Brain Abscess After Halo Fixation for the Cervical Spine

Risk of Skull Perforation with Halo Vest Skull Pins

Introduction

A halo vest is an immobilization device widely used to stabilize the cervical spine. Pain and infection at the skull pin insertion site are common complications, but skull perforation is rare, and most published studies are case reports. This study aimed to identify risk factors for skull perforation by comparing patients who did and did not develop perforation.

Methods

Overall thickness and the thicknesses of the internal and external laminae of the skull at the skull pin insertion sites were measured on cranial computed tomography scans of 66 patients fitted with a halo vest. The results were compared between patients who did and did not develop perforation.

Results

Four patients developed perforations. All patients with perforation were older women, and their external and internal laminae were significantly thinner than those of patients who did not develop perforation.

Conclusions

The reported causes of skull pin perforation include infection around the pin, osteoporosis, and an enlarged frontal sinus. However, most patients with perforation in the present study were older women, and the cause was the thinning of the external and external laminae.

The Halofixator for the Treatment of Unstable Fractures of the Upper Cervical Spine - Our Own Experience and Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

In the treatment of upper cervical spine injuries, the semiconservative procedure of the halofixator is now of only secondary importance. Older studies from the 2000 s showed unsatisfactory rates of consolidation as well as high rates of complications. However, due to current data on therapy effectiveness, the literature is inconsistent. The aim of this work is to compare our own experiences and results of treatment with the current literature and to help to clarify the role of the halofixator.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a monocentric retrospective cohort study, patients with unstable injuries of the axial cervical spine who were to be treated in the halofixator were investigated. Individual variables (sex, age, concomitant diseases, Charlson Comorbidity Index) and treatment characteristics (duration of treatment, consolidation status, complications) were recorded using the electronic medical record. Injuries were classified based on CT data at the time of the accident and at the end of treatment, using common classification systems, and assessed with respect to the rate of consolidation. Possible factors influencing bony consolidation as well as complications were statistically analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median duration of treatment was 83 days. The most common injuries were isolated atlas fracture type III (7; 13%) and isolated dens fracture type III (24; 44%). Bony consolidation was demonstrated in 34 cases (63%) and tight pseudarthrosis in 13 cases (24%). Secondary surgical stabilisation was performed in 6 cases (11%). Isolated type III atlas fractures and type III dens fractures had very high consolidation rates of 86% and 92%, respectively. In the subgroups of patients older than 65 years or with a CCI ≥ 4, unstable pseudarthroses were found more frequently. Complications included pin infection (6%), pin dislocation (9%), and pressure ulceration from the halo vest (6%). Cardiopulmonary complications did not occur. No patient died.

DISCUSSION

Good rates of bony consolidation were seen for atlas fractures type III as well as dens fractures type III, which correlate with data in the literature. Dens fractures type II (isolated and combined) and atlas fractures type III in combination with dens fractures showed a worse radiological outcome, which is also unsatisfactory compared to the literature. The rates for procedure-specific complications were relatively low. In particular, work from recent years has demonstrated very good rates for bony consolidation and low complication rates for the treatment of atlas and/or dens fractures with the halofixator, which are confirmed by our results. In contrast, however, a significantly higher cardiac/respiratory complication rate has been reported than occurred in our own patient population.

Treatment strategy of unstable atlas fracture: A retrospective study of 21 patients

At present, the posterior cervical approach with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) remains a commonly effective treatment for unstable Atlas fracture. However, the inserted screws into the C1 lateral mass of some unstable atlas fracture are very difficult, so that the operation is forced to change into C0 to C2 fusion. In order to improve the successful rate of lateral mass screw placement, we introduced a method of fixing lateral mass with a towel clamp in posterior transpedicular fixation, and explore the efficacy and feasibility.Twenty-one consecutive patients with unstable atlas fracture were treated via this method from October 2012 to July 2017. All cases had neck pain and restricted motion of neck movement on admission. Electronic medical records and pre- and postoperative radiographs were reviewed. Screw and rod placement, bone fusion, and spinal cord integrity were assessed via long-term follow-up with anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and computed tomography. Follow-up included clinical assessment of neurological function, assessment of pain using the visual analog scale (VAS), and assessment of the activities of daily living using the neck disability index (NDI).The mean follow-up duration was 22.1 months (range: 12-54 months). No screw loosening or breakage, plate displacement, neurovascular injury, and severe complications occurred during follow-up. The mean operative time was 112.4 ± 14.9 min (range: 82-135 min), and mean blood loss was 386.2 ± 147.9 mL (range: 210-850 mL). One patient experienced continuous neck pain postoperatively, but this gradually disappeared with analgesic administration. At final follow-up, all patients had bone fusion, the VAS scores and NDI were significantly improved compared with preoperatively.Fixing the C1 lateral mass with a towel clamp during posterior transpedicular fixation for unstable atlas fracture appears to be a safe and reliable method, with the advantages of being a simple technique with few complications.