Utility of the Lone Star Retractor System in Microsurgical Carotid Endarterectomy

A Keyhole Approach for Intracranial Hematoma Removal Using ORBEYE

OBJECTIVE

By maximizing the advantages of exoscopy, we developed a keyhole approach for intracranial hematoma removal. Herein, we validated the utility of this procedure, and compared it with conventional microscopic hematoma removal and endoscopic hematoma removal in our institution.

METHODS

We included 12 consecutive patients who underwent this procedure from June 2022 to March 2024. A 4-cm-long skin incision was made, and a keyhole craniotomy (diameter, 2.5 cm) was performed. An assistant manipulated a spatula, and an operator performed hematoma removal and hemostasis using typical microsurgical techniques under an exoscope. The dura mater was reconstructed without sutures using collagen matrix and fibrin glue. The outcomes of this series were compared with those of 12 consecutive endoscopic hematoma removals and 19 consecutive conventional microscopic hematoma removals from October 2018 to March 2024.

RESULTS

The mean age was 72±10 years, and 7 (58%) patients were men. Hematoma location was the putamen in 5 patients and subcortical in 7 patients. The mean operative time was 122±34 min, the mean hematoma removal rate was 95%±8%, and the mortality rate was 0%. Although the preoperative hematoma volume was similar between the 3 groups, the operative time and total time in the operating room was significantly shorter in the exoscope group than in the microscope group (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This procedure may be simpler and faster than conventional microscopic hematoma removal, and comparable to endoscopic hematoma removal.

Exoscopic carotid endarterectomy using movable 4K 3D monitor: Technical note

Background:

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using conventional surgical microscope has been already established as golden standard. Recently, exoscope was introduced into the field of neurosurgery, and various merits of it have been reported. We report the experiences of exoscopic CEA using a movable 4K 3D monitor and discuss the feasibility of it.

Methods:

We report a consecutive series of 15 cases of exoscopic CEA for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis using a movable 4K 3D monitor between January 2020 and April 2021. We utilized ORBEYE as an exoscope system and a 31-inch movable 4K 3D monitor, which was installed in the Maquet Moduevo ceiling supply unit.

Results:

In all 15 cases, the procedures were accomplished only using the ORBEYE. There were no operative complications due to the use of the exoscope. In response to the operative site, the 4K 3D monitor was moved to face the operator. Even when the angle of the visual axis of the exoscope against the horizontal plane was small during the surgical manipulation in the distal portion of ICA, the operator was able to maintain a comfortable posture.

Conclusion:

Using the movable 4K 3D monitor, exoscopic CEA can be performed ergonomically. The operator can manipulate the distal portion of the ICA or proximal portion of the common carotid artery in a comfortable posture and face the monitor by adjusting its position.

The Lone Star Retractor System in Neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

We investigated the role of a self-retaining retractor system, commonly used in ear, abdominal, vascular, urologic and gynecologic surgeries: the Lone Star retractor system. We report our experience in using the Lone Star retractor in different brain surgeries, at a single neurosurgical department.

METHODS

In 2019, patients who underwent brain surgery and in which the Lone Star Retractor System was used were considered for inclusion. Clinical and surgical data of included patients were prospectively collected. Postoperative VAS for local pain, and a properly designed intraoperative retractor stability score, were collected.

RESULTS

Over 2019, the Lone Stare Retractor was used in 20 neurosurgical procedures: 9 high-grade glioma, 2 low-grade glioma, 4 cerebral metastases, and 5 meningiomas. Postoperative mean VAS score was 3.5 (range: 2-4). Intraoperative retractor stability score mean was 2 in frontal, 2 in pterional, 1.75 in subtemporal, 2 in interhemispheric, and 0.5 in suboccipital approaches. The Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale mean value was 4.4 (range: 3-5).

CONCLUSIONS

In our institutional experience, the Lone Star retractor showed many advantages in different brain procedures, when compared with standard fishhooks and other retractors.

Carotid Endarterectomy Using Lone Star Retractor System

Cervical carotid disease is typical atherosclerosis, which is responsible for ischemic stroke. The effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for advanced carotid stenosis has been established in many large studies, and CEA is the gold standard in surgical treatment. On the other hand, endovascular carotid artery stenting (CAS) has become increasingly popular recently. It is very important to avoid any complications to maintain the effectiveness of CEA. The retractor device is important for the exposure of carotid arteries and for the safe surgical manipulation. We have started to use lone star retractor system (LSRS) to deploy the surgical field. LSRS provides the usability to handle and a shallower surgical field without the disturbance of surgical manipulation. And it can facilitate exposure of the distal internal carotid artery because surgeon can retract freely in whole circumference by towing with moderate strength. LSRS may bring the smoother and easier surgical manipulations in CEA.

Reduction of radiation exposure using low pulse rate fluoroscopy during neuroendovascular surgery

INTRODUCTION

Endovascular surgery is minimally invasive, but the radiation exposure can be problematic. There is no report assessing whether radiation exposure can be reduced by using a low pulse rate during carotid artery stenting (CAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether reducing the pulse rate from 7.5 to 4 frames per second (f/s) can reduce the radiation exposure while maintaining safety during CAS procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the radiation data and clinical features of all 100 patients who underwent CAS between 2014 and 2019. We changed the pulse rate from 7.5 to 4 f/s in 2017. The fluoroscopic time (FT), dose area product (DAP), and total air kerma (AK) were collected. Statistical analyses were performed between the pulse rate and clinical outcomes, including radiation exposure.

Diagnosis and Operative Management of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Twisted Carotid Bifurcation

Although carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an established procedure, technical modifications are required when anatomical features are unusual. The present study aimed to determine the characteristics of diagnostic features, surgical management, and outcomes of patients with a twisted carotid bifurcation (TCB). We assessed 108 consecutive patients by cervical carotid echography (CCE) and black-blood magnetic resonance imaging (BB-MRI) before they underwent 115 CEA procedures. We classified carotid bifurcation (CB) anatomy based on anteroposterior findings of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and external carotid artery (ECA) determined by cerebral or three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography as follows. The ICA and ECA ran laterally and medially, respectively, in Type 1, overlapped in Type 2, and the ICA and ECA ran medially and laterally, respectively, in Type 3. We also classified the patients according to whether or not they had a TCB and compared their diagnostic findings, clinical characteristics, and surgical outcomes. The numbers of patients with Types 1, 2, and 3 were 74 (64.4%), 32 (27.8%), and 9 (7.8%), respectively, and 13 (11.3%) with a TCB included four patients with Type 2 and all nine patients with Type 3. The appearance of Type 3 differed from that of the other two types on CCE and BB-MR images. After correcting the anatomical location of a TCB, surgical duration and adverse event rates did not significantly differ between patients with and without a TCB. Patients with a TCB could safely undergo CEA after correcting the ICA to the normal position.

Tumor retractor: a simple and novel instrument for brain tumor surgery

Background

It is important to secure a surgical space during brain tumor surgery. One of the commonly used methods is to retract the brain. We hypothesized that the tumor can be retracted and that the normal brain tissue retraction can be minimized during surgery, and thus, the degree of collateral damage caused by brain retraction would be reduced.

Methods

The tumor retractor had a 90°, hard, and sharp tip for fixation of the tumor. The distal part of the retractor has a malleable and thin blade structure. By adjusting the angle of the distal malleable part of the tumor retractor, the operator can make the retracting angle additionally. Retractors with thin blade can be used in a conventional self-retraction system. To pull and hold the tumor constantly, the tumor retractor is held by a self-retraction system. The surgical technique using a tumor retractor is as follows: The first step is to fix the retractor to the tumor. The second step is to pull the retractor in the operator’s desired direction by applying force. After the tumor is pulled by adjusting the degree of force and angle, the surgical arm should be held in place to maintain the tumor retracted state.

Results

The tumor retractor was used to minimize the brain retraction, pulling the tumor in the opposite direction from the surrounding brain tissue. In clinical cases, we can apply the tumor retractor with good surgical outcomes.

Conclusions

A tumor retractor can be used to pull a tumor and minimize the brain retraction.

Outcomes after Transverse-Incision 'Mini' Carotid Endarterectomy and Patch-Plasty

Purpose

Traditional exposure for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) involves making a longitudinal incision parallel to the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid. Such incisions can be painful, aesthetically displeasing, and associated with a high incidence of cranial nerve injury (CNI). This study describes the outcomes of CEA performed through small (<5 cm long), transversely oriented incisions located directly over the carotid bifurcation, as identified by color-enhanced Duplex ultrasound.

Materials and Methods

Patient demographics and operative data were collected retrospectively from an in-house database of consecutive vascular patients undergoing CEA with a small transversely oriented incision for both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenoses.

Results

A total of 52 consecutive patients underwent CEA between 2012 and 2016 (median age, 73.5 years; interquartile range, 67–80.3; male/female ratio, 40:12). CEA was performed under regional/local anesthesia (LA) in 48 (92.3%) patients, with 4 (7.7%) being performed under general anesthesia. One patient under LA experienced neurological dysfunction intraoperatively (manifesting as an inability to count out loud) that resolved with insertion of shunt. One patient experienced a transient neurological event (expressive dysphasia) within the immediate postoperative period, which resolved within 6 hours. No in-hospital death or perioperative major adverse cardiovascular events were noted. No persistent CNIs nor bleeding complications necessitating re-exploration were reported. Follow-up data were available for a median period of 3.1 years and for all patients. Three patients experienced strokes following discharge (2 strokes contralateral to and 1 transient ischemic attack ipsilateral to the operated side).

Conclusion

Small, transversely orientated incisions, hidden within a neck skin crease can be safely performed in the majority of patients undergoing CEA.