontaneous intracystic hemorrhage: Case report and review of the literature

Background:

Spinal intradural extramedullary arachnoid cysts represent about 1–3% of all primary spinal space-occupying lesions often causing spinal cord and/or radicular nerve compression. Spontaneous intralesional hemorrhages are extremely rare and are typically found within intracranial arachnoid cysts. Here, a 55-year-old female presented with a spontaneous hemorrhage into a cervical spine arachnoid cyst warranting surgical intervention (i.e., fenestration/excision/occlusion).

Case Description:

A 55-year-old female presented with 3 weeks of dull pain in the cervicothoracic region. She subsequently developed paresthesias and progressive lower extremity weakness with (urinary incontinence. The cervical magnetic resonance revealed a right anterolateral intradural extramedullary “cystic” lesion extending from C7 to T2; it contained a heterogeneous signalon T2W sequences, and a fluid-fluid level was documented on the T2-GRE and FLAIR sequences. At surgery, consisting of a laminectomy, two hemorrhagic cystic lesions were identified and removed. Histological findings were consistent with hemorrhagic into an arachnoid cyst.

Conclusion:

Only rarely hemorrhages develop in intraspinal intradural extramedullary spinal arachnoid cysts.

A Single Vertebral Surgical Approach for Spinal Extradural Meningeal Cysts Spanning Multiple Vertebral Segments by Auxiliary Neuroendoscope

BACKGROUND

Spinal extradural meningeal cysts (SEMCs) are rare lesions, especially those spanning multiple vertebral segments, and the surgical strategy has remained controversial. In the present study, we have described the outcomes of 4 patients with SEMCs treated with dural defect repair alone assisted by neuroendoscopy.

METHODS

From January 2018 to January 2020, 4 patients with SEMCs spanning multiple vertebral segments had undergone single-vertebral laminectomy or hemilaminectomy.

RESULTS

The SEMCs in all 4 patients had spanned multiple vertebral segments, from T11 to L2. Using magnetic resonance imaging, the location of the dural defect was predicted correctly for 3 patients. Single-vertebral laminectomy was used in 2 patients and single-vertebral hemilaminectomy in 2 patients. Intraoperatively, the entire cyst, including the upper pole, lower pole, and middle segment of the cyst, was explored using neuroendoscopy. In each patient, only 1 dural defect was found, which had been located in the middle segment of the cyst (T12-L1). All cyst dural defects had been sutured under a microscope. In all cases, the cyst wall was not removed. Postoperatively, the symptoms for all the patients had improved significantly, and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging studies showed obvious cyst regression. During the follow-up period of 15-44 months, no recurrence was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

For SEMCs spanning multiple vertebral segments, dural defect repair without cyst wall resection through single-vertebral hemilaminectomy or laminectomy can be effective. Intraoperative neuroendoscopy can assist, not only in finding the dural defect, but also in avoiding the omission of multiple dural defects as much as possible.

Transforaminal endoscopic excision of bi-segmental non-communicating spinal extradural arachnoid cysts: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Spinal extradural arachnoid cysts (SEACs) are a rare cause of spinal cord compression. Typically, these cysts communicate with the intradural subarachnoid space through a small defect in the dural sac. For symptomatic SEACs, the standard treatment is to remove the cyst in total with a (hemi)laminectomy or laminoplasty. We present a rare case of bi-segmental non-communicating SEACs and describe our experience of using an endoscopic minimal access technique to remove bi-segmental non-communicating SEACs.

CASE SUMMARY

A 79-year-old female presented with pain related to bi-segmental SEACs at the T11-L1 segments. She underwent sequential transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic thoracic cystectomy of the SEACs. Following her first procedure, spinal magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated complete excision of the cyst at the T12-L1 segment. However, the cyst at the T11-T12 segment was still present. Thus, a second procedure was performed to remove this lesion. The patient’s right-sided lumbar and abdominal pain improved significantly postoperatively. Her Japanese Orthopaedic Association score increased from 11 to 25, her visual analogue scale score was reduced from 8 to 1. The physical and mental component summary of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) were 15.5 and 34.375 preoperatively, and had increased to 79.75 and 77.275 at the last follow-up visit, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Bi-segmental non-communicating SEACs are extremely rare. Endoscopic surgery is a safe, effective, and reliable method for treating these cysts. In the event of bi-segmental SEACs, it is important to identify whether both cysts are communicating before surgery, and if not, to remove both cysts separately during the index surgery to avoid re-operation.

True Dural Spinal Epidural Cysts: Report of 5 Cases

BACKGROUND

Spinal arachnoid cysts are a rare cause of compressive myelopathy. Spinal extradural arachnoid cysts (SEACs) are even rarer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the SEACs operated on in our hospital between 2015 and 2019, according to their clinical and radiologic findings, treatments performed, and outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 5 cases (2 males and 3 females), ranging in age from 21 months to 78 years. Except for the pediatric case, all patients presented with pain and 3 had some grade of neurologic impairment. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed multiloculated cyst in 4 cases, and the communication with the dura was properly identified in only 1 case. The patients were operated through a laminectomy or laminoplasty and total removal of the cyst, and the communication with the dura was identified and repaired in all cases. In all cases, the defect was near the exit of a nerve root, and rootlets were seen through it, producing a ball-like valve mechanism. Histology of the cyst wall showed true dura in every case. One patient needed a reoperation for evacuation of a fluid collection (related to the dural sealant). Following Odom's criteria, 3 patients had an excellent outcome and 2 had a fair outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Total excision of a symptomatic SEAC through either laminectomy or laminoplasty is a safe and effective treatment option. Although isolated repair of the dural communication without cyst removal may seem appealing, we have found it very difficult to identify the point of communication preoperatively.

Huge multiple spinal extradural meningeal cysts in infancy

BACKGROUND

Multiple spinal extradural meningeal cysts (SEMCs) are rare lesions. SEMCs communicate with the subarachnoid space through multiple dural defects and expand into the extradural space with progressive spinal cord compression.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a 5-month-old boy with hydronephrosis involving nine huge SEMCs that were distributed from the T1-L5 levels. Eight SEMCs, except for one small noncommunicating cyst, were exposed through laminoplastic laminotomy at the T10-L5 and T3-5 levels. Five transdural communications with dural defects were packed with a piece of autologous muscle and fibrin glue. Tenting sutures to lift up the dura to the vertebral arch were added to minimize the extradural dead space. Postoperatively, cord compression was relieved and hydronephrosis improved.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, packing of all dural defects and dural tenting sutures at a one-staged operation is useful in the surgical management of huge and multiple SEMCs in infancy.

A New Classification for Pathologies of Spinal Meninges, Part 1: Dural Cysts, Dissections, and Ectasias

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of pathologies of the spinal dura is often unclear and their management controversial.

OBJECTIVE: To classify spinal dural pathologies analogous to vascular aneurysms, present their symptoms and surgical results.

METHODS: Among 1519 patients with spinal space-occupying lesions, 66 patients demonstrated dural pathologies. Neuroradiological and surgical features were reviewed and clinical data analyzed.

RESULTS: Saccular dural diverticula (type I, n = 28) caused by defects of both dural layers, dissections between dural layers (type II, n = 29) due to defects of the inner layer, and dural ectasias (type III, n = 9) related to structural changes of the dura were distinguished. For all types, symptoms consisted of local pain followed by signs of radiculopathy or myelopathy, while one patient with dural ectasia presented a low-pressure syndrome and 10 patients with dural dissections additional spinal cord herniation. Type I and type II pathologies required occlusion of their dural defects via extradural (type I) or intradural (type II) approaches. For type III pathologies of the dural sac no surgery was recommended. Favorable results were obtained in all 14 patients with type I and 13 of 15 patients with type II pathologies undergoing surgery.

CONCLUSION: The majority of dural pathologies involving root sleeves remain asymptomatic, while those of the dural sac commonly lead to pain and neurological symptoms. Type I and type II pathologies were treated with good long-term results occluding their dural defects, while ectasias of the dural sac (type III) were managed conservatively.