1
|
Mohan S, Wang S, Chawla S, Abdullah K, Desai A, Maloney E, Brem S. Multiparametric MRI assessment of response to convection-enhanced intratumoral delivery of MDNA55, an interleukin-4 receptor targeted immunotherapy, for recurrent glioblastoma. Surg Neurol Int 2021; 12:337. [PMID: 34345478 PMCID: PMC8326072 DOI: 10.25259/sni_353_2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant brain tumor and carries a dismal prognosis. Attempts to develop biologically targeted therapies are challenging as the blood-brain barrier can limit drugs from reaching their target when administered through conventional (intravenous or oral) routes. Furthermore, systemic toxicity of drugs often limits their therapeutic potential. To circumvent these problems, convection-enhanced delivery (CED) provides direct, targeted, intralesional therapy with a secondary objective to alter the tumor microenvironment from an immunologically "cold" (nonresponsive) to an "inflamed" (immunoresponsive) tumor. Case Description We report a patient with right occipital recurrent GBM harboring poor prognostic genotypes who was treated with MRI-guided CED of a fusion protein MDNA55 (a targeted toxin directed toward the interleukin-4 receptor). The patient underwent serial anatomical, diffusion, and perfusion MRI scans before initiation of targeted therapy and at 1, 3-month posttherapy. Increased mean diffusivity along with decreased fractional anisotropy and maximum relative cerebral blood volume was noted at follow-up periods relative to baseline. Conclusion Our findings suggest that diffusion and perfusion MRI techniques may be useful in evaluating early response to CED of MDNA55 in recurrent GBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suyash Mohan
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Sumei Wang
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Sanjeev Chawla
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Kalil Abdullah
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Arati Desai
- Department of Medicine Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Eileen Maloney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Steven Brem
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Predicting Survival in Glioblastoma Patients Using Diffusion MR Imaging Metrics-A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12102858. [PMID: 33020420 PMCID: PMC7600641 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary An accurate survival analysis is crucial for disease management in glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Due to the ability of the diffusion MRI techniques of providing a quantitative assessment of GBM tumours, an ever-growing number of studies aimed at investigating the role of diffusion MRI metrics in survival prediction of GBM patients. Since the role of diffusion MRI in prediction and evaluation of survival outcomes has not been fully addressed and results are often controversial or unsatisfactory, we performed this systematic review in order to collect, summarize and evaluate all studies evaluating the role of diffusion MRI metrics in predicting survival in GBM patients. We found that quantitative diffusion MRI metrics provide useful information for predicting survival outcomes in GBM patients, mainly in combination with other clinical and multimodality imaging parameters. Abstract Despite advances in surgical and medical treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), the medium survival is about 15 months and varies significantly, with occasional longer survivors and individuals whose tumours show a significant response to therapy with respect to others. Diffusion MRI can provide a quantitative assessment of the intratumoral heterogeneity of GBM infiltration, which is of clinical significance for targeted surgery and therapy, and aimed at improving GBM patient survival. So, the aim of this systematic review is to assess the role of diffusion MRI metrics in predicting survival of patients with GBM. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, a systematic literature search was performed to identify original articles since 2010 that evaluated the association of diffusion MRI metrics with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the QUIPS tool. A total of 52 articles were selected. The most examined metrics were associated with the standard Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) (34 studies) and Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) models (17 studies). Our findings showed that quantitative diffusion MRI metrics provide useful information for predicting survival outcomes in GBM patients, mainly in combination with other clinical and multimodality imaging parameters.
Collapse
|
3
|
Flores-Alvarez E, Durand-Muñoz C, Cortes-Hernandez F, Muñoz-Hernandez O, Moreno-Jimenez S, Roldan-Valadez E. Clinical Significance of Fractional Anisotropy Measured in Peritumoral Edema as a Biomarker of Overall Survival in Glioblastoma: Evidence Using Correspondence Analysis. Neurol India 2020; 67:1074-1081. [PMID: 31512638 DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.266284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Fractional anisotropy (FA), a diffusion tensor image (DTI) derived biomarker is related to invasion, infiltration, and extension of glioblastoma (GB). We aimed to evaluate FA values and their association with intervals of overall survival (OS). Materials and Methods Retrospective study conducted in 36 patients with GB included 23 (63.9%) males, 46 ± 14 y; and 13 (36.1%) females, 53 ± 13; followed up for 36 months. We measured FA at edema, enhancing rim, and necrosis. We created two categorical variables using levels of FA and intervals of OS to evaluate their relationships. Kaplan-Meier method and correspondence analysis evaluated the association between OS (grouped in 7 six-month intervals) and FA measurements. Results Median FA values were higher in healthy brain regions (0.351), followed by peritumoral edema (0.190), enhancing ring (0.116), and necrosis (0.071). Pair-wise comparisons among tumor regions showed a significant difference, P < 0.001. The median OS for all patients was 19.3 months; variations in the OS curves among subgroups was significant χ2 (3) = 8.48, P = 0.037. Correspondence analysis showed a significant association between FA values in the edema region and the survival intervals χ2 (18) = 30.996, P = 0.029. Conclusions Alternative multivariate assessment using correspondence analysis might supplement the traditional survival analysis in patients with GB. A close follow-up of the variability of FA in the peritumoral edema region is predictive of the OS within specific six-month interval subgroup. Further studies should focus on predictive models combining surgical and DTI biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Flores-Alvarez
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital General de Mexico Eduardo Liceaga (HGMEL), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Coral Durand-Muñoz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medica Sur Clinic and Foundation, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Onofre Muñoz-Hernandez
- Direction of Research, Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez (HIMFG), National Health Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sergio Moreno-Jimenez
- Radioneurosurgery Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ernesto Roldan-Valadez
- Directorate of Research, Hospital General de Mexico "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Department of Radiology, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hempel JM, Brendle C, Bender B, Bier G, Kraus MS, Skardelly M, Richter H, Eckert F, Schittenhelm J, Ernemann U, Klose U. Diffusion kurtosis imaging histogram parameter metrics predicting survival in integrated molecular subtypes of diffuse glioma: An observational cohort study. Eur J Radiol 2019; 112:144-152. [PMID: 30777204 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Revised: 11/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the study was to assess the predictive value of preoperatively assessed diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) metrics as prognostic factors in the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System integrated glioma groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS Seventy-seven patients with histopathologically confirmed treatment-naïve glioma were retrospectively assessed between 08/2013 and 10/2017 using mean kurtosis (MK) and mean diffusivity (MD) histogram parameters from DKI, overall and progression-free survival, and relevant prognostic molecular data (isocitrate dehydrogenase, [IDH]; alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked, [ATRX]; chromosome 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on metric variables to determine the optimal cutoff-values. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess univariate survival data. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was performed on significant results from the univariate analysis. RESULTS There were significant differences in overall and progression-free survival between patient age (p = 0.001), resection statuses (p = 0.002), WHO glioma grades (p < 0.0001), and integrated molecular profiles (p < 0.0001). Survival was significantly better in patients with lower MK and higher MD values globally (p = 0.009), in gliomas without chromosome 1p/19q LOH (p < 0.0001), and those with retained ATRX expression (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Patient age and MK from DKI from DKI are relevant factors for preoperatively predicting overall and progression-free survival. Regarding the molecular subgroups, they seem to be predictive in gliomas with ATRX retention, representing a feature of IDH wild-type gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johann-Martin Hempel
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany; Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Cornelia Brendle
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany; Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Benjamin Bender
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany; Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Georg Bier
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany; Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mareen Sarah Kraus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marco Skardelly
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany; Interdisciplinary Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany; Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hardy Richter
- Interdisciplinary Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Franziska Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany; Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jens Schittenhelm
- Institute of Neuropathology, Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany; Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Ernemann
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany; Center for CNS Tumors, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Uwe Klose
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|