Magnetic Resonance Thermometry-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Neurosurgery, a Promising Tool for Dural-Based Lesions?

The Role of Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Surgical Neuro-Oncology: Series of 100 Consecutive Patients

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an adjuvant treatment for intracranial lesions that are treatment refractory or in deep or eloquent brain. Initial studies of LITT in surgical neuro-oncology are limited in size and follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To present our series of LITT in surgical neuro-oncology to better evaluate procedural safety and outcomes.

METHODS

An exploratory cohort study of all patients receiving LITT for brain tumors by a single senior neurosurgeon at a single center between 2013 and 2018. Primary outcomes included extent of ablation (EOA), time to recurrence (TTR), local control at 1-yr follow-up, and overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included complication rate. Outcomes were compared by tumor subtype. Predictors of outcomes were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients underwent 100 LITT procedures; 61% remain alive with 72% local control at median 7.2 mo follow-up. Median TTR and OS were 31.9 and 16.9 mo, respectively. For lesion subtypes, median TTR (months, not applicable [N/A] if <50% rate observed), local control rates at 1-yr follow-up, and median OS (months) were the following: dural-based lesions (n = 4, N/A, 75%, 20.7), metastases (n = 45, 55.9, 77.4%, 16.9), newly diagnosed glioblastoma (n = 11, 31.9, 83.3%, 32.3), recurrent glioblastoma (n = 14, 5.6, 24.3%, 7.3), radiation necrosis (n = 20, N/A, 67.2%, 16.4), and other lesions (n = 6, 12.3, 80%, 24.4). TTR differed by tumor subtype (P = .02, log-rank analysis). EOA predicted local control (P = .009, multivariate proportional hazards regression); EOA > 85% predicted longer TTR (P = .006, log-rank analysis). Complication rate was 4%.

CONCLUSION

Our series of LITT in surgical neuro-oncology, 1 of the largest to date, further evidences its safety and outcomes profile.

High-Frequency Irreversible Electroporation for Intracranial Meningioma: A Feasibility Study in a Spontaneous Canine Tumor Model

High-frequency irreversible electroporation is a nonthermal method of tissue ablation that uses bursts of 0.5- to 2.0-microsecond bipolar electric pulses to permeabilize cell membranes and induce cell death. High-frequency irreversible electroporation has potential advantages for use in neurosurgery, including the ability to deliver pulses without inducing muscle contraction, inherent selectivity against malignant cells, and the capability of simultaneously opening the blood–brain barrier surrounding regions of ablation. Our objective was to determine whether high-frequency irreversible electroporation pulses capable of tumor ablation could be delivered to dogs with intracranial meningiomas. Three dogs with intracranial meningiomas were treated. Patient-specific treatment plans were generated using magnetic resonance imaging-based tissue segmentation, volumetric meshing, and finite element modeling. Following tumor biopsy, high-frequency irreversible electroporation pulses were stereotactically delivered in situ followed by tumor resection and morphologic and volumetric assessments of ablations. Clinical evaluations of treatment included pre- and posttreatment clinical, laboratory, and magnetic resonance imaging examinations and adverse event monitoring for 2 weeks posttreatment. High-frequency irreversible electroporation pulses were administered successfully in all patients. No adverse events directly attributable to high-frequency irreversible electroporation were observed. Individual ablations resulted in volumes of tumor necrosis ranging from 0.25 to 1.29 cm³. In one dog, nonuniform ablations were observed, with viable tumor cells remaining around foci of intratumoral mineralization. In conclusion, high-frequency irreversible electroporation pulses can be delivered to brain tumors, including areas adjacent to critical vasculature, and are capable of producing clinically relevant volumes of tumor ablation. Mineralization may complicate achievement of complete tumor ablation.

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Thermometry at 3 Tesla: Importance of Calibration Measurements

To demonstrate the importance of calibration measurements in 3 Tesla proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy (¹H-MRS) thermometry for human brain temperature estimation for routine clinical applications. In vitro proton MR spectroscopy to obtain calibration constants of the water-chemical shift was conducted at 3 Tesla with a temperature-controlled phantom, containing a pH-buffered aqueous solution of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), methylene protons of Cr (Cr2), dimethyl silapentane sulfonic acid (DSS), and sodium formate (NaFor). Estimations of absolute human brain temperature were performed utilizing the correlation of temperature to the water-chemical shift for the resonances of NAA, Cr, and Cr2. Data for calibration of the metabolites' chemical shift differences and in vivo temperature estimations were acquired with single-voxel point-resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequences (repetition time/echo time = 2000/30 ms; voxel size 2 × 2 × 2 cm³). Spectroscopy data were quantified in the time-domain, and a Pearson correlation analysis was performed to estimate the correlation between the chemical shift of metabolites and measured temperatures. The correlation coefficients (r) of our calibration measurements were NAA 0.9975 (±0.0609), Cr -0.9979 (±0.0621), Cr2 - 0.9973 (±0.0577), DSS -0.9976 (±0.0615), and NaFor -0.8132 (±2.348). The mean calculated brain temperature was 37.78 ± 1.447°C, and the mean tympanic temperature was 36.83 ± 0.2456°C. Calculated temperatures derived from Cr and Cr2 provided significant (p = 0.0241 and p = 0.0210, respectively) correlations with measured temperatures (r = 0.4108 and r = -0.4194, respectively). Calibration measurements are vital for ¹H-MRS thermometry. Small numeric differences in measured signal and data preprocessing without any calibration measurements reduce accuracy of temperature calculations, which indicates that calculated temperatures should be interpreted with caution. Application of this method for clinical purposes warrants further investigation and a more practical approach.