Anticoagulation Therapy in Traumatic Brain Injury

Applying an updated brain injury guideline classification to interhospital transfer of patients with traumatic brain injury: Who benefits most?

OBJECTIVE

The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) categorize patients with mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). We examined whether TBI transfer guidelines should be modified to incorporate BIG alongside polytrauma and patient frailty assessments to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from transfer.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 18 years old transferred to our Level 1 trauma center in 2019-2023 with nonpenetrating blunt cranial trauma were identified retrospectively. BIG scores were calculated using presentation, injury, in-hospital, and follow-up characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 999-patient cohort, 168 patients were considered BIG1, 133 BIG2, and 698 BIG3. BIG1 and BIG2 (compared with BIG3) patients had lower injury severity scores (14.6, 13.8, 19.9, respectively, p < 0.001), no > 1-point decline in Glasgow Coma Scale score during transportation (0, 0, 16.8 %, p < 0.001), shorter hospital stays (4.6 days, 3.6, 8.3, p < 0.001), fewer intensive care unit admissions (31.5 %, 37.6 %, 66.6 %, p < 0.001), rare progression on imaging (1.2 %, 4.6 %, 29.4 %, p) without clinical decline, and minimal neurosurgical interventions (0, 1.5 %, 13.9 %, p < 0.001). BIG2 polytrauma patients had greater risk of neurologic decline (OR 2.13, p = .04), whereas BIG1 patients had no meaningful predictors of neurologic decline. BIG3 classification (OR 5.92), SDH (OR 3.03), and high-velocity injury (OR 2.52) were the greatest risk factors for neurosurgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

BIG1 and BIG2 patients without polytrauma may not require transfer, but BIG2 patients with polytrauma and BIG3 patients often required transfer. Frailty and patient age may not require consideration in decision-making. Assessment including BIG and polytrauma may reduce unnecessary transfers, preserve hospital resources, and optimize patient care.

The risk of hemorrhagic complications after anticoagulation therapy in trauma patients: A multicenter evaluation

BACKGROUND

The use of anticoagulation therapy (ACT) in trauma patients during the postinjury period presents a challenge given the increased risk of hemorrhage. Guidelines regarding whether and when to initiate ACT are lacking, and as a result, practice patterns vary widely. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence of hemorrhagic complications in patients who received ACT during their hospitalization, identify risk factors, and characterize the required interventions.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, all trauma admissions at two Level I trauma centers between January 2015 and December 2020 were reviewed. Patients with preexisting ACT use or those who developed a new indication for ACT were included for analysis. Demographic and outcome data were collected for those who received ACT during their admission. Comparisons were then made between the complications and no complications groups. A subgroup analysis was performed for all patients started on ACT within 14 days of injury.

RESULTS

A total of 812 patients were identified as having an indication for ACT, and 442 patients received ACT during the postinjury period. The overall incidence of hemorrhagic complications was 12.7%. Of those who sustained hemorrhagic complications, 18 required procedural intervention. On regression analysis, male sex, severe injuries, and the need for hemorrhage control surgery on arrival were all found to be associated with hemorrhagic complications after the initiation of ACT. Waiting 7 days to 14 days from the time of injury to initiate ACT reduced the odds of complications by 46% and 71%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of ACT in trauma during the postinjury period is not without risk. Waiting 7 days to 14 days postinjury might greatly reduce the risk of hemorrhagic complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management Study; Level IV.

Identification of clinically relevant patient endotypes in traumatic brain injury using latent class analysis

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex condition where heterogeneity impedes the advancement of care. Understanding the diverse presentations of TBI is crucial for personalized medicine. Our study aimed to identify clinically relevant patient endotypes in TBI using latent class analysis based on comorbidity data. We used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database, which includes 2,629 adult TBI patients. We identified five stable endotypes characterized by specific comorbidity profiles: Heart Failure and Arrhythmia, Healthy, Renal Failure with Hypertension, Alcohol Abuse, and Hypertension. Each endotype had distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes: The Heart Failure and Arrhythmia endotype had lower survival rates than the Renal Failure with Hypertension despite featuring fewer comorbidities overall. Patients in the Hypertension endotype had higher rates of neurosurgical intervention but shorter stays in contrast to the Alcohol Abuse endotype which had lower rates of neurosurgical intervention but significantly longer hospital stays. Both endotypes had high overall survival rates comparable to the Healthy endotype. Logistic regression models showed that endotypes improved the predictability of survival compared to individual comorbidities alone. This study validates clinical endotypes as an approach to addressing heterogeneity in TBI and demonstrates the potential of this methodology in other complex conditions.

Timing of anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism after recent traumatic and vascular brain Injury

Currently, there is no consensus guideline for initiating anticoagulation in patients with a traumatic or vascular brain injury. Initiating anticoagulation for management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) can vary significantly from 72 hours to 30 weeks due to the risk of hemorrhagic complications. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes using modified Rankin Score (mRS) in a patient population with early (≤ 3 days) versus late (> 3 days) initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation from the time VTE was diagnosed. This retrospective study included patients with a traumatic or vascular brain injury who developed either deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Use of anticoagulation prior to admission, diagnosis with VTE on admission, or patients with a non-brain injury were exclusion criteria. Secondary outcomes measured were all-cause mortality, length of stay, and reasons for early interruption of anticoagulation. Therapeutic anticoagulation was started early in 76 (74%) patients compared to late initiation in 27 (26%) patients. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The mRS score 0-3 versus 4-6 was similar in patients who received early anticoagulation versus those who received it later. However, there was a trend favoring better outcomes in the early group [mRS 4-6; 78% vs. 93%; p = 0.085] and in subgroup analysis of patients with VTE diagnosed 4-7 days [mRS 4-6; 26% vs. 56%; p = 0.006] compared to the late group. In univariate and multivariable logistic regression, only age was associated with a significant worse outcome (median, IQR) 36 years (24-50) vs. 58 years (44-65) OR 1.07 (1.03-1.12); p < 0.001. In this study, early initiation of anticoagulation did not worsen clinical outcomes.

The Impact of Preinjury Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Use on Elderly Patients with Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Following Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma

BACKGROUND

Although it is often assumed that preinjury anticoagulant (AC) or antiplatelet (AP) use is associated with poorer outcomes among those with acute subdural hematoma (aSDH), previous studies have had varied results. This study examines the impact of preinjury AC and AP therapy on aSDH thickness, 30-day mortality, and extended Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months in elderly patients (aged ≥65).

METHODS

A level 1 trauma center registry was interrogated to identify consecutive elderly patients who presented with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and associated traumatic aSDH between the first of January 2013 and the first of January 2018. Relevant demographic, clinical, and radiological data were retrieved from institutional medical records. The 3 primary outcome measures were aSDH thickness on initial computed tomography scan, 30-day mortality, and unfavorable outcome at 6 months (extended Glasgow Outcome Scale).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two elderly patients were admitted with moderate or severe TBI and traumatic aSDH. The mean (±SD) age was 78.39 (±7.87) years, and a majority of patients (59.8%, n = 79) were male. There was a statistically significant difference in mean aSDH thickness, but there were no significant differences in 30-day mortality (P = 0.732) and unfavorable outcome between the AP, AC, combined AP and AC, and no antithrombotic exposure groups (P = 0.342).

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm these observations, but our findings do not support the preconceived notion in clinical practice that antithrombotic use is associated with poor outcomes in elderly patients with moderate or severe TBI.

Mild Head Trauma (MHT) and Antiplatelet Therapy. Reply to Lorenzati et al. Comment on "Savioli et al. Mild Head Trauma: Is Antiplatelet Therapy a Risk Factor for Hemorrhagic Complications? Medicina 2021, 57, 357"

We read your data with interest, and we truly appreciate the similar experience [...].

Timing of Restarting Anticoagulation and Antiplatelet Therapies After Traumatic Subdural Hematoma-A Single Institution Experience

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of information regarding the optimal timing of restarting antiplatelet therapy (APT) and anticoagulation therapy (ACT) after traumatic subdural hematoma (tSDH). Therefore, we sought to report our experience at a single level 1 trauma center with regard to restarting APT and/or ACT after tSDH.

METHODS

A total of 456 consecutive records were reviewed for unplanned hematoma evacuation within 90 days of discharge and thrombotic/thromboembolic events before restarting APT and/or ACT.

RESULTS

There was no difference in unplanned hematoma evacuation rate in patients not receiving APT or ACT (control) compared with those necessitating APT and/or ACT (6.4% control, 6.9% APT alone, 5.8% ACT alone, 5.4% APT and ACT). There was an increase in post-tSDH thrombosis/thromboembolism in patients needing to restart ACT (1.9% APT alone, P = 0.53 vs. control; 5.8% ACT alone, P = 0.04 vs. control; 16% APT and ACT; P < 0.001 vs. control). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with coronary artery disease necessitating APT and patients with atrial fibrillation necessitating ACT had higher thrombosis/thromboembolism rates compared with controls (1.0% control vs. 6.1% coronary artery disease, P = 0.02; 1.0% control vs. 10.1% atrial fibrillation, P < 0.001). The median restart time of ACT was approximately 1 month after trauma; APT was restarted 2-4 weeks after trauma depending on clinical indication.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring reinitiation of APT and/or ACT after tSDH were at elevated risk of thrombotic/thromboembolic events but not unplanned hematoma evacuation. Therefore, patients should be followed closely until APT and/or ACT are restarted, and consideration for earlier reinitiation of blood thinners should be given on a case-by-case basis.

How do you manage ANTICOagulant therapy in neurosurgery? The ANTICO survey of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINCH)

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulant assumption is a concern in neurosurgical patient that implies a delicate balance between the risk of thromboembolism versus the risk of peri- and postoperative hemorrhage.

METHODS

We performed a survey among 129 different neurosurgical departments in Italy to evaluate practice patterns regarding the management of neurosurgical patients taking anticoagulant drugs. Furthermore, we reviewed the available literature, with the aim of providing a comprehensive but practical summary of current recommendations.

RESULTS

Our survey revealed that there is a lack of knowledge, mostly regarding the indication and the strategies of anticoagulant reversal in neurosurgical clinical practice. This may be due a lack of national and international guidelines for the care of anticoagulated neurosurgical patients, along with the fact that coagulation and hemostasis are not simple topics for a neurosurgeon.

CONCLUSIONS

To overcome this issue, establishment of hospital-wide policy concerning management of anticoagulated patients and developed in an interdisciplinary manner are strongly recommended.

Restarting and timing of oral anticoagulation after traumatic intracranial hemorrhage: a review and summary of ongoing and planned prospective randomized clinical trials

Anticoagulant-associated traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICrH) is a devastating injury with high morbidity and mortality. For survivors, treating clinicians face the dilemma of restarting oral anticoagulation with scarce evidence to guide them. Thromboembolic risk is high from the bleeding event, patients’ high baseline risks, that is, the pre-existing indication for anticoagulation, and the risk of immobility after the bleeding episode. This must be balanced with potentially devastating hematoma expansion or new hemorrhagic lesions. Retrospective evidence and expert opinion support restarting oral anticoagulants in most patients with tICrH, but timing is uncertain. Researchers have failed to make clear distinctions between tICrH and spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (sICrH), which have differing natural histories. While both appear to benefit from restarting, sICrH has a higher rebleeding risk and similar or lower thrombotic risk. Clinical equipoise on restarting is also divergent. In sICrH, equipoise is centered on whether to restart. In tICrH, it is centered on when. Several prospective randomized clinical trials are ongoing or about to start to examine the risk–benefit of restarting. Most of them are restricted to patients with sICrH, with antiplatelet control groups. Most are also restricted to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), as they are associated with a lower overall risk of ICrH. There is some overlap with tICrH via subdural hematoma, and one trial is specific to restart timing with DOACs in only traumatic cases. This is a narrative review of the current evidence for restarting anticoagulation and restart timing after tICrH along with a summary of the ongoing and planned clinical trials.

Is the Regular Intake of Anticoagulative Agents an Independent Risk Factor for the Severity of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Geriatric Patients? A Retrospective Analysis of 10,559 Patients from the TraumaRegister DGU®

The purpose of this study was to assess anticoagulant medication as an independent factor influencing the occurrence of a severe traumatic brain injury in geriatric patients. Data were collected from the TraumaRegister DGU^® between January 2015 and December 2018. We included patients with an age of ≥65 years with a blunt TBI; an AISHead ≥2 but no other relevant injuries. Patients were divided into five subgroups: no anticoagulant medication, anti-platelet drugs, vitamin K antagonists, direct-oral-anticoagulants, and heparinoids. Separation between moderate TBI (AISHead 2–3) and severe TBI (AISHead ≥ 4) and multivariable regression analysis were performed. The average age of 10,559 included patients was 78.8 years with a mean ISS of 16.8 points and a mortality of 22.9%. The most common cause of injury was a low fall of <3 m with 72.8%. With increasing age, the number of patients without any anticoagulant therapy decreased from 65.9% to 29.9%. The intake of coagulation medication increased mortality significantly. Severe TBI was observed in 51% of patients without medication and ranged from 61 to 67% with anticoagulant drugs. After adjusting for confounding variables, the intake of VKA or DOACs was significantly associated with an increased risk of severe TBI. The use of anticoagulant medication is an independent factor and is associated with an increased severity of TBI depending on the type of medication used.

Rates of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Mild Head Trauma Patients Presenting to Emergency Department and Their Management: A Comparison of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Drugs with Vitamin K Antagonists

Background and objectives: Anticoagulants are thought to increase the risks of traumatic intracranial injury and poor clinical outcomes after blunt head trauma. The safety of using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is unclear. This study aims to compare the incidence of post-traumatic ICH following mild head injury (MHI) and to assess the need for surgery, mortality rates, emergency department (ED) revisit rates, and the volume of ICH. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center observational study on all patients admitted to our emergency department for mild head trauma from 1 January 2016, to 31 December 2018. We enrolled 234 anticoagulated patients, of which 156 were on VKAs and 78 on DOACs. Patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans on arrival (T0) and after 24 h (T24). The control group consisted of patients not taking anticoagulants, had no clotting disorders, and who reported an MHI in the same period. About 54% in the control group had CTs performed. Results: The anticoagulated groups were comparable in baseline parameters. Patients on VKA developed ICH more frequently than patients on DOACs and the control group at 17%, 5.13%, and 7.5%, respectively. No significant difference between the two groups was noted in terms of surgery, intrahospital mortality rates, ED revisit rates, and the volume of ICH. Conclusions: Patients with mild head trauma on DOAC therapy had a similar prevalence of ICH to that of the control group. Meanwhile, patients on VKA therapy had about twice the ICH prevalence than that on the control group or patients on DOAC, which remained after correcting for age. No significant difference in the need for surgery was determined; however, this result must take into account the very small number of patients needing surgery.

Clinical practice for antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in neurosurgery: data from an Italian survey and summary of current recommendations - part I, antiplatelet therapy

The use of antiplatelet medication is widespread as reducing risk of death, myocardial infarction, and occlusive stroke. Currently, the management of neurosurgical patients receiving this type of therapy continues to be a problem of special importance. In this paper, we present the results of an Italian survey focused on the management neurosurgical patient under antiplatelet therapy and, for any item of the investigation, the relative advices coming from literature. This survey was conducted including 129 neurosurgery units in Italy. The present paper was designed by following each question posed in the survey by a brief discussion on literature data. There is a considerable lack of consensus regarding management of antiplatelet therapy in neurosurgery, with critical impact on patient's treatment. What is clearly evident from the present survey is the considerable variability in neurosurgical care for antiplatelet patients; it is reasonable to assume that this scenario reflects the paucity of evidence regarding this issue.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach in adult patients with traumatic brain injury receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: an Austrian interdisciplinary consensus statement

There is a high degree of uncertainty regarding optimum care of patients with potential or known intake of oral anticoagulants and traumatic brain injury (TBI). Anticoagulation therapy aggravates the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage but, on the other hand, patients take anticoagulants because of an underlying prothrombotic risk, and this could be increased following trauma. Treatment decisions must be taken with due consideration of both these risks. An interdisciplinary group of Austrian experts was convened to develop recommendations for best clinical practice. The aim was to provide pragmatic, clear, and easy-to-follow clinical guidance for coagulation management in adult patients with TBI and potential or known intake of platelet inhibitors, vitamin K antagonists, or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Diagnosis, coagulation testing, and reversal of anticoagulation were considered as key steps upon presentation. Post-trauma management (prophylaxis for thromboembolism and resumption of long-term anticoagulation therapy) was also explored. The lack of robust evidence on which to base treatment recommendations highlights the need for randomized controlled trials in this setting.

Postoperative Thromboembolic Prophylaxis with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin and Risk of Rebleeding in Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Early postoperative administration of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to prevent thromboembolic events in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is controversial. Our goal was to investigate impact of early postoperative LMWH administration on recurrence rate of CSDHs.

METHODS

Retrospective review was performed of 136 patients with CSDHs who were operated on during an 18-month period. Early postoperative administration of LMWH was at the discretion of the treating surgeon. This resulted in patients treated (heparin [H] group) or not treated with LMWH (no heparin [NH] group). All patients underwent imaging 4 weeks after surgery or earlier in cases of deterioration. The primary outcome variable was reoperation. Secondary outcomes were reoperation, important residual hematoma (defined as hematoma depth of more than one third of original size), and incidence of thromboembolic complications. Relative risk and absolute risk reduction were calculated.

RESULTS

We included 105 patients, 50 (47.6%) in the NH group and 55 (52.4%) in the H group. Nine patients (18%) in the NH group and 6 patients (10.9%) in the H group required secondary surgery (relative risk 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.23-1.58, P = 0.404, absolute risk reduction 0.07). Eleven patients (22%) in the NH group and 15 patients (27.3%) in the H group presented with important residual hematoma or underwent surgery for hematoma recurrence (relative risk 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.63-2.44, P = 0.532, absolute risk reduction -0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide preliminary evidence that early postoperative administration of LWMH does not increase risk of clinically relevant recurrence of CSDHs.