Multimodality Management of Spetzler-Martin Grade 3 Brain Arteriovenous Malformations with Subgroup Analysis

Analysis of the incidence of death, hemorrhage, and neurological deficit in the treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs): surgery versus other treatments - a systematic review

To evaluate the incidence of mortality, hemorrhage, and neurological deficits in treating intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) in patients over 18 through a comparative analysis of surgical approaches and other therapeutic modalities. A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and LILACS databases in November 2023. Inclusion criteria included clinical trials, cohorts studies, case-controls studies, and case series comparing patients over 18 undergoing surgery or microsurgery versus other treatments (radiosurgery, isolated embolization, and conservative treatment). Exclusions criteria included studies on non-AVM diseases, non-intracranial AVMs, cavernous malformations, pregnant patients, and those treated with both radiosurgery and microsurgery. Twelve studies included 1,555 patients, with an average age of 42.65 years. Of these, 711 underwent surgery (with or without prior embolization), and 844 underwent other procedures. In the surgery group, the incidence of death was 1.69%, while in the other procedures group, it was 2.96%. The incidence of neurological deficits and hemorrhage in the surgery group was 11.67% and 4.22%, respectively. In other procedures, these incidences were both 9.12%. The average obliteration rate in the surgery group was 97.45%, compared to 49.77% for radiosurgery, 38.46% for isolated embolization, and 0.6% for conservative treatment. This systematic review highlighs that surgery achieves the highest AVM obliteration rates but carries a higher risk neurological déficits. Radiosurgery minimizes these risks, while conservative treatment offers advantages in mortality and hemorrhage reduction. No single modality proves to be universally superior, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches and further randomized trials to clarify comparative safety and efficacy.

Efficacy of radiosurgery with and without angioembolization: A subgroup analysis of effectiveness in ruptured versus unruptured arteriovenous malformations - An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Congenital arterial defects such as cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) increase brain bleeding risk. Conservative therapy, microsurgical removal, percutaneous embolization, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or a combination may treat this serious disease. This study compares angioembolization with SRS to SRS alone in ruptured or unruptured brain ateriovenous malformations (BAVM) patients.

Methods

We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations for this study. Until September 2023, PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for literature. English-language studies comparing SRS alone to embolization with SRS on ruptured or non-ruptured AVMs that could not be operated on were considered. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed research study quality.

Results

Results included 46 studies with a total of 7077 participants. There was a greater obliteration rate in the SRS-only group (60.4%) than in the embolization plus SRS group (49.73%). Particularly in the SRS-only group, ruptured AVMs showed a noticeably greater obliteration rate than unruptured AVMs (P = 0.002). However, no notable differences were found in hemorrhagic events or radiation-induced changes between the two groups; however, the SRS-only group had a slightly greater, yet not statistically significant, mortality rate.

Conclusion

Our data showed that ruptured brain AVMs had a much greater obliteration rate than unruptured ones, mostly due to SRS alone, without embolization. The aggregated data showed no significant changes, whereas SRS alone decreased radiation-induced alterations and hemorrhagic rates but with increased mortality. SRS alone may have a higher risk-to-reward ratio for nidus obliteration in ruptured brain AVM patients, so it should be used without embolization, although more research is needed to determine the effects of immediate and late complications.

Endovascular Treatment of Spetzler-Martin Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations: A Single-Center 12 years' Experience Stratified by the Spetzler-Martin Modified Scale

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Limited evidence exists for endovascular first-line treatment of Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade III brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). In this article, we sought to evaluate advanced endovascular techniques for treating SM III AVMs across different sizes, eloquence, and patterns of venous drainage.

METHODS

Data from AVMs SM III treated between January 2010 and January 2022 were collected: size (S), eloquence (E), drainage (V), angioarchitecture features (arterial and venous aneurysms, venous drainage, and venous stenosis), treatment strategy (single arterial, double arterial, venous, both arterial and venous, and transvenous endovascular embolization with selective temporary flow arrest [TFATVE]), neoadjuvant treatment, and number of previous embolization sessions. AVMs were classified according to the modified SM grade as follows: small (S1V1E1/III-), medium/deep (S2V1E0/III), medium/eloquent (S2V0E1/III+), and large (S3V0E0). Treatment complications (hemorrhagic and ischemic), clinical discharge and 6-month outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0-2, mRS), and angiographic occlusion rates were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 91 AVMs (62.6% ruptured, 72.5% S1V1E1, 7% S2V1E0, 19.7% S2V0E1, and 0% S3V0E0) in 91 patients (mean age 37 ± 15.8 years) were included. Treatment techniques included single arterial approach (28.6%), double arterial technique (30.8%), single venous strategy (9.9%), TFATVE (10.9%), and arterial and venous combined (19.8%). The angiographic occlusion rate was 91.2% (90.9% S1V1E1, 100% S2V1E0, and 88.9% S2V0E1) for all techniques, and 100% for the transvenous technique, isolated or combined with transarterial embolization. Minor complication (mRS 0-2), major complication (mRS >2), and mortality rate were 16.5%, 2.2%, and 3.4%, respectively. Overall, treatment morbimortality (mRS >2) was 3% (2/66) for S1V1E1, 0% for S2V1E0, and 16.7% (3/18) for S2V0E1.

CONCLUSION

Although morbidity is non-negligible , endovascular treatment of SM grade III lesions with advanced techniques offers up to 100% rates of cure, which is of high interest, especially for ruptured deep-seated eloquent AVMs with high reruptured rates, and less amenable to microsurgery techniques.

Radiosurgery With Prior Embolization Versus Radiosurgery Alone for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The addition of adjuvant embolization to radiosurgery has been proposed as a means of improving treatment outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the relative efficacy and safety of radiosurgery with adjuvant embolization vs radiosurgery alone remain uncertain. Moreover, previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have included a limited number of studies and did not consider the effects of baseline characteristics, including AVM volume, on the outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preradiosurgery embolization for intracranial AVMs with consideration to matching status between participants in each treatment group.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, up to January 2023. All studies evaluating the utilization of preradiosurgery embolization were included.

RESULTS

A total of 70 studies (9 matched and 71 unmatched) with a total of 12 088 patients were included. The mean age of the included patients was 32.41 years, and 48.91% of the patients were female. Preradiosurgery embolization was used for larger AVMs and patients with previous hemorrhage ( P < .01, P = .02, respectively). The obliteration rate for preradiosurgery embolization (49.44%) was lower compared with radiosurgery alone (61.42%, odds ratio = 0.56, P < .01), regardless of the matching status of the analyzed studies. Although prior embolization was associated higher rate of cyst formation ( P = .04), it lowered the odds of radiation-induced changes ( P = .04). The risks of minor and major neurological deficits, postradiosurgery hemorrhage, and mortality were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that although preradiosurgery embolization is a suitable option to reduce the AVM size for future radiosurgical interventions, it may not be useful for same-sized AVMs eligible for radiosurgery. Utilization of preradiosurgery embolization in suitable lesions for radiosurgery may result in the added cost and burden of an endovascular procedure.

Long-term outcomes of microsurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery as the first-line treatment for arteriovenous malformations: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide multicenter prospective registry data

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the risk and benefit profile of microsurgery (MS) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as the first-line treatment for unruptured and ruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors included AVMs underwent MS or SRS as the first-line treatment from a nationwide prospective multicenter registry in mainland China. The authors used propensity score-matched methods to balance baseline characteristics between the MS and SRS groups. The primary outcomes were long-term hemorrhagic stroke or death, and the secondary outcomes were long-term obliteration and neurological outcomes. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses with different study designs were performed to confirm the stability of our findings.

RESULTS

Of the 4286 consecutive AVMs in the registry from August 2011 to December 2021; 1604 patients were eligible. After matching, 244 unruptured and 442 ruptured AVMs remained for the final analysis. The mean follow-up duration was 7.0 years in the unruptured group and 6.1 years in the ruptured group. In the comparison of primary outcomes, SRS was associated with a higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke or death both in the unruptured and ruptured AVMs (unruptured: hazard ratio 4.06, 95% CI: 1.15-14.41; ruptured: hazard ratio 4.19, 95% CI: 1.58-11.15). In terms of the secondary outcomes, SRS was also observed to have a significant disadvantage in long-term obliteration [unruptured: odds ratio (OR) 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.04; ruptured: OR 0.09, 95% CI: 0.05-0.15]. However, it should be noted that SRS may have advantages in preventing neurofunctional decline (unruptured: OR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.27-1.14; ruptured: OR 0.41, 95% CI: 0.23-0.76). The results of subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were consistent in trend but with slightly varied powers.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical practice-based real-world study comprehensively compared MS and SRS for AVMs with long-term outcomes. MS is more effective in preventing future hemorrhage or death and achieving obliteration, while the risk of neurofunctional decline should not be ignored.

Geometrical Characteristics of Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations That Contribute to Better Outcomes in Endovascular Treatment

BACKGROUND

Grade III brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is a distinct subgroup of AVMs that encompasses multiple subtypes according to the Spetzler-Martin classification.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 61 patients with grade III AVM who underwent embolization between 2010 and 2022. The study analyzed the angioarchitecture of the AVM nidus and evaluated the outcomes of the embolization procedures.

RESULTS

There were 29 patients (47.5%) with subtype S1E1V1, 20 patients (32.8%) with subtype S2E1V0, and 12 patients (19.7%) with subtype S2E0V1. The rate of complete occlusion in all patients was 47.5% (29 patients). The rate of complete occlusion was higher in cases with a compact nidus (P < 0.001). Several parameters were associated with occlusion of the AVM nidus, including ≤3 arterial feeders (P = 0.017) and presentation with hemorrhage (P = 0.007), with the majority of patients with a compact nidus presenting with hemorrhage. Other factors associated with compact geometry were the presence of a single deep vein, ≤3 arterial feeders, ≤2 superficial draining veins, and an AVM nidus size ≤3 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

The compact nature of grade III AVM is a crucial predictor for the success of embolization. Several characteristics associated with a compact nidus, such as presentation with hemorrhage and a lower number of arterial feeders, have a significantly higher closure rate. Other factors, such as a single deep draining vein, reduced superficial venous drainage, and small size, show a strong association with complete obliteration.

Microsurgery Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Treatment of Patients With Brain Arteriovenous Malformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment decision-making for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) with microsurgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare microsurgery vs SRS for bAVMs.

METHOD

Medline and PubMed were searched from inception to June 21, 2022. The primary outcomes were obliteration and follow-up hemorrhage, and secondary outcomes were permanent neurological deficit, worsened modified Rankin scale (mRS), follow-up mRS > 2, and mortality. The GRADE approach was used for grading the level of evidence.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included, which yielded 817 patients, of which 432 (52.8%) and 385 (47.1%) patients underwent microsurgery and SRS, respectively. Two cohorts were comparable in age, sex, Spetzler-Martin grade, nidus size, location, deep venous drainage, eloquence, and follow-up. In the microsurgery group, the odds ratio (OR) of obliteration was higher (OR = 18.51 [11.05, 31.01], P < .000001, evidence: high) and the hazard ratio of follow-up hemorrhage was lower (hazard ratio = 0.47 [0.23, 0.97], P = .04, evidence: moderate). The OR of permanent neurological deficit was higher with microsurgery (OR = 2.85 [1.63, 4.97], P = .0002, evidence: low), whereas the OR of worsened mRS (OR = 1.24 [0.65, 2.38], P = .52, evidence: moderate), follow-up mRS > 2 (OR = 0.78 [0.36, 1.7], P = .53, evidence: moderate), and mortality (OR = 1.17 [0.41, 3.3], P = .77, evidence: moderate) were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Microsurgery was superior at obliterating bAVMs and preventing further hemorrhage. Despite a higher rate of postoperative neurological deficit with microsurgery, functional status and mortality were comparable with patients who underwent SRS. Microsurgery should remain a first-line consideration for bAVMs, with SRS reserved for inaccessible locations, highly eloquent areas, and medically high-risk or unwilling patients.

Endovascular treatment as the main approach for Spetzler-Martin grade III brain arteriovenous malformations

BACKGROUND

Because Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade III brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) constitute a heterogeneous group of lesions with various combination of sizes, eloquence, and venous drainage patterns, their management is usually challenging. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical/imaging outcomes and the procedural safety of endovascular approach as the main treatment for the cure of SM grade III bAVMs.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, prospectively collected data of SM grade III bAVMs treated by endovascular techniques between 2010 and 2018 at our hospital were reviewed. Patients older than 16 years with angiographic follow-up of at least 6 months after endovascular treatment were entered in the study. The patients had a mean follow-up of 12 months. The data were assessed for clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale), permanent neurological deficit, post-operative complications, and optimal imaging outcome, defined by complete exclusion of AVM. The independent predictive variables of poor outcome or hemorrhagic complication were assessed using binary logistic regression.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients with 65 AVMs were included in the study. Mean age of the patients was 40.0±14.4. Most common presentation was hemorrhage (61.5%). The patients underwent one to eight endovascular procedures (median=2). Mean nidus diameter was 30.2±13.0. A complete obliteration of AVM was achieved in 57 patients (87.7%). Post-procedure significant hemorrhagic and ischemic complications were seen in 13 (20%) and five (7.7%) patients respectively, leading to five (7.7%) transient and four (6.2%) permanent neurological deficits. Eight patients (12.3%) experienced worsening of mRS after embolization. Ten patients (15.4%) had poor outcome (mRS 3-5) at follow-up and two (3%) died.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment can achieve a high rate of complete exclusion of grade III AVM but may be associated (as in other treatment modalities) with significant important complications.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02879071.