Assessing the Role of Preoperative Embolization in the Surgical Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations

Comparison of conservative management, microsurgery only, and microsurgery with preoperative embolization for unruptured arteriovenous malformations: A propensity score weighted prospective cohort study

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and deficiency of conservative management (CM), microsurgery (MS) only, and microsurgery with preoperative embolization (E + MS) for unruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

METHODS

We prospectively included unruptured AVMs undergoing CM, MS, and E + MS from our institution between August 2011 and August 2021. The primary outcomes were long-term neurofunctional outcomes and hemorrhagic stroke and death. In addition to the comparisons among CM, MS, and E + MS, E + MS was divided into single-staged hybrid and multi-staged E + MS for further analysis. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity scores was applied to control for confounders by treatment indication across the three groups.

RESULTS

Of 3758 consecutive AVMs admitted, 718 patients were included finally (266 CM, 364 MS, and 88 E + MS). The median follow-up duration was 5.4 years. Compared with CM, interventions (MS and E + MS) were associated with neurological deterioration. MS could lower the risk of hemorrhagic stroke and death. Multi-staged E + MS was associated with neurological deterioration and higher hemorrhagic risks compared with MS, but the hybrid E + MS operation significantly reduced the hemorrhage risk.

CONCLUSION

In this study, unruptured AVMs receiving CM would expect better neurofunctional outcomes but bear higher risks of hemorrhage than MS or E + MS. The single-staged hybrid E + MS might be promising in reducing inter-procedural and subsequent hemorrhage.

Multi-Stage Treatment for Spetzler-Martin Grades III, IV, and V Arteriovenous Malformations: Preoperative Embolization and Microsurgical Resection in a Consecutive Series of 250 Patients

PURPOSE

The treatment of high-grade brain AVMs is challenging and has no guidelines available to date. This study was aimed at reporting the experience of two centers in treating these AVMs through a multi-stage approach consisting of preoperative embolization and microsurgical resection.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for 250 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of high-grade brain AVM (Spetzler-Martin grades III, IV, and V) treated in two centers in Germany between January 1989 and February 2023. The analyzed data included demographic, clinical, morphological, and neurological data.

RESULTS

A total of 150 cases (60%) were classified as Spetzler-Martin grade III, 82 cases (32.8%) were classified as grade IV, and 18 cases (7.2%) were classified as grade V. Eighty-seven cases (34.8%) presented with hemorrhage. The devascularization percentages achieved were <50% in 24 (9.6%), 50-80% in 55 (22%), and >80% in 171 (68.4%) cases. The average number of sessions was 5.65 ± 5.50 and 1.11 ± 0.32 endovascular and surgical procedures, respectively, and did not significantly differ by rupture status. Death or dependency (mRS score ≥ 3) after the last follow-up was observed in 18.8% of patients and was significantly associated with age > 80 years and poor baseline neurological condition. The complete resection rate was 82.3% and was significantly associated with age > 80 years, large nidus, and deep venous drainage. Permanent disabling neurological deficit after at least 3 months of follow-up was diagnosed in 13.2% of patients and was significantly associated with age > 80 years and infratentorial locations.

CONCLUSION

A multi-stage treatment for high-grade AVMs is feasible for selected cases but comes at a functional cost. The devascularization percentage was not associated with the investigated outcomes. Age > 80 years was associated with poor safety and effectiveness outcomes; consequently, this treatment should be offered only in exceptional circumstances.

Microsurgery versus Microsurgery With Preoperative Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative embolization has traditionally been regarded as a safe and effective adjunct to microsurgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM). However, there is currently no high-level evidence to ascertain this presumption.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of microsurgery (MS) vs microsurgery with preoperative embolization (E + MS) in patients with bAVM through systematic review.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase. The primary outcome was bAVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative bleeding (mL), complications, worsened modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and mortality. The pooled proportions of outcomes were calculated through the logit transformation method. The odds ratio (OR) of categorical data and mean difference of continuous data were estimated through the Mantel-Haenszel and the inverse variance methods, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies met the eligibility criteria. One thousand eight hundred twenty-eight patients were treated by microsurgery alone, and 1088 were treated by microsurgery with preoperative embolization, respectively. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in AVM obliteration (94.1% vs 95.6%, OR = 1.15 [0.63-2.11], P = .65), mortality (1.7% vs 2%, OR = 0.88 [0.30-2.58], P = .82), procedural complications (18.2% vs 27.2%, OR = 0.47 [0.19-1.17], P = .10), worsened mRS (21.2% vs 18.5%, OR = 1.08 [0.33-3.54], P = .9), and intraoperative blood loss (mean difference = 182.89 [-87.76, 453.55], P = .19).

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in AVM obliteration, mortality, complications, worse mRS, and intraoperative blood loss between MS and E + MS groups. For AVMs where MS alone has acceptable results, it is reasonable to bypass unnecessary preoperative embolization given higher postoperative complication risk.

Treatment of high-grade brain arteriovenous malformations using a hybrid operating room: A prospective single-arm study

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of patients with high Spetzler-Martin (S-M) grade brain arteriovenous malformations (BAVMs) remains controversial. Few studies have investigated outcomes in such patients treated in a hybrid operating room (hOR).

OBJECTIVE

To examine outcomes of one-stop hybrid BAVM treatment in patients with high-grade lesions.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled patients with high-grade BAVMs (S-M grade ≥3) aged 18-65 years who underwent one-stop hybrid BAVM treatment at our hospital between October 2016 and March 2021. High-grade BAVM patients who underwent surgery from 2010 to 2016 served as historical controls.

RESULTS

Forty-one high-grade BAVM patients underwent one-stop hybrid treatment in a hOR. Sixty-one propensity score-matched patients comprised the historical control group. The groups did not significantly differ in patient and BAVM characteristics. Intraoperative angiography in four patients of the hOR group demonstrated residual nidus that required further immediate resection. Main procedural complications included hemorrhage, neurologic deficit, and seizure. In the historical control group, diffuse angioarchitecture and arteriovenous fistula were independent risk factors for incomplete resection.

CONCLUSIONS

One-stop hybrid BAVM treatment is safe and effective for removal of high-grade BAVMs, especially those with diffuse or complex angioarchitecture. Preoperative embolization can effectively reduce blood flow while preserving motor and language function. The combined application of functional magnetic resonance imaging, electrophysiological monitoring, and awake craniotomy can successfully avoid causing neurological injury.

Surgical management outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations after preoperative embolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative embolization for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) has been shown to mitigate morbidity for high-risk AVMs, chiefly by reducing lesional blood flow before resection. However, associated risks include postembolization AVM rupture, and the effect of preoperative embolization on outcome remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis of the literature on preoperative embolization for microsurgically treated AVMs.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of all English-language publications reporting clinical outcomes after combined embolization and surgical resection for AVMs. Single- and 2-arm analyses were performed using random-effects modeling.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies with 2108 patients were included in this analysis. Most patients (90.6%) who underwent embolization had at least a 50% obliteration of AVMs on posttreatment preoperative angiography, with a mean rate of obliteration of approximately 80% (range 28.8-100%). Among patients who had combined treatment, 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-4.6%) experienced embolization-related hemorrhagic complications before surgery. Both treatment groups achieved excellent postsurgical complete resection rates (odds ratio [OR] 1.05; 95% CI 0.60-1.85). Neither the clinical outcome (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.84-2.40) nor the total number of hemorrhagic complications (OR 1.84; 95% CI 0.88-3.85) was significantly different between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, preoperative embolization appears to have substantially reduced the lesional volume with active AV shunting before AVM resection. Anecdotally, preoperative embolization facilitates safe and efficient resection; however, differences in outcomes were not significant. The decision to pursue preoperative embolization remains a nuanced decision based on individual lesion anatomy and treatment team experience.

Surgical treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: clinical outcomes of patients included in the registry of a pragmatic randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

The Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Study (TOBAS) is a pragmatic study that includes 2 randomized trials and registries of treated or conservatively managed patients. The authors report the results of the surgical registry.

METHODS

TOBAS patients are managed according to an algorithm that combines clinical judgment and randomized allocation. For patients considered for curative treatment, clinicians selected from surgery, endovascular therapy, or radiation therapy as the primary curative method, and whether observation was a reasonable alternative. When surgery was selected and observation was deemed unreasonable, the patient was not included in the randomized controlled trial but placed in the surgical registry. The primary outcome of the trial was mRS score > 2 at 10 years (at last follow-up for the current report). Secondary outcomes include angiographic results, perioperative serious adverse events, and permanent treatment-related complications leading to mRS score > 2.

RESULTS

From June 2014 to May 2021, 1010 patients were recruited at 30 TOBAS centers. Surgery was selected for 229/512 patients (44%) considered for curative treatment; 77 (34%) were included in the surgery versus observation randomized trial and 152 (66%) were placed in the surgical registry. Surgical registry patients had 124/152 (82%) ruptured and 28/152 (18%) unruptured arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), with the majority categorized as low-grade Spetzler-Martin grade I-II AVM (118/152 [78%]). Thirteen patients were excluded, leaving 139 patients for analysis. Embolization was performed prior to surgery in 78/139 (56%) patients. Surgical angiographic cure was obtained in 123/139 all-grade (89%, 95% CI 82%-93%) and 105/110 low-grade (95%, 95% CI 90%-98%) AVM patients. At the mean follow-up of 18.1 months, 16 patients (12%, 95% CI 7%-18%) had reached the primary safety outcome of mRS score > 2, including 11/16 who had a baseline mRS score ≥ 3 due to previous AVM rupture. Serious adverse events occurred in 29 patients (21%, 95% CI 15%-28%). Permanent treatment-related complications leading to mRS score > 2 occurred in 6/139 patients (4%, 95% CI 2%-9%), 5 (83%) of whom had complications due to preoperative embolization.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical treatment of brain AVMs in the TOBAS registry was curative in 88% of patients. The participation of more patients, surgeons, and centers in randomized trials is needed to definitively establish the role of surgery in the treatment of unruptured brain AVMs. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02098252 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Intraoperative Monitoring Cerebral Blood Flow During the Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in Hybrid Operating Room by Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging

Background

Hemodynamic changes caused by hybrid surgery for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM) are usually related to long-term lesions from "blood stealing". There are currently no viable low-cost, noninvasive procedures for assessing cerebral perfusion in the operating room. This study aims to investigate the use of intraoperative laser speckle contrast image (LSCI) software in AVM surgery.

Methods

In Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 14 patients who underwent surgery with LSCI were collected. To analyze the hemodynamic features of AVM and the influence on the peripheral cortex of AVM embolization and resection, we assessed the transit time between feeding arteries and drainage veins by intraoperative digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Meanwhile, LSCI was performed at pre-embolization, post-embolization, and after complete resection of bAVM.

Results

In this study, the transit time of bAVM before and after embolization was compared, the transit time before embolization was significantly shorter than that after embolization (p < 0.05). We also got good visualization of relative CBF, in addition, to flow imaging in the cortical vasculature round bAVM with LSCI. The flux of post-surgery was significantly higher than pre-embolization (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Hemodynamic variable assessment plays an important role in the resection of AVM in the hybrid operative room and LSCI can be used to visualize and evaluate cortical cerebral blood flow to detect pathological hyperperfusion in real-time with a good spatial-temporal resolution in a sensitive and continuous, non-invasive mode.

Effects of Preoperative Embolization on Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis

BACKGROUND

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) with low Spetzler-Martin grades (I and II) are associated with good neurological outcomes after microsurgical resection; however, the use of preoperative embolization for these lesions is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the neurological outcomes of preoperative embolization with no embolization in patients with low-grade AVMs.

METHODS

Patients with a Spetzler-Martin grade I or II AVM who underwent microsurgical resection during January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2019, were analyzed. Patients undergoing preoperative embolization were compared with patients not undergoing embolization. A propensity score was constructed from baseline characteristics and used to match intervention (embolization) and control (nonembolization) groups in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was poor neurological status on last follow-up examination, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score >2 and a modified Rankin Scale score worse at follow-up than at the preoperative examination.

RESULTS

Of the 603 patients analyzed, 310 (51.4%) underwent preoperative embolization and 293 (48.6%) did not. Patients in the embolization cohort compared with those in the nonembolization cohort had a higher percentage of Spetzler-Martin grade II AVMs (71.6% vs 52.6%, P < .001) and a lower percentage of hemorrhage (41% vs 55%, P = .001). After propensity score matching, no differences were found between paired cohorts (each N = 203) for baseline characteristics with a significant reduction in absolute standardized mean differences. No significant differences were found in primary outcomes between treatment groups in the matched or unmatched cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative embolization of low-grade Spetzler-Martin AVMs is not associated with improved neurological outcomes after microsurgical resection.

Chinese Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery Society and Chinese Interventional & Hybrid Operation Society, of Chinese Stroke Association Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in Eloquent Areas

Aim: The aim of this guideline is to present current and comprehensive recommendations for the management of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) located in eloquent areas. Methods: An extended literature search on MEDLINE was performed between Jan 1970 and May 2020. Eloquence-related literature was further screened and interpreted in different subcategories of this guideline. The writing group discussed narrative text and recommendations through group meetings and online video conferences. Recommendations followed the Applying Classification of Recommendations and Level of Evidence proposed by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Prerelease review of the draft guideline was performed by four expert peer reviewers and by the members of Chinese Stroke Association. Results: In total, 809 out of 2,493 publications were identified to be related to eloquent structure or neurological functions of bAVMs. Three-hundred and forty-one publications were comprehensively interpreted and cited by this guideline. Evidence-based guidelines were presented for the clinical evaluation and treatment of bAVMs with eloquence involved. Topics focused on neuroanatomy of activated eloquent structure, functional neuroimaging, neurological assessment, indication, and recommendations of different therapeutic managements. Fifty-nine recommendations were summarized, including 20 in Class I, 30 in Class IIa, 9 in Class IIb, and 2 in Class III. Conclusions: The management of eloquent bAVMs remains challenging. With the evolutionary understanding of eloquent areas, the guideline highlights the assessment of eloquent bAVMs, and a strategy for decision-making in the management of eloquent bAVMs.

A combined single-stage procedure to treat brain AVM

Complete resection of brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is a surgical challenge, mainly due to risk of intraoperative rupture. The objective of this feasibility study was to analyze complete resection rate at 3 months and clinical outcome at 6 months after treatment of brain AVM by combined single-stage embolization and surgical resection. A retrospective observational study from July 2015 to February 2019 was conducted at the Department of Neurosurgery of Strasbourg University Hospital, France. Decision to treat was taken on the basis of history of AVM rupture, symptomatic AVM, or morphologic risk factors for rupture. Complete resection rate was assessed on postoperative cerebral subtraction angiography at 3 months and clinical outcome at 6 months was evaluated on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). In the 16 patients treated for symptomatic brain AVM, the rate of complete resection was 75%, resection with residual shunt 18.7%, and incomplete resection with residual nidus 6.3%. Good clinical outcome (mRS=0 or 1) was achieved in 81.3% of patients at 6 months. The transfusion rate was 7.1%. There were procedural complications in 12.5% of patients but no intraoperative ruptures. This combined single-stage procedure allows extensive preoperative embolization of the AVM, facilitating surgical microdissection by identifying the dissection plane and perforating arteries and allowing the operator to work in close contact with the nidus without fear of intraoperative rupture.

Periprocedural intracranial hemorrhage after embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The primary goal of the treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is angiographic occlusion to eliminate future hemorrhage risk. Although multimodal treatment is increasingly used for AVMs, periprocedural hemorrhage after transarterial embolization is a potential endovascular complication that is only partially understood and merits quantification.

METHODS

Searching the period between 1990 and 2019, the authors of this meta-analysis queried the PubMed and Embase databases for studies reporting periprocedural hemorrhage (within 30 days) after liquid embolization (using cyanoacrylate or ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer) of AVMs. Random effects meta-analysis was used to evaluate the pooled rate of flow-related hemorrhage (those attributed to alterations in AVM dynamics), technical hemorrhage (those related to procedural complications), and total hemorrhage. Meta-regression was used to analyze the study-level predictors of hemorrhage, including patient age, Spetzler-Martin grade, hemorrhagic presentation, embolysate used, intent of treatment (adjuvant vs curative), associated aneurysms, endovascular angiographic obliteration, year of study publication, and years the procedures were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 98 studies with 8009 patients were included in this analysis, and the mean number of embolization sessions per patient was 1.9. The pooled flow-related and total periprocedural hemorrhage rates were 2.0% (95% CI 1.5%-2.4%) and 2.6% (95% CI 2.1%-3.0%) per procedure and 3.4% (95% CI 2.6%-4.2%) and 4.8% (95% CI 4.0%-5.6%) per patient, respectively. The mortality and morbidity rates associated with hemorrhage were 14.6% and 45.1%, respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed a pooled total hemorrhage rate per procedure of 1.8% (95% CI 1.0%-2.5%) for adjuvant (surgery or radiosurgery) and 4.6% (95% CI 2.8%-6.4%) for curative intent. The treatment of aneurysms (p = 0.04) and larger patient populations (p < 0.001) were significant predictors of a lower hemorrhage rate, whereas curative intent (p = 0.04), angiographic obliteration achieved endovascularly (p = 0.003), and a greater number of embolization sessions (p = 0.03) were significant predictors of a higher hemorrhage rate. There were no significant differences in periprocedural hemorrhage rates according to the years evaluated or the embolysate utilized.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study-level meta-analysis, periprocedural hemorrhage was seen after 2.6% of transarterial embolization procedures for cerebral AVMs. The adjuvant use of endovascular embolization, including in the treatment of associated aneurysms and in the presurgical or preradiosurgical setting, was a study-level predictor of significantly lower hemorrhage rates, whereas more aggressive embolization involving curative intent and endovascular angiographic obliteration was a predictor of a significantly higher total hemorrhage rate.

Outcome of Microsurgery for Arteriovenous Malformations in a Resource-Restricted Environment: Single-Surgeon Series from Vietnam

BACKGROUND

The health care expenditure in Vietnam is equivalent to 1% of that in the United States. For most patients with brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM), surgery is the only available treatment modality. This study reports on the outcomes on AVM microsurgery in this resource-restricted environment.

METHODS

This is a prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed case series of consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection of AVM by a single surgeon in Vietnam. All surgeries were performed in a 3-year period in Hanoi. The primary endpoints were obliteration of the AVM and surgical morbidity (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] > 1).

RESULTS

There were 86 patients and 62% presented with hemorrhage. Only 2 patients had preoperative embolization, and 47 patients (54%) had preoperative digital subtraction angiography. All patients underwent microsurgical resection of their AVM. Excluding the 4 patients who died, the AVM obliteration rate was 98%. The mean follow-up was 20.1 months. Before surgery, 36% of patients had at least some disability (mRS > 1). Postoperatively, this was reduced to 10% (McNemar P = 0.007). For the overall cohort, neurologic status was improved from initial encounter to final assessment (P = 0.001). Because of resource restrictions, some patients with hemorrhage experienced delays in treatment. There was no difference in outcome between patients who were admitted before or after 24 hours post ictus (P = 0.6). The days spent waiting for surgery did not correlate with final mRS in univariate regression (R² = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Notwithstanding the limitation in health care resources in Vietnam, surgery for AVMs was successful in eliminating the malformation, with obliteration rates and morbidity comparable with international standards.

Single-stage planning for total cure of grade III-V brain arteriovenous malformations by embolization alone or in combination with microsurgical resection

PURPOSE

There are no established guidelines for treatment of Spetzler-Martin grade III-V brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs). The purpose of this study is to report our institutional experience in total obliteration/eradication of grade III-V bAVMs by single-stage planning of embolization combined with microsurgical resection when necessary.

METHODS

All patients harboring Spetzler-Martin (S-M) grade III-V bAVMs treated with single-stage planning between January 2006 and January 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. This treatment paradigm is applicable only to surgically accessible bAVMs and does not include deep-seated bAVMs. Indications for treatment, clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed based on modified Rankin Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were identified. Seventeen patients (54.8%) presented with hemorrhage, 10 (32.3%) with seizures, 3 (9.7%) with headaches, and 1 (3.2%) with progressive neurological deficit. Based on S-M grading system, 25 patients (80.6%) harbored grade III bAVM, 5 patients had grade IV bAVMs (16.1%), and 1 patient (3.2%) had a grade V bAVM. There were no treatment-related complications in 24/31 (77.4%) patients. Of the total of seven patients with complications, four patients had clinical deterioration. The long-term (> 6-month), non-disabling morbidity (mRS ≤ 2) rate was 6.5%. The long-term, disabling morbidity rate was 3.2% with a mortality of 3.2%. Complete angiographic obliteration was achieved in 30/31 (96.8%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Single-stage treatment strategy can be considered as an alternative to multistage embolization prior to surgery in grade III-V bAVMs. In this study, a high rate of total obliteration with relatively low rates of permanent morbidity and mortality was achieved.