Prognostic Factors of Hearing Outcome in Untreated Vestibular Schwannomas: Implication of Subdivision of Their Growth by Volumetric Analysis

Analysis of the association between vestibular schwannoma and hearing status using a newly developed radiomics technique

PURPOSE

Vestibular schwannoma is a benign tumor originating from Schwann cells surrounding the eighth cranial nerve and can cause hearing loss, tinnitus, balance problems, and facial nerve disorders. Because of the slow growth of the tumor, predicting the hearing function of patients with vestibular schwannoma's is important to obtain information that would be useful for deciding the treatment modality. This study aimed to analyze the association between magnetic resonance imaging features and hearing status using a new radiomics technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 115 magnetic resonance images and hearing results from 73 patients with vestibular schwannoma. A total of 70 radiomics features from each tumor volume were calculated using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Radiomics features were classified as histogram-based, shape-based, texture-based, and filter-based. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to select the radiomics features among the 70 features that best predicted the hearing test. To ensure the stability of the selected features, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was repeated 10 times. Finally, features set five or more times were selected as radiomics signatures.

RESULTS

The radiomics signatures selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method were: minimum, variance, maximum 3D diameter, size zone variance, log skewness, skewness slope, and kurtosis slope. In random forest, the mean performance was 0.66 (0.63-0.77), and the most important feature was Log skewness.

CONCLUSIONS

Newly developed radiomics features are associated with hearing status in patients with vestibular schwannoma and could provide information when deciding the treatment modality.

Natural History of Serviceable Hearing During Active Surveillance of Nongrowing Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma Supports Consideration of Initial Wait-and-Scan Management

OBJECTIVE

The treatment paradigm of vestibular schwannoma (VS) focuses on preservation of neurologic function, with small tumors increasingly managed with active surveillance. Often, tumor size and hearing outcomes are poorly correlated. The aim of the current work was to describe the natural history of hearing among patients with nongrowing VS during observational management.

STUDY DESIGN

Historical cohort study.

PATIENTS

Adults with sporadic VS.

INTERVENTION

Wait-and-scan management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Maintenance of serviceable hearing (SH) after diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among 228 patients with nongrowing VS, 157 patients had SH at diagnosis. Rates of maintaining SH (95% CI; number still at risk) at 1, 3, and 5 years after diagnosis were 94% (89-98; 118), 81% (74-89; 65), and 78% (71-87; 42), respectively. Poorer hearing at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] per 10 dB hearing level increase in pure-tone average of 2.51, p < 0.001; HR per 10% decrease in word recognition score of 1.70, p = 0.001) was associated with increased likelihood of developing non-SH during observation. When controlling for baseline hearing status, tumors measuring 5 mm or greater in the internal auditory canal or with cerebellopontine angle extension were associated with significantly increased risk of developing non-SH (HR, 4.87; p = 0.03). At 5 years after diagnosis, 95% of patients with nongrowing intracanalicular VS measuring less than 5 mm maintained SH.

CONCLUSIONS

Hearing worsens during periods of nongrowth in sporadic VS. Patients with small (<5 mm) intracanalicular tumors demonstrate robust maintenance of SH over time, reinforcing the consideration of initial observation in this patient subset.

Long-Term Hearing Outcome After Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the main treatment options in the management of small to medium size vestibular schwannomas (VSs), because of high tumor control rate and low cranial nerves morbidity. Series reporting long-term hearing outcome (>3 years) are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, with the aim of focusing on long-term hearing preservation after SRS.

METHODS

Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we reviewed articles published between January 1990 and October 2020 and referenced in PubMed or Embase. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical study or case series of VSs treated with SRS (single dose), reporting hearing outcome after SRS with a median or mean audiometric follow-up of at least 5 years. Hearing preservation, cranial nerves outcomes, and tumor control were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. Hearing preservation was found in 59.4% of cases (median follow-up 6.7 years, 1409 patients). Main favorable prognostic factors were young age, good hearing status, early treatment after diagnosis, small tumor volume, low marginal irradiation dose, and maximal dose to the cochlea. Tumor control was achieved in 96.1%. Facial nerve deficit and trigeminal neuropathy were found in 1.3% and 3.2% of patients, respectively, both significantly higher in Linear Accelerator series than Gamma Knife series ( P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Long-term hearing preservation remains one of the main issues after SRS, with a major impact on health-related quality of life. Our meta-analysis suggests that hearing preservation can be achieved in almost 60% of patients after a median follow-up of 6.7 years, irrespective of the technique.

Hearing Preservation in Observed Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the natural history of hearing loss for patients presenting with serviceable hearing (SH) who undergo a wait-and-scan approach for sporadic vestibular schwannoma (VS) using aggregate time-to-event survival analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

SETTING

Published international English literature, January 1, 2000 to May 31, 2020.

PATIENTS

Patients with sporadic VS entering a wait-and-scan approach with SH at diagnosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Observation with serial MRI and audiometry.

RESULTS

In total, 3,652 patients from 26 studies were included for analysis. Mean age at diagnosis was 58.8 years (SD, 4.1). Mean follow-up was 49.2 months (SD, 26.5). In total, 755 patients (21%) failed conservative treatment and underwent radiosurgery or microsurgery at the time of last follow-up. The average loss to follow-up was 6.9% (SD, 11.1). A total of 1,674 patients had SH at the time of diagnosis. Survival rates for maintaining SH were 96% at 1 year, 77% at 3 years, 62% at 5 years, and 42% at 10 years following diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review, aggregate data from 3,652 patients across 26 studies show consistent patterns in progression of hearing loss during observation for patients with sporadic VS as a function of time. As an easy-toremember conservative benchmark for those presenting with SH at diagnosis: approximately 75% retain SH at 3 years, 60% at 5 years, and 40% at 10 years.

Current Understanding of Hearing Loss in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review

Objective

Hearing loss is the most common initial symptom in patients with sporadic vestibular schwannomas (SVS). Hearing preservation is an important goal of both conservative and surgical therapy. However, the mechanism of SVS-associated hearing loss remains unclear. Thus, we performed this systematic review to summarize the current understanding of hearing loss in the SVS and distill a testable hypothesis to further illuminate its underlying mechanism.

Methods

A systematic review querying four databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies evaluating hearing loss in patients with SVS and exploring the potential mechanisms of hearing impairment.

Results

A total of 50 articles were eligible and included in this review. After analysis, the retrieved studies could be categorized into four types: (1) 29 studies explore the relationship between hearing loss and the growth pattern of the tumor (e.g., tumor size/volume, growth rate, tumor location, etc.); (2) ten studies investigate the potential role of cochlear dysfunction in hearing deterioration, including structural abnormality, protein elevation in perilymph, and cochlear malfunctioning; (3) two studies looked into SVS-induced impairment of auditory pathway and cortex; (4) in the rest nine studies, researchers explored the molecular mechanism underlying hearing loss in SVS, which involves molecular and genetic alterations, inflammatory response, growth factors, and other tumor-associated secretions.

Conclusions

Multiple factors may contribute to the hearing impairment in SVS, including the growth pattern of tumor, cochlear dysfunction, impairment of auditory pathway and cortex, genetic and molecular changes. However, our current understanding is still limited, and future studies are needed to explore this multifactorial hypothesis and dig deeper into its underlying mechanism.

Identifying Factors Associated with the Growth of Vestibular Schwannomas: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Surveillance imaging is a valid management option for selected vestibular schwannomas (VS). An ideal protocol for radiologic monitoring would highlight growth-related risk factors and tailor management accordingly. This study aims to identify variables associated with the growth of sporadic VS to enhance surveillance imaging, enable early intervention, and optimize outcomes.

METHODS

The review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A systematic review of 5 databases (PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) was performed to identify negative and positive growth predictors of sporadic vestibular schwannomas. The search was limited to studies reported between January 2015 and January 2020. We conducted an individual patient data meta-analysis using a 1-stage multivariate mixed-effect logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 437 studies were identified, of which 25 met our criteria for full-text analysis. Articles that measured VS with comparable methods were determined eligible for meta-analysis inclusion. The selected articles were highly heterogeneous in their use of grading scales and assessment of tumor size. Our review showed that size at diagnosis (odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.18; P < 0.0001) and intracanalicular localization (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.90; P = 0.023) were associated with VS growth.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors most frequently reported as being associated with growth within the literature were size of VS at diagnosis and localization of an intracanalicular component. Greater attention should be placed on these criteria within the surveillance imaging algorithm for VS.

The Influence of Vestibular Schwannoma Tumor Volume and Growth on Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the relationship among vestibular schwannoma (VS) tumor volume, growth, and hearing loss.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Adults with observed VS and serviceable hearing at diagnosis were included. The primary outcome was the development of nonserviceable hearing as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Associations of tumor volume with baseline hearing were assessed using Spearman rank correlation coefficients. Associations of volume and growth with the development of nonserviceable hearing over time were assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and summarized with hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

Of 230 patients with VS and serviceable hearing at diagnosis, 213 had serial volumetric tumor data for analysis. Larger tumor volume at diagnosis was associated with increased pure-tone average (PTA) (P < .001) and decreased word recognition score (WRS) (P = .014). Estimated rates of maintaining serviceable hearing at 6 and 10 years following diagnosis were 67% and 49%, respectively. Larger initial tumor volume was associated with development of nonserviceable hearing in a univariable setting (HR for 1-cm³ increase: 1.36, P = .040) but not after adjusting for PTA and WRS. Tumor growth was not significantly associated with time to nonserviceable hearing (HR, 1.57; P = .14), although estimated rates of maintaining serviceable hearing during observation were poorer in the group that experienced growth.

CONCLUSION

Larger initial VS tumor volume was associated with poorer hearing at baseline. Larger initial tumor volume was also associated with the development of nonserviceable hearing during observation in a univariable setting; however, this association was not statistically significant after adjusting for baseline hearing status.

Current Volumetric Models Overestimate Vestibular Schwannoma Size Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery

OBJECTIVE

Accurate volume assessment is essential for the management of vestibular schwannoma after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A cuboidal approximation for volume is the standard surveillance method; however, this may overestimate tumor volume. We sought to evaluate several volumetric models and their suitability for post-SRS surveillance.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

We evaluated 54 patients with vestibular schwannoma before and after SRS.

INTERVENTION(S)

Gold-standard volumes were obtained by a radiation oncologist using contouring software. Volume was also calculated by cuboidal, ellipsoidal, and spherical formulae using tumor diameters obtained by a neuroradiologist.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Percent error (PE) and absolute percent error (APE) were calculated. Paired t test evaluated bias, and the Bland-Altman method evaluated reproducibility. Linear regression evaluated predictors of model error.

RESULTS

All models overestimated volume compared with the gold standard. The cuboidal model was not reproducible before SRS (p < 0.001), and no model was reproducible after SRS (cuboidal p < 0.001; ellipsoidal p = 0.02; spherical p = 0.02). Significant bias was present before SRS for the cuboidal model (p < 0.001), and post-SRS for all models [cuboidal (p < 0.001), ellipsoidal (p < 0.02), and spherical (p = 0.005)]. Model error was negatively associated with pretreatment volume for the cuboidal (PE p = 0.03; APE p = 0.03), ellipsoidal (PE p = 0.03; APE p = 0.04), and spherical (PE p = 0.02; APE p = 0.03) methods and lost linearity post-SRS.

CONCLUSIONS

The standard cuboidal practice for following vestibular schwannoma tumor volume after SRS overestimates size. Ellipsoidal and spherical estimations have improved performance but also overestimate volume and lack reliability post-SRS. The development of other volumetric models or application of contouring software should be investigated.

Stereotactic radiotherapy in three weekly fractions for the management of vestibular schwannomas

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the rates of tumor control, hearing preservation and cranial nerve toxicity with the use of CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy consisting of 2100 cGy to the 80% isodose line delivered in three weekly fractions to treat vestibular schwannomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review of vestibular schwannoma patients treated with CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy or undergoing watchful waiting between 2006 and 2017 was performed. For inclusion, patients receiving CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy must have had pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging and audiography, and 2 follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and audiograms. Watchful waiting patients must have had a minimum of 2 magnetic resonance imaging and 2 audiograms.

RESULTS

Forty patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty-two underwent CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy. Eighteen remain in watchful waiting. Crude tumor control was 86.4% at mean radiographic follow-up of 52.3 months. Kaplan-Meier progression-free survival was 76.9% at 5 years. Kaplan-Meier survival from radiographic growth was 61.5% at 5 years. Kaplan-Meier hearing preservation was 17.5% at 5 years. All patients undergoing watchful waiting presenting with serviceable hearing maintained serviceable hearing. Serviceable hearing among CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy patients was 42.9% prior to treatment and 14.2% through mean follow-up of 53.7 months. One patient experienced trigeminal nerve toxicity 45 months after SRT. 95.5% of CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy patients were complication-free.

CONCLUSIONS

Our fractionation regimen provides tumor control consistent with current literature. Hearing outcomes, however, should be discussed with patients prior to CyberKnife stereotactic radiotherapy.