A Portable Training Model for Deep Bypass Surgery

Prototype of Low-Cost Microvascular Clips for Laboratory Use

BACKGROUND

Vascular neurosurgical procedures require temporary or permanent surgical clips to treat cerebral aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, or bypass surgery. In this scenario, surgical clips should have specific characteristics such as high-quality material, proper design, closing force, and biocompatibility. Due to these characteristics, the price of these clips does not allow their availability at the experimental surgery laboratory worldwide.

METHODS

We describe here the technique for manufacturing handcrafted clips of low cost, using dental stainless steel or titanium wire of 0.18 mm, 0.20 mm, or 0.22 mm in diameter. We must complete six steps to obtain the clip using our hands and small electrician needle nose pliers for wire molding.

RESULTS

These clips have a closing force of 30-60 gr/cm2 (depending on the wire diameter). They can be used in the experimental surgery laboratory to clip arteries or veins during vascular microsurgery procedures. Also, they can be used as temporary clips with confidence in low-flow bypass (v.gr. superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery or occipital artery to posterior inferior cerebellar artery anastomoses).

CONCLUSIONS

Making practical low-cost clips for use in laboratory procedures or during low-flow anastomosis as temporary clips is possible. The main advantages are the low cost and the worldwide availability of the basic materials. The main disadvantage is the learning curve to get the ability to master the manufacturing of these clips.

Superiority of living animal models in microsurgical training: beyond technical expertise

Background

Many studies are investigating the role of living and nonliving models to train microsurgeons. There is controversy around which modalities account for the best microsurgical training. In this study, we aim to provide a systematic literature review of the practical modalities in microsurgery training and compare the living and nonliving models, emphasizing the superiority of the former. We introduce the concept of non-technical skill acquisition in microsurgical training with the use of living laboratory animals in the context of a novel proposed curriculum.

Methods

A literature search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and Scopus within the past 11 years based on a combination of the following keywords: “microsurgery,” “training,” “skills,” and “models.” The online screening process was performed by two independent reviewers with the Covidence tool. A total of 101 papers was identified as relevant to our study. The protocol was reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

Results

Living models offer the chance to develop both technical and non-technical competencies (i.e., leadership, situation awareness, decision-making, communication, and teamwork). Prior experience with ex vivo tissues helps residents consolidate basic skills prior to performing more advanced techniques in the living tissues. Trainees reported a higher satisfaction rate with the living models.

Conclusions

The combination of living and nonliving training microsurgical models leads to superior results; however, the gold standard remains the living model. The validity of the hypothesis that living models enhance non-technical skills remains to be confirmed.

Level of evidence: Not ratable.

The impact of neurosurgical procedure on cognitive resources: Results of bypass training

Background:

Neurosurgeons are exposed to unavoidable distractions in their natural operating environment. Distractions can affect both the surgeon's concentration and the safety and duration of the surgery. Such distraction can be studied by applying a simultaneous cognitive task during a surgical procedure.

Methods:

We used a previously described cognitive task: a forward (DF) and backward digit (DB) repetition task to interfere with the surgeon's attention during a training bypass. A pilot study was performed to find suitable digit repetition lengths. For the main experiment, we used four-digit strings. The test task was alternated across two consecutive sutures (n = 153, 8 bypasses), followed by two consecutive control sutures without digit repetition. The duration and the number of correct answers for the digit repetition task were compared to a baseline digit repetition without simultaneous surgery.

Results:

During the bypass surgery, digit repetitions (especially DB) became slower (P < 0.0001). More errors were made during DB compared to DF only during simultaneous bypass (P < 0.0001). However, we found no effect of digit repetition tasks on individual suture times (P = 0.823).

Conclusions:

The ability to engage in simultaneous tasks while performing surgery is diminished. A surgeon with extensive training can withstand external distraction without an effect on performance; however, this is achieved by partially ignoring the simultaneous task. Our data support that during surgery other cognitive tasks should be avoided to ensure safety.