Optimization of Microelectrode Recording in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography

Prediction of pyramidal tract side effect threshold by intra-operative electromyography in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for patients with Parkinson's disease under general anaesthesia

Introduction

In DBS for patients with PD, STN is the most common DBS target with the sweet point located dorsal ipsilaterally adjacent to the pyramidal tract. During awake DBS lead implantation, macrostimulation is performed to test the clinical effects and side effects especially the pyramidal tract side effect (PTSE) threshold. A too low PTSE threshold will compromise the therapeutic stimulation window. When DBS lead implantation is performed under general anaesthesia (GA), there is a lack of real time feedback regarding the PTSE. In this study, we evaluated the macrostimulation-induced PTSE by electromyography (EMG) during DBS surgery under GA. Our aim is to investigate the prediction of post-operative programming PTSE threshold using EMG-based PTSE threshold, and its potential application to guide intra-operative lead implantation.

Methods

44 patients with advanced PD received STN DBS under GA were studied. Intra-operative macrostimulation via EMG was assessed from the contralateral upper limb. EMG signal activation was defined as the amplitude doubling or greater than the base line. In the first programming session at one month post-operation, the PTSE threshold was documented. All patients were followed up for one year to assess clinical outcome.

Results

All 44 cases (88 sides) demonstrated activations of limb EMG via increasing amplitude of macrostimulation the contralateral STN under GA. Revision tracts were explored in 7 patients due to a low EMG activation threshold (<= 2.5 mA). The mean intraoperative EMG-based PTSE threshold was 4.3 mA (SD 1.2 mA, Range 2.0-8.0 mA), programming PTSE threshold was 3.7 mA (SD 0.8 mA, Range 2.0-6.5 mA). Linear regression showed that EMG-based PTSE threshold was a statistically significant predictor variable for the programming PTSE threshold (p value <0.001). At one year, the mean improvement of UPDRS Part III score at medication-off/DBS-on was 54.0% (SD 12.7%) and the levodopa equivalent dose (LED) reduction was 59.5% (SD 23.5%).

Conclusion

During STN DBS lead implantation under GA, PTSE threshold can be tested by EMG through macrostimulation. It can provide real-time information on the laterality of the trajectory and serves as reference to guide intra-operative DBS lead placement.

Neurophysiology during movement disorder surgery

During stereotactic procedures for treating medically refractory movement disorders, intraoperative neurophysiology shifts its focus from simply monitoring the effects of surgery to an integral part of the surgical procedure. The small size, poor visualization, and physiologic nature of these deep brain targets compel the surgeon to rely on some form of physiologic for confirmation of proper anatomic targeting. Even given the newer reliance on imaging and asleep deep brain stimulator electrode placement, it is still a physiologic target and thus some form of intraoperative physiology is necessary. This chapter reviews the neurophysiologic monitoring method of microelectrode recording that is commonly employed during these neurosurgical procedures today.

Effect of Intraoperative Computed Tomography in Microelectrode Recording during Frameless Stereotactic Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease

BACKGROUND

Microelectrode recording (MER)-guided deep brain stimulation (DBS) remains the standard electrophysiological procedure to place the DBS lead at the optimal target. When single-track MER or test stimulation yields suboptimal results, trajectory adjustments are needed. Intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) can be useful to visualize the microelectrode and verify possible adjustments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of iCT in MER during frameless stereotactic DBS for Parkinson disease (PD).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 28 PD patients, of whom 19 received iCT and 9 did not, and measured intracranial volume, cerebral volume, cerebrospinal fluid volume, and pneumocephalus volume. Euclidean distance was assessed according to merged preoperative brain CT and magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative brain CT.

RESULTS

Fifty-six hemispheres in the 28 patients were analyzed for MER tracks. The patients who received iCT had a significantly lower mean number of MER tracks (1.6 vs. 2.6, P = 0.013) and lower mean Euclidean distance (2.2 mm vs. 2.7 mm, P = 0.033) compared with those who did not receive iCT. Although there was a trend of a decrease in pneumocephalus using intraoperative imaging, there was no significant difference in surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

iCT can reduce the number of MER tracks and increase surgical accuracy. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether iCT can reduce surgical complications and improve surgical outcomes.

The Medial Subthalamic Nucleus Border as a New Anatomical Reference in Stereotactic Neurosurgery for Parkinson's Disease

INTRODUCTION

The intersection of Bejjani's line with the well-delineated medial subthalamic nucleus (STN) border on MRI has recently been proposed as an individualized reference in subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson's disease (PD). We, therefore, aimed to investigate the applicability across centers of the medial STN border as a patient-specific reference point in STN DBS for PD and explore anatomical variability between left and right mesencephalic area within patients. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate a recently defined theoretic stimulation "hotspot" in a different center.

METHODS

Preoperative 3-Tesla T2 and susceptibility-weighted images (SWI) were used to identify the intersection of Bejjani's line with the medial STN border in left and right mesencephalic area. The average stereotactic coordinates of the center of stimulation relative to the medial STN border were compared with the predefined theoretic stimulation "hotspot."

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients provided 108 stereotactic coordinates of medial STN borders on both sequences. Significant difference in means was found in the Y-(anteroposterior) and Z-(dorsoventral) directions (T2 vs. SWI; p < 0.001). Mean coordinates in the Y-(anteroposterior) direction differed significantly between left and right mesencephalic area (T2: p < 0.001; SWI: p = 0.021). Sixty-six DBS leads were placed in 36 patients that had finished stimulation programming, and the average stereotactic coordinates of the center of stimulation relative to the medial STN border on T2 sequences were 3.1 mm lateral, 0.7 mm anterior, and 1.8 mm superior, in proximity of the predefined theoretic stimulation "hotspot."

CONCLUSION

The medial STN border is applicable across centers as a reference point for STN DBS surgery for PD and seems suitable in order to account for interindividual and intraindividual anatomical variability if one is aware of the discrepancies between T2-weighted imaging and SWI.

A Comparative Study of Fiducial-Based and Fiducial-Less Registration Utilizing the O-Arm

BACKGROUND

Frameless stereotactic surgery utilizing fiducial-based (FB) registration is an established tool in the armamentarium of deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgeons. Fiducial-less (FL) registration via intraoperative CT, such as the O-arm, has been routinely used in spine surgery, but its accuracy for DBS surgery has not been studied in a clinical setting.

OBJECTIVE

We undertook a study to analyze the accuracy of the FL technique in DBS surgery and compare it to the FB method.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 97 patients underwent DBS surgery using the NexFrame and the O-arm registration stereotactic system. Patients underwent FB (n = 50) registration from 2015 to 2016 and FL (n = 47) O-arm registration from 2016 to 2017.

RESULTS

The radial errors (RE) and vector/euclidean errors of FB and FL registration were not significantly different. There was no difference in additional passes between methods, but there was an increase in the number of RE ≥2.5 mm in the FL method.

CONCLUSION

Although there was no statistically significant difference in RE or the need for additional passes, the increased number of errors ≥2.5 mm with the FL method (17 vs. 4% in FB) indicates the need for further study. We concluded that O-arm images of the implants should be utilized to assess and correct for this error.

Analysis of Movement-Related Beta Oscillations in the Off-Medication State During Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

PURPOSE

Local field potential recordings from deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads provide insight into the pathophysiology of Parkinson disease (PD). We recorded local field potential activity from DBS leads within the subthalamic nucleus in patients with PD undergoing DBS surgery to identify reproducible pathophysiological signatures of the disease.

METHODS

Local field potentials were recorded in 11 hemispheres from patients with PD undergoing subthalamic nucleus-DBS. Bipolar recordings were performed off medication for 2 minutes at rest and another 2 minutes with continuous repetitive opening-closing of the contralateral hand. Spectral analysis and bicoherence were performed and compared between the two testing conditions.

RESULTS

In all hemispheres, predominance of the beta band frequency (13-30 Hz) was observed at rest and during movement. Beta peak energy was significantly (P < 0.05) increased during movement compared with rest in 6 of 10 hemispheres. Significant beta bicoherence was observed at rest and during movement in 5 of 10 hemispheres. The most robust local field potential recordings were observed at the DBS contact(s) independently chosen for programming in 9 of the 10 hemispheres.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PD, beta activity that increases with repetitive movement may be a signature of the "off" medication state. These findings provide new data on beta oscillatory activity during the Parkinsonian "off" state that may help further define the local field potential signatures of PD.

Implementation of Intraoperative Computed Tomography for Deep Brain Stimulation: Pitfalls and Optimization of Workflow, Accuracy, and Radiation Exposure

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for movement disorders. Stereotactic electrode placement can be guided by intraoperative imaging, which also allows for immediate intraoperative quality control. This article is about implementation and refining a workflow applying intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) for DBS.

METHODS

Eighteen patients underwent DBS with bilateral implantation of directional electrodes applying a 32-slice movable computed tomography scanner in combination with microelectrode recording.

RESULTS

iCT led to a significant decrease in overall procedural time, despite performing multiple scans. In 3 of the initial 5 cases, iCT caused an adjustment of the final electrodes demonstrating the learning curve and the necessity to integrate road mapping for the exchange of microelectrode to final electrode. Implementation of low-dose computed tomography protocols added microelectrode iCT to the refined workflow, resulting in an intraoperative adjustment of a trajectory in 1 patient. Low-dose protocols lowered the total effective dose to 1.15 mSv, that is, a reduction by a factor of 3.5 compared to a standard non-iCT DBS procedure, despite repeated iCTs. Intraoperative lead detection based on final iCT revealed a radial error of 1.04 ± 0.58 mm and a vector error of 2.28 ± 0.97 mm compared to the preoperative planning, adjusted by the findings of microelectrode recording.

CONCLUSIONS

iCT can be easily integrated into the surgical workflow resulting in an overall efficient time-saving procedure. Repeated intraoperative scanning ensures reliable electrode placement, although low-dose scanning protocols prevent extensive radiation exposure. iCT of microelectrodes is feasible and led to the adjustment of 1 electrode.

Awake versus Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Technical Considerations and Critical Review of the Literature

Advancements in neuroimaging have led to a trend toward direct, image-based targeting under general anesthesia without the use of microelectrode recording (MER) or intraoperative test stimulation, also referred to as “asleep” deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Asleep DBS, utilizing imaging in the form of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) or magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), has demonstrated reliable targeting accuracy of DBS leads implanted within the globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus while also improving clinical outcomes in patients with Parkinson’s disease. In lieu, of randomized control trials, retrospective comparisons between asleep and awake DBS with MER have shown similar short-term efficacy with the potential for decreased complications in asleep cohorts. In lieu of long-term outcome data, awake DBS using MER must demonstrate more durable outcomes with fewer stimulation-induced side effects and lead revisions in order for its use to remain justifiable; although patient-specific factors may also be used to guide the decision regarding which technique may be most appropriate and tolerable to the patient.