Race as an Independent Predictor of Temporal Delay in Time to Diagnosis and Treatment in Patients with Cervical Stenosis: A Study of 133 Patients with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Racial Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

We examined racial disparities in (1) cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) utilization and (2) CDA in-hospital outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ACDF and CDA are established treatments for cervical disc disease. While CDA may offer certain advantages over ACDF, its utilization patterns have not been comprehensively explored.

METHODS

This study of 2012 to 2019 discharges from the National Inpatient Sample included White, Black, and Hispanic patients aged 18 years and older who underwent elective ACDF or CDA. Patient demographics, comorbidities, cervical spine diagnoses, and hospital characteristics were extracted. Survey-weighted logistic regression modeled the adjusted association between race and CDA (vs. ACDF) utilization; an interaction between race and year examined temporal changes in disparities. For CDA outcomes, multivariable logistic regression was used for binary outcomes (nonhome discharge, combined complications, and dysphagia) and linear regression for length of stay.

RESULTS

The cohort included 712,355 weighted procedures (97.6% ACDF; 84.2% White, 9.7% Black, 6.1% Hispanic). CDA utilization increased from 1.0% of the procedures in 2012 to 3.8% in 2019. Black and Hispanic patients had significantly lower odds than White patients of receiving CDA versus ACDF (OR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.89, P=0.001; OR=0.80, 95% CI: 0.69-0.93, P=0.003) respectively. There was no statistically significant interaction between race and discharge year (P=0.50). For in-hospital CDA-specific outcomes, Black (vs. White) patients were more likely to experience dysphagia (OR=2.70, 95% CI: 1.53-4.78, P=0.001) and combined complications (OR=3.10, 95% CI: 1.91-5.05, P <0.001). There were no significant differences in any CDA outcome for Hispanic versus White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed decreased utilization of CDA versus ACDF in minority patients, a pattern that persisted over time despite overall increasing CDA utilization. In addition, a higher burden of dysphagia and combined complications following CDA in Black patients warrants further examination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Geospatial Evaluation of Disparities in Access to Cervical Spine Fusion in Metropolitan Areas Across the United States

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study with epidemiologic analysis of public Medicare data.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to use geospatial analysis to identify disparities in access to cervical spine fusions in metropolitan Medicare populations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical spine fusion is among the most common elective procedures performed by spine surgeons and is the most common surgical intervention for degenerative cervical spine disease. Although some studies have examined demographic and socioeconomic trends in cervical spine fusion, few have attempted to identify where disparities exist and quantify them at a community level.

METHODS

Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services physician billing and Medicare demographic data sets from 2013 to 2020 were filtered to contain only cervical spine fusion procedures and then combined with US Census socioeconomic data. The Moran Index geospatial clustering algorithm was used to identify statistically significant hotspot and coldspots of cervical spine fusions per 100,000 Medicare members at a county level. Univariate and multivariate analysis was subsequently conducted to identify demographic and socioeconomic factors that are associated with access to care.

RESULTS

A total of 285,405 cervical spine fusions were analyzed. Hotspots of cervical spine fusion were located in the South, while coldspots were throughout the Northern Midwest, the Northeast, South Florida, and West Coast. The percent of Medicare patients that were Black was the largest negative predictor of cervical spine fusions per 100,000 Medicare members ( β =-0.13, 95% CI: -0.16, -0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Barriers to access can have significant impacts on health outcomes, and these impacts can be disproportionately felt by marginalized groups. Accounting for socioeconomic disadvantage and geography, this analysis found the Black race to be a significant negative predictor of access to cervical spine fusions. Future studies are needed to further explore potential socioeconomic barriers that exist in access to specialized surgical care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective.

Addressing the Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Musculoskeletal Spine Care in the United States

➤ Despite being a social construct, race has an impact on outcomes in musculoskeletal spine care.➤ Race is associated with other social determinants of health that may predispose patients to worse outcomes.➤ The musculoskeletal spine literature is limited in its understanding of the causes of race-related outcome trends.➤ Efforts to mitigate race-related disparities in spine care require individual, institutional, and national initiatives.

Racial Differences in Perioperative Complications, Readmissions, and Mortalities After Elective Spine Surgery in the United States: A Systematic Review Using AI-Assisted Bibliometric Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of race on post-operative outcomes and complications following elective spine surgery in the United States.

METHODS

PUBMED, MEDLINE(R), ERIC, EMBASE, and SCOPUS were searched for studies documenting peri-operative events for White and African American (AA) patients following elective spine surgery. Pooled odds ratios were calculated for each 90-day outcome and meta-analyses were performed for 4 peri-operative events and 7 complication categories. Sub-analyses were performed for each outcome on single institution (SI) studies and works that included <100,000 patients.

RESULTS

53 studies (5,589,069 patients, 9.8% AA) were included. Eleven included >100,000 patients. AA patients had increased rates of 90-day readmission (OR 1.33, P = .0001), non-routine discharge (OR 1.71, P = .0001), and mortality (OR 1.66, P = .0003), but not re-operation (OR 1.16, P = .1354). AA patients were more likely to have wound-related complications (OR 1.47, P = .0001) or medical complications (OR 1.35, P = .0006), specifically cardiovascular (OR 1.33, P = .0126), deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) (OR 2.22, P = .0188) and genitourinary events (OR 1.17, P = .0343). SI studies could only detect racial differences in re-admissions and non-routine discharges. Studies with <100,000 patients replicated the above findings but found no differences in cardiovascular complications. Disparities in mortality were only detected when all studies were included.

CONCLUSIONS

AA patients faced a greater risk of morbidity across several distinct categories of peri-operative events. SI studies can be underpowered to detect more granular complication types (genitourinary, DVT/PE). Rare events, such as mortality, require larger sample sizes to identify significant racial disparities.

Racial Disparities and Surgical Outcomes After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis 2015-2020

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to assess the effect of race on outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

We identified 57,913 adult patients who underwent elective ACDF spine surgery from 2015 to 2020. Data were extracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative course, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were stratified by race.

RESULTS

A total of 57,913 patients, white (n = 49,016), African American (AA; n = 7200), Native American (NA; n = 565), and Asian (n = 1132) underwent ACDF fusion surgery. AA patients had higher comorbidities, including diabetes (24.7%), dyspnea (5.9%), and hypertension (61.6%) compared with the other groups (P < 0.001). NA and AA were higher tobacco users, (33.1%) and (28.7%), respectively (P < 0.001). Most of the patients reported in this dataset had single-level surgeries. AAs had a longer average hospital stay (2.51±7.31 days) and operative time (144.13±82.26 min) (P < 0.001). Lower risk of superficial surgical site infection (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.77; P = 0.005) and greater risk of reintubation (ORadj, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.25-2.17; P < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (ORadj, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.27-2.79; P = 0.001), renal insufficiency (ORadj, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.38-7.20; P = 0.006), and return to the operating room (ORadj, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.18-1.65; P < 0.001 were reported in AAs compared with whites. NAs showed an increased risk of superficial surgical site infection compared with whites (ORadj, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.05-6.36; P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparities were found to independently affect rates of complications after surgery for ACDF.

Disparities in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion provision and outcomes for cervical stenosis

Background

Disparities in neurosurgical care have emerged as an area of interest when considering the impact of social determinants on access to health care. Decompression via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical stenosis (CS) may prevent progression towards debilitating complications that may severely compromise one's quality of life. This retrospective database analysis aims to elucidate demographic and socioeconomic trends in ACDF provision and outcomes of CS-related pathologies.

Methods

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database was queried between 2016 and 2019 using International Classification of Diseases 10th edition codes for patients undergoing ACDF as a treatment for spinal cord and nerve root compression. Baseline demographics and inpatient stay measures were analyzed.

Results

Patients of White race were significantly less likely to present with manifestations of CS such as myelopathy, plegia, and bowel-bladder dysfunction. Meanwhile, Black patients and Hispanic patients were significantly more likely to experience these impairments representative of the more severe stages of the degenerative spine disease process. White race conferred a lesser risk of complications such as tracheostomy, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury in comparison to non-white race. Insurance by Medicaid and Medicare conferred significant risks in terms of more advanced disease prior to intervention and negative inpatient. Patients in the highest quartile of median income consistently fared better than patients in the lowest quartile across almost every aspect ranging from degree of progression at initial presentation to incidence of complications to healthcare resource utilization. All outcomes for patients age > 65 were worse than patients who were younger at the time of the intervention.

Conclusions

Significant disparities exist in the trajectory of CS and the risks associated with ACDF amongst various demographic cohorts. The differences between patient populations may be reflective of a larger additive burden for certain populations, especially when considering patients' intersectionality.

Reporting demographics in randomized control trials in spine surgery - we must do better

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Demographic factors contribute significantly to spine surgery outcomes. Although race and ethnicity are not proxies for disease states, the intersection between these patient characteristics and socioeconomic status significantly impact patient outcomes.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency of demographic reporting and analysis in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) published in the three highest impact spine journals.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We analyzed 278 randomized control trials published in The Spine Journal, Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine between January 2012 - January 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Extracted manuscript characteristics included the frequency of demographic reporting, sample size, and demographic composition of studies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of RCTs published between January 2012 - January 2022 in the three highest impact factor spine journals in 2021: The Spine Journal, Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. We determined if age, gender, BMI, race, and ethnicity were reported and analyzed for each study. The overall frequency of demographic reporting was assessed, and the reporting trends were analyzed for each individual year and journal. Among studies that did report demographics, the populations were analyzed in comparison to the national population per United States (US) census reports. Studies were evaluated for bias using Cochrane risk-of-bias.

RESULTS

Our search identified 278 RCTs for inclusion. 166 were published in Spine, 65 in The Spine Journal, and 47 in Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. Only 9.35% (N=26) and 3.9% (N=11) of studies reported race and ethnicity, respectively. Demographic reporting frequency did not vary based on the publishing journal. Reporting of age and BMI increased over time, but reporting of race and ethnicity did not. Among RCTs that reported race, 88% were conducted in the US, and 85.71% of the patients in these US studies were White. White subjects were overly represented compared to the US population (85.71% vs. 61.63%, p<.001), and non-White or Black patients were most underrepresented (2.89% vs. 25.96%, p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RCTs published in the three highest impact factor spine journals failed to frequently report patient race or ethnicity. Among studies published in the US, study populations are increasingly represented by non-Hispanic White patients. As we strive to care for an increasingly diverse population and reduce disparities to care, spine surgeons must do a better job reporting these variables to increase the external validity and generalizability of RCTs.

Do Community-level Disadvantages Account for Racial Disparities in the Safety of Spine Surgery? A Large Database Study Based on Medicare Claims

BACKGROUND

Racial health disparities across orthopaedic surgery subspecialties, including spine surgery, are well established. However, the underlying causes of these disparities, particularly relating to social determinants of health, are not fully understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there a racial difference in 90-day mortality, readmission, and complication rates ("safety outcomes") among Medicare beneficiaries after spine surgery? (2) To what degree does the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a community-level marker of social determinants of health, account for racial disparities in safety outcomes?

METHODS

To examine racial differences in 90-day mortality, readmission, and complications after spine surgery, we retrospectively identified all 419,533 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or older who underwent inpatient spine surgery from 2015 to 2019; we excluded 181,588 patients with endstage renal disease or Social Security disability insurance entitlements, who were on Medicare HMO, or who had missing SVI data. Because of the nearly universal coverage of those age 65 or older, Medicare data offer a large cohort that is broadly generalizable, provides improved precision for relatively rare safety outcomes, and is free of confounding from differential insurance access across races. The Master Beneficiary Summary File includes enrollees' self-reported race based on a restrictive list of mutually exclusive options. Even though this does not fully capture the entirety of racial diversity, it is self-reported by patients. Identification of spine surgery was based on five Diagnosis Related Groups labeled "cervical fusion," "fusion, except cervical," "anterior-posterior combined fusion," "complex fusion," and "back or neck, except fusion." Although heterogeneous, these cohorts do not reflect inherently different biology that would lead us to expect differences in safety outcomes by race. We report specific types of complications that did and did not involve readmission. Although complications vary in severity, we report them as composite measures while being cognizant of the inherent limitations of making inferences based on aggregate measures. The SVI was chosen as the mediating variable because it aggregates important social determinants of health and has been shown to be a marker of high risk of poor public health response to external stressors. Patients were categorized into three groups based on a ranking of the four SVI themes: socioeconomic status, household composition, minority status and language, and housing and transportation. We report the "average race effects" among Black patients compared with White patients using nearest-neighbor Mahalanobis matching by age, gender, comorbidities, and spine surgery type. Mahalanobis matching provided the best balance among propensity-type matching methods. Before matching, Black patients in Medicare undergoing spine surgery were disproportionately younger with more comorbidities and were less likely to undergo cervical fusion. To estimate the contribution of the SVI on racial disparities in safety outcomes, we report the average race effect between models with and without the addition of the four SVI themes.

RESULTS

After matching on age, gender, comorbidities, and spine surgery type, Black patients were on average more likely than White patients to be readmitted (difference of 1.5% [95% CI 0.9% to 2.1%]; p < 0.001) and have complications with (difference of 1.2% [95% CI 0.5% to 1.9%]; p = 0.002) or without readmission (difference of 3.6% [95% CI 2.9% to 4.3%]; p < 0.001). Adding the SVI to the model attenuated these differences, explaining 17% to 49% of the racial differences in safety, depending on the outcome. An observed higher rate of 90-day mortality among Black patients was explained entirely by matching using non-SVI patient demographics (difference of 0.00% [95% CI -0.3% to 0.3%]; p = 0.99). However, even after adjusting for the SVI, Black patients had more readmissions and complications.

CONCLUSION

Social disadvantage explains up to nearly 50% of the disparities in safety outcomes between Black and White Medicare patients after spine surgery. This argument highlights an important contribution of socioeconomic circumstances and societal barriers to achieving equal outcomes. But even after accounting for the SVI, there remained persistently unequal safety outcomes among Black patients compared with White patients, suggesting that other unmeasured factors contribute to the disparities. This is consistent with evidence documenting Black patients' disadvantages within a system of seemingly equal access and resources. Research on racial health disparities in orthopaedics should account for the SVI to avoid suggesting that race causes any observed differences in complications among patients when other factors related to social deprivation are more likely to be determinative. Focused social policies aiming to rectify structural disadvantages faced by disadvantaged communities may lead to a meaningful reduction in racial health disparities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Patients From Socioeconomically Distressed Communities Experience Similar Clinical Improvements Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) when categorizing patients based on socioeconomic status. Secondarily, we sought to compare PROMs based on race.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Social determinants of health are believed to affect outcomes following spine surgery, but there is limited literature on how combined socioeconomic status metrics affect PROMs following ACDF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors identified patients who underwent primary elective one-level to four-level ACDF from 2014 to 2020. Patients were grouped based on their distressed community index (DCI) quintile (Distressed, At-Risk, Mid-tier, Comfortable, and Prosperous) and then race (White or Black). Multivariate regression for ∆PROMs was performed based on DCI group and race while controlling for baseline demographics and surgical characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 1204 patients included in the study, all DCI groups improved across all PROMs, except mental health component score (MCS-12) for the Mid-tier group ( P =0.091). Patients in the Distressed/At-Risk group had worse baseline MCS-12, visual analog scale (VAS) Neck, and neck disability index (NDI). There were no differences in magnitude of improvement between DCI groups. Black patients had significantly worse baseline VAS Neck ( P =0.002) and Arm ( P =0.012) as well as worse postoperative MCS-12 ( P =0.016), PCS-12 ( P =0.03), VAS Neck ( P <0.001), VAS Arm ( P =0.004), and NDI ( P <0.001). Multivariable regression analysis did not identify any of the DCI groupings to be significant independent predictors of ∆PROMs, but being White was an independent predictor of greater improvement in ∆PCS-12 (β=3.09, P =0.036) and ∆NDI (β=-7.32, P =0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

All patients experienced clinical improvements regardless of DCI or race despite patients in Distressed communities and Black patients having worse preoperative PROMs. Being from a distressed community was not an independent predictor of worse improvement in any PROMs, but Black patients had worse improvement in NDI compared with White patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Growing Racial Disparities in the Utilization of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An Analysis of Trends From 2004 to 2014

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess trends in utilization rates of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, as well as perioperative surgical metrics between Black and White patients undergoing operative treatment for ASD in the United States.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Racial disparities in access to care, complications, and surgical selection have been shown to exist in the field of spine surgery. However, there is a paucity of data concerning racial disparities in the management of ASD patients.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2004 to 2014 were identified in the nationwide inpatient sample (NIS). Utilization rates, major complications rates, and length of stay (LOS) for Black patients and White patients were trended over time. Utilization rates were reported per 1,000,000 people and determined using annual census data among subpopulations stratified by race. All reported complication rates and prolonged hospital stay rates are adjusted for Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, income quartile by zip code, and insurance payer status.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2014, ASD utilization for Black patients increased from 24.0 to 50.9 per 1,000,000 people, whereas ASD utilization for White patients increased from 29.9 to 73.1 per 1,000,000 people, indicating a significant increase in racial disparities in ASD utilization (P-trend < 0.001). There were no significant differences in complication rates or rates of prolonged hospital stay between Black and White patients across the time period studied (P > 0.05 for both).

CONCLUSION

Although Black and White patients undergoing ASD surgery do not differ significantly in terms of postoperative complications and length of hospital stay, there is a growing disparity in utilization of ASD surgery between White and Black patients from 2004 to 2014 in the United States. There is need for continued focus on identifying ways to reduce racial disparities in surgical selection and perioperative management in spine deformity surgery.Level of Evidence: 3.

Socioeconomic Status Impacts Access to Orthopaedic Specialty Care

»

Financial, personal, and structural barriers affect access to all aspects of orthopaedic specialty care.

»

Disparities in access to care are present across all subspecialties of orthopaedic surgery in the United States.

»

Improving timely access to care in orthopaedic surgery is crucial for both health equity and optimizing patient outcomes.

»

Options for improving orthopaedic access include increasing Medicaid/Medicare payments to physicians, providing secondary resources to assist patients with limited finances, and reducing language barriers in both clinical care and patient education.

Disparities in the Surgical Treatment of Adult Spine Diseases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Our goal was to systematically review the literature on racial/ethnic, insurance, and socioeconomic disparities in adult spine surgery in the United States and analyze potential areas for improvement.

METHODS

We conducted a database search of literature published between January 1990 and July 2020 using PRISMA guidelines for all studies investigating a disparity in any aspect of adult spine surgery care analyzed based on race/ethnicity, insurance status/payer, or socioeconomic status (SES).

RESULTS

Of 2679 articles identified through database searching, 775 were identified for full-text independent review by 3 authors, from which a final list of 60 studies were analyzed. Forty-three studies analyzed disparities based on patient race/ethnicity, 32 based on insurance status, and 8 based on SES. Five studies assessed disparities in access to care, 15 examined surgical treatment, 35 investigated in-hospital outcomes, and 25 explored after-discharge outcomes. Minority patients were less likely to undergo surgery but more likely to receive surgery from a low-volume provider and experience postoperative complications. White and privately insured patients generally had shorter hospital length of stay, were more likely to undergo favorable/routine discharge, and had lower rates of in-hospital mortality. After discharge, white patients reported better outcomes than did black patients. Thirty-three studies (55%) reported no disparities within at least 1 examined metric.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive systematic review underscores ongoing potential for health care disparities among adult patients in spinal surgery. We show a need for continued efforts to promote equity and cultural competency within neurologic surgery.

Racial Disparities in Outcomes After Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Racial disparities are a major issue in health care but the overall extent of the issue in spinal surgery outcomes is unclear. We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis of disparities in outcomes among patients belonging to different racial groups who had undergone surgery for degenerative spine disease.

METHODS

We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Review Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to January 20, 2021 for relevant articles assessing outcomes after spine surgery stratified by race. We included studies that compared outcomes after spine surgery for degenerative disease among different racial groups.

RESULTS

We found 30 studies that met our inclusion criteria (28 articles and 2 published abstracts). We included data from 20 cohort studies in our meta-analysis (3,501,830 patients), which were assessed to have a high risk of observation/selection bias. Black patients had a 55% higher risk of dying after spine surgery compared with white patients (relative risk [RR], 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-1.87; I² = 70%). Similarly, black patients had a longer length of stay (mean difference, 0.93 days; 95% CI, 0.75-1.10; I² = 73%), and higher risk of nonhome discharge (RR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.47-1.81; I² = 89%), and 30-day readmission (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.03-2.04; I² = 96%). No significant difference was noted in the pooled analyses for complication or reoperation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients have a significantly higher risk of unfavorable outcomes after spine surgery compared with white patients. Further work in understanding the reasons for these disparities will help develop strategies to narrow the gap among the racial groups.

Black Race as a Social Determinant of Health and Outcomes After Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Multistate Analysis, 2007 to 2014

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of patient hospitalization and discharge records.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between race and inpatient postoperative complications following lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Racial disparities in healthcare have been demonstrated across a range of surgical procedures. Previous research has identified race as a social determinant of health that impacts outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. However, these studies are limited in that they are outdated, contain data from a single institution, analyze small limited samples, and report limited outcomes. Our study aims to expand and update the literature examining the association between race and inpatient postoperative complications following lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

We analyzed 267,976 patient discharge records for inpatient lumbar spine surgery using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Databases for California, Florida, New York, Maryland, and Kentucky from 2007 through 2014. We used unadjusted bivariate analysis, adjusted multivariable, and stratified analysis to compare patient demographics, present-on-admission comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and complications by categories of race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

Black patients were 8% and 14% more likely than white patients to experience spine surgery specific complications (adjusted odds ratios [aOR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.13) and general postoperative complications (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07-1.20), respectively. Black patients, compared with white patients, also had increased adjusted odds of 30-day readmissions (aOR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07-1.20), 90-day readmissions (aOR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), longer length of stay (LOS) (adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.14-1.16), and higher total charges (adjusted Incidence Rate Ratio: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.07-1.09).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that black patients, as compared with white patients, are more likely to have postoperative complications, longer postoperative lengths of stay, higher total hospital charges, and increased odds of 30- and 90-day readmissions following lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Socioeconomic disparities in the utilization of spine augmentation for patients with osteoporotic fractures: an analysis of National Inpatient Sample from 2011 to 2015

BACKGROUND CONTENT

Vertebral augmentation procedures are used for treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Prior studies have reported disparities in the treatment of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures, particularly with regards to the use of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to report updates in racial and health insurance inequalities of spine augmentation procedures in patients with osteoporotic fractures.

METHODS

With the use of the National Inpatient Sample, we identified hospitalized patients with osteoporotic fractures between the period of 2011 and 2015. Patients with spine augmentation, defined by the utilization of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, were also identified. Our primary outcome was defined as the utilization of spine augmentation procedures across ethnic (white, hispanic, black, and asian/pacific islander) and insurance (self-pay, private insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid) groups. Variables were identified from the NIS database using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth diagnosis codes. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used for statistical analysis with p value <.05 considered significant. A subgroup analysis was performed across the utilization of kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and Medicare coverage.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 110,028 patients with a primary diagnosis of vertebral fracture between 2011 and 2015 (mean age: 74.4±13.6 years, 68% women). About 16,237 patients (14.8%) underwent any type of spine augmentation with over 75% of the patients receiving kyphoplasty. Multivariate analysis showed that black patients (odds ratio [OR]=0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.70, p<.001), Hispanic patients (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.86, p<.001), and Asian/Pacific Islander (OR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89, p<.001) had significantly lower odds for receiving any spine augmentation compared with white patients. Patients with Medicaid (OR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.53-0.66, p<.001), private insurance (OR=0.90, 95% CI: 0.85-0.96, p=.001), and those who self-pay (OR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.47-0.69, p<.001) had significantly lower odds of spine augmentation compared with those with Medicare. Comparative use of kyphoplasty was not significantly different between white and black patients (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.70-1.04, p=.12). However, Hispanic patients (OR=0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99, p=.04) and Asian/Pacific Islander patients (OR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.92, p=.007) had significantly lower use of kyphoplasty compared with white patients. The comparative use of kyphoplasty among patients receiving spine augmentation was not significantly different across each insurances status when compared with patients with Medicare.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that racial and socioeconomic disparities continue to exist with the utilization of spine augmentation procedures in hospitalized patients with osteoporotic fractures.

Current Concepts in Orthopaedic Care Disparities

Healthcare delivery is profoundly affected by race/ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status. The effect of these factors on patient health and the quality of care received is being studied in more detail. Orthopaedic surgery over the past several years has paid increasing attention to these disparities as well. Not only do these disparities exist with regard to accessing care but also with regard to the quality of care received and postoperative outcomes. Total joint arthroplasty, hip fractures, and spine surgery represent areas where the effect of these factors has been reported. Not only is it essential for the clinician to understand the extent of care disparities but also the manner in which these disparities affect patient health and outcomes within the orthopaedic surgery setting. Strategies should be devised to minimize the effect of these factors on clinical care and patient health.

Influence of racial disparities on patient-reported satisfaction and short- and long-term perception of health status after elective lumbar spine surgery

OBJECTIVE

In spine surgery, racial disparities have been shown to impact various aspects of surgical care. Previous studies have associated racial disparities with inferior surgical outcomes, including increased complication and 30-day readmission rates after spine surgery. Recently, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction measures have been proxies for overall quality of care and hospital reimbursements. However, the influence that racial disparities have on short- and long-term PROs and patient satisfaction after spine surgery is relatively unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of racial disparities on 3- and 12-month PROs and patient satisfaction after elective lumbar spine surgery.

METHODS

This study was designed as a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. The medical records of adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients who had undergone elective lumbar spine surgery for spondylolisthesis (grade 1), disc herniation, or stenosis at a major academic institution were included in this study. Patient demographics, comorbidities, postoperative complications, and 30-day readmission rates were collected. Patients had prospectively collected outcome and satisfaction measures. Patient-reported outcome instruments—Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale for back pain (VAS-BP), and VAS for leg pain (VAS-LP)—were completed before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery, as were patient satisfaction measures.

RESULTS

The authors identified 345 medical records for 53 (15.4%) African American (AA) patients and 292 (84.6%) white patients. Baseline patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between the two cohorts, with AA patients having a greater body mass index (33.1 ± 6.6 vs 30.2 ± 6.4 kg/m2, p = 0.005) and a higher prevalence of diabetes (35.9% vs 16.1%, p = 0.0008). Surgical indications, operative variables, and postoperative variables were similar between the cohorts. Baseline and follow-up PRO measures were worse in the AA cohort, with patients having a greater baseline ODI (p < 0.0001), VAS-BP score (p = 0.0002), and VAS-LP score (p = 0.0007). However, mean changes from baseline to 3- and 12-month PROs were similar between the cohorts for all measures except the 3-month VAS-BP score (p = 0.046). Patient-reported satisfaction measures at 3 and 12 months demonstrated a significantly lower proportion of AA patients stating that surgery met their expectations (3 months: 47.2% vs 65.5%, p = 0.01; 12 months: 35.7% vs 62.7%, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The study data suggest that there is a significant difference in the perception of health, pain, and disability between AA and white patients at baseline and short- and long-term follow-ups, which may influence overall patient satisfaction. Further research is necessary to identify patient-specific factors associated with racial disparities that may be influencing outcomes to adequately measure and assess overall PROs and satisfaction after elective lumbar spine surgery.